:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣、大陸與香港中小學教師之玩興、教學創新、工作滿足與工作表現之關係
書刊名:教育與心理研究
作者:余嬪 引用關係
作者(外文):Yu, Ping
出版日期:2006
卷期:29:2
頁次:頁227-266
主題關鍵詞:玩興組織玩興氣氛教學創新行為工作滿足工作表現PlayfulnessOrganizational playfulness climateCreativityInnovationJob satisfactionWork performance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:250
  • 點閱點閱:79
本研究之主要目的在探討與比較三地教師玩興、組織玩興氣氛、教學創新、工作滿足與工作表現的一般情形,並分析與比較個人玩興與組織玩興氣氛各因素對教學創新、工作滿足與工作表現的預測情形。本研究以問卷調查法為主,受試者包括:臺灣521人(臺北、高雄)、中國673人(北京、上海、哈爾濱),香港地區219人,總計三地共取樣1,413人。其中男性共311人,女性共1,095人;任教於中學共687人,小學共713人。 研究主要發現三地教師在成人玩興總分差異不顯著,而臺灣比大陸教師、大陸比香港教師知覺到較高的組織玩興氣氛。此外,臺灣比大陸、香港教師工作滿足高;大陸教師的教學創新行為較臺灣與香港高;大陸也比香港教師知覺到較高的工作表現。整體來看,教師的個人玩興與創新教學相關較高,組織玩興氣氛與工作滿足相關較高;而個人玩興特質中的「樂於創造、解決問題」最能預測三地教師的創新行為與工作表現。此外,組織中的主管支持輕鬆互動、低嚴肅僵化、低競爭批評與空間環境有助休閒的氣氛最能預測三地教師的工作滿足。 比較有趣的是「自我堅持」與「樂在其中」等個人玩興特質完全不能顯著預測三地華人教師的教學創新、工作滿足或工作表現。少數玩興因子對預測變項甚至有負面的影響:對臺灣教師來說,組織氣氛中的「不拘小節、幽默快樂」與「低嚴肅僵化競爭批評」對創新教學有負面的影響。「幽默自在、自得其樂」對香港教師的創新教學與大陸教師的工作表現有負面的影響。「童心未泯、好玩有趣」與「休閒同樂、激發創意」對香港教師的工作滿足有負面的影響。 綜合看來,玩興的確是預測三地教師創新教學、工作滿足與工作表現的重要因素,而個人玩興與組織玩興氣氛各因素的影響力不同,顯示東西文化的差異與三地教師的同中有異,未來如何因地制宜與拿捏合宜來激發教師玩興與形塑組織玩興氣氛以提高教學創新、工作滿足、與工作表現是可努力之處。
This survey research is to investigate the differences of teachers’ playfulness, organizational playfulness climate, creativity, job satisfaction, and work performance in Taiwan, Mainland China, and Hong Kong. It also compares the predictability of the factors of adult playfulness and organizational playfulness climate to teachers’ innovation, job satisfaction, and work performance in these three regions. There are 1,413 teachers (311 males and 1095 females; 687 in middle school, 713 in elementary school) involved in the study. It is found that there is no significant difference of adult playfulness among teachers of the three regions. However, teachers from Taiwan perceive higher organizational playfulness climate than teachers in China, who perceive higher organizational playfulness climate than teachers from Hong Kong. Teachers’ innovation behavior is higher in China than Taiwan or Hong Kong. Teachers’ job satisfaction is higher in Taiwan than China or Hong Kong, but teachers from China perceive higher work performance than teachers from Hong Kong. Among teachers of three regions, personal playfulness has the highest correlation with teaching innovation, and organizational playfulness climate has the highest correlation with job satisfaction. The personal factor of “love to create and to solve problems” best predicts teachers’ innovation and work performance. The climate factors of “supportive leadership”, “organizational flexibility and low criticism”, and “relaxing environment” best predict job satisfaction among teachers of three regions. The “persistence” and “self-content” factors don’t have any significant predicting influence. Other factors such as “humor” and “organizational flexibility and low criticism” even have negative influences in some of the predictions. Though there are many similarities among teachers of three regions, there are differences. Further discussions and suggestions are generated.
期刊論文
1.Glynn, Mary A.、Webster, Jane(1992)。The adult playfulness scale: an initial assessment。Psychological Reports,71(1),83-103。  new window
2.Kirton, M. J.、Pender, S.(1982)。The Adaption-innovation Continuum, Occupational Type and Course Selection。Psychological Reports,51,883-886。  new window
3.Barnett, L. A.(1991)。The Playful Child: Measurement of a Disposition to Play。Play & Culture,4(6),51-74。  new window
4.余嬪(20040600)。樂在工作--組織玩興研究。高雄師大學報. 教育與社會科學類,16,19-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Szabo, A.(2003)。The Acute Effects of Humor and Exercise on Mood and Anxiety。Journal of Leisure Research,35(2),152-162。  new window
6.Glynn, Mary A.、Webster, Jane(1993)。Refining the Nomological Net of the Adult Playfulness Scale: Personality, Motivational, and Attitudinal Correlates for Highly Intelligent Adults。Psychological Reports,72(3),1023-1026。  new window
7.Gouldson, T.(2000)。Does Humor Belong at Work?。Canadian Electronics,15(3),6。  new window
8.Miller, S.(1973)。Ends, Means and Galumphing: Some Leitmotifs of Play。American Anthropologist,75(1),87-98。  new window
9.Starbuck, W. H.、Webster, J.(1991)。When is play productive?。Accounting, Management and Information Technologies,1(1),71-90。  new window
10.吳靜吉(20020900)。華人學生創造力的發掘與培育。應用心理研究,15,17-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.邱皓政(20020900)。學校組織創新氣氛的內涵與教師創造力的實踐--另一件國王的新衣?。應用心理研究,15,191-223。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.熊秉真(19990600)。歷史上的幼教與童年--若干中國式的假設與呈現。本土心理學研究,11,203-261。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.余嬪、吳靜吉、林偉文、楊潔欣(20030600)。成人玩興量表與組織玩興氣氛量表之發展。測驗學刊,50(1),73-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Amabile, Teresa M.(1997)。Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do。California Management Review,40(1),39-58。  new window
15.Amabile, Teresa M.(1988)。A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations。Research in Organizational Behavior,10(1),123-167。  new window
16.Berg, Deanna H(1995)。The Power of a Playful Spirit at Work。Journal for Quality and Participation,18(4),32-39。  new window
17.Ekvall, G.(1996)。Creativity and Innovation, European。Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,5(1),105-126。  new window
18.Ellyatt, W.(2002)。Action Guide: Play and Playfulness - Their Vital Role in Learning and Life。Paths of Learning,14。  new window
19.Rudowicz, E.(2004)。Applicability of the Test of Creative Thinking-drawing Production for Assessing Creative Potential of Hong Kong Adolescents。Gifted Child Quarterly,48(3),202-219。  new window
20.Runco, M. A.、Bahleda, M. D.(1987)。Implicit Theories of Artistic, Scientific, and Everyday Creativity。Journal of Creative Behavior,20,93-98。  new window
會議論文
1.Glynn, M. A.、Ibarra, H.(1988)。Innovating and Ludiology: Elaborations on the Technology of Foolishness。The Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management。Anaheim, CA。  new window
2.陳學志(2003)。整合知、情、意、行的幽默創意訓練課程的發展。2003「創造力實踐歷程」研討會。  延伸查詢new window
3.余嬪、吳靜吉、程蕙瑤、蔡淑敏、楊潔欣(2004)。玩興、創造力與工作表現之關係。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳靜吉(2004)。創意氛圍與創造力。瀋陽。1-23。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉誠(2003)。簡述香港的創造力研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Lieberman, J. N.(1974)。Explorations in Teacher Characteristics: Playfulness in the Classroom Teacher。0。  new window
學位論文
1.王涵儀(2002)。教師使用戲劇技巧教學之相關因素研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.王翠品(2002)。內部行銷作為、工作滿足、與離職傾向關係之研究--以H連鎖娛樂事業為例(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.廖素華(1978)。國小校長領導方式、教師人格特質與教師工作滿足的關係(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊智先(2000)。教師工作動機、選擇壓力、社會互動與創造力之關係(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.王振鴻(2000)。國小教師對九年一貫課程之變革關注及其影響因素研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林偉文(2002)。國民中小學學校組織文化、教師創意教學潛能與創意教學之關係(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林珈夙(1997)。校長領導風格、教師創意生活經驗、教學創新行為與學校效能之關係(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
8.呂冠頤(2003)。現狀霸權與崛起強權互動模式之研究:一個理論與歷史的分析途徑,0。  延伸查詢new window
9.招志強(2002)。探討一九九七後香港政治與經濟的改變,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Ellis G. D.、Witt, P. A.(1989)。The leisure diagnostic battery users manual。State College, PA:Venture。  new window
2.黃奕光、王蔵真(2003)。Asian創造力--為甚麼西方人比東方人有創造力。台北:台灣培生教育。  延伸查詢new window
3.Ellis, Michael J.(1973)。Why people play?。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
4.詹志禹(2002)。創造力教育政策白皮書--小學階段。臺北市:教育部顧問室。  延伸查詢new window
5.Lieberman, J. N.(1977)。Playfulness。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
6.Lundin, Stephen C.、Paul, Harry、Christensen, John、武威立(2000)。如魚得水。台北:經典傳訊。  延伸查詢new window
7.Sutton, Robert I.、徐鋒志(2002)。11 1/2逆向管理。臺北:大塊文化。  延伸查詢new window
8.Goodale, Thomas、Godbey, Geoffrey(1988)。The evolution of leisure: Historical and philosophical perspectives。State College, PA:Venture Publishing, Inc.。  new window
9.Goffman, Erving(1974)。Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
10.三民書局大辭典編纂委員會(1985)。大辭典。台中市。  延伸查詢new window
11.王保進(2002)。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。臺北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
12.Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly(1975)。Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: The Experience of Play in Work and Games。Jossey-Bass。  new window
13.Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly(1996)。Creativity: The Work and Lives of 91 Eminent People。New York:Harper Collins。  new window
14.Feynman, Richard(2003)。別鬧了,費曼先生:科學頑童的故事。別鬧了,費曼先生:科學頑童的故事。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.Schrage, Mechael(2003)。認真玩創新。認真玩創新。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
16.Kel ly, Tom(2002)。IDEO物語。IDEO物語。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
17.Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly(2001)。快樂從心開始。快樂從心開始。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
18.陳學治、王慶中(2005)。笑話與幽默。笑話與幽默。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
19.創意教師、創意智庫(2005)。「創意教師」、「創意智庫」成果暨數位影像觀摩展會議手冊。「創意教師」、「創意智庫」成果暨數位影像觀摩展會議手冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
20.Bodrova, E.、Leong, D. J.(1999)。Play and its Role in Development and Learning: The Vygotskian Approach。Play in a Changing Society。Little Rock, AR。  new window
21.Carroll, J. M.、Mack, R. L.(1984)。Learning to Use a Word Processor: By Doing, by Thinking and by Knowing。Human Factors in Computer Systems。Norwood, NJ。  new window
其他
1.Teaching Philosophy,0。  new window
圖書論文
1.吳靜吉(2002)。國際創造力教育發展之趨勢。教育部:創造力政策白皮書。  延伸查詢new window
2.Dansky, J. L.(1999)。Play。Encyclopedia of Creativity。San Diego, CA:Academic Press。  new window
3.Daft, R. L.(1982)。Bureaucratic Versus Non-bureaucratic Structure and the Process of Innovation and Change。Research in the sociology of organizations。Greenwish, CT:JAI。  new window
4.Iso-Ahola, Seppo E.(1989)。Motivation for leisure。Understanding leisure and recreation: Mapping the past charting the future。State College:R. A. Venture Publishing。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 國民中小學活化校園指標建構之研究
2. 家庭效能信念之運作歷程及其影響
3. 幼兒園教保活動課程大綱對教師專業知識主體性之治理--社會認識論權力/知識觀點的解析
4. 不同教育型態高齡學習者社會支持、自我調控學習與成功老化之比較研究
5. 幼兒數學自主學習創新教學模式之行動研究
6. 南部四縣市國民小學校長科技領導與學校效能關係之研究-以教師知識管理、組織文化為中介變項
7. 積木課程介入對幼兒園家長知識信念與創造力內隱理論影響之研究
8. 國民小學校長領導行為、教師專業發展與創新教學效能關係之研究-以臺灣北部四市為例
9. 國民小學教師變革關注、變革接受與教學效能關係之研究—以教師專業發展評鑑政策實施為例
10. 國民小學校長道德領導行為、學校創新、組織溝通與學校效能徑路模式之建構與驗證
11. 國民小學校長空間領導、教師社群運作與學生學習成效關係之研究
12. 小組知識翻新活動中的設計思考與創造力表現:以個案研究為例
13. 不同發展階段的創造性潛能與傾向潛在組型及創意自我效能中介效果
14. 我國技術型高中機械科學生創造性人格特質及教師創造力教學對學生技術創造力影響之研究—以學校組織創新氣氛為調節變項
15. 少子女趨勢下國民小學教師專業發展評鑑認知、自我效能、專業承諾與創意教學行為關係之研究
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE