:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:工作限制下技能水準差異和訓練對網球正手拍技能表現的影響
作者:林耀豐 引用關係
作者(外文):Yaw-Feng Lin
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:體育學系
指導教授:林清和
劉有德
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2003
主題關鍵詞:運動發展工作限制不同技能水準motor developmenttask constraintsdifferent skill levels
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(18) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:17
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:41
本研究的主要目的在探討:一、比較不同工作限制與技能水準之成熟個體,其技能操控與技能表現的能力。二、探討工作限制下速度與準確性的關連程度。三、探討不同工作限制與訓練歷程,對技能操控與技能表現能力的影響。本研究實驗一為先前研究,主要在確認實驗參與者網球學習週數及工具的信度與效度檢定;實驗二的實驗參與者分別為一般科系(平均身高:171.52±4.78公分、平均體重:68.73±4.48公斤)、體育科系(平均身高:173.23±3.35公分、平均體重:71.27±5.32公斤)及網球選手(平均身高:175.48±3.38公分、平均體重:72.72±4.53公斤)等三組不同技能水準之大學生各四十名,共計一百二十名男性;實驗三是延續實驗二之研究,以相同實驗參與者(N= 120),隨機分派至短拍小拍面組、中拍中拍面組、長拍大拍面組與控制組等四組。在實驗二期間每位實驗參加者需以三種球拍長度(65公分、68公分及71公分)與三種拍面面積(95 平方英吋 、110平方英吋及120 平方英吋)所組合成九種球拍型態的工作限制,分別做6次的正手拍擊球技能表現測試,共形成54次的試做次數,並以混合設計三因子變異數來考驗不同技能水準與工作限制對網球正手擊球之技能表現的影響。實驗三則依不同工作限制下之球拍型態所分配的組別介入四週的影片回饋教學與實際擊球之訓練課程,並以獨立樣本單因子共變數分析來考驗工作限制下之技能表現是否可藉由訓練的歷程而獲得改善。而研究結果指出:
一、 不同技能水準與不同工作限制對網球正手擊球之技能表現結果與品質有一定程度的影響,且在較適中的球拍長度時出現較佳的技能表現之趨勢;但在不同拍面面積上雖有顯著的差異,最佳的技能表現則呈現出較不一致的狀態,且各動作成分之間的發展並非同步。
二、 不同球拍工作限制下之正手擊球速度與準確性之絕對誤差間呈現出顯著的負相關,驗證速度與準確性互相交易之觀點。
三、 不同工作限制下之球拍型態組別在技能表現結果與品質方面,經影片分析回饋與實際擊球練習之介入訓練後皆顯現出其效應;而各肢體之技能表現品質在各組間雖有進步的趨勢,但進步的幅度並非呈現出一致的趨勢,顯示各動作成分之間的發展並非同步。
The main objectives of this research were: 1) Compare mature individuals at different skill levels under different task constraints, evaluating their motor control and skills performance ability. 2) Investigate speed and accuracy levels under task constraints. 3) Investigate the effect of task constraints and the training process on skills control and skills performance ability. The participants in Experiment 1 of this study were university students at different skill levels, 40 from each of these three categories: 1) general science departments (Height, 171.52±4.78 cm, Weight, 68.73±4.48 kg), 2) the Dept. of Physical Education(Height, 173.23±3.35 cm, Weight, 71.27±5.32 kg), and 3) tennis team players(Height, 175.48±3.38 cm, Weight, 72.72±4.53 kg), for a total of 120 males. Experiment 2 extended the research of Experiment 1. The same participants (N= 120) were randomly assigned to four groups, 1) a short racket and small face area group, 2) a medium racket and face area group, 3) a long racket and large face area group, and 4) a control group. In the time period of Experiment 1, each participant had to perform 6 tests of forehand skills performance at 9 racket types of task constraints. There were 9 constraints by the following multiplication: 3 racket lengths (65 cm, 68 cm, and 71 cm) X 3 face surface areas (95 inches2, 110 inches2, and 120 inches2). 6 tests at nine constraints make a total of 54 tests per participant. By doing this, we could measure their scores should be analyzed by the three-way ANOVA. The objective was to investigate the effect of different skill levels and task constraints on the performance of tennis forehand skills. In Experiment 2, the 4 groups described above entered a four-week training program composed of video feedback teaching and practice hitting. By doing this, we could measure their scores should be analyzed by the three-way ANOVA. This was in order to investigate whether skills performance under task constraints can be improved through the course of training. The results of this study show that: 1) Different skill levels and different task constraints to a certain extent impact the results and quality of tennis forehand skills performance. In addition, there was a trend towards more ideal performance at a racket length more appropriate to the individual. However, although there were obvious differences between rackets of different face areas, there was an uneven relationship between this variable and skills performance. As well, the various components involved in the action of a tennis forehand did not develop simultaneously. 2) There was a clear negative correlation between the absolute variance of forehand speed and accuracy under different racket task constraints, proving the thesis that there is exchanging between speed and accuracy. 3) In terms of the results and quality of skills performance for the different groups under different task constraints, following the film analysis feedback and the practice hitting training, the effectiveness of this training was clear. There was a trend towards improvement in the quality of skills performance for each individual extremity. However, the range of improvement was not the same for each group, showing that the development of the components of each action is not synchronous.
李村棋 。(1999)。男童手球投擲動作形式:工作與環境限制效應(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所,台北市,台灣。
李村棋與卓俊伶。(1998)。十二歲學童單手投擲型式的關鍵因素:手掌寬度。體育學報,第二十五輯,259-268。
林清和。(1996)。運動學習程式學。台北:史文哲出版社。
林和 譯。(1999)。混沌-不測風雲的背後。台北:天下文化出版社。
林耀豐。(2002)。環境限制下年齡差異對木球推桿準確性之技能表現的影響效應。高雄市:復文圖書出版社。
胡名霞。(2001)。運動控制與動作學習。台北市:金名圖書有限公司。
陳秀惠。(1996)。速度準確性理論的認識與應用。中華體育,第三十八期,96-104。new window
溫卓謀。(2001)。羽球運動員知覺預期能力與訓練策略之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所,台北市,台灣。new window
曾進興。(1985)。認知技能自動化運作的本質(未出版碩士論文)。國立台灣大學心理學研究所,台北市,台灣。
楊梓楣 。(1999)。 環境限制篩測下兒童接球動作發展的年齡與性別效應(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所,台北市,台灣。
楊梓楣與卓俊伶。(1998a)。接球動作型式的環境限制變項探討。體育學報,第二十五輯,269-278。
楊梓楣與卓俊伶。(1998b)。5-12歲女童接球動作發展的年齡差異。體育學報,第二十六輯,81-88。
鄭昭明。(1994)。認知心理學。台北市:桂冠出版社。
賴世炯。(2000)。兒童動作表現的費茲定律檢驗及訊息處理能力的年齡效應(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所,台北市,台灣。
謝扶成。(2002)。平衡木上走步型式的改變:環境與年齡效應(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所,台北市,台灣。
Abernethy, B., & Wood, J. M. (1992). An assessment of the effectiveness of selected visual training programs in enhancing sports performance. Report to Australian Sports Commission, 181 pp.
Abrams, R. A., & Pratt, J. (1993). Rapid aimed limb movements: different effects of practice on component submovements. Journal of motor behavior, 25(4), 288-298.
Barbagallo, F. (1987). Teaching team sport:what methodology? Didattica Del Movimento, 3-6.
Bernstein, N. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. London: Pergamon Press.
Burton, A. W. (1987). The effect of number of movement components on response time in children. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 13, 231-247.
Burton, A. W., Greer, N. L., & Wiese, D. M. (1992). Changes in overhand throwing patterns as a function of a ball size. Pediatric Exercise Science, 4, 50-67.
Burton, A. W., Greer, N. L., & Wiese-Bjornstal, D. M. (1993). Variations in grasping and throwing patterns as a function of a ball size. Pediatric Exercise Science, 5, 25-41.
Christina, R. W., Barresi, J. V., & Shaffner, P. (1990). The development of response selection accuracy in a football linebacker using video training. The Sport Psychologist, 4, 11-17.
Clark, J., & Phillips, S. (1985). A developmental sequence of the standing long jump. In J. Clark & J. Hmphrey (Eds.), Motor development: Current selected research (pp. 73-85). Princeton, NJ: Princeton.
Cohen, J. (1998). Statistical power analysis for the behavior science. New york: Academic Press.
Crossman, E. R. F.W., & Goodeve, P. J. (1983). Feedback control of hand movements and Fitts Law. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 251-278. (original work published in 1963).
Erbaugh, S. J. (1986). Effects of aquatic training on swimming skill development of preschool children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 439-446.
Farrow, D., Chivers, P., Hardingham, C., & Sachse, S. (1998). The effect of video-based perceptual training on the tennis return of serve. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 29, 231-242.
Fischman, M. G., Moore, J. B., & Steele, K.H. (1992). Children''s one-hand catching as a function of age, gender, and ball location. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 349-355.
Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391.
Gabbard, C. P. (1992). Lifelong Motor Development(2nd ed.). Chicago: Brown & Benchmark.
Gallahue, D. L., & Ozmun, J. C. (1998). Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gesell, A. (1954). The ontogenesis of infant behavior. In L. Carmichael (Ed.), Manual of child psychology. New York: Wiley.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. E. Shaw and J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goodwin, D. L., & Watkinson, E. J. (2000). Inclusive physical education from the perspective of students with physical disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17(2), 144-160.
Guttridge, M. V. (1939). A study of motor achievement of young children. Archives of Psychology, 244, 1-178.
Haken, H., Kelso J. A. S., & Bunz, H. A. (1985). Theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biological Cybermetics, 51, 356-374.
Halverson, L. E. (1971). The significance of motor development. In G. Engstrom (Ed.) The significance of the young child’s motor development (pp. 17-33). Washington, D. C.: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Haywood, K. M. (1993). Life span motor development (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Hollerbach, J. M. (1978). A study of human moter control though analysis and synthesis of handwriting. Unpublished doctoral dissertatin, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambrige.
Johnson, R. D. (1962). Measurements of achievement in fundamental skills of elementary school children. Research Quarterly, 33, 94-103.
Jwo, J. (1997). Strategic behavior in a reciprocal tapping task: The effects of age, gender, and practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Kelso, J. A. S., & Schoner, G. (1988). Self-organization of coordinative movement patterns. Human Movement Science, 7, 27-46.
Labrge, D.(1975). Attention and automatic information processing in P. M. A. Rabbit (Ed.), Attention and performance V. London: Academic Press.
Lefebvre, C., & Reid, G. (1998). Prediction in ball catching by children with and without a developmental coordination disorder. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15, 299-315.
Liu, S. Y. (1997). The effects of distance and condition on the accuracy and movement patterns in basketball shooting and dart throwing. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Minnesota.
Lindly, S. (1987). Perceptual training in basketball. Unpublished master’s thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Manno, R., Beccarini, C., & D-Ottavio, S. (1992). Training the young soccer player. SDS Rivista Di Cultura Sportiva Roma, 11, 2-8.
McConnell, A. & Wade, G. (1990). Effects of lateral ball location, grade, and sex on catching. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70, 59-66.
Merriman, W. J., & Barnett, B. E. (1995). A preliminary investigation of the relationship between language and gross motor skills in preschool children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81(3), 1211-1216.
Meyer, D. E., Abrams, R. A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C. E. & Smith, E. K. (1988). Optimality in human motor performance: idea control of rapid aimed movement. Psychological Review, 95, 340-370.
Mondoni, M. (1985). Teaching and methodology of child training in basketball. International Congress on Teaching Team Sports, 317-328.
Morris, A. M., Williams, J. M., Atwater, A. E., & Wilmore, J. H. (1982). Age and sex differences in motor performance of 3 through 6 year old children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 53, 214- 221.
Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp. 341-361). Amsterdam: Martius Nijhoff.
Poe, A. (1976). Description of the movement characteristics of two year old children performing the jump and reach. Research Quarterly, 47, 409-416.
Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium. Hillsdale, N. J. : Erlbaum.
Roberton, M. A. (1977). Stability of stage categorizations across trials: Implications for the "stage theory" of overarm throw development. Journal of Human Movement Studies,3 ,49-59.
Roberton, M. A. (1978). Longitudinal evidence for developmental stages in the forceful overarm throw. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 4, 167-175.
Roberton, M. A. (1989). Motor development: recognizing our roots, charting our future. Quest, 41(3), 213-223.
Rose, D. J (1997). A multilevel approach to the study of motor control and learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Salmoni, A. W., & Pascoe, C. (1979). Fitts’ reciprocal tapping task: A developmental study. In G.C. Roberts and K. M. Nwell (Eds.), Psychology of motor behavior and sport 1978 (pp. 288-294). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Motor learning and moter performance : from principle to practice. Champon, IL : Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R. A. (1988) Motor control and learning: A behavior emphasis. (2nd). Champain, IL: Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S. & Quinn, J. T. (1979). Motor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor act. Psychological Review, 86, 415-451.
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing. II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
Singer, R. N., Cauraugh, J. H., Chen, D., Steinberg, S. G., & Wang, L. (1994). Training mental quickness in beginning/intermediate tennis players. The Sport Psychology, 8, 305-318.
Stoffregen, T. A. (2000). Affordance and events. Ecological Psychology, 12(1), 1-28.
Strohmeyer, H. S., Williams, K., & Schaub-George, D. (1991). Development sequences for catching a small ball: A prelongitudinal screening. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 257-266.
Takahiko, N., Hiromi. M., Mitsuharu. I., Morie, I., Atsushi. K., & Noriyuki. K. (1998). System dynamics modeling of motor performance development correlating physical training in soccer player. Tsukuba Ibaraki Ken, 21, 57-62.
Teasdale, N. & Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Deceleration requirements and the control of pointing movements. Journatl of Motor Behavior, 2, 131-138.
Thelen, E. (1989). The (Re)discovery of motor development: Learning new things from an old filed. Development Psychology, 25, 946-949.
Thelen, E., & fisher, D. M. (1982). Newborn stepping: an explanation for a disappearing reflex. Developmental Psychology, 18, 760-75.
Thelen, E., & Ulrich, B. D. (1991). Hidden skills: A dynamical systems analysis of treadmill stepping during the first year. Monographs of Society for Research in child Development, 56(1), serial #223.
Thelen, E. (1986). Development of coordinated movement: Implications for early human development. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control. Amsterdam: Martius Nijhoff.
Thomas, J. R., & French, K. E. (1985). Gender differences across age in motor performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 260-282.
Turvey, M. T. (1992). Affordance and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology, 4, 173-187.
Van-Emmerik, R. E. A., & Wagenaar, R. C. (1995). The functional role of movement variability: implications for learning and relearning processes. Corpus, Psyche et Societas, 2(2), 56-70.
Williams, A. M., Davids, K., & Williams, J. G. (1992). Perception and action in sport. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 22, 147-204.
Wrisbert. C. A., & Mead. B. J. (1983). Developing coincident timing skill in children: a comparison of training methods. Research Quarterly for Exercise and sport, 56, 67-74.
Zaal, F. T. J. M., & Bootsma, R. J. (1995). The topology of limb deceleration in prehension tasks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27(2), 193-207.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE