臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：玩興與工作表現的關係:聰明/努力工作的中介角色
作者：林瑩滋
作者(外文)：YING-TZU LIN
校院名稱：國立中山大學
系所名稱：人力資源管理研究所
指導教授：陳以亨
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2011
主題關鍵詞：玩興；聰明工作；認真工作；工作表現；working-smart；working-hard；job performance；playfulness
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:27
機器與科技的發展，使得在知識經濟下的競爭更講究人腦的充分開發利用。當企業轉向透過「玩」的手法以及環境設計來管理員工，此現象透露，員工藉由在工作中「玩」的活動與氣氛，人的潛能可以藉由「玩」在所謂的工作裡獲得平衡與釋放。這樣的手法最常見於追求創新的企業，企業常經由人格特質來甄選員工，玩興人格特質雖然在教育以及心理治療上已有著墨，但在企業組織中的應用仍為少見。「玩興」人格特質在孩童的學習中對創造力的展現深具影響，聰明工作與認真工作是決定工作績效的工作行為，人格特質會影響行為展現傾向。本研究針對此人格特質探討其在工作環境中與工作行為以及工作績效的關係，並對相關研究結果予以討論。
Organizations nowadays want employees who are flexible, adaptable, autonomous, creative, willing to learn, self-motivated, and able to fit productively into teams to satisfy instable and varied consumer demands. Consequently, job performance no more relies on repetitive and routine tasks which traditionally could be completed and improved by working-hard only.
Nevertheless, the economy in the world is becoming dynamic, rapid and unpredictable for sure. Transparently workers will need to unceasingly increase their skill base to experience workplace success in the future. Therefore, management scholars suggest organizations who want to survive or outperform of the time may need to consider traits in addition of conscientiousness when making hiring decisions. The Big Five undoubtedly provides the general and basic consideration of personality. As the environment nowadays changes, not only the Big Five but also more advanced and specific personality constructs for advantageous solutions hitting the mark are needed.
Playfulness, defined as a multidimensional personality with curiosity, absorption, sense of humor, manifest joy and childlikeness factors, may be one promising personality which replies the call from the academic and plays as the alternative selection assessment tool for selection to the practical simultaneously. Playfulness has been emphasized in child development, education, and clinical counseling fields for a long time. This personality fosters optimal human function and accompanies intrinsic motivation according to developmental psychology and positive psychology perspectives. Notwithstanding its importance, playfulness in adults does not catch enough attention of the academic.
This study first empirically tests relationship between playfulness and job performance (in-role performance, creative performance) and clarifies the discrepancy of style effects on different dimensions of performance which may better explain the phenomena in the workplace. Second, this study moves a step forward to propose a personality construct from developmental psychology triangle especially favorable to selection consideration. Third, through the lens of working behavior style, the results of this study also better explain the mechanism link playfulness and performance that throw light on training direction for people in organizations already. By defining working-smart/hard as behavioral style instead of ability and motivation, this study opens a new avenue for research to discuss the issue thoroughly. Future research suggestions and practical applications are also provided.
Abramis, D. J. (1990). Play in work: Childish hedonism or adult enthusiasm. American Behavioral Scientist, 33(3), 335-373.
Barnett, L. A. (1990). Playfulness: Definition, design, and measurement. Play and Culture, 3(4), 319-336.
Barnett, L. A. (1991). Characterizing playfulness: Correlates with individual attributes and personality traits. Play and Culture, 4(4), 371-393.
Barnett, L. A. (2007). The nature of playfulness in young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 949-958.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
Bundy, A. C. (1993). Assessment of play and leisure: Delineation of the problem. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(3), 217-222.
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance perdiction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnett & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 687-732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Chen, S. J., & Chen, H. C. (2005). Development of the multidimensional sense of humor scale. Research in Applied Psychology, 26, 167-187.
Coad, A. (1996). Smart work and hard work: Explicating a learning orientation in strategic management accounting. Management Accounting Research, 7, 387-408.
Collins, L. A., Kumar, V. K., Treadwell, T. W., & Leach, E. (1997). The personal attitude scale: A scale to measure spontaneity. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 49(4), 147-156.
Costea, B., Crump, N., & Holm, J. (2005). Dionysus at work? The ethos of play and the ethos of management. Culture & Organization, 11(2), 139-151.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Play and intrinsic rewards. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 15(3), 41-63.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 815-822.
Deci, E. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2004). Self-determination theory and basic need satisfaction: Understanding human development in positive psychology. Ricerche di Psichologia, 27(1), 17-34.
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need Satisfaction, Motivation, and Well-Being in the Work Organizations of a Former Eastern Bloc Country: A Cross-Cultural Study of Self-Determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), 930-942. doi: 10.1177/0146167201278002
Fallona, C. (2000). Manner in teaching: A study in observing and interpreting teachers'' moral virtues. Teacher and Teacher Education, 16, 681-695.
Fang, E., Palmatier, R. W., & Evans, K. R. (2004). Goal-setting paradoxes? Trade-offs between working hard and working smart: The United States versus China. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(2), 188-202.
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362. doi: 10.1002/job.322
Glynn, M. A., & Webster, J. (1992). The adult playfulness scale: An initial assessment. Psychological Reports, 71(1), 83-104.
Guitard, P., Ferland, F., & Dutil, É. (2005). Toward a better understanding of playfulness in adults. OTJR: Occupation, Participation, and Health, 25(1), 9-22.
Hogan, R. (1998). What is personality psychology? Psychological Inquiry, 9(2), 152-153.
Hogan, R., Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Personality measurement and employment decisions: Questions and answers. American Psychologist, 51(5), 469-477.
Holmes, T. L., & Srivastava, R. (2002). Effects of job perceptions on job behaviors: Implications for sales performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(5), 421-428.
Howard, A. (1995). A framework for work change. In A. Howard (Ed.), The changing nature of work (pp. 3-44). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., & Fincham, F. (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(3), 291-305.
Keller, H., Treadwell, T. W., Kumar, V. K., & Leach, E. S. (2002). The personal attitude scale-ll: A revised measure of spontaneity. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 55(1), 35-46.
Klehe, U., & Anderson, N. (2007). Working Hard and working smart: Motivation and ability during typical and maximum performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 978-992.
Kruger, A. (1995). The adult playfulness scale: A review. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 32(2), 36-38.
Kuiper, N. A., & Martin, R. A. (1998). Laughter and stress in daily life: Relation to positive and negative affect. Motivation and Emotion, 22(2), 133-153.
Lieberman, J. N. (1965). Playfulness and divergent thinking: An investigation of their relationship at the kindergarten level. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 107(2), 219-224.
Lieberman, J. N. (1966). Playfulness: An attempt to conceptualize a quality of play and of the player. Psychological Reports, 19(3), 1278.
Lieberman, J. N. (1977). Playfulness: Its Relationship to Imagination and Creativity. New York, New York: Acedemic Press, INC.
Litman, J., & Spielberger, C. D. (2003). Measuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 75-86.
Locke, E. A., Mento, A. J., & Katcher, B. L. (1978). The interaction of ability and motivation in performance: An exploration of the meaning of moderators. Personnel Psychology, 31(2), 269-280.
Lyons, M. (1987). A Taxonomy of Playfulness for use in Occupational Therapy. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 34(4), 152-156. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.1987.tb01589.x
Maier, N. R. F. (1955). Psychology in industry (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Houghton Miffin.
Martin, R. A., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1983). Sense of humor as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(6), 1313-1324.
Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48-75.
Maxwell, S., Reed, G., Saker, J., & Story, V. (2005). The two faces of playfulness: A new tool to select potentially successful sales reps. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 25(3), 215-229.
McCloy, R. A., Campbell, J. P., & Cudeck, R. (1994). A confirmatory test of a model of performance determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 493-505.new window
Rapp, A., Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Schillewaert, N. (2006). The impact of knowledge and empowerment on working smart and working hard: The moderating role of experience. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23, 279-293.
Ringel, S. (2003). Play and impersonation: Finding the right intersubjective rhythm. Clinical Social Work Journal, 31(4), 371-381.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Schaefer, C., & Greenberg, R. (1997). Measurement of playfulness: A neglected therapist variable. International Journal of Play Therapy, 6(2), 21-31.
Starbuck, W. H., & Webster, J. (1991). When is play productive? Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 1(1), 71-90.
Sujan, H., Weitz, B. A., & Kumar, N. (1994). Learning orientation, working smart, and effective selling. Journal of Maketing, 58, 39-52.
Tegano, D. W. (1990). Relationship of tolerance of ambiguity and playfulness to creativity. Psychological Reports, 66(3), 1047-1056.
Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500-517. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500
Truhon, S. A. (1983). Playfulness, play, and creativity: A path analytic model. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 143(1), 19.
Webster, J., & Martocchio, J. J. (1992). Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 201-226.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1000（臺灣：992，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2042760 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67836717
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上