機構投資者、盈餘平穩化與會計資訊價值攸關性__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	機構投資者、盈餘平穩化與會計資訊價值攸關性
書刊名：	管理評論
作者：	陳慶隆／翁佩瑜／范宏書
作者(外文)：	Chen, Ching-lung／Weng, Pei-yu／Fan, Hung-shu
出版日期：	2016
卷期：	35:3
頁次：	頁1-27+109-134
主題關鍵詞：	機構投資者；盈餘平穩化；價值攸關性；監督假說；短視假說；Institutional ownership；Income smoothing；Value-Relevance；Monitoring hypothesis；Myopia hypothesis
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:4 共同引用:107 點閱:56

機構投資者在公司策略性盈餘報導決策中所扮演的角色有兩種不同的觀點：(1)為精明的投資者，當機構投資者持股比例增加時，股價應會反映更多未來盈餘資訊(機構投資者監督假說)；(2)過度專注當期盈餘，當機構投資者持股比例高時，股價反映未來盈餘資訊的程度較小(機構投資者短視假說)。本研究以公司盈餘平穩化行為對會計資訊價值攸關性之影響為架構，以非平衡式追蹤資料檢測機構投資者在此架構中所可能產生之影響，以豐富此一領域之研究。實證結果在某種程度支持機構投資者監督假說，亦即公司在機構投資者持股率高時，會顯著提高公司盈餘平穩化行為對於盈餘變數及權益帳面價值變數的相對價值攸關性。若進一步考慮機構投資者的交易策略(持股波動性)，發現公司在機構投資者持股率高且持股波動性低時，顯著提高盈餘平穩化對於盈餘變數的相對價值攸關性；另一方面，公司在機構投資者持股率低且持股波動性高時，在多數情境測試下，會顯著降低盈餘平穩化對於盈餘變數的相對價值攸關性，然前述兩種類型機構投資者對盈餘平穩化公司之權益帳面價值變數之相對價值攸關性影響不明顯。本研究進行若干敏感性測試，顯示實證結果具高度穩固性。

以文找文

The active monitoring hypothesis provides evidence that firms with higher institutional ownership are less likely to manage earnings, which in turn, enhances the value-relevance of accounting numbers. Yet, recent studies also highlight the importance of explicitly considering the short-term oriented investing behavior of institutional investors (the myopia hypothesis) when investigating the association between institutional ownership and managerial earnings reporting. Thus, the role of institutional investors in managerial earnings reporting remains an open question. Based on the informative association between income smoothing and the value-relevance of financial reporting, this study uses the unbalanced-panel data regressions to examine the monitoring or myopia role of institutional investors on the association between income smoothing and the value-relevance of accounting numbers. The empirical results to some extent support the monitoring hypothesis that the higher institutional ownership is, income smoothing generates more value-relevance of both earnings and equity book value. Moreover, in the income smoothing with higher institutional ownership/lower ownership volatility case, it reveals that the increasing value-relevance of earnings is enhanced. However, in the income smoothing with lower institutional ownership/higher ownership volatility case, it is found that the increasing value-relevance of earnings is mitigated. This study also documents that the role of institutional ownership on the association between income smoothing and the value-relevance of equity book value is unobvious in the analysis, both in the high and low ownership volatility cases. We demonstrate some diagnostic checks and evidence the results are robust to the various specifications.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	蕭朝興、陳馨蕙、黃俊凱(20110400)。臺灣機構投資人動態持股偏好之探討。管理學報，28(2)，97-126。延伸查詢
2.	Henderson, B. Charlene、Kaplan, Steven E.(2000)。An examination of audit report lag for banks: A panel data approach。Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory，19(2)，159-174。
3.	Edmans, Alex(2009)。Blockholder trading, market efficiency and managerial myopia。Journal of Finance，64(6)，2481-2513。
4.	Kalelkar, Rachana、Nwaeze, Emeka T.(2011)。Sarbanes-Oxley act and the quality of earnings and accruals: Market-based evidence。Journal of Accounting and Public Policy，30(3)，275-294。
5.	Balachandran, S.、Mohanram, P.(2011)。Is the Decline in the Value Relevance of Accounting Driven by Increased Conservatism?。Review of Accounting Studies，16(2)，272-301。
6.	Chen, A. S.、Hong, B.-S.(2006)。Institutional ownership changes and returns around analysts' earnings forecast release events: Evidence from Taiwan。Journal of Banking & Finance，30(9)，2471-2488。
7.	Brav, Alon、Jiang, Wei、Partnoy, Frank、Thomas, Randall(2008)。Hedge Fund Activism, Corporate Governance, and Firm Performance。Journal of Finance，63(4)，1729-1775。
8.	Ahmed, A. S.、Kilic, Emre、Lobo, G. J.(2006)。Does recognition versus disclosure matter? Evidence from value-relevance of banks' recognized and disclosed derivative financial instruments。The Accounting Review，81(3)，567-588。
9.	Arce, Miguel、Mora, Araceli(2002)。Empirical Evidence of the Effect of European Accounting Differences on the Stock Market Valuation of Earnings and Book Value。European Accounting Review，11(3)，573-599。
10.	Bhattacharya, N.、Demers, E.、Joos, P.(2010)。The relevance of accounting information in a stock market bubble: Evidence from internet IPOs。Journal of Business Finance and Accounting，37(3/4)，291-321。
11.	Ramalingegowda, Santhosh、Yu, Yong(2012)。Institutional ownership and conservatism。Journal of Accounting and Economics，53(1/2)，98-114。
12.	Hadani, Michael、Khan, Raihan、Goranova, Maria(2011)。Institutional investors, shareholder activism, and earnings management。Journal of Business Research，64(12)，1352-1360。
13.	Ou, Jane A.、Sepe, James F.(2002)。Analysts Earnings Forecasts and the Roles of Earnings and Book Value in Equity Valuation。Journal of Business Finance & Accounting，29(3/4)，287-316。
14.	Chaney, Paul K.、Lewis, Craig M.(1998)。Income Smoothing and Underperformance in Initial Public Offerings。Journal of Corporate Finance，4(1)，1-29。
15.	張文瀞、周玲臺、林修葳(20030700)。內部人持股連續變動公司之盈餘管理行為特性。會計評論，37，53-83。延伸查詢
16.	Chaney, Paul K.、Lewis, Craig M.(1995)。Earnings management and firm valuation under asymmetric information。Journal of Corporate Finance，1(3/4)，319-345。
17.	Fudenberg, Drew、Tirole, Jean(1995)。A theory of income and dividend smoothing based on incumbency rents。Journal of Political Economy，103(1)，75-93。
18.	Shiller, Robert J.、Pound, John(1989)。Survey evidence on diffusion of interest and information among investors。Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization，12(1)，47-66。
19.	Sankar, Mandira Roy、Subramanyam, K. R.(2001)。Reporting discretion and private information communication through earnings。Journal of Accounting Research，39(2)，365-386。
20.	Bartov, Eli、Radhakrishnan, Suresh、Krinsky, Itzhak(2000)。Investor sophistication and patterns in stock returns after earnings announcements。The Accounting Review，75(1)，43-63。
21.	Bushee, Brian J.(2001)。Do institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-run value?。Contemporary Accounting Research，18(2)，207-246。
22.	Marquardt, Carol A.、Wiedman, Christine I.(2004)。The effect of earnings management on the value relevance of accounting information。Journal of Business Finance & Accounting，31(3/4)，297-332。
23.	Lo, K.、Lys, T.(2000)。The Ohlson model: contribution to valuation theory, limitations, and empirical applications。Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance，15(3)，337-367。
24.	Koh, P.(2003)。On the association between institutional ownership and aggressive corporate earnings management in Australia。The British Accounting Review，35(2)，105-128。
25.	Maug, Ernst(1998)。Large shareholders as monitors: is there a trade-off between liquidity and control?。Journal of Finance，53(1)，65-98。
26.	Kwak, Wikil、Lee, Ho-Young、Mande, Vivek(2009)。Institutional Ownership and Income Smoothing by Japanese Banks through Loan Loss Provisions。Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies，12(2)，219-243。
27.	Francis, Jennifer、Schipper, Katherine(1999)。Have Financial Statements Lost Their Relevance?。Journal of Accounting Research，37(2)，319-352。
28.	范宏書、陳慶隆(20130700)。第34號財務會計準則公報對盈餘與權益帳面價值的價質攸關性之影響。管理評論，32(3)，1-23。延伸查詢
29.	Collins, Daniel W.、Pincus, Morton、Xie, Hong(1999)。Equity Valuation and Negative Earnings: The Role of Book Value of Equity。The Accounting Review，74(1)，29-61。
30.	陳慶隆、林秀謙、盧鎮瑋(2014)。衍生性金融商品使用程度對會計資訊價值攸關性之影響--避險與非避險使用動機之檢測。管理系統，21(2)，329-361。延伸查詢
31.	Arya, Anil、Glover, Jonathan、Sunder, Shyam(1998)。Earnings Management and the Revelation Principle。Review of Accounting Studies，3(1)，7-34。
32.	Barth, Mary E.、Beaver, William H.、Landsman, Wayne R.(2011)。The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting: Another View。Journal of Accounting & Economics，31(1)，77-104。
33.	Chung, Richard、Firth, Michael、Kim, Jeong B.(2002)。Institutional Ownership and Opportunistic Earnings Management。Journal of Corporate Finance，8(1)，29-48。
34.	Hsu, Grace C.-M.、Koh, Ping-Sheng(2005)。Does the Presence of Institutional Investors Influence Accruals Management? Evidence from Australia。Corporate Governance: An International Review，13(6)，809-825。
35.	Iatridis, George Emmanuel(2013)。Environmental Disclosure Quality: Evidence on Environmental Performance, Corporate Governance and Value Relevance。Emerging Markets Review，14，55-75。
36.	Kilic, Emre、Lobo, Gerald J.、Ranasinghe, Tharindra、Sivaramakrishnan, K.(2013)。The Impact of SFAS 133 on Income Smoothing by Banks through Loan Loss Provisions。The Accounting Review，88(1)，233-260。
37.	Kim, Olwer(1993)。Disagreements among Shareholders over a Firm's Disclosure Policy。Journal of Finance，48(2)，747-760。
38.	Kothari, S. P.、Leone, Andrew J.、Wasley, Charles E.(2005)。Performance Matched Discretionary Accruals Measures。Journal of Accounting & Economics，39(1)，161-197。
39.	Lang, Mark、Raedy, Jana Smith、Wilson, Wendy(2006)。Earnings Management and Cross Listing: Are Reconciled Earnings Comparable to US Earnings?。Journal of Accounting & Economics，42(1/2)，255-283。
40.	Liang, Jia-Wen、Lin, Mei-Feng、Chin, Chen-Lung(2012)。Does Foreign Institutional Ownership Motivate Firms in Emerging Markets to Increase Voluntary Disclosure?。Review of Quantitative Finance & Accounting，39(1)，5-76。
41.	Lim, Chee Y.、Ding, David K.、Charoenwong, Charlie(2013)。Non-Audit Fees, Institutional Monitoring, and Audit Quality。Review of Quantitative Finance & Accounting，41(2)，343-384。
42.	Lin, Ling、Manowan, Pavinee(2012)。Institutional Ownership Composition and Earnings Management。Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets & Policies，15(4)，1-22。
43.	Mitra, Santanu、Hossain, Mahmud(2009)。Value-Relevance of Pension Transition Adjustments and Other Comprehensive Income Components in the Adoption Year of SFAS No. 158。Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting，33(3)，279-301。
44.	Nwaeze, Emeka T.(1998)。Adjustment Process of the Price to Book Ratio for Regulated Utilities。Financial Review，33(4)，125-140。
45.	Yu, Kun(2013)。Does Recognition versus Disclosure Affect Value Relevance? Evidence from Pension Accounting。The Accounting Review，88(3)，1095-1127。
46.	Trueman, Brett、Titman, Sheridan(1988)。An Explanation for Accounting Income Smoothing。Journal of Accounting Research，26(Suppl.)，127-139。
47.	Burgstahler, David C.、Dichev, Ilia D.(1997)。Earnings, Adaptation and Equity Value。The Accounting Review，72(2)，187-215。
48.	范宏書、陳慶隆、廖英任(20080100)。盈餘管理對會計資訊的相對價值攸關性之影響。管理與系統，15(1)，93-136。延伸查詢
49.	Merton, Robert C.(1974)。On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates。The Journal of Finance，29(2)，449-470。
50.	Velury, Uma、Jenkins, David S.(2006)。Institutional ownership and the quality of earnings。Journal of Business Research，59(9)，1043-1051。
51.	Huang, Roger D.、Shiu, Cheng-Yi(2009)。Local Effects of Foreign Ownership in an Emerging Financial Market: Evidence from Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors in Taiwan。Financial Management，38(3)，567-602。
52.	Bushee, Brian J.(1998)。The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior。The Accounting Review，73(3)，305-333。
53.	Jones, Jennifer J.(1991)。Earnings Management during Import Relief Investigations。Journal of Accounting Research，29(2)，193-228。
54.	Barth, M. E.、Landsman, W. R.、Lang, M. H.(2008)。International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality。Journal of Accounting Research，46(3)，467-498。
55.	Graham, John R.、Harvey, Campbell R.、Rajgopal, Shiva(2005)。The economic implications of corporate financial reporting。Journal of Accounting and Economics，40(1-3)，3-73。
56.	Subramanyam, K. R.(1996)。The pricing of discretionary accruals。Journal of Accounting and Economics，22(1-3)，249-281。
57.	Tucker, Jennifer W.、Zarowin, Paul A.(2006)。Does Income Smoothing Improve Earnings Informativeness?。The Accounting Review，81(1)，251-270。
58.	Barth, Mary E.、Beaver, William H.、Landsman, Wayne R.(1998)。Relative Valuation Roles of Equity Book Value and Net Income as a Function of Financial Health。Journal of Accounting and Economics，25(1)，1-34。
59.	Collins, Daniel W.、Maydew, Edward L.、Weiss, Ira S.(1997)。Changes in the Value-relevance of Earnings and Book Values over the past Forty Years。Journal of Accounting and Economics，24(1)，39-67。
60.	Healy, Paul M.、Wahlen, James M.(1999)。A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting。Accounting Horizons，13(4)，365-383。
61.	Holthausen, Robert W.、Watts, Ross L.(2001)。The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting。Journal of Accounting and Economics，31(1-3)，3-75。
62.	Leuz, Christian、Nanda, Dhananjay、Wysocki, Peter D.(2003)。Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison。Journal of Financial Economics，69(3)，505-527。
63.	劉正田(20010700)。研發支出資本化之會計基礎股票評價。會計評論，33，1-26。延伸查詢
64.	DeFond, Mark L.、Park, Chul W.(1997)。Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings。Journal of Accounting and Economics，23(2)，115-139。
65.	蕭朝興、尤靜華、林庭宇(20091200)。臺灣股市投資人競價策略與價格優劣之比較。中山管理評論，17(4)，927-969。延伸查詢
66.	范宏書(20090900)。盈餘平穩化與會計資訊的相對價值攸關性。臺大管理論叢，19(S2)，127-164。延伸查詢
67.	Jiambalvo, James、Rajgopal, Shivaram、Venkatachalam, Mohan(2002)。Institutional ownership and the extent to which stock prices reflect future earnings。Contemporary Accounting Research，19(1)，117-145。
68.	White, Halbert L. Jr.(1980)。A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity。Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society，48(4)，817-838。
69.	Bhattacharya, Utpal、Daouk, Hazem、Welker, Michael(2003)。The world price of earnings opacity。The Accounting Review，78(3)，641-678。
70.	Ohlson, James A.(1995)。Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Security Valuation。Contemporary Accounting Research，11(2)，661-687。
71.	Davis-Friday, Paquita Y.、Folami, L. B.、Liu, Chao-Shin、Mittelstaedt, H. Fred(1999)。The Value Relevance of Financial Statement Recognition vs. Disclosure: Evidence from SFAS No. 106。The Accounting Review，74(4)，403-423。

研究報告
1.	Kirschenheiter, M.、Melumad, N.(2005)。Earnings quality and smoothing。West Lafayette, IN：Purdue University。
2.	Hunt, Alister、Moyer, Susan E.、Shevlin, Terry(2000)。Earnings Volatility, Earnings Management, and Equity Value。University of Washington。
3.	Nizalova, Olena Y.、Murtazashvili, Irina(2011)。Exogenous Treatment and Endogenous Factors: Vanishing of Omitted Variable Bias on the Interaction Term。Institute for the Study of Labor, Kyiv School of Economics and University of Pittsburgh.。

圖書
1.	Greene, Willian H.(2004)。Econometric Analysis。Prentice-Hall。
2.	Scott, Willian R.(2012)。Financial Accounting Theory。Toronto：Pearson Prentice Hall。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	企業大陸投資盈餘匯回與公司價值：公司治理評鑑及機構投資人之影響
2.	關鍵查核事項揭露與審計品質及審計報告時效性之關聯
3.	公司成長性對停發現金股利決策的影響
4.	醫療財團法人的會計資訊品質特性
5.	董監事暨重要職員責任保險與會計資訊價值攸關性
6.	中國家族企業及後代接班對研發創新活動之影響
7.	以Cobb-Douglas生產函數分析新冠肺炎後臺灣半導體產業研發投入與獲利能力之關聯性
8.	實質盈餘管理、公司治理、高階經理人報酬
9.	石油與天然氣蘊藏量揭露資訊與未來盈餘預測之研究
10.	新式查核報告、審計品質與會計資訊價值攸關性
11.	內部董事的建言功能與公司績效
12.	內部治理與外部監督機制對公司價值之影響
13.	激勵性薪酬結構對盈餘管理選擇策略的影響
14.	機構法人買賣超、行為偏誤與動能效應
15.	股東可扣抵稅額減半規定對公司現金股利政策之影響：從所有權結構來探討

1.	高交易量散戶在臺灣期貨市場的獲利能力佳嗎？
2.	應用分量迴歸於營運績效及財務危機與盈餘管理關係之探討–以上市企業為例
3.	生產力與技術效率之研究—台灣資訊服務業與農業之驗證
4.	投資者對公司無形資產之認知及對投資意願之影響
5.	我國企業利用研究發展支出從事盈餘管理之研究
6.	核心代理問題與董監自利行為、研發效率之關聯性
7.	以資源配置組合(RDP)分析集團企業ROE及會計處理的改變對企業評價之影響
8.	董事會之獨立、專業、參與對企業績效及風險之影響
9.	母公司智慧資本移轉對子公司經營績效之影響：以大陸台商為例
10.	資訊揭露評鑑系統對投資者未來盈餘評價能力、分析師盈餘預測與會計師查核意見型態之影響
11.	Tobin'sQ與內部人持股關係研究-以台灣電子業為例
12.	無形資產投入量與企業報酬及風險之研究
13.	以智慧資本觀點探討知識經濟時代的價值攸關性
14.	人力資本揭露概念性架構之探討
15.	兩稅合一制度對於股權評價之影響研究

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	獨立董事在企業租稅規劃的監督效果
2.	公司治理評鑑與盈餘品質
3.	服務體驗管理：亞洲文獻回顧與未來研究方向
4.	臺灣生產與作業管理之相關期刊文獻回顧與前瞻：從工業3.0到工業3.5
5.	臺灣組織行為的實證發現：一項國內管理期刊論文的30年回顧
6.	董事及高階主管政治連結與公司績效之關聯性
7.	自願性揭露企業社會責任資訊之決定因素與其資訊後果
8.	公部門人員情緒勒索認知、工作壓力與離職傾向關聯之研究
9.	董監事暨重要職員責任保險與盈餘穩健性
10.	直接採用IFRS前後財務報表資訊內涵之比較
11.	網站知名度與網站忠誠度之相關分析--以科技接受模式為中介變數
12.	負負得正：隨創時相依性如何促成負資源轉換
13.	臺灣年金制度改革的財務影響與世代不均問題
14.	體驗行銷對顧客滿意度與顧客忠誠度影響之研究--以壽險公司服務中心為例
15.	Building Brand Equity through Industrial Tourism

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫