:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:PISA2018閱讀素養測試內容變化與對我國語文閱讀教學的借鑒
書刊名:比較教育研究
作者:俞向軍宋乃慶王雁玲
出版日期:2017
卷期:2017(5)
頁次:3-10
主題關鍵詞:國際學生評價項目閱讀素養測評語文閱讀教學群文閱讀PISA 2018Reading literacyAssessment frameworkAssessment of reading literacyMultiple texts reading
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:5
PISA2018閱讀素養測試內容變化為在定義中增加"評價"元素,刪除"紙質"文本限定詞;測試維度調整為閱讀情境、閱讀文本、閱讀策略。其中閱讀文本包括文本單位、文本結構和導航、文本形式和文本類型;閱讀策略涵蓋文本處理策略、任務管理策略兩個方面。首次從文本單位來規定試題分布比例,單文本占65%,多文本占35%。由這些變化得出對我國語文閱讀教學可借鑒之處包括重視自主評價,關注高階閱讀;重視數字閱讀,開展多層次閱讀;重視多文本閱讀,推行群文閱讀教學。
There are three main changes in reading literacy of PISA 2018 Draft Analytical Frameworks. First, it revised the definition of reading literacy by adding "evaluating" to text processing and removing the modifier term "written" preceding the core concept "texts". Second, it organizes the reading domain into processes, texts and scenarios. The processes cover two broad categories-text processing and task management processes, and texts being viewed from four dimensions-source(single and multiple), organization and navigation(static and dynamic), format(continuous, non-continuous, mixed) and type(description, narration, exposition, argument, instruction, interaction, transaction). Third, distribute reading tasks along the targeted processes involving single texts(65%) and multiple texts(35%). It analyzed the updated frameworks which carries longterm implications for reading instruction and Chinese language curriculum and teaching reform in general: more attention should be paid to reader’s self-evaluation, high-level and multi-level reading processes, and electronic and multiple texts reading.
期刊論文
1.Kuhn, M. R.、Stahl, S. A.(2003)。Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices。Journal of Educational Psychology,95(1),3-21。  new window
2.羅士琰、宋乃慶、王雁玲(2016)。基於實證的小學語文閱讀素養研究:內涵、價值及表現形式。中國教育學刊,2016(10),77-83。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳重穆、宋乃慶(1993)。淡化形式,注重實質:兼論《九年義務教育全日制初級中學數學教學大綱》。數學教育學報,1993(2),4-9。  延伸查詢new window
4.馬世曄(2017)。閱讀素養與國家競爭力--國外閱讀素養測試對我們的啟示。教育測量與評價,2010(7),13-15。  延伸查詢new window
5.White, S.、Chen, J.、Forsyth, B.(2010)。Reading-related Literacy Activities of American Adults: Time Spent, Task Types, and Cognitive Skills Used。Journal of Literacy Research,42(3),276-307。  new window
6.左嵐(2015)。國際閱讀評估項目研究:中國與國際比較研究。比較教育研究,2015(10),106-112。  延伸查詢new window
7.朱小虎(2010)。PISA對學生學習方式方法的研究及啟示。外國中小學教育,2010(9),23-26。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2009)。PISA 2009 assessment framework: key competencies in reading, mathematics and science。Paris:OECD。  new window
2.祝新華(2015)。促進學習的閱讀評估。北京:人民教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.天下雜誌教育基金會(2010)。閱讀動起來:閱讀力實戰關鍵。臺北:天下雜誌出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.何瑞珠、盧乃桂(2015)。從國際視域論析教育素質與平等:PISA的啟示。北京:教育科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.OECD(1999)。Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills: The PISA 2000 Assessment of Reading, Mathematical and Scientific Literacy。Paris:OECD。  new window
6.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2016)。PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education。OECD。  new window
其他
1.OECD(2018)。PISA 2018 Draft Analytical Frameworks,https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/PISA-2018-draft-frameworks.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE