臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：聽覺中樞處理功能測驗發展及其相關之探究
作者：蔡志浩
作者(外文)：Chih-Hao Tsai
校院名稱：國立高雄師範大學
系所名稱：特殊教育學系
指導教授：陳小娟
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2006
主題關鍵詞：聽覺中樞處理功能測驗；頻率分辨；間隔察覺；音高型態辨識；時長型態辨識；雙耳異訊；聽覺辨位；反應時間；(Central) Auditory Processing Test Battery；frequency discrimination；gap detection；pitch pattern recognition；duration pattern recognition；dichotic pitch；lateralization；reaction time；(C)APD；APD
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:42
本研究旨在發展一套評量聽覺中樞處理功能的測驗，測驗選取係以美國聽語學會2005年提出之聽覺中樞處理功能新定義為依據，各測驗均以非語音及最簡約兩項為原則進行編製，包括頻率分辨、間隔察覺、音高型態辨識、時長型態辨識、雙耳異訊音高及聽覺辨位等6項測驗；另外也探討一些因素對聽覺中樞處理功能的影響。
研究對象為國小三年級聽覺正常兒童，包括預試樣本30人、正式施測樣本100人、重測與效標效度樣本31人；此外，也請 100位家長填寫量表。使用工具包括右利手評量表、聽知覺檢核表、中耳功能分析儀、聽力檢查儀、自編聽覺中樞處理功能測驗、國外版之間隔察覺、音高型態辨識及時長型態辨識測驗等。主要研究結果摘要如下：
一、聽覺中樞處理功能測驗具之內部一致性與重測信度等兩項係數穩定，且得分不受試題
呈現先後次序的影響；而測驗本身具有一定程度的內容效度、效標效度及構念效度。
二、兒童的作答反應時間與聽覺中樞處理測驗得分兩者顯著相關，得分愈高，作答反應時
間有愈短的趨勢。
三、頻率分辨、間隔察覺、音高型態辨識及時長型態辨識等4項測驗，兩耳得分大致高於單
用左耳或右耳，其中頻率分辨、間隔察覺及時長型態測驗呈現右耳優勢現象。
四、六項測驗在1k Hz的得分有高於4k Hz的趨勢，但是只有音高型態、雙耳異訊音高、聽
覺辨位測驗達顯著水準。
五、性別在不同測驗有顯著差異；男生在頻率分辨、間隔察覺、音高型態辨識及時長型態
辨識等4項測驗得分有略高於女生的趨勢，其中頻率分辨測驗男生得分顯著高於女性；
而女生在雙耳異訊及聽覺辨位之兩耳互動測驗得分有略高於男生的趨勢，其中聽覺辨
位測驗女生得分顯著高於男生。
六、兒童日常生活中的聽覺表現與聽覺中樞處理功能測驗得分顯著相關，換言之，日常生
活中之各項聽覺表現愈好，在聽覺中樞處理功能測驗的得分也愈高。
七、純音聽力檢查、聽小骨肌反射閾測驗之結果，與聽覺中樞處理功能各項測驗的關聯極
低，說明一般聽力檢查在聽覺中樞處理功能的評估時，僅能扮演排除周邊聽力問題的
功能。
八、就影響聽覺中樞處理功能之因素來看，性別、聽覺表現及反應時間等三個變項，對聽
覺中樞處理功能測驗，有8成以上的解釋量，說明性別、聽覺表現及反應時間能有效解
釋兒童在聽覺中樞處理功能的表現。
九、100名兒童之聽覺中樞處理功能得分大致可分為6種類型，高分組在各項表現接近平均
數，至於中低分組則依測驗性質不同而略高或低於平均表現。
本研究依據上述各項研究結果，針對實際在臨床施測與解釋、在教育的篩檢與教學，以及在研究的內涵與方法等方面，提出各項建議。
The purposes of the study were to develop a (Central) Auditory Processing Test Battery (CAPTB) and to explore the influences of some factors upon auditory performances. The six tests were chosen based on the definition made by American Speech and Hearing Association (AHSA). The test battery was composed based on principles of non-speech and simplistic.
The subjects were 3rd graders with normal hearing, including 30 for pre-testing, 100 for formal testing and 31 for re-test and criteria validity test. Parents of 100 children were also asked to fill the auditory performance checklist. CAPTB included frequency discrimination, gap detection, pitch pattern recognition, duration pattern recognition, dichotic pitch, and lateralization tests. The main results were as the following:
1. The self-developed CAPTB had good reliability and validity.
2. A relationship was observed between scores of CAPTB and the
reaction time. The higher the CAPTB scores were, the shorter the
reaction time would be.
3. Performance was better in the diotic mode than the monotic mode
for frequency discrimination, gap detection, pitch pattern
recognition, and duration pattern tests. The effect of right ear
advantage was shown in the previous three tests.
4. There was a tendency of higher scores for 1k Hz than for 4k Hz in
all tests of CAPTB. However, only three tests showed significant
differences between scores of these two frequencies, i.e. pitch
pattern, dichotic pitch, and lateralization tests.
5. Differences were observed in auditory performances between
different genders. Boys’ scores were higher than girls’ in
frequency discrimination, gap detection, pitch pattern
recognition, and duration pattern recognition tests. Only one
test showed significant differences, i.e. frequency
discrimination test. Girls’ scores were higher than boys’ in the
rest two tests and only the scores of lateralization test
revealed significant differences.
6. There were significant correlation between scores of auditory
performance checklist and CAPTB.
7. Results of pure tone test and acoustic reflex threshold test had
low correlation with scores of CAPTB. These two tests could serve
the role of exclusion the peripheral auditory problem.
8. The gender, the scores of the auditory checklist and the reaction
time occupied 83% of variability in scores of CAPTB. It seems
that these three factors could predict children’s performance in
CAPTB to a certain degree.
9. Children’s scores in CAPTB could be grouped into six subtypes.
Further discussion was made on the basis of these findings. Suggestions for the application of the CAPTB and future researches were also addressed.
參考文獻
壹、中文部分
王淑蓮、潘淑姿、廖秋莉(2002)。中樞聽知覺處理障礙兒童的特徵與教學。國小特殊教new window
育，33，52-59。
江源泉(2003)。中樞聽覺處理異常。國教世紀，207，13-18。
吳裕益(2005)。測驗理論。測驗理論課堂講義。高雄：高師大特殊教育系。
吳裕益(2004)。線性結構模式的理論與應用。線性結構模式課堂講義。高雄：高
師大特殊教育系。
吳裕益、邱上真、陳小娟、曾進興、陳振宇、謝淑蘭、成戎珠、黃朝慶、洪碧霞、
櫻井正二郎(1997)。兒童認知功能綜合測驗之編製，特殊教育研究學刊，15，。new window
李昭幸(1999)。聽覺正常者之聽覺中樞能力研究。特殊教育學報，13，33-60。new window
林鴻清、徐銘燦、張克昌(1999)。簡介聽覺中樞病變之症狀和聽力檢查。中華聽語學誌，
14，64-73。
陳小娟(1993)。中樞聽覺處理障礙鑑定─國語同調號疊詞初探。台南：國立台南
師範學院特殊教育學系。
陳小娟(1998)。聽覺中樞功能篩檢測驗賡續研究。特殊教育與復健學報，6，39-63。new window
陳小娟(2002)。中樞聽覺系統功能異常之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究
計畫結案報告。計畫編號：NSC89-2314-B-017-001。
陳英豪、吳裕益(1993)。測量與評量。高雄：復文。
蔡志浩、陳小娟(2002)。噪音背景辨識語音測驗編製之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,new window
23, 121-140。


貳、英文部分
Anderson, K. L. (1991). Screening instrument for targeting
educational risk in preschool children ( S.I.F.T.E.R). Tampa, FL:
Educational Audiology Association.
Anderson, K. L., & Matkin, N. (1996). Screening instrument for targeting educational risk in preschool children (age 3-kindergarten) (Preschool S.I.F.T.E.R). Tampa, FL: Educational Audiology Association.
American National Standards Institute (ANIS)(1996). American national standard specification for audiometers (ANSI S 3.6). NY: Author.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1992). Issues in central auditory processing disorders: A report from the ASHA Ad Hoc Committee on Central Auditory Processing. Rockville, MD: Author.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1996). Central auditory processing: Current status of research and implications for clinical practice. American Journal of Audiology, 5,41–54.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). (Central) auditory processing disorders. MD: ASHA Author.
Banai, K., & Ahissar, M. (2004). Poor frequency discrimination probes Dyslexics with particularly impaired working memory. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 9, 328-340.
Bailely, P. J., & Snowling, M. J. (2002). Auditory processing and the development of language and literacy. British Medical Bulletin, 63, 135-146.
Barasch, C. T., Guitar, B., McCauley, R. J., & Absher, R. G. (2000). Disfluency and time reception, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1429-1439.
Bavosi, R., & Rupp, R. R. (1984). Dichotic abilities in children, normal adults and aphasic adults for open- and closed-context word. The Journal of Auditory Research, 24, 256-278.
Bellis, T. J. (1997). Assessment and Management of Central Auditory Processing Disorders in the Education Setting: From Science to Practice. San Deigo, CA: Singular.
Bellis, T. J. (2002a). Developing deficit-specific intervention plan for individuals with auditory processing disorder. Seminars in Hearing, 23(4), 287-295.
Bellis, T. J. (2002b). When the brain can’t hear. Unraveling the mystery of Auditory Processing Disorder. NY: Pocket books.
Bellis, T. (2003). Assessment and Management of Central auditory Processing Disorders in the educational setting – From science to practice (2nd edition). NY: Thomas Delmar Learning.
Bellis, J. T., & Wilber, L. A. (2001). Effect of aging and gender on interhemispheric function. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 246-263.
Berlin, I. C., & Lowe, D. (1978). Differential diagnostic evaluation: Central auditory processing function. In J. Katz (eds.), Handbook of clinical audiology. MD: William & Wilkins Co.
Benson, P. (1995). Fisher’s Auditory Problems Checklist. Educational Audiology Newsletter, 9, 6-9.
Ben-Yehudah, G. & Ahissar, M.(2004). Sequential spatial frequency discrimination is consistently impaired among adult dyslexics. Vision Research, 44(10): 1047-1063.
Bilger, R. C., Nutzel, J. M., Rabinowitz, W. M. & Rzeczkowski, C. (1984). Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 27, 32-84.new window
Bocca, E. (1953). Factors in fluencing binaural integration of periodically switched messages. Acta Oto-laryng, 53, 142-144.
Bocca, E., Calearo, C., & Cassinari, V. (1954). A new method for testing hearing in
temporal lobe tumors. Acta Otolaryngologica, 42, 219-221.
Bocca, E., Calearo, C., & Cassinari, V., & Migliavacca, F. (1955). Testing “cortical” hearing in temporal lobe tumors. Acta Otolaryngologica, 44, 289-304.
Broothroyd, A. (1968). Development in speech audiometry. Sound, 2, 2-10.
Bungert-Kahl, P. Biedermann,F., Dorrscheidt, G. J., Cramon, D. Y., & Rubsamen, R. (2004). Psychoacoustic test tools for the detection of deficits in central auditory processing: Normative data. Z Audiol, 43(2). 48-71.new window
Cacace, A. T., & McFarland, D. J. (1998). Central Auditory Processing Disorder in School-aged Children: A critical Review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Reasearch, 41, 355-373.
Chalfant, J.C., & Scheffelin, M. A. (1969). Central processing dysfunctions in children: a review research. NINDS Monograph, 9, 11-20.
Cestnick, L., & Jerger, J. (2000). Auditory temporal processing and lexical/nonlexical reading in developmental dyslexics. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 11, 501-503.
Chermak, G. D. (1998). Managing central auditory processing disorders, Metalinguistic and metaconitive approaches. Seminar Hearing, 19, 379-392.
Chermak, G. D. & Musiek, F. E. (1997). Central Auditory Processing Disorders: New Perspective. CA: Singular Publishing Group.
Chermak, G. D., & Musiek, F. E. (2002). Auditory Training: Principles and Approaches for Remediating and Managing Auditory Processing Disorders. Seminars in Hearing, 4. 297-307.
Cockburn, J. (1995). Listening Environment Profile. Phonic Ear, Inc., Petaluma, CA. (800/227-0735).
Colorado Department of Education (1997). Auditory processing disorders: A team approach to screening, assessment & intervention practices. CO: Colorado Department of Education.
Craig, C. H. (1993). Effect of three conditions of predictability on word-recognition performance. Journal of Speech and Hearing Reasearch, 31, 588-592.
Cranford, J. L., Stream, R. W., Rye, C. V., & Slade, T. L. (1982). Detection discrimination of brief-duration tones. Arch Otolaryngol, 108, 350-357.
Davis, S. M. & McCroskey, R. L. (1980). Auditory fusion in children. Journal of Child Development, 51, 75-80.
Divenyi, P. L. & Haup, K. M. (1977). Audiological correlated of speech understanding deficits in elderly listener with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.Ⅰ. age and lateral asymmetry effect. Ear and Hearing, 22, 444-449.
Dyven, P. L., & Hirsh, I. (1974). Identification of temporal order in three-tone sequences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 56, 582-593.
Dirk, D. (1964). Perception of dichotic and monaural verb material and cerebral dominance for speech. Acta Oto-laryng, 58, 73-80.
Dirk, D. D., Bell, T. S., Rossman, R.N., and Kincaid, G.E..(1986). Articulation index predictions of contextually dependent words. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80, 82-92.
Diveny, P. L., Efron, R., & Yund, E. W. (1977). Ear dominance in dichotic cords and ear superiority in frequency discrimination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of American, 62, 607-617.
Domitz, D. M., & Show, L. S. (2000). A New CAPD Battery-Multiple Auditory Processing Assessment: Factor Analysis and Comparisons with SCAN. American Journal of Audiology,9 ,1-11.
Dubno, J. R., Dirk, D. D., & Morgan, D. E. (1984). Effect of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76,87-96.
Durrant, J. D., & Lovirinc, J. H. (1995). Bases of hearing science. MD: William & Wilkins.
Efron, R. (1971). Temporal perception, aphasia and déjà vu. Brain, 403-424.
Efron, R., & Crandall, P. H. (1983). Central auditory processingⅡ. Effects of anterior temporal lobectomy. Brain and Language, 19, 237-253.
Efron, R. (1990). The decline and fall of hemispheric specialization. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Efron, R., Crandall, P. H., Koss, B., & Yund, W. E. (1983). Central auditory processingⅢ.The “Cocktail Party” effect and anterior temporal lobectomy. Brain and Language, 19, 254-263.
Efron, R., Koss, B., & Yund, W. E. (1983). Central auditory processingⅣ. Ear dominance-spatial and temporal complexity. Brain and Language, 19, 264-282.
Efron, R., & Yund, E. W. (1976). Ear dominance and intensity independence in the perception of dichotic chords. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 889-898.
Efron, R., Yund, E. W., & Divenyi, P. L. (1979) Individual difference in the perception of dichotic chords, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 75-86.
Eimas, P.D. (1975). Developmental studies of speech perception. In L.B. Cohen, and P. Salaptek (Eds.), Infant Perception: from Sensation to Cognition. New York: Academic Press, Vol. 2, , 193-231.
Elfenbein, J. L., Small, A. M., & Davis, J. M. (1993). Developmental pattern of Duration Discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 842-849.
Elliott, L. L. (1979). Performance of children aged 7 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 651-653.new window
Elliott, L. L. (1995). Verbal auditory closure and the speech perception in noise (SPIN) test. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 38, 1363-1376.new window
Elliott, L. L., Lyons, L., & Busse, L. A. (1983). Speech understanding of older adults: A preliminary study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, S24.
Ferre, J. M. (2002). Managing Children’s Central Auditory Processing Deficits in the Real World: What Teachers and Parents Want to Know. Seminars in Hearing, 4. 319-325.
Fitzgibbons, P. J., & Gordon-Salant, S. (1995). Age effects on duration discrimination with simple and complex stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 662-670.
Florida Department of Education (2001). Auditory Processing Disorders The Florida Technology Report. FL: Florida Department of Education.
Fry, D. B. (1961). Word and sentences tests for use in speech audiomtery. Lancent, 22, 197-199.
Garstecki, D. C., & Erler, S. F. (2001). Personal and social conditions potentially influencing women’s hearing loss management. American Journal of Audiology, 10, 1-13.
Gelfand, S. A. (1997). Essentials of Audiology. Thieme Medical Publishers: New York.Theme.
Gillet, P. (1993). Auditory processes. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.
Given, G. D., Trina, A. & Hume, W. G. (1998). Auditory process skill and hearing aid satisfaction in sample older adults. Perceptual and motor skill, 33, 122-125.
Griffiths, T. D. (2002). Central auditory pathologies, Brithish Medical Buttetin, 200, 63, 107-120.
Gordon-Salant, S., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (2001). Source of age-related recognition difficulty for time-compressed speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 709-719.
Groen, J. (1969). Diagnostic value of lateralization ability for dichotic time differences, Acta Otolaryngology, 67, 326-332.
Grose, J. H., Hall Ⅲ, J. W., & Buss, E. (2004). Duration discrimination in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: effect of stimulus type and frequency. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 5-12.
Halstead, W. C. (1947). Brain and Intelligence: A Quantitative Study of the Frontal Lobes. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Hanks, W. D., & Johnson, G. D. (1998). HINT list equivalency using in older listener. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 41, 1335-1340.
Harris, J. D. (1960). Combinations of distortion in speech. Archives of Otolaryngology, 72, 227-232.
Hartmann, W. M., & Loty, S. L. (1996). On the pitches of the components of a complex tones. Journal of Acoustical Society of Ameriam, 99, 567-578.
Hausler, R., & Levine, R. (1980). Brainstem auditory evoked potentials are related to interaural time discrimination in patients with multiple scerosis. Brain Research, 91, 589-594.
Hayes, A. N. & Gerald, R. P. (1985). Audiology. Englewood Cliffs, N. J. : Prentice Hall.
Hirsh, I. J., Davis, H., Sliverman, S. R., Reynold, E. G., Eldert, E. & Benson, R. W. (1952). Development for speech audiometry. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 17, 321-337.
Howes, D. (1957). On the relation between the intelligibility and frequency of occurrences of English words. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 296-307.
Isaacs, L. E., Horn, D. G., Keith, R. W., & McGrath, M. (1982). Auditory Fusion in Learning-Disabled and Normal Adolescent Children. Presented at the annual ASHA convention, Toronto,.
Jerger, J. F. (1960). Observations on auditory behavior in lesions of the central auditory pathways, Archives of Otolaryngology, 71, 797-806
Jerger, M. (1996). Phoneme awareness and the role of the educator. Intervention in School & Clinic, 32, 5-13.
Jerger, J., Alford, B., Lew, H., Rivera, V., & Chmiel, R. (1995). Dichtotic listening, eventing-related potentials and interhemispheric transfer in elderly. Ear and Hearing, 16, 482-498.
Jerger, J., Chmiel, R., Allen, J. & Wilson, A. (1994). Effect of age and gender on dichotic sentence identification. Ear and hearing, 15(4), 274-286.
Jerger, J., & Hayes, D. (1977). Diganostic speech audiometry. Archives of Otolaryngology, 103, 216-222.
Jerger, J., & Musiek, F. E. (2000). Diagnosis of auditory processing disorder in school-age children. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 11, 467-474.
Johnson, D. J., & Myklebust, H. R. (1971). Learning disabilities : educational principles and practices. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Kalikow, D. N., Steven, K. N., and Elliott, L. L. (1977). Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise testing sentence materials with controlled word predictabililty. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1337-1351.new window
Katz, J., Stecker, N., & Handerson, D. (1992). Central Auditory Processing: A Transdisciplinary View. MO: Mosby.
Katz, J. (2002). Clinical and research concerns regarding the 2000 APD consensus report and recommendation. Audiology Today, 14-17.
Keith, R. W. (1977). Central auditory dysfunction. NY: Grune & Stratton.
Keith, R. (1995). Tests of central auditory processing. In R. Roeser & M. Downs (Eds.), Auditory disorders in school children (3rd ed.), pp. 101-116. NY: Thieme Medical Publications.
Keith, R. W. (2000). Random Gap Detection Test. Audetic of St. Louis.
Keith, R. W. (2002a). Is evaluating auditory processing disorders in your socpe of practice? The Hearing Journal, 55, 5-17.
Keith, R. W. (2002b). Standardization of Time Compressed Sentence Test. Journal of Educational Audiology, 10, 15-20.
Kelly, D. A. (1995). Central auditory processing disorders: Strategies for use with children and adolescents. TX: Communication Skill Builders.
King, W. M. Lombardino, L. J., Crandell, C. C., & Ceonard, C. M. (2003) Comorbid Audiotory Processing Disorder in Developmental Dyslexia. Ear and Hearing, 24, 448-456.
Kraus, N. (1999). Speech sound perception, neurophysiology, and plasticity. Pediatric Otorinolaryngol, 47, 123-129.
Levine, R., Gardner, J., Stufflebeam, S., Fllterton, B., Carlisle, E., Furst, N., Rosen, B., & Kiang, M. (1993). Effects of multiple sclerosis brainstem lesions on sound lateralization and brainstem auditory evoked potential. Hearing Research, 68, 73-88.
Lindamood, C., & Lindamood, P. (1971). Auditory discrimination in depth (rev. ed). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Lyzenga, J., & Horst, J. W. (1995). Frequency discrimination of band limited harmonic complexes related to vowels, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 1493-1955.
Mannell, R. H. (1994). The perceptual and auditory implication of parametric scaling in synthetic speech, Unpublihed Ph. D. dissertation, Macquarie University.
Marriage, J., King, J., Briggs, L. & Lutman, M. E.(2001). The reliability of the Scan test: results from a primary school population in the U.K. British Journal of Audiology, 35, 199-208.new window
Marshall, C. M., Snowling, M. J., & Bailey, P. J. (2001). Rapid auditory processing and phonological ability in normal readers and readers with dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 925-940.
Martin, S. J., & Jerger, J. F. (2005). Some effects of aging on central auditory processing. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 42(4), 25-44.
Matathias, O., Sohmer, H., & Biton, V. (1985). Central auditory test and auditory nerve brainstem evoked response in multiple scerosis. Acta Otolaryngology, 99, 369-376.new window
Masters, M. G., Nancy A. Stecker, N. A., & Katz, J. (1998). Central auditory processing disorders: mostly management. MA: Allyn and Bacon.
McArthur, G. M., & Bishop,D. V. M. (2001).Auditory perceptual processing in the people with reading and oral language impairment: current issues and recommendation. Dyslexia, 7, 150-170.
McArthur, G. M., & Bishop,D. V. M. (2004). Which people with specific language impairment have auditory processing deficits, Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 869-874.
McCroskey, R. L., & Keith, R. W. (1996). Auditory Fusion Test-Revised (AFT-T), Auditec of St. Louis.
McCroskey R. L. & Kidder H. C. (1980). Auditory fusion among learning disabled, reading disabled and normal children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 69-76.
McCroskey R. L., Pavlovic, D., Allen, M. & Nelson, P. (1981). Auditory fusion procedures assess reverberation in a theater. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 15 , 24-26.
McFarland, D. J., & Cacace, A. T. (1995). Modality specificity as a criterion for diagnosing central auditory processing disorders. American Journal of Audiology, 4, 17-18.
McFarlang, D. J., & Cacace, A. T. (2000). Letter to edit: Factor Analysis in CAPD and the “Unimodal” Test Battery: Do We Have a Model that Will Satisfy? . American Journal of Audiology ,9 ,1-3.
McGiven, R. F., Berka, C., Languis, M. L., & Chapman, S. (1991). Detection deficit in temporal pattern discrimination using seashore rhythm test in young children with reading impairments. Journal of Learning Disiability, 24, 58-62.new window
Minnesota Pivision of Special Education (2001). Auditory Processing Disorders Management. Minnesota Department of Education.
Merzenich, M. M., Jenkins, W. M., Johnston, P., Miller, S. L., & Tallal, P. A. (1996). Temporal Processing Deficits of Language-Learning Impaired Children Ameliorated by Training. Science, 271, 77-81.
Moore, B. C. J. (1997). An introduction to the psychology of hearing (3 rd ed). London: Academic Press.
Moore, B. C. J., Glasberg, B. R. & Shailer, M. J. (1984). Frequency and intensity difference limens for harmonics within complex tones, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, 550-561.
Moore, B. C. J., & Raab, D. H. (1974). Mechanisms underlying the frequency discrimination of pulsed tone and detection of frequency modulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 1049-1054.
Musiek, F. E. (1994). Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 5, 265-268.
Musiek, F. E. (2002). Auditory plasticity: What is it, and why do clinician need to know? The Hearing Journal, 55(4), 70.
Musiek, F. E., Baran, J. A., & Pinheiro, M. L. (1990). Duration Pattern Recognition in Normal Subjects and Patients with Cerebral and Cochlear Lesions. Audiology, 29, 304-313.
Muisek, F. E, & Chermak, G. D. (1994). Three Commonly Asked Questions about Central Auditory Processing Disorders: Assessment. American Journal of Audiology, ,23-27.
Musiek, F. E., Geurkink, N. A., & Kietel, S. A. (1982). Test battery assessment of auditory perceptual dysfunction in children. Laryngoscope, 92, 251-257.
Musiek, F. E., Gollegly, K. M., Kibbe, K. S., & Reeves, A. G. (1989). Electrophysiologic and behavior auditory findings in multiple sclerosis. The American Journal of Otology, 10, 343-350.
Musiek, F. E., & Pinheiro, M. L. (1987). Frequency patterns in cochlear, brainstem, and cerebral lesions. Audiology, 26, 79-88.
Musiek, F. E., Pinheiro, M., & Wilson, D. H. (1980). Auditory pattern perception in “split brain” patients. Archives of Otolaryngology, 106, 610-612.
Musiek, F. E., Shinn, J., & Hare, C. (2002). Plasticity Auditory Training, and Auditory Processing Disorders. Seminars in Hearing, 4. 263-275.
Myklebust. H. R. (1954). Auditory disorders in children : a manual for differential diagnosis. NY: Grune & Stratton.Myklebust. H. R. (1971). The pupil rating scale: screening for learning disabilities. NY: Grune & Stratton.
Noffsinger, D. (1993). Behavioral Special Test. American Journal of Audiology, 1, 17-18.
Newby, H. A. (1979). Audiology. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Oldfield, R.C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
Olsen, W. (1991). Special Auditory Tests: A Historical Perspective. J. T. Jacobson, & J. L. Northern. (Eds.). Diagnostic Audiology. NY: Thieme.
Owen, J. H. (1981). Influence of acoustical and linguistic factors on the SPIN test difference score. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, 678-682.new window
Rees, N. S. (1973). Auditory processing factors in language disorders: The view from Procrustes bed. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 38, 304-315.
Pickett, J. M. (1980). The sounds of speech communication: a primer for acoustic tic phonetics and speech perception. MD: University Park Press,.
Pinheiro, M. L., & Ptacek, P. H. (1971). Reversals in the perception of noise and tone patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 1779-1782.
Pollack, K., Rubenstein, H., & Decker, L. (1959). Intelligibility of known and unknown message sets. The Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 31, 273-279.
Phillips, D. P. (1995). Central Auditory Processing: A view from auditory neuroscience. American Journal of Otology, 16, 338-352.
Phillips, D. P. (2002). Central Auditory System and Central Auditory Processing Disorders: Some Conceptual Issues. Seminars in Hearing, 4. 251-261.
Riensche, L. L., Thuman, P. R., Lincoln, K. L., & Bamb, L. E. (1983). Age effects on performance on the Willeford central auditory processing test battery. Journal of Auditory Research, 23(2), 131-135.new window
Rodriguez, G. P., DiSarno, N. H., & Hardiman, C. J. (1990). Central auditory processing in normal-hearing elderly adults. Audiology. 29. 85-92.
Rosenberg, G. G. (2002). Classroom Acoustics and Personal FM Technology in Management of Auditory Processing Disorder. Seminars in Hearing, 4.,309-317.
Ruhm, H. B., Mencke, E. O., Milburn, B., Cooper, W. A., & Rose, D. E. (1996). Differential sensitivity to duration of acoustic signals. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 9, 371-384.
Seashore, C. E., Lewis, D., & Saetveit, J. G. (1956). Measures of Music Talent. The Psychological Corporation。
Sloan, C. (1991). Treating auditory processing difficulties in children. CA: Singuar Pub.
Show, R. L., & Chermak, G. (1999). Implications From Factor Analysis for Central Auditory Processing Disorders. American Journal of Audiology,8 ,1-6.
Show, R. L., Chermak, G. D., & Berent, M. (2000). Central Auditory Processing and Test Measures: ASHA 1996 Revisited. American Journal of Audiology,9 ,1-5.
Show, R. L., & Seikel, J. A. (2000). Letter to edit. Support for a Multiple-Factor Model of Auditory Processing. American Journal of Audiology, 11 ,1-3.
Shower, E. G., & Biddulph, R. (1931). Differential pitch sensitivity of the ear. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 8, 275-287.
Silman, S., & Sliverman, C. A. (1997). Auditory Diagnosis: Principles and Applications. San Diego, California: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
Silman, S., Silverman, C.A., & Emmer, M.B. (2000). Central auditory processing disorders and reduced motivation: Three case studies. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 11(2), 57-63.
Singer, J., Hurley, R. M., Preece, J. P. (1998). Effectiveness of central auditory processing tests with children, American Journal of Audiology, 7, 1-12.
Smith, T. T., Bradham, T., Chandler, L., & Wells. C. (2000). The effect of examiner’s race on the performance of African children on the SCAN. Language, Speech, and Hering Service in Schools, 31, 116-125.
Smoski, W. J., Brunt, M. A., & Tannahill, J. C. (1992). Listening characteristics of children with central auditory processing disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 145-152.
Speaks, C., Niccum, N., & Tasell, D. V. (1985). Effects of stimulus material on the dichotic listening performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 16-25.
Steven, S.S. (1974). Sound and hearing. Netherlands: Time-Life International.
Tallal, P. (1990). Fine-grained discrimination deficits in language-learning-impaired children are specific neither to the auditory modality nor to speech perception. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 33. 616-617.
Tallal, P., Miller, S. L., Bedi, G., & Byma, G.(1996). Language Comprehension in Language-Learning Impaired Children Improved with Acoustically Modified Speech. Science, 271, 81-84,.
Tomson, S. (2002). Comparison of Word Familiarity: Conversational Words v. NU-6 list Words. Lincoln Journal Star, 21, p1-6.
Tobias, J. V. (1964). On phonemic analysis of speech discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 7, 98-100.
Tremblay, K., Kruas, N., Carrell, T., & McGee, T. (1997). Central auditory system plasticity: generalization to novel stimuli following listening training. Journal of the Acousitical Society of American, 102, 3752-3773.
Tremblay, K., Kraus, N., & McGee, T. (1998) The time course of learning: Neurophysiologic changes during speech training. NeuroReport. 9(16), 3557-3560.
Trembaly, K., Kraus, N., McGee, T., Ponton, C., & Otis, B.(2001). Central auditory plasticity: changes in N1-P2 complex after speech sound training. Ear and Hearing, 22, 79-90.
Van De Vijver, F. R., Kok, A., Bakker, D. J., & Bouma, A. (1984). Laterization of ERP components during verbal dichotic information processing. Psychophysiology, 21, 123-134.
Van Hattum R. J. (1985). Administration of Speech-Language Services In the Schools, UK: Gollege Hill Press.
Vaughan, N. E., & Letowski, T. (1977). Effect of age, speech rate, and type of test on temporal auditory processing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 1192-1200.new window
ven den Brink, G. (1976). Dichotic pitch fusion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 811-815.
Ventura County SELPA. (2000). Central auditory processing disorders: A team approach to assessment and intervention. CA:Ventura County SELPA.
Visto, J. C., Cranford, J. L., & Scudder, R. (1996). Dynamic Temporal Processing of Nonspeech Acoustic Information by Children With Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 510-517.
Watson, B. U. (1991). Some relationships between intelligence and auditory discrimination. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 34(3), 621-627.
Walker, M. M., Shinn, J. B., Cranford, J. L., Givens, G. D., & Holbert, D. (2002). Auditory Temporal Processing Performance of Young Adults With Reading Disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45 ,598–605.
Warren, R. M. & Warren, R. P. (1970). Auditory illusions and confusions. Scientific American, 223, 30-36.
Wier, C.C., Jesteadt, W., & Green, D. M. (1976). Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61,178-184.
Weldon, P. R., Murray, T. J., & Quine, D. B. (1983). Hearing changes in Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of Neurosurgical Nursing 15, (2): 98-103
Wertz, D., Hall, J. W., & Davis, W. (2002). Auditory Processing Disorders: Management Approaches Past to Present. Seminars in Hearing, 4, 277-285.
Willeford, J. A. (1977). Assessing central auditory behavior in children: A test battery approach.In R. Keith (Ed.), Central auditory dysfunction (pp. 43–72). NY: Grune & Stratton.new window
Willeford, J. A., & Burleigh, J. M. (1985). Handbook of central auditory processing disorders in children. NY: Grune, & Stratton, Inc.
Woodward, B. (2001). CIA told to assassinate bin Laden. Lincoln Journal Star, 10, 1-2.
Young, M. L. (1985). Central auditory processing in urban black children, normal and learning disabled. The Journal of Auditory Research, 25, 247-253.
Yund, E. W., & Efron, R., (1977).Model for the relative salience of the pitch of pure tones presented dichotically. Journal of the Acoustical Society of American, 62, 607-617.
Zemlin, W. R. (1998). Speech and hearing science: anatomy and physiology. MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Zwicker, E., & Fastl, H. (1972). On the development of the critical band. Journal of the Acousitcal Soceity of American, 52, 699-702.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：355（臺灣：349，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2298792 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68094749
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上