郭象《莊子注》是否竊自向秀，歷來爭訟不斷，論者甚多。本文側重於向秀《莊子注》依文之輯校，除將歷來各種較完備之輯本全部蒐羅排比、校勘異同外，另增輯一條，計得輯文一百三十七條。每條輯文均回覈其所從出各書版本數種，進行校勘。今本《莊子》郭象有注者亦逐條並列，以茲比較。輯文依向、郭注文之關係，概分為向郭注全異者、向郭注相近者、向郭注相同者與向有注郭無注者四類。文末並根據輯校的結果提出作者的一些意見。

　　There have been arguments about Annotations on Chuang Tzu authored by Kuo Hsiang since he was accused of plagiarizing Hsiang Hsiu. In this article, the writer focuses on those editions as annotated by Hsiang Hsiu. The writer has collected the most comprehensive versions, and compared their differences with those annotated by Kuo Hsiang. Accordingly, the writer has summarized 137 items. Each item is double-checked with its original publications. Those versions as annotated by Kuo Hsiang are annexed to each item for comparison. In the collated text, the writer outlines the relation of annotations between Kuo Hsiang and Hsiang Hsiu as follows: 1.those complete different; 2.those similar; 3.those the same; 4.those Hsiang Hsiu annotated but Kuo Hsiang didn't. Based on his collation, the writer discusses his view point on these findings.