臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：學生美感經驗、創意自我效能與創造力：教師創造力教學有效嗎？
書刊名：教育實踐與研究
作者：張原誠／蕭佳純 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chang, Yuan-cheng／Hsiao, Chia-chun
出版日期：2016
卷期：29:2
頁次：頁65-104
主題關鍵詞：美感經驗；創造力；創造力教學；創意自我效能；Aesthetic experience；Creative self-efficacy；Creativity；Creativity instruction
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:785
  • 點閱點閱:177
本研究主旨在探討學生美感經驗及創意自我效能對創造力的影響，並以教師的創造力教學做為調節變項，以創造力成分理論、創造力系統理論及創意自我效能理論為理論基礎，建立研究模式。研究對象為大專院校設計學門的畢業專題學生與專題指導老師，取樣50組畢業專題團隊，共50位指導老師與338位學生，並運用階層線性模式（HLM）來分析教師與學生層次間各變項的影響。研究結果發現，教師的提升創造力意向教學方式有助於學生美感經驗，而學生的美感經驗會影響創造力與創意自我效能；教師增進創造力技能的教學方式會透過學生審美的態度、對美的理解力與完整經驗，提升學生創意成品信念，但是透過學生對美的快感，則會降低學生創意成品信念；教師創造力教學在學生創意自我效能與創造力之間不會產生調節效果。根據以上發現，本研究認為學校為了學生創造力的發展，應該重視學生美感經驗的培養，而且也要重新檢討教師的創造力教學方式。
Based on creativity component theory, creativity system theory and creative self-efficacy theory, this study aims to explore the influence of college students' aesthetics experience and creative self-efficacy on their creativity and the role of creativity instruction as a mediator variable. The participants were 338 college design majors in 50 teams who were working on their graduation exhibitions, and 50 advising professors from departments related to design. Hierarchical Linear Models were applied for analysis. The result showed that instruction on enhancing students' creative intention positively affect students' aesthetics experience. Students' aesthetics experience affects their creativity and creative self-efficacy. Creativity instruction with focus on creativity skills by means of promoting aesthetic attitude, aesthetic understanding, and offering complete experiences had a moderating effect on students' perception toward creative product. However, there was a negative moderating effect of creative instruction on perceived aesthetic pleasure and students' perception toward creative product. There was no moderating effect of creative instruction on the relationship between students' creative self-efficacy and creativity. Accordingly, the study concluded that in order to enhance students' creativity, universities should stress on the development of students' aesthetics experiences and re-evaluation of approaches to creativity instruction.
Other
1.Amabile, Teresa M.(1982)。The Social Psychology of Creativity，Springer-Verlag。  new window
期刊論文
1.Biswas, G.、Jeong, H.、Kinnebrew, J.、Sulcer, B.、Roscoe, R.(2010)。Measuring self-regulated learning skills through social interactions in a teachable agent environment。Research and Practice in Technology-Enhanced Learning，5(2)，123-152。  new window
2.Kinnebrew, J. S.、Biswas, G.(2011)。Modeling and measuring self-regulated learning in teachable agent environments。Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society，7(2)，19-35。  new window
3.Lussier, C.(2010)。Aesthetic literacy: The gold medal standard of learning excellence in dance。Physical & Health Education Journal，76(1)，40-44。  new window
4.Livingston, Larry(2010)。Teaching creativity in higher education。Arts Education Policy Review，111(2)，59-62。  new window
5.馮莉雅(20060600)。餐旅美學教育成效之調查研究--以國立高雄餐旅學院為例。高餐通識教育學刊，3，1-26。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳玲璋(20130500)。全觀性美感體驗對學校教學意涵之探究。藝術教育研究，25，109-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Mathisen, G. E.、Bronnick, K. S.(2009)。Creative self-efficacy: An intervention study。International Journal of Educational Research，48(1)，21-29。  new window
8.Fenner, D. E. W.(2003)。Aesthetic experience and aesthetic analysis。The Journal of Aesthetic Education，37(1)，40-53。  new window
9.林素卿(2009)。美感經驗對課程美學建構之啟示。東海教育評論，3，43-70。  延伸查詢new window
10.Lubart, T. I.、Getz, I.(1997)。Emotion, metaphor, and the creative process。Creative Research Journal，10(4)，285-301。  new window
11.James, Lawrence R.、Demaree, Robert G.、Wolf, Gerrit(1993)。rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement。Journal of Applied Psychology，78(2)，306-309。  new window
12.林偉文(20110600)。創意教學與創造力的培育--以「設計思考」為例。教育資料與研究，100，53-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.陳玉樹、胡夢鯨(20081200)。任務動機與組織創新氣候對成人教師創意教學表現之影響：階層線性模式分析。教育心理學報，40(2)，179-198。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.洪素蘋、黃宏宇、林珊如(20081200)。重要他人回饋影響創意生活經驗？：以模式競爭方式檢驗創意自我效能與創意動機的中介效果。教育心理學報，40(2)，303-319+321。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Kear, M.(2000)。Concept analysis of self-efficacy。Graduate Research in Nursing，2(2)，1-7。  new window
16.Turner, S.(2013)。Teachers' and pupils' perceptions of creativity across different key stages。Research in Education，89，23-40。  new window
17.Hsu, Michael L. A.、Hou, Sheng-Tsung、Fan, Hsueh-Liang(2011)。Creative self-efficacy and innovative behavior in a service setting: Optimism as a moderator。Journal of Creative Behavior，45(4)，258-272。  new window
18.彭台光、林鉦棽(20080200)。組織現象和層次議題：非獨立性資料的概念和實徵。組織與管理，1(1)，95-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.張世彗(20110600)。創造力教學、學習與評量之探究。教育資料與研究，100，1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.楊忠斌(2009)。美感經驗理論對教師的啓示。教育資料與研究，88，49-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.葉玉珠、李若瑜、賴思齊(2015)。「設計產品美感生活體驗量表」之發展。設計研究學報，8，64-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Abbott, D. H.(2010)。Experiencing creative self-efficacy: A case study approach to understand creativity in blogging。Journal of Media and Communication Studies，2，170-175。  new window
23.Aliakbari, F. H.(2015)。A comparison between self-efficacy and creativity of students in ordinary and smart schools。Journal of Educational and Management Studies，5(1)，92-97。  new window
24.Bammens, Y. P. M.(2016)。Employees' innovative behavior in social context: A closer examination of the role of organizational care。Journal of Product Innovation Management，33(3)，244-259。  new window
25.Beghetto, R. A.(2009)。Correlates of intellectual risk taking in elementary school science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，46，210-223。  new window
26.Beghetto, R. A.、Kaufman, J. C.(2013)。Fundamentals of creativity。Educational Leadership，70，10-15。  new window
27.Carroll, N.(2015)。Defending the content approach to aesthetic experience。Metaphilosophy，46(2)，171-188。  new window
28.Chamberlin, S. A.、Moon, S.(2005)。Model-eliciting activities: An introduction to gifted education。Journal of Secondary Gifted Education，17，37-47。  new window
29.Chuang, L. M.(2007)。The social psychology of creativity and innovation: Process theory perspective。Social Behavior and Personality，35(7)，875-888。  new window
30.Daly, S. R.、Mosyjowski, E. A.、Seifert, C. M.(2014)。Teaching creativity in engineering courses。Journal of Engineering Education，103(3)，417-449。  new window
31.Davidovitch, N.、Milgram, R. M.(2006)。Creative thinking as a predictor of teacher effectiveness in higher education。Creativity Research Journal，18，385-390。  new window
32.Kark, R.、Shamir, B.、Chen, G.(2003)。The two faces of transformational leadership: Dependence and empowerment。Journal of Applied Psychology，88(2)，243-255。  new window
33.Millar, G.、Dahl, C.(2011)。The power of creativity。The Alberta Teachers' Association Magazine，91(3)，16-21。  new window
34.Robbins, T. L.、Kegley, K.(2010)。Playing with thinkertoys to build creative abilities through online instruction。Thinking Skills and Creativity，5，40-48。  new window
35.Rufo, D.(2012)。Building forts and drawing on walls: Fostering student-initiated creativity both inside and outside the elementary classroom。Art Education，65(3)，40-47。  new window
36.Runco, M. A.(1996)。Creativity and development: Recommendations。New Directions for Child Development，72，87-91。  new window
37.Shriki, A.(2013)。A model for assessing the development of students' creativity in the context of problem posing。Creative Education，4(7)，430-439。  new window
38.溫福星、邱皓政(20090400)。組織研究中的多層次調節式中介效果：以組織創新氣氛、組織承諾與工作滿意的實證研究為例。管理學報，26(2)，189-211。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.周淑卿(20110100)。學習歷程中美感經驗的性質--藝術與科學課堂的探究。課程與教學，14(1)，19-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.Girod, Mark、Twyman, Todd、Wojcikiewicz, Steve(2010)。Teaching and learning science for transformative, aesthetic experience。Journal of Science Teacher Education，21(7)，801-824。  new window
41.Gong, Yaping、Huang, Jia-Chi、Farh, Jiing-Lih(2009)。Employee Learning Orientation, Transformational Leadership, and Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Employee Creative Self-Efficacy。Academy of Management Journal，52(4)，765-778。  new window
42.Tierney, Pamela、Farmer, Steven M.(2002)。Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance。Academy of Management Journal，45(6)，1137-1148。  new window
43.Yang, H. L.、Cheng, H. H.(2009)。Creative self-efficacy and its factors: An empirical study of information system analysts and programmers。Computers in Human Behavior，25(2)，429-438。  new window
44.吳清山(20020400)。創意教學的重要理念與實施策略。臺灣教育，614，2-8。  延伸查詢new window
45.Simplicio, J. S. C.(2000)。Teaching classroom educators how to be more effective and creative teacher。Education，120(4)，675-680。  new window
46.Baron, Reuben M.、Kenny, David A.(1986)。The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，51(6)，1173-1182。  new window
47.Hunter, S. T.、Bedell, K. E.、Mumford, M. D.(2007)。Climate for creativity: A quantitative review。Creativity Research Journal，19(1)，69-90。  new window
48.蕭佳純(20121100)。國小學生內在動機、學科知識與創造力表現關聯之研究：教師創造力教學的調節效果。特殊教育研究學刊，37(3)，89-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
49.林碧芳、邱皓政(20080300)。創意教學自我效能感量表之編制與相關研究。教育研究與發展期刊，4(1)，141-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
50.彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(20060200)。管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報，23(1)，77-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
51.蕭佳純(20111200)。學校創新氣氛、教師內在動機與教師創意教學表現關聯之研究：多層次調節式中介效果之探討。當代教育研究季刊，19(4)，85-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
52.陳玉樹、郭銘茜(20130900)。四向度成就目標對教師創意教學表現之影響：創意自我效能的中介效果與團隊學習行為的跨層級調節效果檢定。教育科學研究期刊，58(3)，85-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
53.Podsakoff, Philip M.、MacKenzie, Scott B.、Lee, Jeong-Yeon、Podsakoff, Nathan P.(2003)。Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies。Journal of Applied Psychology，88(5)，879-903。  new window
研究報告
1.教育部統計處(2014)。大專校院科系別概況。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Davies, S.、Higgins, K.、Hopkins, R.、Stecker, R.、Cooper, D.(2009)。A companion to aesthetics。Malden, MA：Wiley-Blackwell。  new window
2.Starko, A. J.(2000)。Creativity in the Classroom: School in the curious delight。NJ：LEA。  new window
3.Amabile, T. M.(1996)。Creativity in Context。Westview Press。  new window
4.Gallagher, J. J.、Gallagher, S. A.(1994)。Teaching the gifted child。Boston, Massachusetts：Allyn and Bacon Inc.。  new window
5.溫福星(2006)。階層線性模式的原理、方法與應用。台北：雙葉。  延伸查詢new window
6.Jung, C.、Rothgeb, C. L.、Clemens, S. M.(1973)。Experimental researches: Collected works of Carl Jung。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。  new window
7.Kaufman, J. C.、Sternberg, R. J.、黃曉嵐、蔡淑君(2014)。創造力：理論與當代議題面面觀。台北：華騰文化。  延伸查詢new window
8.Kreft, I. G. G.、Leeuw, J.、邱皓政(2009)。多層次模型分析導論。台北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
9.Maquet, Jacques Jérôme Pierre、武珊珊、王慧姬(2003)。美感經驗：一位人類學者眼中的視覺藝術。台北：雄獅。  延伸查詢new window
10.Runco, Mark A.、邱皓政、丁興祥(2008)。創造力：當代理論與議題。台北：心理。  延伸查詢new window
11.Richards, R.、賴麗珍(2009)。日常創造力與人類特質新論。台北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
12.Simonton, D. K.(2004)。Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and Zeitgeist。Cambridge, UK：Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Tatarkiewicz, W.、劉文潭(2001)。西洋六大美學理念史。台北：聯經。  延伸查詢new window
14.Torrance, H.(1995)。Evaluating autheneic assessment: Problems and possibilities in new approaches to assessment。Buckingham：Open University Press。  new window
15.崔光宙、方志華(1992)。美感判斷發展研究。臺北：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
16.Guilford, J. P.(1968)。Intelligence, creativity and their educational implications。San Diego, California：Robert R. Knapp。  new window
17.張世彗(20070000)。創造力：理論、技法與教學。臺北：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.朱光潛(2003)。談美。晨星出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.Sternberg, Robert J.(1999)。Handbook of creativity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
20.Guilford, Joy Paul(1965)。Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education。McGraw-Hill。  new window
圖書論文
1.Amabile, T. M.(1987)。The motivation to be creative。Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics。Buffalo, New York：Bearly Limited。  new window
2.Csikszentmihalyi, M.、Wolfe, R.(2000)。New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: Implications of systems perspective for creativity in education。International handbook of giftedness and talent。Nailsea, UK：Elsevier Science。  new window
3.Dewey, J.(1981)。Experience and nature。John Dewey: The later works。Carbondale, IL：Southern Illinois University Press。  new window
4.Seel, M.(2008)。On the scope of aesthetic experience。Aesthetic experience。New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
5.Tomlin, A.(2008)。Introduction[Aesthetic experience]。Aesthetic experience。New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
6.Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly(1999)。Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity。The Handbook of Creativity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Sternberg, R. J.、Lubart, T. I.(1999)。The concept of creativity: prospects and paradigms。Handbook of creativity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Bandura, Albert(1994)。Self-efficacy。Encyclopedia of human behavior。New York：Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 部屬啊！您有做自己的機會嗎？尚嚴、專權雙元領導與部屬任務績效之關聯性：以情緒調節策略揭開潘朵拉的盒子
2. 部屬難為：領導者利組織不道德行為與部屬離職傾向、越級建言、主管導向組織公民行為與沉默行為之關係：以領導者-部屬交換關係為調節效果
3. 設計思考提升學習動機與問題解決信心--臺灣大學生學習設計思考課程的實證分析
4. 學校支持對教師創造力教學行為影響之研究：角色認定與專業學習社群的多層次中介分析
5. 探討不同族群新住民子女在兩類創意思考表現之差異：以文化距離作為中介變項
6. 國小教師參與專業學習社群對學生學習動機與學習行為影響之研究
7. 國際觀光旅館職場友誼與工作表現關係之探討--以卓越能力商數為中介變項
8. 教師協作在校長教學領導對教師自我效能影響的多層次中介效果研究：兼論教育階段的調節效果
9. 青少年社會網絡指標及幽默表現風格之交互作用影響與被霸凌經驗之關係
10. 6E教學模式結合STEM融入大學生專題課程之研究
11. 中高齡職涯未來時間觀、職場成功老化和就業力之關係--探討工作要求與資源的調節式中介作用
12. 生活美感經驗與幸福感之研究
13. 教保服務人員美感經驗教學量表建構
14. 融入社會實踐的大學通識藝術課程--以「藝術欣賞自主學習」及「服務學習與社會實踐」課程為例
15. CDIO體育課程設計與傳統體育課程設計對大專生學習成效之比較
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：430（臺灣：421，外國：9） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1780212 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67589146
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上