:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學線上學習者準備度與學習成就關係之研究
作者:洪敏玲 引用關係
作者(外文):Hung, Min-Ling
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:教育研究所
指導教授:周倩
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2012
主題關鍵詞:線上學習者準備度量表線上溝通自我效能學習者控制測量恆等性學習成就Online Learner Readiness Scale (OLRS)online communication self-efficacylearner controlmeasurement invariancelearning performance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:26
本研究旨在探究線上學習者準備度與學習成就之關係。研究問題包含
1. 性別議題:
1.1. 線上學習者準備度量表在男女不同性別團體,是否具備測量恆等性?
1.2. 男女學生在線上學習者準備度量表構面的潛在平均數是否有顯著差異?
2. 線上學習者的在期中準備度的分數是否與期末的準備度分數(完成線上課程後)有顯著差異?
3. 線上學習者準備度對於學習成就是否有正向影響?
4. 線上學習者溝通自我效能對於非同步線上討論表現(討論區的成績)是否有正向影響?
5. 線上學習者準備度構面是否能預測學生未來願意再次修習線上課程?
本研究對象為大學生,修習線上課程—資訊素養與倫理,以「線上學習者準備度量表」作為主要施測工具,該量表包含五個構面—電腦與網路自我效能、自我導向學習、學習動機、學習者控制以及線上溝通自我效能。學習成就則包含小組報告、非同步線上討論成績、期中期末考試成績。本研究採用多群組樣本測量模式分析、成對樣本t檢定、結構方程模式、邏輯斯迴歸來進行檢驗。
研究結果顯示線上學習者準備度具備跨性別測量恆等性的特徵。學習者控制與學習動機在期中分數高於期末,而線上溝通自我效能在期末分數則高於期中。此外,學習者準備度雖然對學習成效有正向影響,然而解釋力不佳;而線上溝通自我效能則是對非同步線上討論表現無影響。線上溝通自我效能與學習動機則能顯著預測未來是否願意再次修習線上課程。
The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between online learners’ readiness and learning performance. We investigated the following research questions:
1. Gender issues:
1.1. Does the Online Learner Readiness Scale (OLRS) hold measurement invariance properties between gender groups?
1.2. Are there any gender differences in the dimensions of the OLRS by means of latent mean analysis (LMA)?
2. Is there a significant difference between students’ readiness scores in the middle of the semester and scores in the final of the semester?
3. Does online learners’ readiness have a positive impact on their learning performance?
4. Does online learners’ online communication self-efficacy have a positive impact on their learning performance in asynchronous discussion (as measured by online discussion grade?)
5. Do online learners’ readiness factors predict their decision about taking online course again in the future?
Participants were college level students participating in online courses, Internet Literacy and Ethics. The Online Learner Readiness Scale (OLRS) was the instrument used in this study. Learning performance was measured by group project, asynchronous discussion performance, and midterm/ final exam.
This study utilized multi-group invariance analysis in order to assess the measurement and structural invariance. A paired sample t-test was conducted to answer the second research question. SEM was conducted to answer the question 3 and 4. A binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to answer the last question.
Analysis shows that the OLRS exhibits adequate cross-gender equivalence. The scores of learner control and motivation for learning were higher in the midterm than those at the end of the semester. The score of communication self-efficacy was lower in the midterm than that in the final. Student readiness was not a powerful construct in explaining learning performance and online communication self-efficacy did not influence asynchronous discussion performance. Online communication self-efficacy and motivation for learning were statistically significant predictors of learners’ willingness to take online course again in the future.
Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 32-54.

Anderson, T. (1997). Integrating lectures and electronic course materials. Innovations in Education and Training International, 34(1), 24-31.

Artino, A. R. (2009). Think, feel, act: Motivational and emotional influences on military students' online academic success. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21, 146−166.

Artino, A.R., & Stephens, J.M. (2009). Academic Motivation And Self-Regulation: A Comparative Analysis of Undergraduate and Graduate Students Learning Online. Internet and Higher Education, 12(3-4), 146-151.

Azevedo, R. (2005). Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 193-197.

Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., &Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research & Development, 56(1), 45-72.

Balduf, M. (2009). Underachievement among college students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 274–294.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.

Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., Hardy, A. B., & Howells, G. N. (1980). Tests of the generality of self-efficacy theory. Cognitive Theory and Research, 4, 39-66.


Barrick, R. M., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job
performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.

Beas, M.I., &Salanova, M. (2006).Self-efficacy beliefs, computer training and psychological well-being among Information and communication technology workers. Computer in Human Behavior, 22, 1043-1058.

Bergen, C., & Kingston, P. (1994).A framework for analyzing the contribution of educational technology to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 58-60.

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Brindley, J.E., Walti, C., & Blaschke, L.M. (2009). Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 1-18.

Brockett, R. G. (1985). A response to Brookfield's critical paradigm of self-directed adult learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 36, 55-59.

Brookfield, S. (1995). Adult Learning: an Overview. In A. Tuinjman (Ed.) International Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford, Pergamon Press.

Bunz, U., Curry, C., &Voon, W. (2007).Perceived versus actual computer-email-web fluency. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2321-2344.

Cahoon, B. (1998b). Adult learning and the Internet: Themes and things to come. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 78, 71-76.

Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning: A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Caspi, A., Chajuta, E., & Saportaa, K. (2008). Participation in class and in online
discussions: Gender differences. Computers & Education, 50(3), 718-724.



Cassidy, S. & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the computer self-efficacy (CUSE) Scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender, and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(2), 133-153.

Cheng , C.K., Pare , D.E., Collimore, L.M., Joordens, S. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of a voluntary online discussion forum on improving students’ course performance. Computers & Education, 56, 253–261.

Chizmar, J. F., & Walbert, M. S. (1999). Web-based learning environments guided by principles of good teaching practice. Journal of Economic Education, 30(3), 248-264.

Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.new window

Compeau, D., Gravill, J., Haggerty, N., & Kelley, H. (2006). Computer self-efficacy: A review. In P. Zhang & D. Galletta (eds.). Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations (pp.225-261). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.

Connolly, M., Hodson, P., James, C., Graff, M. G., Jones, C., & Davies, J. (2003). E-College Wales evaluation report. Glamorgan: University of Glamorgan.

Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2009). Combining shared control with variability over surface features: Effects on transfer test performance and task involvement. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 290-298.new window

Costa, A. L., B. Kallick., 2004. Launching Self-Directed Learners. Educational Leadership, 62(1), 51-55.

Czubaj, C. A. (2004). Literature review: Reported educator concerns regarding cyberspace curricula. Education, 124(4), 676-683.

Davidson-Shivers, G., Morris, S. B., & Sriwongkol, T. (2003). Gender differences: are they diminished in online discussions? International Journal on e-learning, 2(1), 29-36.

Davies, J. & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657–663.

Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985).Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

Deng, X., Doll, W. J., & Truong, D. (2004).The determinants and consequences of computer self-efficacy in an ongoing use context. Behavior & Information Technology, 23(6), 395-412.

De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers and Education, 46 (1), 6-28.

Diaz, D. P., & Cartnal, R. B. (1999). Comparing student learning styles in an online distance learning class and an equivalent on-campus class [electronic version]. College Teaching, 47(4), 130−135 (Retrieved October 1, 2005, from http://home.earthlink.net/~davidpdiaz/LTS/html_docs/grslss.htm).

Discenza, R., Howard, C., & Schenk, K. (2002). The design & management of effective distance learning programs. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for
learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40, 117-128.

Eastin, M. A., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6(1). Retrieved September 2000, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/eastin.html.

Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235.

Evans, T. (2000). Flexible delivery and flexible learning: Developing flexible learners? In V. Jakupec& J. Garrick (Eds), Flexible learning, human resource and organizational development (pp. 211-224). London: Routledge.


Fairchild, A. J., Jeanne Horst, S., Finney, S. J., & Barron, K. E. (2005). Evaluating existing and new validity evidence for the academic motivation scale. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(3), 331-358.

Federico, P. (2000). Learning styles and student attitudes toward various aspects of network-based instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(4), 359-379.

Fornel, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(2), 39-50.

Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18-33.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., and Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.

Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. (2004). Student role adjustment in online communities of inquiry: Model and instrument validation. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 61-74.

Gibbons, M. (2002).The self-directed learning handbook: Challenging adolescent students to excel. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Girasoli, A. J., &Hannafin, R. D. (2008). Using asynchronous AV communication tools to increase academic self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1676-1682.

Gonzalez-Gomez, F., Guardiola, J., Rodriguez, O. M., & Alonso, M. A.M. (2012). Gender differences in e-learning satisfaction, Computers & Education, 58(1), 283-290.

Graf, S., Liu, T. C., & Kinshuk. (2010). Analysis of learners’ navigational behaviour and their learning styles in an online course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2), 116–131.

Guglielmino, L. M. (1977). Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.The University of Georgia, Athens, GA.

Gunn, C., McSporran, M., Macleod, H., & French, S. (2003). Dominant or different? Gender issues in computer supported learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 14-30.

Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammon, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 358–389). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hannafin, M. J. (1984). Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Instructional Development, 7(3), 6-10.

Hancock, G. R. (1997). Structural equation modeling methods of hypothesis testing of latent variable means. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30, 91-105.

Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2001). Educational research in the Internet age: Examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30(9), 22-26.

Hayashi, A., Chen, C., Ryan, T., & Wu, J. (2004). The role of social presence and
moderating role of computer self-efficacy in predicting the continuance usage of e‐learning systems. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(2), 139-154.

Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2003). Evaluating the participation and quality of thinking of pre-service teachers in an asynchronous online discussion environment: Part 1. International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(3), 247-262.

Hill, J. R. (2002). Overcoming obstacles and creating connections: Community building in Web-based learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 14(1), 67-86.

Hong, K. S. (2002). Relationships between students' and instructional variables with satisfaction and learning from a Web-based course. The Internet & Higher Education, 5 (3), 267-281.


Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C.H, & Own, Z.Y. (2010). Learner Readiness For Online Learning: Scale Development and Student Perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080-1090.

Hsu, Y. C., & Shiue, Y. M. (2005).The effect of self-directed learning readiness on achievement comparing face-to-face and two-way distance learning instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(2), 143-56.

Jeong, A., & Frazier, S. (2008). How day of posting affects level of critical discourse in asynchronous discussions and computer-supported collaborative argumentation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 875-887.

Jonassen, D. H. (1986). Hypertext principles for text and courseware design. Educational Psychologist, 21(4), 269-292.

Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers as mind tools for schools. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 797-807.

Kay, R. H. (2009). Examining gender differences in attitudes toward interactive classroom communications systems (ICCS).Computers & Education, 52(4), 730-740.

Keller, J.M. & Litchfield, B.C. (2002). Motivation and performance. In A.A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 83–98). NJ: Merril Prentice Hall.

Kesici, S., Sahin I., Akturk, A. O. (2009). Analysis of cognitive learning strategies and computer attitudes according to college students' gender and locus of control, Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 529-534.

Kim, C. J. (2005). Construction of E-learning environments in Korea. Educational Technology Research &Development, 53(4), 108-115.
Kleinman, S. (2005). Strategies for encouraging active learning, interaction, and academic integrity in online courses. Communication Teacher, 19(1), 13-18.


Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York: Association Press.

Law, K. M. Y., Lee, V. C. S., & Yu, Y. T. (2010). Learning motivation in E-learning facilitated computer programming courses. Computers & Education, 55(1), 218-228.

Lee, B.-C., Yoon, J.-O., & Lee, I. (2009). Learners' acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computer & Education, 53(4), 1320-1329.

Lepper, M. (1989).Children and computers. American Psychologist, 44(2), 170-178.

Lepper, M., & Cordova, D. (1992). A desire to be taught: Instructional consequences of intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 16(3), 187-208.

Li, N., & Kirkup, G. (2007). Gender and cultural differences in Internet use: A study of China and the UK. Computers & Education, 48(2), 301-317.

Lin, B., & Hsieh, C. T. (2001). Web-based teaching and learner control: A research review. Computers & Education, 37(4), 377-386.

Lin, S. Y., & Overbaugh, R. (2009).Computer-mediated discussion, self-efficacy and gender. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 999-1013.

MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W., and Sugawara, H., M. (1996), "Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling," Psychological Methods, 1 (2), 130-49.

Marakas, G.M., Yi, M.Y., & Johnson, R.D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126-163.

Masters, K., & Oberprieler, G. (2004).Encouraging equitable online participation through curriculum articulation. Computers &Education, 42(4), 319-332.
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990).A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.

Mattice, N.J., & Dixon, P.S. (1999). Student preparedness for distance education (Research Report). Santa Clarita, CA: College of the Canyons.

Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 40(3), 237-253.

McVay, M. (2000). Developing a Web-based distance student orientation to enhance student success in an online Bachelor’s degree completion program. Unpublished practicum report presented to the Ed.D. Program, Nova Southeastern University, Florida.

McVay, M. (2001). How to be a successful distance learning student: Learning on the Internet. New York: Prentice Hall.

Merrill, M. (1983). Component display theory. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their status (pp. 279-334). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Merrill, M. D. (1984). What is learner control? In R.K. Bass and C.D. Dills (Eds.), Instructional development: The state of the art II (pp. 221-242). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Pub Co.

Milheim,W.D., & Martin, B. L. (1991).Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: three different perspectives. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18(3), 99-105.

Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29-48.

Mullen, G. E., & Tallent-Runnels, M. K. (2006). Student outcomes and perceptions of instructors' demands and support in online and traditional classrooms. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(4), 257-266.

Newman, D., Johnson, C., Cochrane, C., & Webb, B. (1996). An experiment in group learning technology: Evaluating critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported seminars. Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 4(1), 57-74.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Press.

Little, A. M. (2008). An examination of motivational strategies and academic achievement in an online high school learning environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.

Morris, L. V., Finnegan, C., & Wu, S. (2005). Tracking student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(3), 221−231.

Oddi, L. E. (1987). Perspectives on self-directed learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 38, 21-31.

Pachnowski, Lynne, M., Jurczyk and Joseph, P. (2000). Correlating Self-directed Learning with Distance Learning Success. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association. Clearwater, FL, February 16-19, 2000.

Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2010). Students' expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54(1), 222-229.

Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999).Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Palmer, S., Holt, D., & Bray, S. (2008). Does the discussion help? The impact of a formally assessed online discussion on final student results. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 847-858.

Peng, H., Tsai, C. C., & Wu, Y. T. (2006). University students’ self-efficacy and their attitudes toward the Internet: The role of students’ perceptions of the Internet. Educational Studies, 32(1), 73-86.

Peters, M., Kethley, B., & Bullington, K. (2002).The relationship between homework and performance in an introductory operations management course. Journal of Education for Business, 77(6), 340-344.


Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002).Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Pollock, P. H., Hamann, K., & Wilson, B. M. (2005). Teaching and learning online: assessing the effect of gender context on active learning. Journal of Political Science Education, 1, 1-15.

Poole, D. M. (2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 162-177.

Reeves, T. C. (1993). Pseudoscience in computer-based instruction: The case of lecturer control research. Journal of Computer-based Instruction, 20(2), 39-46.

Reigeluth, C. M., & Stein, F. S. (1983). The elaboration theory of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Robson, C. (1993). Real World Research: A resource for social scientists and practitionerresearchers. Oxford, England: Blackwell.

Roper, A. R. (2007). How students develop online learning skills. Educause Quarterly, 30(1), 62-64.

Rovai, A. P., & Downey, J. R. (2010). Why some distance education programs fail while others succeed in a global environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 141-147.

Rovai, A. P., & Baker, J. (2005). Gender differences in online learning: Sense of community, perceived learning and interpersonal interactions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 31-44.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Saade, R. G., He, X., & Kira, D. (2007). Exploring dimensions to online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1721-1739.


Salanova, M., Grau, R., Cifre, E. &Llorens, S. (2000). Computer training, frequency of use and burnout: the moderating role of computer self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 575-590.

Sam, H. K., Othman, A. E. A., & Nordin, Z. S. (2005). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and attitudes toward the Internet: A study among undergraduates in Unimas. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (4), 205-219.

Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.

Schroeders, U., & Wilhelm, O. (2011). Computer usage questionnaire: Structure, correlates, and gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 899-904.

Shyu, H. Y., & Brown, S. W. (1992). Learner control versus program control in interactive videodisc instruction: What are the effects in procedural learning? International Journal of Instructional Media, 19(2), 85-95.

Smith, P. J. (2000). Preparedness for flexible delivery among vocational learners. Distance Education, 21(1), 29-48.

Smith, P. J., Murphy, K. L., & Mahoney, S. E. (2003). Towards identifying factors underlying readiness for online learning: An exploratory study. Distance Education, 24(1), 57-67.

Smith, P. J. (2005). Learning preferences and readiness for online learning. Educational Psychology, 25(1), 3-12.

Song, L., & Hill, J. R. (2007).A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27-42.


Stefanou, C., & Salisbury-Glennon, J. (2002). Developing motivation and cognitive learning strategies through an undergraduate learning community. Learning Environments Research, 5(1), 77-97.
Tiene, D. (2000). Online discussions: a survey of advantages and disadvantages compared to faceto-face discussions. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 4, 371-384.

Torkzadeh, R. Chang, J. C. J., & Hardin, A. (2010). Usage and impact of technology enabled job learning. European Journal of Information Systems, 20, 69-86.

Torkzadeh, G. & Van Dyke, T.P. (2001).Development and validation of an Internet self-efficacy scale. Behavior & Information Technology, 20(4), 275-280.

Tsai, C.-C., & Lin, C.-C. (2004). Taiwanese adolescents’ perceptions and attitudes regarding the Internet: Exploring gender differences, Adolescence, 39, 725-734.

Thiele, J. E. (2003, August). Learning patterns of online students. Journal of Nursing Education, 42(8), 364−366.

Thompson, M. M. (1998). Distance learners in higher education. In C. C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education: Institutional responses for quality outcomes (pp. 9-24). Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.

Thomas, M.J.W. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 351-366.

Wang, L.-C. C., & Beasley, W. (2002). Effects of learner control and hypermedia preference on cyber-students’ performance in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11(1), 71-91.

Warner, W., Christie, G. & Choy, S. (1998). The Readiness of VET Clients for Flexible Delivery Including On-Line Learning, Research Report. Available online at http://www.worklearning.corskill.com.au/worklearning/WL/research/.

Weisskirch, R. S. & Milburn, S. S. (2003). Virtual discussion: Understanding college students’ electronic bulletin board use. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(3), 215–225.
Williams, M. D. (1996). Leaner-control and instructional technologies. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for education communications and technology (pp. 957-983). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

Vandewaetere, M., & Clarebout, G. (2011). Can instruction as such affect learning? The case of learner control. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2322-2332.

Vaughan, K., & MacVicar, A. (2004). Employees’ pre-implementation attitudes and perceptions to E-learning: a banking case study analysis. Journal of European Industrial Training, 28(5), 400-413.

Vekiri, I., & Chronak, A. (2008). Gender issues in technology use: Perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1392-1404.

Visser, L., Plomp, T., Amirault, R., & Kuiper, W. (2002). Motivating Students at a Distance: The Case of an International Audience. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(2), 94-110.

Vonderwell, S., & Turner, S. (2005). Active learning and pre-service teachers' experiences in an online course: A case study. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 65-84.

Yang, C. C., Tsai, I. C., Kim, B., Cho, M.-H., & Laffey, J. M. (2006). Exploring the relationships between students’ academic motivation and social ability in online learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(4), 277-286.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE