REFERENCES
Ambard, P. D., &; Ambard, L. K. (2012). Effects of narrative script advance organizer strategies used to introduce video in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 45(2), 203-228.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Alvermann, D. E. (1981). The compensatory effect of graphic organizers on descriptive text. Journal of Educational Research, 75(1), 44-48.
Ayres, P., &; Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 135-146). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. London: Pearson.
Borrás, I., &; Lafayette, R. (1994). Effects of multimedia courseware subtitling on the speaking performance of college students of French. The Modern Language Journal, 78(1), 61-75.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: principles and classroom practices. New York: Longman.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Longman.
Brunyé, T. T., Taylor, H. A., &; Rapp, D. N. (2008). Repetition and dual coding in procedural multimedia presentations, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22,877-895.
Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Canham, M., &; Hegarty, M. (2010). Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20, 155-166.
Carroll, D. W. (1999). Psychology of language. New York: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Chang, C. H. (1991). Contemporary psychology, Taipei: Tung-Hua.
Chang, C. C., Tseng, K. H., &; Tseng, J. S. (2011). Is single or dual channel with different English proficiencies better for English listening comprehension, cognitive load and attitude in ubiquitous learning environment? Computers and Education, 57, 2313-2321.
Chen, I. J., Chang, C. C., &; Yen, J. C. (2012). Effects of presentation mode on mobile language learning: a performance efficiency perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(1), 122-137.
Chen, N. S., Hsieh, S. W., &; Kinshuk (2008). Effects of short term memory and content representation type on mobile language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 12 (3), 93-113.
Christie, D. L., &; Schumacher, G. M. (1976). Some conditions surrounding the effectiveness of advance organizers for children’s retention of orally presented prose. Journal of Reading Behavior, 8(3), 299-309
Chung, J. M. (1996). The effects of using advance organizers and captions to introduce video in the foreign language classroom. TESL Canada Journal, 14(1), 61-65.
Chung, J. M. (1999). The effects of using video texts supported with advance organizers and subtitles on Chinese college students' listening comprehension: An empirical study. Foreign Language Annals, 32(3), 295-308.
Chung, J. M. (2002). The effects of using two advance organizers with video texts for the teaching of listening in English. Foreign Language Annals, 35(2), 231-241.
Chung, J. M., &; Huang, S. C. (1998). The effects of three aural advance organizers for video viewing in a foreign language classroom. System, 26, 553-565.
Clark, J. M., &; Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149-210.
Cross, J. (2011). Comprehending news videotexts: The influence of the visual content. Language Learning and Technology, 15(2), 44-68.
Dillon, A., &; Jobst, J. (2005). Multimedia learning with hypermedia. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 569-588). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Eilam, B., &; Poyas, Y. (2008). Learning with multiple representations: Extending multimedia learning beyond the lab. Learning and Instruction, 18, 368-378.
Elkhafaifi, H. (2005). The effect of prelistening activities on listening comprehension in Arabic learners. Foreign Language Annals, 38(4), 505-513.
Garza, T. J. (1991). Evaluating the use of captioned video materials in advanced foreign language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), 239-258.
Goulah, J. (2007). Village voices, global visions: Digital video as a transformative foreign language learning tool. Foreign Language Annals, 40(1), 62-78.
Grgurovic, M., &; Hegelheimer, V. (2007). Help options and multimedia listening: Students’ use of subtitles and the transcript. Language Learning and Technology, 11(1), 45-66.
Griffin, C. C., Malone, L. D., &; Kameenui, E. J. (1995). Effects of graphic organizer instruction on fifth-grade students. The Journal of Educational Research, 89(2), 98-107.
Gruba, P. (2004). Understanding digitized second language videotext. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(1), 51-82.
Guichon, N., &; McLornan, S. (2008). The effects of multimodality on L2 learners: Implications for CALL resource design. System, 36(1), 85-93.
Guillory, H. G. (1998). The effects of key word captions to authentic French video in foreign language instruction. CALICO Journal, 15(1-3), 89-108.
Hanley, J. E., Herron, C. A., &; Cole, S. P. (1995). Using video as an advance organizer to a written passage in the FLES classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 57-66.
Harskamp, E. G., Mayer, R. E., &; Suhre, C. (2007). Does the modality principle for multimedia learning apply to science classrooms? Learning and Instruction,17, 465-477.
Hayati, A., &; Hohmedi, F. (2011). The effect of films with and without subtitles on listening comprehension of EFL learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 181-192.
Herron, C. (1994). An investigation of the effectiveness of using an advance organizer to introduce video in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 190-198.
Herron, C. A., Cole, S. P., Corrie, C., &; Dubriel, S. (1999). The effectiveness of a video-based curriculum in teaching culture. The Modern Language Journal, 83(4), 518-533.
Herron, C. A., Dubriel, S., Corrie, C., &; Cole, S. P. (2002). A classroom investigation: Can video improve intermediate-level French language students' ability to learn about a foreign culture? The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 36-53.
Herron, C., York, H., Cole, S. P., &; Linden, P. (1998). A comparison study of student retention of foreign language video: Declarative versus interrogative advance organizer. Modern Language Journal, 82, 237-247.
Herron, C. A., Hanley, J. E. B., &; Cole, S. P. (1995). A comparison study of two advance organizers for introducing beginning foreign language students to video. The Modern Language Journal, 79(3), 387-395.
Hirsch, E. D. (1987). Cultural literacy— What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Horz, H., &; Schnotz, W. (2010). Cognitive load in learning with multiple representations. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno &; R. Brunken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 229-252). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, L. (2004). Testing L2 vocabulary recognition and recall using pictorial and written test items, Language Learning and Technology, 8(3), 122-143.Kalyuga, S. (2010). Schema acquisition and sources of cognitive load. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno &; R. Brunken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 48-64). New York: Cambridge University Press.
King, J. (2002). Using DVD feature films in the EFL classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(5), 509-523.
Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction, 12, 1-10.
Kloster, A. M., &; Winne, P. H. (1989). Effects of different types of organizers on students’ learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 9-15.
Kovalik, C. L., &; Williams, M. A. (2011). Cartoons as advance organizer. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(2), 40-64.
Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Langang-Fox, J., Platania-Phung, C., &; Waycott, J. (2006). Effects of advance organizers, mental models and abilities on task and recall performances using a mobile phone network. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1143-1165.
Latifi, M., Mobalegh, A., &; Mohammadi, E. (2011). Movie subtitles and the improvement of listening comprehension ability: Does it help? The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 18-29.
Lin, H., Kidwai, K., Munyofu, M., Swain, J., Ausman, B., &; Dwyer, F. (2005). The effect of verbal advance organizers in complementing animated instruction. Journal of Visual Literacy, 25(2), 237-248.
Lin, H., &; Chen, T. (2006). Decreasing cognitive load for novice EFL learners: Effects of question and descriptive advance organizers in facilitating EFL learners’ comprehension of an animation-based content lesson. System, 34, 416-431.
Lin, H., &; Chen, T. (2007). Reading authentic EFL text using visualization and advance organizers in a multimedia learning environment. Language Learning and Technology, 11(3), 83-106.
Lin, H., Chen, T., &; Dwyer, F. M. (2006). Effects of static visuals and computer-generated animations in facilitating immediate and delayed achievement in the EFL classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 39(2), 203-219.
Lin, H., Dwyer, F., &; Swain, J. (2006). The effect of varied cognitive strategies used to complement animated instruction in facilitating achievement of higher order learning objectives. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(3), 155-167.
Lin, H., Ching, Y. H., Hsu, Y. C., &; Dwyer, F. (2010). Learning from animation: The effect of prior knowledge and navigation mode. International Journal of Instructional Media, 37(2), 201-212.
Low, R., &; Sweller, J. (2005). The modality principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 147-158). New York: Cambridge University Press.
MacDonald, M., Badger, R., &; White, G. (2000). The real thing?: Authenticity and academic listening. English for Specific Purposes, 19,253-267.
Markham, P. (1999). Captioned videotapes and second-language listening word recognition. Foreign Language Annals. 32(3). 321-328.
Markham, P., &; Peter, L. (2002-2003). The influence of English language and Spanish language captions on foreign language listening/reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 31(3), 331-341.
Markham, P. L., Peter, L. A., &; McCarthy, T. J. (2001). The effects of native language vs. target language subtitles on foreign language students' DVD video comprehension. Foreign Language Annals, 34(5), 439-445.
Mayer, R. E., &; Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
Mayer, R. E., &; Moreno, R. (2010). Techniques that reduce extraneous cognitive load and manage intrinsic cognitive load during multimedia learning. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno &; R. Brunken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 131-152). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1-19.
Mayer, R. E. (2005a). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31-48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2005b). Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pretraining, and modality principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 169-182). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2005c). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 183-200). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2005d). Principles of multimedia learning based on social cues: Personalization, voice, and image principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 201-214). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (1980). Elaboration techniques that increase the meaningfulness of technical text: An experimental test of the learning strategy hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 770-784.Merkt, M., Weigand, S., Heier, A., &; Schwan, S. (2011). Learning with videos vs. learning with print: The role of interactive features. Learning and Instruction, 21, 687-704.
Michel, E., &; Roebers, C. M. (2008). Children’s knowledge acquisition through film: influence of programme characteristics. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1228-1244.
Mohammadi, M., Moenikia, M., &; Babelan, A. Z. (2010). The role of advance organizer on English language learning as a second language. Procedia Social Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4667-4671.
Moreno, R., &; Park, B. (2010). Cognitive load theory: historical development and relation to other theories. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno &; R. Brunken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 9-28). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Moreno, R., &; Mayer, R. E. (2010). Techniques that increase generative processing in multimedia learning: Open questions for cognitive load research. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno &; R. Brunken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 153-177). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mortazavi, S. M. (2011). The relationship between time lapse between introducing lexical advance organizers and video viewing, and comprehension in a foreign language classroom. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2023-2027.
Plass, J. L. (1998). Design and evaluation of the user interface of foreign language multimedia software: A cognitive approach. Language Learning and Technology, 2(1), 40-53.
Reed, S. K. (2006). Cognitive architectures for multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 87-98.
Renkl, A., &; Atkinson, R. K. (2010). Learning from worked-out examples and problem solving. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno &; R. Brunken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 91-108). New York: Cambridge University press.
Renkl, A. (2005). The worked-out examples principle in multimedia. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 229-246). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., &; Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rifkin, B. (2000). Video in the proficiency-based advanced conversation class: an example from the Russian-language curriculum. Foreign Language Annals, 33(1), 63-70.
Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. New York: Longman.
Rost, M. (1990). Listening in language learning. New York: Longman.
Sadoski, M., &; Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Huk, T., Imhof, B., &; Kammerer, Y. (2009). The effects of realism in learning with dynamic visualizations. Learning and Instruction, 19, 481-494.
Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 49-70). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schuler, A., Scheiter, K., Rummer R., &; Gerjets, P. (2012). Explaining the modality effect in multimedia learning: Is it due to a lack of temporal contiguity with written text and pictures? Learning and Instruction, 22, 92-102.
Schumacher, G. M., Liebert, D., &; Fass, W. (1975). Textual organizer, advance organizers and the retention of prose material. Journal of Reading Behavior, 7(2), 173-180.
Schwan, S., &; Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: Learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14, 293-305
Secules, T., Herron, C., &; Tomasello, M. (1992). The effect of video context on foreign language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 76(4), 480-490.
Seufert, T., Schutze, M., &; Brunken, R. (2009). Memory characteristics and modality in multimedia learning: An aptitude-treatment-interaction study. Learning and Instruction, 19, 28-42.
Sildus, T. I. (2006). The effect of a student video project on vocabulary retention of first-year secondary school German students. Foreign Language Annals, 39(1), 54-70.
Simmons, D. C., Griffin, C. C., &; Kameenui, E. J. (1988). Effects of teacher-constructed pre-and post-graphic organizer instruction on sixth-grade science students’ comprehension and recall. The Journal of Educational Research, 82(1),15-21.
Stahl, S. A., &; Jacobson, M. G. (1986). Vocabulary difficulty, prior knowledge, and text comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18(4), 309-323.
Stewart, M. A., &; Pertusa, I. (2004). Gains to foreign language while viewing target language closed caption films. Foreign Language Annals, 37(3), 438-443.
Stone, C. L. (1983). A Meta-analysis of advance organizer studies. The Journal of Experimental Education, 51(4), 194-199.
Swaffar, J., &; Vlatten, A. (1997). A sequential model for video viewing in the foreign language curriculum. The Modern Language Journal, 81(2), 175-188.
Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Recent theoretical advances. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno &; R. Brunken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 29-47). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sweller, J. (2005a). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19-30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sweller, J. (2005b). The redundancy principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 159-168). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sydorenko, T. (2010). Modality of input and vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning and Technology, 14(2), 50-73.
Taylor, G. (2005). Perceived processing strategies of students watching captioned video. Foreign Language Annals, 38(3), 422-427.
Teichert, H. U. (1996). A comparative study using illustrations, brainstorming, and questions as advance organizers in intermediate college German conversation classes. The Modern Language Journal, 80(4), 509-517.
Townsend, M. A. R., &; Clarihew, A. (1989). Facilitating children’s comprehension through the use of advance organizers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21(1), 15-35.
Tschirner, E. (2001). Language acquisition in the classroom: The role of digital video. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14(3-4), 305-319.
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., &; Kester, L. (2005). The four-component instructional design model: Multimedia principles in environments for complex learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 71-96). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wagner, E. (2007). Are they watching? test-taker viewing behavior during an L1 video listening test. Language Learning and Technology, 11(1), 67-86.Warschauer, M., &; Kern, R. (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Weyers, J. R. (1999). The effect of authentic video on communicative competence. The Modern Language Journal, 83(3), 339-349.
Wilberschied, L., &; Berman, P. M. (2004). Effects of using photos from authentic video as advance organizers on listening comprehension in an FLES Chinese class. Foreign Language Annals, 37(4), 534-540.
Williams, H., &; Thorne, D. (2002). The value of teletext subtitling as a medium for language learning. System, 28, 217-228.
Winke, P., Gass, S., &; Sydorenko, T. (2010). The effect of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities. Language Learning and Technology,14(1), 65-86.
Wood, D., Bruner, J., &; Ross, C. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Child Psychiatry, 17, 89-100
Wu, M. L. &; Tu, J. T. (2006). SPSS and statistical application analysis. Taipei: Wu Nan.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, Mass: MIT press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.