:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以資源配置組合(RDP)分析集團企業ROE及會計處理的改變對企業評價之影響
作者:楊麗玲
作者(外文):Yang,Li-Ling
校院名稱:輔仁大學
系所名稱:商學研究所
指導教授:陳明道
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2009
主題關鍵詞:評價杜邦拆解資源配置組合研究與發展國際會計準則國際鑑價準則顯著性損益表投資人報酬率現金ValuationDu-Pont decompositionResources deployment portfolioR&DIFRSsIVSC
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:71
本文提出以資源配置組合(RDP)拆解集團企業股東權益報酬(ROE)的方法,模式將集團企業的資源依會計規範拆解為五大類別的資產配置,營運權益報酬率(RoOE)、財務權益報酬率(RoFE)、其他權益報酬率(RoXE)、影響權益報酬率(RoIE)及創新研發權益比(R&DI)。研究樣本為2001年到2005年468家上市公司,共計2,340公司-年觀察值。 實證結果說明RDP拆解能夠有效改善杜邦拆解模式對市場的評價並與我們所預期的符合,營運資源的股東權益報酬不論在對於長期或短期價值的創造,都是最顯著的成分。未來創新研發股東權益比R&DI在長期價值的創造是相當重要的,但是在解釋短期的價值創造是不顯著的。此外,會計的全球接軌,我國的會計處理標準自2005年都已經改變了,我們同時也檢定會計處理的改變對於RDP模式解釋力及對他的個別成分的影響。財務權益報酬在會計標準IAS No.32 和 No.39的採用之前,顯著性上是不穩定的,在實施以公平價值評價後對於長期價值創造則具有顯著解釋力,但是在解釋短期的價值創造仍是不顯著的。影響權益報酬不論是會計規範改變前或改變後,顯著性上都是不穩定的。董監酬勞/員工現金及股票分紅的費用認列,揭露營運權益成份中被隱藏的巨大營運成本,投資人給予負面的市場評價。我們也考慮目前的報表存在「髒淨值」,損益表淨利不完全,本文將股東權益之「其他綜合損益項目」調整入帳,迴歸檢定發現RDP拆解模式對於企業長期價值創造的解釋力更加顯著提升。本文最大貢獻為RDP五大資產配置的拆解方式,不但有利於集團企業的評價,也符合目前要接軌的國際會計準則與國際鑑價指南之精神。
This study proposes a resources deployment portfolio (RDP) approach to decomposing return on equity (ROE) for business analysis. The five components are return on operating equity (RoOE), return on financial equity (RoFE), return on other equity (RoXE), return on influencing equity (RoIE), and R&D intensiveness (R&DI). Sample firms consist of Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation (TSEC) listed companies, to 468 firms per year or 2340 observations over 2001 to 2005 sample period. Empirical results demonstrate that RDP decomposition offers substantial improvement over DuPont decomposition in explaining market valuation. Confirming the perceived sustainability, RoOE is the most consistently significant component for both long-term and short-term value creation. R&DI is generally significant in contributing to long-term value creation but is not significant for short-term value creation. In addition, the global convergence initiative since 2005 has brought about fundamental changes in domestic accounting standards, we meanwhile examining the effects of accounting changes on the explanatory power of the RDP model as well as its individual components. Before the adoption of accounting standards similar to IAS No. 32 and No. 39, RoFE is nonstable component, after the adoption recognition of financial instruments primarily at fair value is generally significant in contributing to long-term value creation but is not significant for short-term value creation. RoIE are nonstable components that exhibit considerable the accounting standard changes front or change behind in valuation significance. The recognition of director and employee cash and stock bonuses as expenses will reveal this huge hidden operation cost in the operating equity component, investors regard as the negative impacts to market values of companies. We also consider under dirty-surplus accounting the income in the income is not complete, is deposited the other comprehensive income items adjustment, the regression examination finds the RDP decomposition model is significant increase to long-term value creation. The greatest contribute this text proposes the five resources deployment portfolio (RDP) approach to decomposing return on equity (ROE) for business valuation not only, also match IFRSs and IVSC.
中文部分
1. 中華民國會計研究發展基金會(1984),採權益法之長期股權投資會計處理準則,財務會計準則公報第5號。
2. (1985),合併財務報表,財務會計準則公報第7號。
3. (2003),金融商品之會計處理準則,財務會計準則公報第34號。
4. (2004),資產減損之會計處理準則,財務會計準則公報第35號。
5. (2005),金融商品之表達與揭露,財務會計準則公報第36號。
6. (2006),無形資產之會計處理準則,財務會計準則公報第37號。
7. (2006),待出售非流動資產及停業單位之會計處理準則,財務會計準則公報第38號。
8. (2007),股份基礎給付之會計處理準則,財務會計準則公報第39號。
9. 李淑華、簡雪芳、蔡彥卿(2005),「台灣股市對權益法長投之投資收益是否反應不足?」,2005會計理論與實務研討會,台灣大學會計學系/中華會計教育學會,台北。
10. 李郁儒(2006),三十四號公報與股票報酬之關聯性研究-以電子業為例,台灣大學未出版碩士論文,台北。
11. 李冠皓、鍾俊文「釐清員工分紅稀釋率之定義」,貨幣觀測與信用評等,41,35-46.
12. 巫素玫(2002),影響員工分紅入股高低之因素及宣告時市場反應,東海大學企業管理學研究所未出版碩士論文,台北。
13. 周建弘(2008),「IFRS接軌的挑戰」,會計研究月刊,276期,72-77.
14. 林岱融(2006),我國電子業上市公司金融商品公平價值資訊之報導方式對於價值攸關性之影響,輔仁大學未出版碩士論文,台北。
15. 徐君毅(2000),研發與廣告支出與企業價值變動之因果關係研究,東海大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文,台北。
16. 郭子慧(2003),員工分紅配股與權益評價,國立中山大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文,台北。new window
17. 陳怡庭(2006),適用『第34號公報:金融商品之會計處理準則』對於上市公司股價的影響-以台灣傳統產業為例,台灣大學未出版碩士論文,台北。
18. 陳妙玲(2003),「員工分紅配股評價對每股盈餘之影響」,會計研究月刊,207期(頁132-137)。
19. 陳明道(2002),加強資產評價制度之建立:公平價值會計的國際規範與財報彙整,台灣證券交易所贊助之研究報告。
20. ______ (2006),「集團企業分析、評價、與信評的整合模式」,兩岸管理暨經濟合作發展模式學術研討會,輔仁大學,台北。
21. 彭瑞年(2005),員工分紅稀釋率與投資績效之關係,東吳大學國際貿易學系未出版碩士論文,台北。
22. 蔡志瑋(2003),員工分紅與公司績效及投資人報酬之相關性研究—以我國上市資訊電子業為例,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文, 台北。
23. 劉正田(2001),「研發支出資本化之會計基礎股票評價」,會計評論,33,1-26。new window
24. 謝月香(2000),無形資產,國立成功大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文,台北。
25. 顏信輝、顏裕芳(2002),「無形資產與台灣股票評價攸關性之研究-股市週期與產業別之影響」,當代會計,3(2),121-147。new window
26. 蘇佩芬(2003),「國際會計準則(IAS)與我國財務會計準則之比較-兼論國際會計準則調和化-」,中原大學會計學系未出版碩士論文,台北。






















英文部分
1. Aboody David (1996). Market valuation of employee stock options. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22, 357-391.
2. Aboody David, Barth M. E. & Kasznik Ron (2004). SFAS No.123 Stock-Based Compensation Expense and Equity Market Values. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 251-275.
3. Ahmed, K. & Falk, H. (2006). The value relevance of management’s research and development reporting choice: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25, 231–264.
4. Barth, M.E., Beaver, W.H. & Landsman, W.R. (1996).Value-relevance of banks’ fair value disclosures under SFAS No.107. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 513-537.
5. Bell Timothy B., Landsman Wayne R., Miller Bruce L.,& Yeh She ( 2002). The Valuation Implications of Employee Stock Option Accounting for Profitable Computer Software Firms. The Accounting Review , 77(4), 971-996.
6. Chan, L. K. Lakonishok,C. J. & Sougiannis,T. (2001). The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditures. Journal of Finance, 56, 2431-2457.
7. Chen, David M. & Yang, Li-Ling (2009). Market Valuation of Employee and Director Bonuses for Profitable High-Tech Firms: The Case of Taiwan”, Journal of International Management Studies, 4(1), 189-196.
8. _______ (2009). An Empirical Test of a Resources Deployment Portfolio (RDP) Approach to Business Group ROE Decomposition. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies , 12(4), 1-26.
9. Connelly, R. A. & Hirschey, M. (1984). R&D, Market Structure and Profits: A Value-Based Approach. Review of Economic and Statistics, 66(4), 682-686.
10. Dhaliwal, D., Subramanyam, K.R., & Trezevant, R.(1999). Is Comprehensive Income Superior to Net Income as a Measure of Firm Performance?. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26, 43-67.
11. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)(1990). Disclosure of Information about Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk and Financial Instruments with Concentrations of Credit Risks. SFAS No.105.
12. _______ (1991). Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. SFAS No.107.
13. _______ (1994). Disclosure about Derivative Financial Instruments and Fair Value Financial Instruments. SFAS No.119.
14. _______ (1998). Accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS No.133.
15. Goodwin, John & Ahmed Kamran (2006). Longitudinal value relevance of earnings and intangible assets: Evidence from Australian firms. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation,
15, 72–91.
16. Hall, B. H. (1993). The Stock Market’s Valuation of R&D Investment During the 1980s. American Economic Review, 83(2), 259-264.
17. Hirschey, M., & Weygandt, J.J. (1985). Amortization Policy for Advertising and Research and Development Expenditures. Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 326-335.
18. Hirst, D. E. & Hopkins, P. E. (1998). Comprehensive Income Reporting and Analysts’ Valuation Judgments. Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 47–75.
19. Hunton, James E., Libby Robert,& Mazza, Cheri L.(2006). Financial Reporting Transparency and Earning Management. The Accounting Review, 81(1), 135-157.
20. Huson, M., Scott, T., & Wier, H. (2001). Earnings Dilution and the Explanatory Power of Earnings for Returns. The Accounting Review,76(4), 589-612
21. International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) (2004). Consolidated and Separated Financial Statements. International Accounting Standards (IAS) No.27.
22. _______ (2004). Investments in Associate. IAS No.28.
23. _______ (2004). Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation. IAS No.32.
24. _______ (2004). Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. IAS No.39.
25. International Valuation Standards Committee (IVSC) (2005). Business Valuation. International Valuation Guidance Note No. 6.
26. Jo Ann Pinto (2005). How Comprehensive is Comprehensive Income? The Value Relevance of Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting,
16(2), 97-122.
27. Jorion, P. (1990). The Exchange Rate Exposure of U.S. Multinationals. Journal of Business, 63(3), 331-345.
28. Koh, J. & Venkatraman, N. (1991). Joint Venture Formations and Stock Market Reactions:An Assessment in the Information Technology Sector. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 869-892.
29. Lee, I. & Wyatt, S.B. (1990).The Effects of International Joint Ventures on Shareholder Wealth. Financial Review, 25(3), 641-649.
30. Lev, B. & Sougiannis, T. (1996). The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics , 21(February), 107-138.
31. ______& Zarowin, P.(1999). The Boundaries of Financial Reporting and How to Extend Them. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(2), 353-385.
32. Mcconnell, J.J.& Nantell, T.J. (1986). Corporate Combinations and Common Stock Returns: The Case of Joint Ventures. Journal of Finance, 41, 519-536.
33. Ohlson J.(1995).Earnings, Book Value, and Dividends in Equity Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661-687.
34. Ohlson J. (1999). On Transitory Earnings. Review of Accounting Studies, 4, 145-162.
35. Pakes, A. (1985). On Patents, R&D and the Stock Market Rate of Return. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 390-419.
36. Palepu, K. G., Healy, P. M. & Bernard , V. L. (2004). Business Analysis and Valuation-Using Financial Statements. 3rd , South-Western Thomson Publications.
37. Sougiannis, T. (1994). The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D. The Accounting Review, 69(January), 44-68.
38. Venkatachalam, M. (1996). Value-Relevance of Bank’s Derivatives Disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22, 327-355.
39. Woolridge, J.R.& Snow, C.C. (1990). Stock Market Reaction to Strategic Investment Decision. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 353-363.
40. Yue Wang, Willem Buijink, & Rob Eken (2006). The value relevance of dirty surplus accounting flows in The Netherlands. The International Journal Accounting, 41, 387-405.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE