臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：美國憲法下的臺灣與承認—一個法律的觀點
作者：庄祖安
作者(外文)：M. Dujon Johnson
校院名稱：國立中山大學
系所名稱：中國與亞太區域研究所
指導教授：林文程
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2012
主題關鍵詞：承認；法律；臺灣；美國；Taiwan；Law；United States；Recognition
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:127
none
The recognition policy of the United States toward Taiwan has been rather consistent in its ambivalence. That is, the United States has chosen a foreign policy route of non-recognition while at the same time discouraging the government of Taiwan not to disturb the stable, but sometimes volatile waters of the Taiwan Strait by declaring independence. This policy of course, engendered by the United States apprehension that such a political declaration would provoke Taiwan’s economic and military power adjoining neighbor; the People’s Republic of China.
This dissertation looks at the inconsistent recognition policies of the United States toward the Republic of China and dispenses with the cause of these inconsistencies, the political process and analysis, and analyzes what is the recognition policies of the United States based on the laws of the United States at the state and federal judicial levels.
In this research I also examine international laws concerning recognition absent the political process and determine if they, too, correspond with the laws of the United States of if they are in fact totally different and based on a different sort of legal criteria. Absent a strong and coherent legal standard in the international realm, I will also look at how other international institutions and organizations like INGOs either reinforce or weaken the rule of law when it comes to their interaction with states and the issue of recognizing nation-states.
Finally, in addition to whether international law and INGOs adhere to or are guided by the rule of law, I propose that if one is not willing to use a legal standard to bestow recognition, then perhaps an intermediary position is the answer. Using as a starting point the agreed upon definition of what is a state is by the Montevideo Conference, I propose a rather simple criteria to determine if recognition should be granted by nation-states by using a non-political and a non-legal means.
American Law Institute. The Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States. Volume I, St. Paul: American Law Institute Publishers, 1986.

American Law Institute. The Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law of the United States § 201, 202, St. Paul: American Law Institute Publishers, 1987.

Cairo Declaration. U.S. Department of State. December 1, 1943.

Charter of the United Nations, ratified 1945. Office of the United Nations. New York, New York.

Conference on Yugoslavia Arbitration Commission. Opinion Number 1, 8, 10 31 I.L.M. 1488, 1494, 1521-1523, 1525-1526 (1992).

Convention on Rights and Duties of States. Article 3, Article 6. December 26, 1933.

First United States - PRC Joint Communiqué. February 28, 1972.

Hamilton, Alexander, Jay, John and Madison, James. The Federalist Papers. Editor Clinton Rossiter; New York, New York: Mentor, 1999.

Carey, George W. and McClellan, James. The Federalist Papers. Gideon Edition (1818).

Grant, Thomas D. Defining Statehood: The Montevideo Convention and Its Discontents. 37 Columbia Journal Transnational Law, 403, 435, 437, 449 (1999).

Hearing on China-Taiwan: United States Policy. U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Foreign Affairs. 97th Congress, 2nd Session, August 18, 1982, at 31-32.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Ratified 1966, Office of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights.

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Ratified 1966, Office of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights.

Japan - PRC Joint Communiqué, Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs Office. September 29, 1972.

Johnson, M. Dujon. Race and Racism in the Chinas: Chinese Racial Attitudes toward Africans and African-Americans, AuthorHouse. 2011.

Lauterpacht, Hersch. Recognition of States in International Law. 53 Yale L.J. 385, 419 (1944).

Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, entered into force, 26 December 1934.

Montevideo Convention. Note 4, articles 3, 7.

National Security Council Memorandums (NSCM). Nixon and Ford Administrations, 1969-1977.

National Security Decision Directives (NSDD). Nixon and Ford Administrations, 1969-1977.

National Security Agency Memorandums (NSAM). Reagan Administration; 1981-1989.

National Security Study Directives (NSSD). Kennedy and Johnson Administrations, 1961-1969.

Oppenheim, Lassa. International Law §§ 71, at 125 (Hersch Lauterpacht ed., 8th ed., 1955).

Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Ratified 1966. Office of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights.

Potsdam Declaration. U.S. Department of State, August 2, 1945.

Second United States - PRC Joint Communiqué. January 1, 1979.

Shepherd, Robert John. Statecraft and the Political Economy on the Taiwan Frontier: 1600-1800. Stanford University Press, 1993.

Sloane, Robert D. The Changing Face of Recognition in International Law: A Case Study of Tibet. 16 Emory International Law Review 107, 117, 2002.

Taiwan Relations Act, public law 96-8, April 10, 1979, 22 USCA 3301-3316, Et. Seq., 2.

Taiwan Relations Act. Public Law 96-8, 93 Statute 14. Enacted April 10, 1979; H.R. 2479. United States Government Printing Office. Washington, D.C., 1979.

Third United States - PRC Joint Communiqué. August 17, 1982.

Talmon, Stephen. Recognition in International Law: A Bibliography. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff; 2000.

Nikokukan Joyaku-shu and Gaimusho joyaku-kyoku. Treaty of Peace between Japan and the Republic of China. April 28, 1952., September, 1962, pp.97-136

Treaty of Peace. April 17, 1895, China-Japan, 181 Consol. TS 217.

Treaty of Peace with Japan. Sept. 8, 1951, Article 2, 3 UST 3169, 136 UNTS 45.

Treaty of Peace. April 28, 1952, ROC-Japan, Article II, 138 UNTS 3.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Ratified 1948, Office of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights.

U.S. Department of State. The Conference at Cairo and Teheran, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1961, p. 324.

United Nations Documents. General Assembly resolution 396 (V), June 1950.

United Nations Documents. Universal Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Resolution 2200A (XXI), 16 December 1966; entered into force March 23, 1976.

United Nations Documents. Universal Declaration on Human Rights. Resolution 210 A (III), December 10, 1948.

United Nations Documents. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, entered into force May 23, 1969.

United Nations Documents, Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect to Treaties. Entered into force August 23, 1978.

United Nations Document. Resolution on the Restoration of the Lawful Rights of the People’s Republic of China in the United Nations. Resolution 2758 (XXVI), October 21, 1971.

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations or Between International Organizations. March 21, 1986.

Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action. Adopted 1993, Office of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights.

Warbrick, Colin. Recognition of States. 41 ICLQ 480, (1993).

Yalta Declaration, U.S. Department of State, March 24, 1945.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：687（臺灣：650，外國：37） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2156165 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67948293
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上