臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：2×2成就目標之因素結構與預測效用研究
作者：江羽慈
作者(外文)：Chiang, Yu-Tzu
校院名稱：國立交通大學
系所名稱：教育研究所
指導教授：林珊如
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2010
主題關鍵詞：成就目標；自我效能；成就動機；國文成績；achievement goals；self-efficacy；achievement motivation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:26
就學習動機的階層而言，成就目標是較具體的動機變項，也是與學習行為最接近、且最直接的影響變項。過去的研究多以西方學生在數學、自然或歐美語言等領域的成就目標對學習的影響為研究主題，較少的研究關注我國學生學習國語文的成就動機。
本研究以台灣國小到高中的學生為樣本，探討2×2成就目標(Elliot & McGregor, 2001)之因素結構、跨一年的測量穩定度及成就目標在國語文學習歷程的預測效用。首先，以2007年的橫斷資料進行驗證性因素分析，檢驗一階四因素結構適配度是否優於各種選替模式(二、三向度)，結果支持2×2成就目標模式的四個因素 (趨向精熟、趨向表現、逃避精熟與逃避表現)是個別存在的。橫斷資料的二階因素結構適配度也優於各種選替模式，證實2×2成就目標符合理論的兩軸因素結構：第一軸為兩個對能力的定義因素(精熟與表現)，第二軸為兩個對能力的定價因素(趨向與逃避)，且此二軸彼此相交，2x2理論的測量模式受到支持。總之，本研究修訂的成就目標量表(AGQ-C)在我國國小到高中學生群中具有良好的信度與效度，亦即2x2成就目標模式能描述我國學生的學習目標。此外，研究結果顯示:四個二階因素個別指向其對應的兩個一階因素的徑路係數值大小相差很多，經由路徑係數的恆等分析檢驗，發現每一對的一階目標對於相對應的二階目標因素有不相同的效果，亦即每一個二階因素(如：表現)受到特定的一階成就目標(趨向表現)所反映。進一步檢驗2x2成就目標在2007、2008兩個時段的測量穩定度，指標檢驗指標包括結構穩定度、差異連續性、平均數穩定度。測量穩定度檢驗結果顯示，兩個時段測量模式的形貌恆等，而模式弱恆等(因素負荷量恆等)、強恆等(截距恆等)模式也都成立，顯示我國學生的成就目標間隔一年後雖然有所變化，但具有合理的連續性與穩定度，而且兩個時段的目標均達正相關、只有趨向表現目標平均數有顯著增加，另三個目標則無顯著差異。預測效用的檢驗以2007年的橫斷資料進行共變結構分析，檢驗成就目標是否能中介國語文自我效能及成績，本研究選擇自我效能，乃因其為社會認知論中重要且穩固的學習動機指標，長久的國語文學習使自我效能內化為近似於內在穩定的特質，而成就目標與外在情境的連結較為密切。結果顯示：趨向精熟、趨向表現、逃避表現三個目標可以中介國文自我效能與國文成績，呼應成就目標理論:成就目標是中介抽象的學習動機與學習行為間的心理建構。同時，成就目標的定價面向(趨向和逃避因素)之中介效果優於成就目標的定義面向(精熟和表現因素)，比起定義面向，成就目標的定價面向:趨向與逃避因素較能反映台灣學生的成就目標；趨向型的目標是預測台灣學生國文成績的最有效因子。本研究發現台灣國小到高中學生的實證資料支持2×2成就目標模式可以描述國語文學習目標，具有跨年的測量穩定性，成就目標對國文自我效能與國文成績具有中介效用。本研究提出未來研究的建議及教室教學的實務建議。
In terms of hierarchical models of motivation, achievement goals are conceptualized as concrete representations of more abstract motivation dispositions and as the proximal, direct regulators of learning behaviors. The major of research have studied achievement goal endorsement in math, science and language subjects among western students. Unfortunately, little research has been published on Taiwanese students’ adoption of achievement goals in their Chinese language class. The aims of the dissertation were to investigate the measurement structure, cross-year goal-pursuit stability and predictive utility of the 2 × 2 achievement goal model (Elliot & McGregor, 2001) in Taiwanese pre-university students while learning Chinese. Factorial/dimensional structures and internal consistencies provided support for the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. The 2 × 2 achievement goal structure of the achievement goal items was confirmed, and the four-factor goal structure was found to be a better fit to the data than a series of alternative models with dichotomous/trichotomous goal structures. The results further offered evidence for the two-dimensional structure posited by the 2 (definition) × 2 (valence) achievement goal model. Path coefficient invariance of the dimensional model indicated that each pairs of goal has nonequivalent contribution to correspondent achievement goal dimensional factor: each dimensional factor was mainly derived from different achievement goals. No significant decreases in model-fits (compared to the weak invariant model) when constraints were added to various invariant models. Three stability indexes (structural, differential continuity, and mean-level stability) provided evidence for the stability of achievement goal endorsement over time in a panel sample of Taiwan pre-university students. In terms of predictive utility, three of four achievement goals: mastery-approach, performance-approach, and performance-avoidance were found to be effective mediators between Chinese self-efficacy and Chinese performance. The findings support the rationale that achievement goals are viewed as a direct, proximal influence on achievement-relevant behavior and motives are portrayed as direct antecedents of achievement goals (Elliot & Church 1997). Results of dimensional factor predictive utility, the approach-avoidance factors along the valence dimension seemed to be more successful than the mastery-performance factors along the definition dimension. Approach-based goals were observed for significant predictors of Chinese grades in Taiwanese students. Taken together, my data strongly supports that the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework appears to be empirically as well as conceptually sound for Taiwanese students and have mediating utility on self-efficacy and Chinese grades.
Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals and the classroom motivational climate. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 327–348). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Student learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267.
Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 269–298.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28 (2), 117–148.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1993). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (5), 1017–1028.
Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 706–722.
Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). Goal Orientation and Ability: Interactive Effects on Self-Efficacy, Performance, and Knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (3), 497–505.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fix indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107 (2), 238–246.
Berry, J. W. (1989). Imposed etics-emics-dervied etics: The operationalization of a compelling idea. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 721-735.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley, New York.
Bong, M. (2001). Between- and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task-value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 23–34.
Bong, M. (2005). Within-grade changes in Korean girls’ motivation and perceptions of the learning environment across domains and achievement levels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 656-672.
Browne, M. W., & Mels, G. (1990). RAMONA PC user's guide. Columbus: Ohio StateUniversity.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
Bouffard, T., Boisvert, J., Vezeau, C., & Larouche, C. (1995). The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 317–329.
Chan, D. W. (2008). Goal orientations and achievement among Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong. High Ability Studies, 19 (1), 37–51.
Chen, S. W. (2005). Chinese goals of achievement and motivations: the case of Taiwanese college students. Unpublished. Doctoral Thesis. National Taiwan University.
Cherng, B. L. (2003). Study of the model of 4 dimension Goal Orientation. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Education, 48 (1), 15–40.
Ciani, K. D., & Sheldon, K. M. (2010). Evaluating the mastery-avoidance goal construct: A study of elite college baseball players. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11 (2), 127-132.
Conroy, D. E., & Elliot, A. J. (2004). Fear of failure and achievement goals in sport: addressing the issue of the chicken and the egg. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping: An International Journal, 17, 271–285.
Conroy, D. E., Elliot, A. J., & Hofer, S. M. (2003). A 2 × 2 achievement goals questionnaire for sport: Evidence for factorial invariance, temporal stability, and external validity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25, 456–476.
Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., Da Fonseca, D., & Moller, A. C. (2006). The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 666–679.
Daniels, L. M., Haynes, T. L., Stupnisky, R. H., Perry, R. P., Newall, N. E., & Pekrun, R. (2008). Individual differences in achievement goals: A longitudinal study of cognitive, emotional, and achievement outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33 (4), 584–608.
Dweck, C. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.
Elliot, A. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.
Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232.
Elliot, A., & Harackiewicz, J. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 70 (3), 461–475.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.
Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100 (3), 613–628.
Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, A. J. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5–12.
Fryer, J. W., & Elliot A. J. (2007). Stability and Change in Achievement Goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99 (4), 700–714.
Geisinger, K. F. (1994). Cross-Cultural Normative Assessment: Translation and Adaptation Issues Influencing the Normative Interpretation of Assessment Instruments. Psychological Assessment, 6 (4), 304–312.
Harackiewicz, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). The joint effects of target and purpose goals on intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 675–689.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33, 1–21.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA7 Sage.
Hwang, K. K. (2008). Life Goals, Achievement Motivation and Value of Effort in Confucian society. In U. Kim, and Y. S. Park (Eds.), Asias’s educational miracle: psychological, social and cultural perspectives. New York: Springer.
Kuo, C. C. (1994). Comparison of the attributional styles, strategy use and matacognitive ability among the students with different reading ability. Bulletin of National Taiwan Normal University, 39, 284-325.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL8: Structural equation modeling with the command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. J. (2002). Should childhood be a journey or a race? Response to Harackiewicz et al. (2002). Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 646–648.
Kaplan, A., Lichtinger, E., & Gorodetsky, M. (2009). Achievement goal orientations and self-regulation in writing: An integrative perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101 (1), 51–69.
Kaplan, A., & Midgley, C. (1999). The relationship between perceptions of the classroom goal structure and early adolescents’ affects in school: The mediating role of coping strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 11 (2), 187–212.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Brown, K. G., Salas, E., Smith, E. A., & Nason, E. R. (2001). Effects of training goals and goal orientation traits on multi-dimensional training outcomes and performance adapt ability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 1–31.
Kuo, C. C. (1994). Comparison of the attributional styles, strategy use and matacognitive ability among the students with different reading ability. Bulletin of National Taiwan Normal University, 39, 284-325.
Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486–512.
Lin, C.-C. (2007). The Relations among Parenting Goal Orientations, Teachers’ Expectations, Achievement Goals, and Academic Achievement of Vocational High School Students. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3 (2), 37-53.
Lopez, D. F. (1999). Social cognitive influences on self-regulated learning: The impact of action-control beliefs and academic goals on achievement-related outcomes. Learning and Individual Differences, 11 (3), 301–319.
Lu, L., Gilmour, R., & Kao, S. F. (2001). Cultural values and happiness: An east-west dialogue. Journal of Social Psychology, 141(4), 477-493.
Marsh, H. W. (1990). The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 623-636.
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.
Meredith, W., & Horn, J. L. (2001). The role of factorial invariance in modeling growth and change. In L. M. Collins, & A. G. Sayer (eds). New methods for the analysis of change (pp 203–240). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Middleton, M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710–718.
Morris, R. L., & Kavussanu, M. (2008). Antecedents of approach-avoidance goals in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28, 465–476.
Murayama, K., Zhou, M., & Nesbit, J. C. (2009). A Cross-Cultural Examination of the Psychometric Properties of Responses to the Achievement Goal Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69 (2), 266–286.
Muis, K. R., & Edwards, O. (2009). Examining the stability of achievement goal orientation. Comptemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 265-277.
Nien, C. L., & Duda, J. L. (2008). Antecedents and consequences of approach and avoidance achievement goals: a test of gender invariance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 352–372.new window
Ng, C. (2000). A path analysis of self-schema, goal orientations, learning approaches and performance. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 1 (2), 93–121.
Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346.
Pajares, F., Britner, S. L., & Valiante, G. (2000). Relation between achievement goals and self-beliefs of middle school students in writing and science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 406–422.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). An Achievement Goal Theory Perspective on Issues in Motivation Terminology, Theory, and Research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92–104.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). Multiple goal, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92 (4), 544-555
Pintrich, P. R., Conley, A. M., & Kempler, T. M. (2003). Current issues in achievement goal theory and research. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 319–337.
Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 33–40.
Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Merrill.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children’s achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 93–105.
Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25, 71–86.
Shih, S., & Alexander, J. M. (2000). Interacting effects of goal setting and self- or other-referenced feedback on children’s development of self-efficacy and cognitive skill within the Taiwanese classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 536–543.
Shih, S. S. (2005a). Taiwanese sixth graders' achievement goals and their motivation, strategy use, and grades: An examination of the multiple goal perspective. Elementary School Journal, 106 (1), 39–58.
Shih, S. S. (2005b). Role of achievement goals in children's learning in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Research, 98 (5), 310-319.
Sideridis, G. D., & Mouratidis, A. (2008). Forced choice versus open-ended assess-ments of goal orientations: a descriptive study. International Review of Social Psychology, 21, 219–248.
Smith, L., Sinclair, K. E., & Chapman, E. S. (2002). Students’ goals, self-efficacy, self-handicapping, and negative affective responses: An Australian senior school student study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 471–485.
Steiger, J. H. (1989). Causal modeling: A supplementary module for SYSTAT and SYGRAPH. Evanston, 1L: SYSTAT.
Stoeber, J., Stoll, O., Pescheck, E., & Otto, K. (2008). Perfectionism and achievement goals in athletes: relations with approach and avoidance orientations in mastery and performance goals. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 102–121.
Sayer, A. G., & Cumsille, P. E. (2001). Second-order latent growth models. In L. Collins & A. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 179–200). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Tanaka, A., Takehara, T., & Yamauchi, H. (2006). Achievement goals in a presentation task: Performance expectancy, achievement goals, state anxiety, and task performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 16 (2), 93–99.
Urdan, T. C. (2004). Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement: Examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, and. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96 (2), 251–264.
Vrugt, A., Oort, F. J., & Zeeberg, C. (2002). Goal orientations, perceived self-efficacy and study results amongst beginners and advanced students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 385–397.
Wang, C. K. J., Biddle, S. J. H., & Elliot, A. J. (2007). The 2 x 2 achievement goal framework in a physical education context. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 8, 147–168.
Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing Achievement Goal Theory: Using Goal Structures and Goal Orientations to Predict Students’ Motivation, Cognition, and Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96 (2), 236–250.
Wolters, C., Yu, S., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goal orienation and students’ motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 211–238.
Yang, L. Z. P. (1988). Development and application of a communicative theory based model for evaluating junior high EFL teaching materials in the Republic of China. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
Zusho, A., Pintrich, P. R., & Cortina, K. S. (2005). Motives, goals, and adaptive patterns of performance in Asian American and Anglo American students. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 141–158.
Zimprich, D., & Mascherek, A. (2010). Five views of a secret: does cognition change during middle adulthood? European Journal of Ageing, 7, 135–146.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：969（臺灣：964，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2111296 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67908210
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上