:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學生美感經驗、創意自我效能與創造力之研究:教師創造力教學的多層次調節式中介效果
作者:張原誠
作者(外文):Chang, Yuan-Cheng
校院名稱:國立臺南大學
系所名稱:教育學系教育經營與管理碩博士班
指導教授:蕭佳純
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2015
主題關鍵詞:美感經驗創意自我效能創造力教學創造力Aesthetic ExperienceCreative Self-efficacyCreativity TeachingCreativity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
本研究主旨在探討學生美感經驗、創意自我效能對創造力的影響,並以教師的創造力教學做為調節變項,以創造力成分理論、創造力系統理論及創意自我效能理論為理論基礎,建立研究模式。研究對象為國內大專院校設計學門的畢業專題學生與專題指導老師,取樣50組畢業專題團隊,共50位指導老師與338位學生,並運用階層線性模式(HLM)來分析教師與學生層次間各變項的影響。
研究的衡量工具部份,本研究建構了「美感經驗量表」,包含「對美的快感」、「審美的態度」、「對美的理解力」與「完整經驗」等構面;「創意自我效能量表」為「創意思考信念」、「創意成品信念」與「抗衡負面評價信念」等構面;「創造力教學量表」包含「提升創造力意向」與「增進創造力技能」等構面。研究結果發現,學生「對美的快感」、「完整經驗」與「創意思考信念」對「創造力」有正向影響;「審美的態度」對「創意思考」有正向影響,「對美的快感」對「創意思考」與「創意成品信念」有負向影響,「對美的理解力」與「完整經驗」對「抗衡負面評價」有正向影響;學生的「對美的快感」與「完整經驗」會透過「創意成品信念」的中介效果間接影響「創造力」;教師「提升創造力意向」對學生的「對美的快感」有正向影響;教師「提升創造力意向」對學生的「對美的理解力」與「完整經驗」有負向影響;教師「增進創造力技能」會透過學生「美感經驗」的中介效果間接影響學生「創意成品信念」。
研究結果可知,美感經驗在創造力研究中的重要性,並可將美感經驗放在前置變項探討;在教師的創造力教學方面,應該要更重視大學教師的創造力教學,建立適合的創造力教學模式與指標,並加強學生與老師對於創造力教學的認知。
The study aims to explore the influence of students’ aesthetics experience, Creative Self-Efficacy on creativity and establish research mode by taking teachers’ creativity teaching as moderating variable, and creativity component theory, creativity system theory and creative self-efficacy as theory basis to understand the influence relation among the variables and the contextual moderating effect of teachers’ creativity teaching. The research subjects are graduation students and advisors in design major of universities and colleges, with 50 groups of graduation teams as the samples composed of 50 advisors and 338 students. Besides, the hierarchical linear modeling is applied to analyze the influence of the hierarchical variables between the teachers and students.
The study firstly sets up an “Aesthetic Experience Scale” including “pleasant sensation to aesthetic”, “aesthetic attitude”, “understanding to aesthetic”, as well as “an experience” before exploring the correlation among the variables. “Creative Self-efficacy Scale” including “creative thinking”, “creative finished products”, contend against negative evaluation”; “Teaching for Creativity” including “promotion of creative intentions“ and “improvement on creativity skills”. In the findings of the research results, the students’ pleasant sensation to aesthetic, an experience and creative thinking have positive effect on creativity. Aesthetic attitude has positive effect on creative thinking. Pleasant sensation to aesthetic has negative effect on creative thinking and creative finished products. Understanding to aesthetic and an experience have positive influence on contend against negative evaluation. Students’ pleasant sensation to aesthetic and an experience can indirectly affect creativity through the mediating effect of creative thinking. The teachers’ promotion of creative intentions has positive effect on students’ pleasant sensation to aesthetic. The teachers’ promotion of creative intentions has negative effect on students’ understanding to aesthetic and an experience. The teachers’ improvement on creativity skills can indirectly affect students’ creative finished product by the mediating effect of aesthetic experience.
It can be learned from the research results that aesthetic experience plays a critical role in the creativity research and can be explored before pre variables. In terms of teachers’ creativity teaching, college teachers’ creativity teaching should be put more emphasis on, so as to establish appropriate mode and index for creativity teaching, and to enhance students’ and teachers’ cognition to creativity teaching.
中文部份
卜道(2003)。在伍珊珊、王慧姬譯(Jacques Maquet著)(2003)。美感經驗:一位人類學者眼中的視覺藝術。台北市:雄師。
王瑞(2002)。創造思考教學策略對學生創造力之影響。臺灣教育,614,24-28。
毛連溫(2001)。如何實施資優教育-培養多元智慧、主動學習的資優兒。臺北:心理。
毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2000)。創造力研究。台北市:心理。
伍珊珊、王慧姬譯(Jacques Maquet著)(2003)。美感經驗:一位人類學者眼中的視覺藝術。台北市:雄師。
呂金燮(2003)。國小資優課程的發展與調適。資優教育研究,2(2),1-21。
李偉俊(2011)。美塔學-一個統合後設認知與創造力的創新理論構想。教育資料與研究雙月刊,100,75-98。
林建妤、林珊如(2004)。創意逆境求生之路-創意自我效能能否克服外在評量對創造力傷害之實驗研究。2004年創造力實踐歷程研討會,台北:創新與創造力研究中心。
林素卿(2009)。美感經驗對課程美學建構之啟示。東海教育評論 2009,3,43-70。
林偉文(2011)。創意教學與創造力的培育-以「設計思考」為例。教育資料與研究雙月刊,100,53-74。
林碧芳、邱皓政(2008)。創意教學自我效能感量表之編製與相關研究。教育研究與發展期刊,4(1),141-170。
林逢祺(1998)。美感經驗與教育。教育研究集刊,7 (41),155-170。
沈翠蓮(2006)。創意原理與設計。台北市:五南。
周淑卿(2010)。學習歷程中美感經驗的性質:藝術與科學課堂的探究。課程與教學季刊,14(1),19-40。
吳清山(2002)。創意教學的重要理念與實施策略。台灣教育,614,2-8。
邱皓政(2005)。創造力的測量與共識衡鑑。教育集刊,30,50-73。
邱皓政譯(Ita Kreft、Jan De Leeuw著)(2009)。多層次模型分析導論。台北市:五南。
邱皓政、丁興祥、林耀南、陳育瑜、林碧芳與王詩婷譯(Mark A. Runco著)(2008)。創造力:當代理論與議題。台北:心理。
洪久賢、洪榮昭、林麗娟、蔡長豔(2007)。影響教師創意教學因素之研究-以綜合活動領域為例。師大學報,52(2),49-71。
洪素蘋、林珊如(2004)。Whatever you say, I can do it-「學生創意自我效能量表」之編製。2004年第二屆創新與創造力研討會。台北:政治大學創新與創造力研究中心。
洪素蘋、黃宏宇、林珊如(2008)。重要他人回饋影響創意生活經驗:以模式競爭方式檢驗創意自我效能與創意動機的中介效果。教育心理學報,40(2),303-322。
洪蘭譯(1999)。不同凡想。台北市:遠流。
徐志文、張雨霖、巫宜錚、許芳彬(2011)。以階層線性模式分析學校組織創新氣氛、教師教學效能對創造力教學之影響。創造學刊, 2(2),87-112。
教育部(2003)。創造力教育白皮書。台北:教育部。
黃宏宇、洪素蘋(2009)。建構效度檢驗之線性與非線性取向:以學生創意自我效能量表為例。國立屏東教育大學學報,33,487-512。
黃宗顯(2010)。領導美學關鍵能力:校長提升領導品質與境界必要的修鍊。教育研究月刊,189, 16-27。
黃家齊、黃荷婷(2006)。團隊成員目標導向對於自我效能與集體效能及創新之影響一個多層次研究。管理學報,23(3),327-346。
黃惠君、葉玉珠(2008)。國中教師教學玩興、教學動機、教學快樂感受與創意教學之關係。教育與心理研究,31(2),85-118。
黃曉嵐、蔡淑君、胡翠茵、張芝萱譯(James C. Kaufman, Robert J. Sternberg著)(2014)。創造力: 理論與當代議題面面觀。台北市:華騰文化。
黃聖哲(2013)。美學經驗的社會構成。台北:唐山。
郭禎祥譯(Elliot Eisner著)(1991)。藝術視覺的教育。台北市:文景。
陳木金(1998)。談美感教育與情意教育。北縣教育,22,24-28。
陳木金(2009)。優質世界公民通識教育在大學實踐的芻議-以政大書院推動為例。公民社會與國家教育政策與制度學術研討會論文集,134-148。台北:國家教育研究院。
陳玉樹、胡夢鯨(2008)。任務動機與組織創新氣候對成人教師創意教學表現之影響:階層線性模式分析。教育心理學報,40(2),179-198。
陳伯璋(2006)。課程研究典飽建構的新取向:論課程美學探究的必要性及其限制。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(編號:NSC94-2413-H032-011),未出版。
陳伯璋、張盈堃(2007)。來自日常生活的教育學院:社區、課程與美學的探究。教育與社會學研究,12,41-72。
陳昭儀、李雪菱(2013)。多元文化創造力教學的實踐與省思。創造學刊, 4(2),5-29。
陳玲璋(2013)。全觀性美感體驗對學校教學意涵之探究。藝術教育研究,25,109-135。
陳新轉(2009)。論美與教育的關係。教育資料與研究,88,111-128。
陳霞鄢、王振德(2004)。國小資優班教師創造力教學行為之研究。資優教育研究,4(1),29-50。
陳龍安(2002)。創造力的開發的理念與實踐。創意學術研討會:國立嘉義大學人文藝術學院,2-20。
崔光宙(1992)。美感判斷發展研究。台北市:師大書苑。
崔光宙(2000)。美學中人的概念及其教育內涵。載於崔光宙、林逢祺主編,教育美學(179-224)。台北市:五南。
郭禎祥譯(Elliot Eisner著)(1991)。藝術視覺的教育。台北市:文景。
許世卿、簡秀娥、蔡德昌( 2008 ) 。創意活動隊學生創意啟發之行動研究。修平人文社會學報,11,133-150。
彭月茵(2010)。創造力系統理論之介紹與教學實務分享。北縣教育,70,37-41。
彭台光、林鉦棽(2008)。組織現象和層次議題:非獨立性資料的概念和實徵。組織與管理,1(1),95-121。
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23( 1),77-98。
張世慧(2007)。創造力理論、技法與教學。台北市:五南。
張世慧(2011)。創造力教學、學習與評量之研究。教育資料與研究雙月刊,100,1-22。
張雨霖、陳學志、徐芝君(2010)。教師創造力信念、創造力教學自我效能對創造力教學行為之影響。復興崗學報,99,151-172。
張春興(2007)。張氐心理學辭典。台北市:東華。
葉玉珠(2000)。創造力發展的生態系統模式及其應用於科技資訊領之內涵分析。教育心理學報,32(1),95-122。
葉玉珠(2006)。創造力教學:過去、現在與未來。台北市:心理。
葉玉珠(2013)。美感體驗歷程與大腦心智反應-設計產品的美感體驗與創造力:認知歷程及神經機制之探討。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(編號:NSC 101-2420-H-004 -014 -MY2),未出版。
楊忠斌(2009)。美感經驗理論對教師的啓示。教育資料與研究雙月刊,88,49-68。
溫福星(2006)。階層線性模式的原理、方法與應用。台北市:雙葉。
詹志禹(2002)。「創造力」的定義與創造力的發展。教育研究,100,117-124。
馮莉雅(2006)。餐旅美學教育成效之調查研究-以國立高雄餐旅學院為例。高餐通識教育學刊,3,1-26。
鄭博真(2011)。我國幼兒教師創造力人格特質與創造力教學行為之研究。高雄師範大學學報,31,71-98。
賴麗珍譯(Ruth Richards著)(2009)。日常創造力與人類特質新論。台北市:五南。
劉千美(2001)。差異與實踐:當代藝術哲學研究。新台北:立緒。
劉文潭譯(W. Tatakiewicz著)(2001)。西洋六大美學理念史。台北市:聯經文化。
劉昌元(1995)。西方美學導論。台北市:聯經文化。
滕守堯譯(R. A. Smith著)(2000)。藝術感覺與美育。四川:四川人民出版社。
簡成熙譯(G. R. Knight著)(2003)。教育哲學導論。台北市:五南。
蕭佳純(2012)。國小學生內在動機、學科知識與創造力表現關聯之研究:教師創造力教學的調節效果。特殊教育研究學刊,37(3),89-113。
羅若蘋、鍾清瑜譯(Michael Michalko著)(2008)。創意思考玩具庫。台北:究竟。

英文部份
Abbott, D. H. (2010a). Experiencing creative self-efficacy: A case study approach to understand creativity in blogging. Journal of Media and Communication Studies, 2, 170–175.
Abbott, D. H. (2010b). Constructing a creative self-efficacy inventory: A mixed methods inquiry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Amabile, T. (1987). The motivation to be creative. In S. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of Creativity Research: Beyond the basics , 223-254 . Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Colorado, CO: Westview Press.
Averill, J. R., Stanat, P., & More, T. A. (1998). Aesthetics and the environment. Review of General Psychology, 2 (2), 153-174.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior,4. New York: Academic Press, 71-81.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.) Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Bandura, A. (2010). Self efficacy. In The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology (4th Ed. 1534-1536). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Banks, J. A. (2007). An introduction to multicultural education (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity in creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173-177.
Baer, J. & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158-63.
Barron, F. (1969). Creative Person and Creative Process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 447–457.
Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Correlates of intellectual risk taking in elementary school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 210–223.
Beghetto, R.A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Fundamentals of creativity. Educational Leadership, 70, 10–15.
Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1993). EQS/Windows user’s guide. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group Agreement, Nonindependence, and Reliability: Implications for Data Aggregation and Analysis. In Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, edited by K. J. Klein and S. W. J. Kozlowski. San Francisco: CA: Jossey-Bass, 349-381.
Biswas, G., Jeong, H., Kinnebrew, J., Sulcer, B., & Roscoe, R. (2010). Measuring self-regulated learning skills through social interactions in a teachable agent environment. Research and Practice in Technology-Enhanced Learning, 5(2), 123-152.
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievemnet in high functioning individuals. Personality and Individual Difference, 85, 499-506
Craft, A. (2002). Creativity and early years education: A lifewide foundation. London: Continuum.
Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools - tensions and dilemmas.UK: Routledge.
Craft, A. (2007). Changes in the landscape of creativity in education. In A. Wilson (Ed.),Creativity in primary education (2nd ed.). Exeter: Learning Matters.
Cropley, A.J. (2001). Creativity in education & learning :a guide for teachers and educators. UK: Kogan Page.
Chamberlin, S. A., & Moon, S. (2005). Model-eliciting activities: An introduction to gifted education. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 37-47.
Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new General Self-Efficacy Scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62-83.
Cheng, S. K. (2000). Indexing creativity fostering teacher behavior: A preliminary validation study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(2), 118-134.
Chuang, L. (2007). The social psychology of creativity and innovation: process theory (PT) perspective. Social Behavior and Personality, 35 (7), 875-88.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Conti, R., Collins, M. A. & Picariello, M. (2001). The role of gender in mediating the effects of competition on children's creativity. Personality and Individual Difference, 30, 1273-1289.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A system view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), The nature of creativity,325-339. Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York: HarperCollins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The handbook of creativity (313-335). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Wolfe, R. (2000). New Conceptions and research approaches to creativity: Implications of systems perspective for creativity in Education. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed). (81-93). New York: Pergamon.
Cuieford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education (4th Ed). New York: McGraw Hill.
Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A. and Seifert, C. M. (2014). Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 103, 417–449.
Davidovitch, N., & Milgram, R. M. (2006). Creative thinking as a predictor of teacher effectiveness in higher education. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 385–390.
Davis, G. A. (2004). Creativity is forever (5th ed.) Dubuque. IW: Kendall/ Hunt Publishing Company.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Dewey, J. (1981). Experience and nature, In J. Dewey (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1 (1925-1953). Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Donnelly, N. (1990). Stumbling on aesthetic experience: afactual account of the accidental discovery of aestheticeducation in an irish context. Studies in Art Eduaction, 31, 141-148.
Efland, A. (1992). Ralph Smith's concept of aesthetic experience and its curriculum implications. Studies in Art Education, 33, 201-209.
Edinger, E. (1968). An outline of analytical psychology. Quadrant, 1, 1-12.
Eisner, E. W. (2002). What can education learn from arts about the practice of education. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(1), 4-16.
Epstein, R. (1990). Generativity theory and creativity. In M. Runco & R. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (116-140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Fenner, D. E. W. (2003). Aesthetic experience and aesthetic analysis. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 37(1), 40-53.
Frijda, N. (1986). The emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. The Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112-1142.
Gallagher, J. J. (1994). Teaching the gifted child (4ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple Intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
Garner, R. (2013). Exams, exams, exams’: Children’s author Sally Gardner says new National Curriculum would stifle classroom creativity. The Independent, 19 June.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 605-622.
Girod, M., Twyman, T., & Wojcikiewicz, S. (2010). Teaching and learning science for transformative, aesthetic experience. Journal of Science for Teacher Education, 21(7), 14-28.
Gist, M. E. & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211.
Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765-778.
Gruber, H. E., & Davis, S. (1988). Inching our way up Mount Olympus: the evolving - systems approach to creative thinking. In R. Sternberg (Ed.) The nature of creativity (243-270). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guilford, J.P. (1968). Intelligence, Creativity and their Educational Implications. Robert R. Knapp.
Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449–455.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1998). Reward, intrinsic motivation, and creativity. American Psychologist, 53,674-675.
Hennessey, B. A. (2003). The social psychology of creative. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 253-271.
Hill, A., Tan, A. G., & Kikuchi, A. (2008). International high school students' perceived creativity self-efficacy. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 18, 105–115.
Hirst, G., van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 280-293.
Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (53-75). New York: Plenum Press.
Hsu, M. L. A., & Fan, H. L. (2006). Assessing organizational innovation vitality: The development of a scale. Paper presented at the R&D Management Conference, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsu, M. L. A., Hou, S. T., & Fan, H. L. (2011). Creative Self- efficacy and. Innovative Behavior in a Service Setting: Optimism as a Moderator. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(4), 258-272.
Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69-90.
Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (2000). Creative approaches to problem solving (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. R. (1993). Rwg: An assessment of within- group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306-309.
Jaussi, K. S., Randel, A. E., & Dionne, S. D. (2007). I am, I think I can, and I do: The role of personal identity, self-efficacy, and cross-application of experiences in creativity at work. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 1-12.
Jung C. (1973). The collected works of Carl Jung. (Hull R. F. C., Trans.).Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kark, R., Shamir, B., & Chen, G. (2003). The Two Faces of Transformational Leadership: Dependence and Empowerment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (2), 243-255.
Kasof, J. (1995). Explaining Creativity: the attributional perspectives. Creativity Research Journal, 8(40), 311-366.
Kear, M. (2000). Concept Analysis of Self-Efficacy . Graduate Research in Nursing, 2(2), 33-45.
Kerdeman, D. (2005). Aesthetic experience and education: Themes and questions. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 39(2), 88-99.
Kinnebrew, J. S., & Biswas, G. (2011). Modeling and measuring self-regulated learning in teachable agent environments. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 7(2), 19-35.
Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing andconducting multilevel research. OrganizationalResearch Methods, 3(3), 211-236.
Kleysen, Robert, F., & Stree, Christopher, T. ( 2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior .Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284-296.
Kris, E. (1952). Psycholoanalytic Explorations in Art. New York: International Univ. Press.
Lubart, T. I., & Getz, I. (1997). Emotion, metaphor, and the creative process. Creativity. Research Journal, 10(4), 285-301.
Livingston, L. (2010). Teaching creativity in higher education. Arts education policy review, 111(2), 59-62.
Lussier, C. (2010). Aesthetic literacy: The gold medal standard of learning excellence in dance. Physical and Health Education, 76(1), 40-44.
Martinsen, Ø. (1995). Cognitive styles and experience in solving insight problems: Replication and extension. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 435–447.
Mathisen, G. E., & Bronnick, K. S. (2009). Creative self-efficacy: An intervention study. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(1), 21-29.
Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In J. S. Robert (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (449-460). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The assicative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 44, 220-232.
Millar, G., & Dahl, C. (2011). The power of creativity. ATA Magazine, 91(3), 16-21.
Millward, L., & Freeman, H. (2002). Role Expectations as Constraints to Innovation: The Case of Female Managers. Creativity Research Journal, 14(1), 93-109.
Oral, G. (2006). Creativity of Turkish prospective teachers. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 65-73.
Parrish, P. E. (2009). Aesthetic principles for instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(4), 511-528.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Richards, R. (1997). Conclusions: when illness yields creativity. In R. Richards & M. Runco (Eds.), Eminent Creativity, Everyday Creativity, and Health. Ablex/Greenwood.
Richards, R. (1999). Fours Ps of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (733-742). NY: Academic Press.
Richards, R. (2007). Everyday creativity and new views of human nature: Psychological, social, and spiritual perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Robbins, T. L., & Kegley, K. (2010). Playing with thinkertoys to build creative abilities through online instruction. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5, 40-48.
Rothenberg, A. (1990). Creativity & madness: New findings and old stereotypes. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Rufo, D. (2012). Building forts and drawing on walls: Fostering student-initiatedcreativity both inside and outside the elementary classroom. Art Education, 65( 3), 40–47.
Runco, M. A. (1991), The Evaluative, Valuative, and Divergent Thinking of Children. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 25, 311–319.
Runco, M. A. (1994). Problem finding, Problem Solving, and Creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Runco, M. A. (1996). Creativity and development: Recommendations. New Directions for Child Development, 72 (Summer), 87-90.
Runco, M. A. (2006). The Development of children’s creativity. In B. Spodek & O. N. Saracho (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (121-131). NJ: Mahwah.
Runco, M. A. (2008). Commentary: Divergent thinking is not synonymous with creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 2, 93-96.
Sanderlin, O. (1971). Creative teaching. New Jersey: A. S. Barnes and Co, Inc.
Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University press.
Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 361-388.
Seel, M. (2008). On the scope of aesthetic experience . In R. Shusterman, & A.Tomlin, (Eds.), Aesthetic experience (98-105). New York: Routledge.
Smith, G., & Amner, G. (1997). Creativity and perception. In M. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Simonton, D. K. (1990). History, chemistry, psychology, and genius: an intellectual autobiography of historiometry. In M. A. Runco, & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity. CA: SAGE.
Simonton, D. K. (1998). Donald Campbell's model of the creative process: Creativity as blind variation and selective retention. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 153-158.
Simonton, D.K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York, NY: Free Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investingincreativity. Ameri-can Psychologist, 51(7), 677-688.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). Concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (3-15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A three-facet model of creativity. in R. J. Sternberg(Ed.). The nature of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34(1), 1-31.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Starko, A. J. (2000). Creativity in the classroom: School in the curious delight. NJ: LEA.
Shriki, A. (2013). A model for assessing the development of students' creativity in the context of problem posing. Creative Education, 4(7), 430-439.
Turner, S. (2013). Teachers’ and pupils’ perceptions of creativity across different key stages. Research in education, 89, 23-40.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). Application of the Pygmalion Process to Employee Creativity. Journal of Management, 30, 413-432.
Torrance, H. (1995). Evaluating autheneic assessment: Problems and possibilities innew approaches to assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Tomlin, A. (2008). Introduction. In R. Shusterman, & A.Tomlin, (Eds.), Aesthetic experience. New York: Routledge.
Vista, C. (2000). Teaching classroom educators how to be more effective and creative teacher. Education, 120(4), 675-680.
Wang, H. (2001). Aesthetic experience, the unexpected and curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 47(1), 90-94.
Wiles, J. (1985). The mind of invention: Activities to stimulate creative thinking. NY : Holt, Rinehart and Wiseonsin.
Williams, F. E. (1970). Classroom ideas for encouraging thinking and feeling (2nd ed.). NY: D. O. K. Publishers Inc.
Williams, F. E. (1972). Encouraging creative potential. New Jersey, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Yang, H. L., & Cheng, H. H. (2009). Creative self-efficacy and its factors: An empirical study of information system analysts and programmers. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 429-438.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE