:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:影響大學生學習成果路徑模式之研究─以「台灣高等教育資料庫」大三學生為例
作者:黃世雄
作者(外文):Shih-Hsiung Huang
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:公民教育與活動領導學系
指導教授:張雪梅
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2010
主題關鍵詞:大學生學習成果學校結構特性家庭社經地位學校環境知覺人際投入程度學術投入程度college studentslearning outcomesschool structural characteristicsfamily socioeconomic statusschool environment perceptionlevel of interpersonal involvementlevel of academic involvement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
本研究旨在探討大學生學習成果及其相關因素之關係,並驗證影響大學生學習成果之路徑模式。主要研究目的,包括:一、瞭解大學生學習成果及其相關因素。二、分析大學生學習成果及其相關因素之概況。三、探討大學生學習成果及其相關因素之關係。四、驗證影響大學生學習成果之路徑模式。五、歸納研究發現,作成結論,提出對高等教育的建議,以及對後續研究的建議。
依據研究目的,本研究首先透過文獻探討,以瞭解大學生學習成果及其相關因素之關係;其次,運用「台灣高等教育資料庫」94學年度大三學生問卷調查資料進行本土資料之分析,以驗證影響大學生學習成果之路徑模式。本研究運用SPSS 12.0版及LISREL8.72版電腦統計套裝軟體進行資料分析,分析方法包括:描述性統計分析、項目分析、因素分析、結構方程模式分析。
本研究主要發現如下:
一、大學生學習成果可分為學業成果、技能成果、情意成果、期望成果。
二、影響大學生學習成果之相關因素,可分為輸入因素含學校結構特性、家庭社經地位,及環境因素含學校環境知覺、人際投入程度、學術投入程度。
三、大學生學習成果的概況,學生自評之技能成果未達理想,學業成果與情意屬理想,期望成果則自評最為理想。
四、影響大學生學習成果相關因素的概況,學校環境知覺、人際投入程度與學術投入程度屬尚可,但均需加強。學校環境知覺最需加強學生事務、學生宿舍、行政支援與生活機能,人際投入程度需加強師生關係,學術投入程度則需加強主動學習。
五、學校結構特性為公立、師生比與住宿比愈高、家庭社經地位愈高、學校環境知覺愈滿意、人際投入程度愈高、學術投入程度愈高,大學生學習成果愈佳。
六、學校結構特性與家庭社經地位,透過學校環境知覺、人際投入程度與學術投入程度的中介作用,間接影響大學生學習成果。
七、學校環境知覺、人際投入程度與學術投入程度是影響大學生學習成果的主要變項。人際投入程度對大學生學習成果最具影響力,學校環境知覺居其次,學術投入程度僅對學業成果具影響力。
八、人際投入程度對學術投入程度的影響力最大,學校環境知覺對人際投入程度及學術投入程度的影響力亦大,學校結構特性與家庭社經地位對學校環境知覺、人際投入程度及學術投入程度的影響力不大。
最後,本研究歸納研究發現,作成結論,提出對高等教育的建議,以及對後續研究的建議。
This study examines the relationships between the learning outcomes of college students and related factors, and verifies the causal model affecting college students’ learning outcomes. The research purposes are (1) to understand college students’ learning outcomes and related factors; (2) to overview the relationship between college students’ learning outcomes and related factors; (3) to explore in-depth the relationship between college students’ learning outcomes and related factors; (4) to verify the causal model affecting the learning outcomes of college students; and (5) to summarize the findings in a conclusion and put forward suggestions for higher education, as well as recommendations for follow-up investigations.
Based on the research purposes, this study first reviewed relevant literatures to learn the relationships between college students’ learning outcomes and related factors. Next, the questionnaire survey for college juniors in 2005 from the Taiwan Higher Education Database was utilized for analysis to verify the causal model affecting the learning outcomes of college students. SPSS 12.0 and LISREL 8.72 were used for statistical analysis, including descriptive statistics analysis, item analysis, factor analysis, and structural equation modeling.
The major findings are summarized as follows:
1.College students’ learning outcomes can be divided into GPA (grade point average) outcomes, skill-based outcomes, affective outcomes, and desired outcomes.
2.Related factors influencing college students’ learning outcomes can be categorized into input factors, i.e. school structural characteristics and family socioeconomic status, and environmental factors, i.e. school environment perception, level of interpersonal involvement and academic involvement.
3.In an overview of college students’ learning outcomes, students’ self-evaluation is not satisfactory for skill-based outcomes, but satisfactory for GPA (grade point average) and affective outcomes, and most satisfactory for desired outcomes.
4.An overview of related factors affecting college students’ learning outcomes displays moderate results in terms of school environment perception, interpersonal involvement and academic involvement, which all need to be strengthened. Improvements in student affairs, dormitories, administrative supports,facilities and amenities should be strengthened for better school environment perception, teacher-student relationship reinforced for improved interpersonal involvement, and autonomous learning underpinned for enhanced academic involvement.
5.Better learning outcomes can be ascribed to the school being public, higher teacher-to-student ratio and percentage of dormitory housing, higher family socioeconomic status, higher satisfaction of school environment perception, higher levels of interpersonal involvement, and higher levels of academic involvement.
6.School structural characteristics and family socioeconomic status indirectly affect college students’ learning outcomes through the mediating effects of school environment perception, level of interpersonal involvement and academic involvement.
7.School environment perception, level of interpersonal involvement and academic involvement are the main variables affecting college students’ learning outcomes, with interpersonal involvement being the most influential, followed by school environment perception; meanwhile, level of academic involvement only affects GPA (grade point average) outcomes.
8.interpersonal involvement has the greatest impact on the level of academic involvement; school environment perception also has a strong impact on interpersonal involvement and academic involvement; in contrast, school structural characteristics and family socioeconomic status has little influence on school environment perception, interpersonal involvement and academic involvement.
Finally, a conclusion summarizing the findings and suggestions for higher education is presented, as well as recommendations for future research.
參考文獻
中文部分
王大維(1997)。家庭系統分化與大學生的心理社會發展之關係研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
王文中(2004)。發展評量計劃。戴於王文中、呂金燮、吳毓瑩、張郁雯、張淑慧(合著),教育測驗與評量(第二版)(頁131-155)。台北:五南。
王淑芳( 2004 )。東吳大學學生宿舍同儕輔導制度實施成效之研究。國立台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
王淑懿、彭森明(2006,2月)。大學校院的學習環境:學生的評鑑。論文發表於行政院國家科學委員會「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」專案舉辦之第二階段成果報告研討會,台北。
內政部(2010)。內政部統計月報。2010年6月17日取自
http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stst/month/list.htm/
台灣高等教育資料庫(2008)。資料庫簡介。2008年4月20日取自
http://www.cher.ed.ntnu.edu.tw/
江民瑜(2007)。影響大學生學校滿意度相關因素之關係模式探討:以台灣地區一般大學學生為例。教育政策論壇,10(3),1-31。
宋玫玫(2005,3月)。公私立大學學生在校生活及未來規劃之差異。論文發表於行政院國家科學委員會「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」專案舉辦之第一階段成果報告研討會,新竹。
沈宗瑞、謝小芩(2006,2月)。大學畢業生對大學發展其多元能力的主觀評價。論文發表於行政院國家科學委員會「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」專案舉辦之第二階段成果報告研討會,台北。
李大偉(1996)。評量方法-技能領域。載於黃政傑主編,教學評量(頁125-140)。台北:師大書苑。
李育逢(1979)。大學身心障礙學生個人背景變項、校園經驗、學習表現及心理社會發展之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
李育錚(1979)。和大學生之學習行為有關的幾個環境與人格因素。台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
吳毓瑩(1993)。教學評量的學與用。國民教育,34(1、2),12-14。
李毓璱( 2004 )。大學生住宿生活適應相關因素研究-以國立台灣大學為例。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
何惠君(2004)。幼兒多元智能學習成果之實證研究-一個托兒所的個案分析。朝陽科技大學幼兒保育系碩士論文,未出版,台中。
余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式: SIMPLIS的應用。台北:高等教育。
林大森(2006,2月)。影響一般/技職大學畢業生薪資所得因素探討。論文發表於行政院國家科學委員會「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」專案舉辦之第二階段成果報告研討會,台北。
林義男(1983)。大學師生的非正式互動與學生學習成果的關係。輔導學報,6,125-148。
林義男(1987)。大學生的學習參與情形與其學習成果的關係。輔導學報,10,179-221。
林義男(1990)。大學生的學習參與、學習型態與學習成果的關係。輔導學報,13,79-128。
林敬修(2010)。一般與身心障礙大學生的個人、家庭及學校經驗因素對學習成果之影響。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系博士論文,未出版,高雄。
林雅慧(2002)。以資料包絡分析法評估我國大學校院研究績效之研究。中華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
吳明隆 (2006)。結構方程模式-SIMPLIS的應用。台北:五南圖書。
洪若烈(2006)。台灣學生學習成就評量之現況分析。教師天地,145,12-16。
洪錦珠(2008)。大學轉學生轉學因素與轉學適應之研究--以六所大學為例。國立台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導系博士論文,未出版,台北。
孫淑柔(2000)。身心障礙學生學習成果評鑑之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系博士論文,未出版,台北。
許籐繼(2005,3月)。多元入學方案對教育機會均等之影響。論文發表於國科會整合型計劃「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」專案舉辦之第一階段成果報告研討會,新竹。
郭生玉(1982)。行為目標與學習評量。戴於中華兒童教育社編,國民小學各科學習效果評量(頁4-21)。台北:中華兒童教育社。
郭生玉(1985)。心理與教育測驗。台北:精華書局。
郭秋勳、郭美辰(2006)。少子化時期高等教育的因應策略與發展。教育研究月刊,151,46-55。
高淑芬、何秀珠(1997)。桃竹苗地區山地國小學童對其家庭環境、學習概況與行為困擾之認知研究。竹師學報,10,143-213。
張雪梅(1996)。學生發展:學生事務工作的理論與實踐。台北:張老師文化。
張雪梅(1999)。大學教育對學生的衝擊—我國大學生校園經驗與學習成果之實證研究。台北:張老師。
張雪梅(2006,2月)。我國大學生能力與大學評鑑結果關係之探討。論文發表於行政院國家科學委員會「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」專案舉辦之第二階段成果報告研討會,台北。
張雪梅、沈俊毅、劉若蘭、林大森、陳佩英、陳素燕(2006,11月)。以學生為本位的高等教育機構評鑑-建構以學生校園經驗與學習成果為機構教育品質評鑑指標之研究。高等教育評鑑國際研討會,台灣師範大學教育評鑑與研究發展中心,台北。
張雪梅(2009)。序言-大學生的學習歷程與高教品質。載於張雪梅、彭森明(主編),台灣大學生的學習歷程與表現(頁001-023)。台北:國立台灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展研究中心。
張瑞濱(2003)。我國私立技術學院經營效率之研究。中華大學科技管理研究所博士論文,未出版,新竹。
張德勝、宋玫玫(2006,5月)。大學到底幫助什麼?從畢業生看大學對學生學習的影響。論文發表於國立台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系主辦台灣「高等教育與學生事務國際學術研討會」,台北。
郭振雄(2000)。多重生產程序之績效評估:我國大學院校效率衡量。國立台灣大學會計學研究所博士論文,未出版,台北。
教育部(2010)。大專院校概況表。2010年6月17日取自
http://www.edu.tw/statistics/content.aspx?site_content_sn=8869
陳世佳(2006,2月)。工讀經驗對學業成就之影響。論文發表於行政院國家科學委員會「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」專案舉辦之第二階段成果報告研討會,台北。
陳伯璋(2005)。台灣高等教育的發展與改革。載於陳伯璋、蓋浙生(主編),新世紀高等教育政策與行政(頁3-36)。台北:高等教育。
陳佩英(2006,2月)。就學貸款行為是否影響大學生繼續就讀研究所的意願。論文發表於行政院國家科學委員會「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」專案舉辦之第二階段成果報告研討會,台北。
陳建州(2000)。家庭社經地位高低與學業成就差異之因果關係。教育社會學通訊,26, 20-23。
陳清溪、林欣怡(2004)。台灣學生學習成就評量資料庫建置計畫之探討。研習資料,21(6),56-67。
陳清溪、林淑敏(2005)。2005年台灣學生學習成就評量。教育研究與發展期刊,1(3),241-263。
陳淑瓊(2008)。大學新生成功轉化相關因素研究-以一所公立大學住宿生為例。國立台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導系博士論文,未出版,台北。
陳淑瓊(2009)。不同居住類型的大學生在校園投入與心理社會發展上的差異。載於張雪梅、彭森明(主編),台灣大學生的學習歷程與表現(頁291-323)。台北:國立台灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展研究中心。
陳舜芬、張傳琳(2004)。松竹楊梅四校大學生校園經驗與學習成果之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(NSC91-2413-H-007-003)。新竹:清華大學教育學程中心。
陳舜芬、曾正宜、陳素燕(2006)。我國大學生知識教育成果及其相關因素之研究。新竹教育大學學報,23,21-42。
陳榮華(1987)。大專學生心態調查研究。台北:國立台灣師範大學教育學院。
陳德華(1999)。我國高等教育改革之趨勢。教育研究資訊,15,1-12。
陳德華(2005)。台灣高等教育的回顧與前瞻。國民教育,46(2),13-31。
陳德華(2007)。台灣高等教育過去20年數量的擴充與結構的轉變。高等教育,2(2),67-96。
馮丹白(2001)。技專校院學生學習成效評量研究報告。教育部(技術及職業教育司) 研究計畫成果報告(RG90100020)。台北:國立台灣師範大學。
彭森明(2003)。如何建置全國性教育資料庫,使其發揮最大價值與功能?。文教新潮,8(3),37-44。
彭森明(2005)。美國學生「學習成果評量」資料之分析及運用。研習資料,22(2),8-25。
彭森明(2006a)。學習成就評量的多元功能及其相應研究設計。教育研究與發展期刊,2(4),21-37。
彭森明(2006b)。學習成就評量發展趨勢。教師天地,145,4-11。
彭森明(2008)。以學生學習與發展為主軸的大學教育評鑑:理念與實施。載於彭森明(主編),高等教育質的提昇:反思與前瞻。(頁235-256)。台北:國立台灣師範大學。
彭森明、王淑懿(2005,3月)。台灣高等教育資料庫簡介。論文發表於國科會整合型計劃「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」專案舉辦之第一階段成果報告研討會,新竹。
黃玉(2000)。大學學生事務的理論基礎-台灣大學生心理社會發展之研究。公民訓育學報,9,161-200。
黃玉(2002a)。e世代多元背景大學生校園經驗心理社會發展與認知發展歷程之縱貫研究(I)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫(NSC91-2413-H-003-
015)。台北:國立台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系。
黃玉(2002b)。另類聲音-大學女生校園經驗與心裡社會發展歷程之質性探究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC90-2413-H-003-038)。 台北:國立台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系。
黃芳銘 (2007)。結構方程模式:理論與應用。台北:五南圖書。
黃政傑(1987)。教學原理。台北:師大書苑。
黃政傑、李隆盛(1996)。國民小學教育評鑑之研究。台北:國立台灣師範大學教育研究中心。
溫福星(2007)。階層線性模式:原理、方法與運用。台北:雙葉書廊。
楊仕裕(2006)。大學生認知發展、靈性發展及其相關影響因素之研究-以天主教輔仁大學為例。國立台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導系博士論文,未出版,台北。
楊珮瑤(1998)。公立大學財源結構之轉型輿規劃。國立中興大學財政學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
楊國賜(1998)。新世紀高等教育政策規劃與改革動向。教育資料集刊,23,157-179。
楊國賜(2001)。大學教育政策白皮書。台北:教育部。
楊國賜(2005)。我國大學自我評鑑機制與運作之探討。台灣教育,632,2-12。
楊朝祥(1984)。技術及職業教育辭典。台北:三民書局。
葉紹國、何英奇、陳舜芬(2006,5月)。大一學生的校園參與經驗與收穫自評-淡江、清華、師大三校的比較。論文發表於國立台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系主辦「高等教育與學生事務國際研討會」,台北。
廖千淳 ( 2004 )。我國北部地區大學宿舍社會氣氛與學生滿意度之研究。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
廖年淼、許韋瀚(2007,3月)。技術校院學生學習概況探討。論文發表於國立台灣師範大學教肓評鑑與發展研究中心主辦「技職教育現況與發展研討會」
,台北。
趙長寧、賴昭文(2006,2月)。大學教育與受聘能力之培育。論文發表於行政院國家科學委員會「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」專案舉辦之第二階段成果報告研討會,台北。
蓋浙生(1985)。教育經濟學。台北:三民書局。
劉奕蘭(2005,3月)。大學生心理社會發展與生活適應關係:性別、學校與科系類型的差異比較。論文發表於行政院國家科學委員會「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」專案舉辦第一階段成果報告研討會,新竹。
劉若蘭(2005)。大專原住民族與漢族學生成功學習模式之建構與驗念-以北部某多元族群技術學院為例。國立台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導系博士論文,未出版,台北。
劉若蘭、黃玉(2006,2月)。大三學生滿意度與心理社會發展因果模式之研究。論文發表於行政院國家科學委員會「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」專案舉辦之第二階段成果報告研討會,台北。
劉若蘭(2009)。從大學生對教育過程及學習成果的滿意度談教育品質的提昇。載於張雪梅、彭森明(主編),台灣大學生的學習歷程與表現(頁325-345)。台北:國立台灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展研究中心。
劉淑蓉(2007)。大學學校環境與其對學生滿意度之影響:公私立大學之比較研究。教育政策論壇,10(1),77-99。
劉緬懷(1982)。教學評量種類與方式。戴於中華兒童教育社編,國民小學各科學習效果評量(頁31-45)。台北:中華兒童教育社。
劉鎔毓(2006,2月)。我國一般/技職大學生課業學習相關經驗之比較分析。論文發表於行政院國家科學委員會「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」專案舉辦之第二階段成果報告研討會,台北。
鄭勝耀、洪志成(2006年,2月)。誰是台灣頂尖高等教育學府的學生。論文發表於行政院國家科學委員會「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」專案舉辦之第二階段成果報告研討會,台北。
謝小芩、沈宗瑞(2006,2月)。學生重視什麼?大三學生對學校滿意度的探討。論文發表於行政院國家科學委員會「台灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討」專案舉辦之第二階段成果報告研討會,台北。
鄺海因(2006)。大學系所評鑑實地訪評啟動。評鑑雙月刊,5。
簡茂發(1987)。心理測驗與統計方法。台北:心理出版社。
簡茂發(1996)。評量。載於黃政傑主編,教學評量(頁1-40)。台北:師大書苑。
羅綸新(2007)。台灣少子化現象對高等教育之衝擊與挑戰。教育資料與研究雙月刊,74,133-150。
蘇逸珊(2001)。大學生依附風格、情緒智力與人際關係之相關研究。屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。


西文部分
Airasian, P. (1994). Classroom assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill.
American College Personnel Association & National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (ACPA & NASPA) (2004). Learning reconsidered: A campus-wide focus on the student experience. Washington, DC: author.
Arnold, J., Kuh, G., Vesper, N., & Schuh, J. (1991). The influence of student effort, college environment and selected student characteristics on undergraduate student learning and personal development at metropolitan institutions. Boston: Paper presented at the mual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education. ED 339296, 27 PP. MF-01;PC-02.
Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC & U) (2002). Greater expectations. Washington, DC: author.
Astin, A. (1973). Measurement and determinants of the outputs of higher education. In L. Solmon & P. Taubman(Eds.) , Does college matter? Some evidences on the impacts of higher education. New York: Academic Press.
Astin, A. (1977). Four critical years. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Astin, A. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308.
Astin, A. (1985). Achieving educational excellence: A critical assessment of priorities and practices in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Astin, A. (1991). What really matters in general education: Provocative findings from a national study of student outcomes. Address presented at the Association of General and Liberal Studies Meeting, Seattle.
Astin, A. (1993). What matters in college?Four critical years revisited. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Avalos, J. (1996). The effects of time-to-degree completion, stopping out, transfering and reasons for leaving college on students’ long-term retention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Califomia, Los Angeles.
Avkiran, N. (2001). Investigating Technical and Scale Efficiencies of Australian Universities through Data Envelopment Analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35, 57-80.
Baird, L. (1990). The undergraduate experience : Communalities and differences among colleges. Research in Higher Education. 31 (3), 271-278.
Banning, J. (1978). Campus ecology: A perspective for student affairs. Portland, Oregon : National Association of Student Personnel Admilnistrators.
Banta, T. & Associates. (1993). Making a difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Barker, R. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Baxter Magolda, M. (1988). Measuring gender differences in intellectual development: A comparison of assessment methods. Journal of College Student Development, 29, 528-537.
Belenky, M., CIinchy, M., Goldberger, R., & Tarule, M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The developmentof self, voice and mind. New York: Basic Books.
Bidwell, C., King, S., Finnie, B., & Scarr, H. (1963). Undergraduate careers : Alternatives and determinan. School Review, 71, 299-316.
Bowen, H. (1977). Investment in learning: The individual and social value of higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bowen, H. (1980). The costs of higher education: How much do colleges and universities spend per student and how much should they spend? San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Bowen, G., & Bok, D. (1998). The shape of the river: long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Boyer, E. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. New York: Harper & Row.
Coleman, J. (1969). Equal educational opportunity. MA:Harvard University Press.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education. (CAS) (2009). CAS professional standards for higher education, (7th ed). Washington, DC: Author.
Chickering, A. (1969). Education and identity. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Chickering, A., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity (2nd ed.). San Francisco
:Jossey-Bass.
Chickering, A., & Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergra-
duate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3-7.
Chickering, A., & Gamson, Z. (1991). Applying the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Davis, M., & Murrell, P. (1993). Turing teaching into learning: The role of student responsibilities in the collegiate experience. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports-Report 8. Washington, D. C. : The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
Edgerton, R., Shulman, L., Kuh, G. , & Associates (2002). NSSE 2002 annual report -From promise to progress, Indiana University: Center for postsecondary Research and Planning.
Ewell, P. (1987). Establishing a campus-based assessment program. In D. Halpern, (ed.). Student outcomes assessment:What institution stand to gain. New Directions for Higher Education. No. 59, Fall. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Feldman, K., & Newcomb, T. (1969). The impact of college on students, Vols. I and II. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Franklin, M. (1993). The effects of differential college environments on academic learning and student perceptions of cognitive development. Unpublished doctoral dissering, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
Glover, J. (1996). Campus environment and students involvement as predictors of outcomes of the community college experience. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Memphis, TN.
Gonyea, R., Kish, K., Kuh, G., Muthiah, R., & Thomas, A. (2003). College student experiences questionnaire revised norms for the 4th edition. Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Postsecondary Research, Policy, and Planning.
Gordon, V., & Habley, R. (2000). Academic advising: A comprehensive handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hackett, G., Betz, N., Casas, and Rocha,-Singh. (1992). Gender, ethnicity, and social cognitive factors predicting the academic achievement for students engineering. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39(4),527-538.
Halpern, D. (1987). Student outcomes assessment: What institutions stand to gain. New Directions for Higher Education. No 59, Fall, San Francisco: Jossey -Bass.
Hair, J., Anderson,R., Tatham R., & Black,W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5 th ed.). Prentice Hall International:UK.
Hanushek, E. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141-1177.
Holland, J. (1966). The Psychology of vocational choice: A theory of personality types and model environments. Waltham, Mass. : Blaidsdell.
Jacobi, M., Astin, A., & Ayala, F. (1987). College student outcomes assessment: A talent development perspective. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
King,R., & Kitchener, K. (1985). Reflective judgment theory and research: Insights into the process of knowing in the college years. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American College Personnel Association, Boston, March 24-27.
Kolb, D. (1976). The learning styles inventory: Technical manual. Boston: McBer.
Kolb, D. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In A. Chickering & Assoates (Eds.) , The modern American college: Responding to the new realities of diverse students and a changing society. San Francisco: Jossey-
Bass.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of teaming development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kuh, G. (1993). In their own words: What students learn outside the classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 277-304.
Kuh, G., Hayek, J., Carini, R., Ouimet, J., Gonyea, R., & Kennedy, J. (2001). NSSE technical and norms report. Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Postsec-ondary Research and Planning.
Kuh, G. (2005). Imagine asking the client—Using student and alumni surveys for accountability in higher education. In J. Burke, & Associates. (Eds.) Achieving accountability in higher education. (p148-172). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Laird, T. (2005). College students experiences with diversity and their effects on academic self-confidence, social agency, and disposition toward critical thinking. Research in Higher Education, 46, 365-387.
Lenning. O. (1977). Previous attempts to structure educational outcomes and outcome-related concepts: A compilation and review of the literature. Boulder, Colo.: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, 19.
Lenning. O. (1980). Assessment and evaluation. In U. Delworth, G. Hanson, & Associates. Student services: A handbook for the profession. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mallette, B., & Cabrera, A. (1991). Determinants of withdrawal behavior: An exploratory study. Research in Higher Education, 32, 179-194.
McLaughLin, B. (1965). Identity and personality:A study of self-perceived identity in college students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
Mentkowski, M., & Doherty, A. (1983). Careering after college: Establishing the validity of abilities learned in college for later careering and professional performance (Final report to the National Institute of Education: Overview and Summary). Milwaukee, WI: Alverno College, Office of Research and Evaluation.
Moos, R. (1979). Evaluating educational environments: Procedures, measures, findings, and policy implications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Moos, R. (1986). The human context: Environmental determinants of behavior. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
Natioltal Institute of Education Study Group (1984). Involvement in learning: Realizing the potential of American higher education. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
Ory, J., & Braskamp, L. (1988). Involvement and growth of students in three academlc programs. Research in Higher Education, 28 116-129.
Pace, C. (1979). Measuring outcomes of college:Fifty years of findings and recommendations for the future. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Pace, C. (1984). Measuring the quality of college student experiences. University of Califomia, Los Angeles: Higher Education Research lnstltute.
Pace, C. (1990). The undergraduates:A report of their activities. Los Angeles:University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
Pascarella, E. (1980). Student-faculty informal contact and college outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 50, 549-595.
Pascarella, E. (1985). Racial differences in factors associated with bachelor's degree completion: A nine-year follow up. Research in Higher Education, 23(4), 351-373.
Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (1991). How college affect students. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, p. (2005). How college affects students. Volume2. A third decade of research. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Pascarella, E., Cruce, T., Umbach, P., Wolniak, G., Kuh, G., Carini, R., Hayek, J., Gonyea, R., & Zhao, C. (2006). Institutional selectivity and good practices in undergraduate education: How strong is the link? Journal of Higher Education , 77(2), 251-285.
Pervin, L. (1968). Performance and satisfaction as a function of individual-environment fit . Psychological Bulletin, 69 (1), 56-58.
Reisser, L. (1995). Revisiting the seven vectors. Journal of College Student Development, 36, 505-511.
Rhodes, E., & Southwick,L. (1986). Determinants of efficiency in public and private universities, mimeo, school of environmental and public affairs. Indiana University, Bloomington.
Sanford, N. (1967). Where college fail: A study of the student as a person. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Seifert, T., Drummond, J., & Pascarella, E. (2006). African-American students’ experiences of good practices:A compassion of institutional type. Journal of College Student Development,47(2),185-205.
Serban, A., & Friedlander, J. (Eds.). (2004). Developing and implementing assessment of studenl learning outcomes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Simmons, A. (1996). Beliefs and academic performance of low-achieving college students. Ph. D. diss. Indiana University, Bloomington.
Smet, M. (2001), Determining the optimal size of study fields in flemish secondary education. Economics of Education Review, 20, 443-457.
Stage, F. (1989). Motivation, academic and social integration and the early dropout. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 385-402.
Stage, F. , & Hossler, D. (2000). Linking student behaviors, college choice, and college persistence. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
Stage, F., & Milne, N. (1996). The experience of college students with learning disabilities. Journal of Higher Education, 67(4), 426-445.
Stark, J. (1990). Approaches to assessing educational outcomes. The Journal of Health Administration Education, 8(2), Spring.
Stern, G. (1970). People in context: Measuring person-environment congruence in education and industry. New York: Jonn Wiley & Sons.
Strange, C. (1996). Dynamics of campus environments. In S.Komives, D.Woodard Jr., & Associates, Student service: A handbookfor the prmssion. (3rd., pp. 244-268). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Terenzini, P., Theophilides, C., & Lorang, W. (1984). Influences on students percep-
tions of their academic skill development during college. Journal of Higher Educatian, 55, 621-636.
Thomas, R., & Chickering, A. (1984). Education and identity revisited. Journal of college Student Personnel, 25, 392-399.
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education:A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89-125.
Tinto, V. (1986). Theories of student departure revisited. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: A handbook of theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 359-384). New York : Agathon.
Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tinto, V. (1998). College as comunities: Taking research on student persistence seriously. Review of Higher Education, 21, 167-171.
Tinto,V., Goodsell Love, A., & Russo, p. (1993). Building learning communities for rew college students: A summury of research finding of the collaborative learning project. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, School of Education.
Watson, L. (1994). An analysis of Black and White student’ perception, involvement, and educational gains in private historically Black and White liberal arts institutions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, lndiana University, Bloomington, IN.
Watson, L. (1996). A collaborative approach to student leaming: A model for administrators in higher education. Planning and changing: An Educational Leadership and Policy Joumal.
Wicker, A. (1979). An introduction to ecological psychology. Cambridge, Mass.:Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, R., Gaff, T., Dienst, E., Wood, L., & Bavry, J. (1975). The impact of college on students. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Wolf, R. (2009). Future directions for American higher education accreditation. In T. V. Bigalke & D. E. Neubauer (Eds.), Public good and quality in higher education in Asia Pacific. New York: Palgrave, MacMillan Press.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE