:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從ISO/TC289成立談永續品牌評價應有的觀念與方法
書刊名:評價學報
作者:陳慶和鄭伉妙劉偉麟王藝涵單乃囿
作者(外文):Chen, Ching-hoCheng, Kang-miaoLiu, Wei-linWang, Yi-hanShan, Nai-yu
出版日期:2015
卷期:8
頁次:頁17-43
主題關鍵詞:品牌價值品牌評價創建-推廣-結果-回應之永續品牌評價指標架構系統思維系統分析結果管理ISO/TC289Brand valueBrand evaluationCreation-Spread-Outcome-Response sustainable brand evaluation frameworkCSOR sustainable brand evaluation frameworkSystems thinkingSystems analysisManaging for results
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:97
目前正值ISO/TC289品牌評價方法發展之初,若能夠從永續的角度而發展一套評估真正的品牌價值的方法,將有助於提供品牌評價較正確的方向。本研究主要目的乃是要提出一套品牌評價方法論,首先根據品牌價值形成的本質與特性,綜整歸納品牌價值形成的過程,而提出品牌評價之概念架構,以初步呈現品牌價值形成的創建、推廣、結果與回應等過程;再應用系統思維與系統分析的概念,根據前述概念架構,深入界定企業內外部在環境、社會、經濟與制度各組成及其影響價值高低之屬性,而建構品牌評價之系統作用關係圖,作為發展永續品牌評價指標架構之基礎。而本研究所提出永續品牌評價指標架構,包含創建(Creation)、推廣(Spread)、結果(Outcome)與回應(Response)之四大評估面向,而四大評估面向下建議之評估項目及評估指標,乃是根據品牌評價之系統作用關係圖中的各種屬性所研擬,因此可較具有系統性地評估品牌價值形成過程中,企業內外部的環境、社會、經濟與制度面向影響因素之綜合作用,換言之,此評估指標因而能夠從永續的角度而真正地評估出品牌之價值,本研究之成果期望可作為ISO/TC289品牌評價方法發展之參考。
The correct direction of brand evaluation for ISO/TC289 may be created if a methodology to evaluate the real brand value is developed with consideration of sustainability at the beginning. The purpose of this study is to develop such a methodology for brand evaluation. The process of brand value generation is summarized firstly according to the nature and characteristics of brand value formation. The conceptual framework of brand evaluation is proposed to describe the process of brand value formation including Creation, Spread, Outcome, and Response. Applying the concepts of systems thinking and systems analysis, the components and attributes of internal and external environment, social, economic, and institutional factors, which affecting the brand value of an enterprise, are identified based on the above conceptual framework. Relationships of system effects on brand evaluation are then constructed as the basis of a sustainable brand evaluation framework. Four evaluation aspects of Creation, Spread, Outcome, and Response (CSOR) are involved in our proposed framework. Suggested evaluation items and indicators of the four aspects are defined by the attributes of the relationships of system effects on brand evaluation. Comprehensive effects of internal and external environment, social, economic and institutional factors of an enterprise can be systematically evaluated using these indicators. In other words, the indicators can be used to evaluate the real brand value with consideration of sustainability. The proposed methodology is expected to be the basis for developing methodology of brand evaluation for ISO/TC289.
期刊論文
1.左峻德、林妙雀(20050600)。從英、德、日品牌鑑價評估探討臺灣連鎖加盟品牌權益衡量。臺灣經濟研究月刊,28(6)=330,104-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.自然之友、公眾環境研究中心、達爾問、環友科技、南京綠石(2011)。蘋果的另一面。IT產業污染調研報告,5。  延伸查詢new window
3.廖世義、鄭喬云(20130300)。綠色EQ對消費者品牌評價之影響--以碳足跡標章知覺為中介變項。中小企業發展季刊,27,81-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Chen, C. H.、Liu, W. L.、Liaw, S. L.(2011)。Integrated Dynamic Policy Management Methodology and System for Strategic Environmental Assessment of Golf Course Installation Policy in Taiwan。Environmental Impact Assessment Review,31(1),66-76。  new window
5.Chen, C. H.、Liu, W. L.、Chiou, I. J.、Liaw, S. L.(2012)。Methodology and System of Total Quantity and Sustainability Management for Industrial Parks。Environmental Engineering Science,29(10),934-945。  new window
6.Chen, C. H.、Liu, W. L.、Leu, H. G.(2006)。Sustainable Water Quality Management Framework and a Strategy Planning System for a River Basin。Environmental Management,38(6),952-973。  new window
7.Chiou, I. J.、Chen, C. H.、Liu, W. L.、Huang, S. M.、Chang, Y. M.(2015)。Methodology of Disaster Risk Assessment for Debris Flows in a River Basin。Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment,29(3),775-792。  new window
研究報告
1.經濟部商業司(2008)。商業服務業品牌鑑價機制報告。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.謝天生(2009)。英國、日本、德國品牌權益模型實證分析與臺灣品牌權益模型之建構--以臺灣電腦產業為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.中華人民共和國國家質量監督檢驗檢疫總局、中國國家標準化管理委員會(2011)。商業企業品牌評價與企業文化建設指南。  延伸查詢new window
2.中華人民共和國國家質量監督檢驗檢疫總局、中國國家標準化管理委員會(2012)。品牌價值要素。  延伸查詢new window
3.Aaker, David A.、Equity, M. B.(1991)。Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name。Free Press。  new window
其他
1.WPP(2015)。What is BrandZ?,http://www.wpp.com/wpp/marketing/brandz/why-brandz/.。  new window
2.Nielsen, A. C.(2006)。認知消費者行為-AC尼爾森中國消費者購物趨勢調查報告,http://www.totapps.com/cwbbs/doc_getfile.jsp?pageNum=1&id=813&attachId=104。  延伸查詢new window
3.BSI(2009)。ISO14000管理系統之持續改善--企業社會責任,http://www.ftis.org.tw/cpe/download/manage/20090921_manage_03_bsi.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
4.中國工業經濟聯合會(2012)。中國工業企業及工業協會社會責任指南,http://www.siccsr.org/WebSite/crs/Upload/File/201211/20121119073915312500.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
5.臺灣綠色和平組織(2015)。邁向再生能源,臺灣資通訊企業做了多少?,http://www.greenpeace.org/taiwan/Global/taiwan/planet3/publications/reports/2015/6ict-in-taiwan.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳苓(2014)。可口可樂工廠抽過多地下水,排放物質又汙染,http://www.moneydj.com/KMDJ/News/NewsViewer.aspx?a=35436658-bfe6-48ad-9591-d8995ce89dd5&c=MB06#ixzz35Qa5LjIi。  延伸查詢new window
7.經濟部工業局(2012)。臺灣國際品牌FAQ手冊,https://www.brandingtaiwan.tw/brand_survey/。  延伸查詢new window
8.Nielsen, A. C.(2009)。Improve Brand Health by Understanding Consumer Behavior with Nielsen Consumer Research,http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/nielsen/en_us/documents/pdf/Fact%20Sheets/Nielsen%20Consumer%20Research.pdf。  new window
9.BBDO-Group(2004)。Brand Equity Drivers Model,http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.202.3243&rep=rep1&type=pdf。  new window
10.Brand Finance(2015)。Global 500 2015: The Annual Report on the World's Most Valuable Global Brands,http://www.brandfinance.com/knowledge_centre/reports/brand-finance-global-500-2015。  new window
11.CSRHub(2015)。CSRHub Category and Subcategory Schema,http://www.csrhub.com/files/CSRHub_Data_Schema_2014_11.pdf。  new window
12.EURIB(2009)。Aaker's Brand Equity Model,http://www.eurib.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Documenten/PDF/Merkmeerwaarde_ENGELS/s_-_Brand_equity_model_by_Aaker_EN_.pdf。  new window
13.IISD(1996)。Global Green Standards: ISO 14000 and Sustainable Development,https://www.iisd.org/pdf/globlgrn.pdf。  new window
14.Interbrand(2014)。Best Global Green Brands 2014,http://interbrand.com/assets/uploads/Interbrand-Best-Global-Green-Brands-2014-Marketing-Toolkit.pdf。  new window
15.Interbrand(2014)。Brand Valuation: A Versatile Strategic Tool for Business,http://bestglobalbrands.com/assets/uploads/00000000938.pdf。  new window
16.Knowles, J.(2015)。In Search of a Reliable Measure of Brand Equity,http://www.zibs.com/knowles.shtml。  new window
17.Market Watch(2014)。Interbrand Releases the 4th annual Best Global Green Brands Report,http://www.marketwatch.com/story/interbrandreleases-the-4th-annual-best-global-green-brands-report-2014-06-24。  new window
18.Millward Brown(2015)。TOP 100 Most Valuable Global Brands 2015,http://www.millwardbrown.com/BrandZ/2015/Global/2015_BrandZ_Top100_Report.pdf。  new window
19.Millward Brown(2015)。Top 100 Global Brands: Methodology,http://www.millwardbrown.com/mb-global/brand-strategy/brandequity/brandz/top-global-brands/2015/methodology。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE