參考文獻

中文部分
白亦方（2010）。課程史研究的理論與實踐。臺北市：高等教育。
卯靜儒（2014）。改革即改變嗎？─教育改革理解路徑之探索。教育學刊，42，1-37。
卯靜儒（2017）。課程發展的典範轉移與文化建立：十二年國教課綱之教育想像與課程實踐。載於白亦方（主編），課程改革2016回顧與展望，（頁201-220）。臺北市：五南。
何縕琪、許木柱、江瑞珍（2008）。原住民文學閱讀教學對學生族群意象發展之效應：以花蓮縣一個國三班級為例。當代教育研究，16（2），1-44。
吳剛、洪建中（2012）。一種新的學習隱喻：拓展性學習的研究－基於”文化-歷史”活動理論視角。遠程教育雜誌，3，23-30。
吳清山、王令宜（2018）。教育4.0世代的人才培育探析。載於中國教育學會（主編），邁向教育4.0：智慧學校的想像與建構（頁3-29）。臺北市：學富文化。
吳清山、林天祐（2011）。教育名詞課程轉化。教育資料與研究雙月刊，102，203-204。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/23/pta_5914_5273376_85638.pdf
宋文里（譯）（2018）。J. Bruner著。教育的文化（The culture of education）。臺北市：遠流。
李子建、邱德峰（2017）。學生自主學習：教學條件與策略。全球教育展望，46（1），47-57。
李雅卿（2006）。自主學習理念六講-知、行、悟的流轉。臺北市：自主學習促進會。
周淑卿（2002）。課程政策與教育革新。臺北市：師大書苑。
周淑卿（2007）。課程發展的夥伴關係中大學研究者的挑戰。載於周淑卿、陳麗華（主編），課程改革的挑戰與省思：黃光雄教授七十大祝壽論文集（一），（頁141-161）。高雄市：麗文。
周淑卿（2019）。國中小前導學校運作現況與展望。載於范巽綠（主編），課程協作與實踐第三輯，（頁114-125）。臺北市：教育部課綱推動專辦。
周淑卿、王郁雯（2019）。從課程統整到跨領域課程：台灣二十年的論述與問題。教育學報，47（2），41-59。
林永豐（2017）。核心素養的課程教學轉化與設計。教育研究月刊，275，4-17。
林佩璇（2004）。學校課程實踐與行動研究。臺北市：高等教育。
林佩璇（2017）。矛盾趨動擴展學習：差異化教學實的踐轉化。課程與教學季刊，20（4），117-150。
林佩璇（2019）。教學活化，活化教學：文化歷史活動理論觀。課程與教學季刊，22（1），17-37。
林佩璇、高翠鴻、許燕萍（2016）。差異化教學的矛盾與轉化：活動理論觀。中等教育，67（4），7-20。
林佳慧、陳柳如、陳佩英（2018）。香港優質學校改進計劃對臺灣課程協作之啓示。課程與教學季刊，21(3)，59-89。
林明地（2012）。提升學習成效的文化核心：健全學校體質。教育資料與研究，107，23-42。
林俊宏（譯）（2018）。Y.N. Harari著。21世紀的21堂課（21 Lessons for the 21st Century）。臺北市：遠見天下文化。
林逢祺、洪仁進（2014）。啟蒙、對化與轉化。臺北市：學富文化。
柯志恩（2008）。後設認知導向的閱讀策略。載於台灣心理學會教育心理學組（合著），我可以學得更好：學習診斷與輔導手冊.高年級版，（頁66-79）。臺北市：心理。
洪詠善、范信賢（主編）（2015）。同行~走進十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。新北市：國家教育研究院。
洪詠善、盧秋珍（2017）。國中理解與實踐自主學習之案例探究。教育研究月刊，278，30-45。
洪詠善、林佳慧、楊惠娥（2018）。十二年國教課綱自主學習之實踐探究。教育脈動，15，20-28。
洪詠善、陳木金、盧秋珍（2014）。學校層級課程實施與課程協作。載於潘文忠主編，十二年國民基本教育課程發展建議書，（頁79-87）。新北市：國家教育研究院。
洪裕宏（2008）。界定與選擇國民核心素養：概念參考架構與理論基礎研究。 行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（NSC 95-2511-S-010-001）。 臺北市：陽明大學。
洪裕宏（2011）。定義與選擇國民核心素養的理論架構。研習資訊，28（4），15-24。
范信賢（2017）。慈心華德福學校課程的美學探究。課程與教學季刊，20（4），55-78。
范信賢（2018）。簡介彈性學習課程。十二年國教課程實踐計畫之學校總體課程規劃與領導工作坊。臺北市：國家教育研究院。
范信賢、尤淑慧（2009）。跨越藩籬：學校與社區連結的案例研究。課程與教學，12（4），89-112。
范信賢、尤淑慧（2017）。專題探究─十二年國教課綱及他山之石。教育脈動，11，50-58。
郭恬君譯（譯）（2015）。S.-S. Deborah著。跳著只能二選一的矛盾思考法（The power of paradox: Harness the energy of competing ideas to uncover radically innovative solutions）。臺北市：商周。
唐淑華（2011a）。從希望感模式論學業挫折之調適與因應－正向心理學提供的「第三種選擇」。臺北市：心理。
唐淑華（2011b）。眾聲喧嘩？跨界思維？－論「教學轉化」的意涵及其在文史科目教學上的應用。教科書研究，4（2），87-120。
國家教育研究院（2014，3月31日）。十二年國教總綱研修第9次會議紀錄。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/8/pta_10093_4260413_00578.pdf
張德銳（2018）。以校長學習領導推動素養導向教學。台灣教育，711，87-93。
教育部（2008）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北市：作者。
教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市：作者。
梁雲霞（2006）。從自主學習理論到學校實務─概念架構與方案發展。當代教育研究，14（4），171-206。
梁雲霞（2009，11月）。學生能夠自主學習嗎？華人教師對自主學習觀點之探究。論文發表於香港教育學院舉辦之「小學教育」國際研究討會，香港。
梁雲霞（2017）。自主學習：教師觀點的探究分析。教育論叢，5，169-198。
梁雲霞（2020）。善教樂學：新課綱脈絡下的自主學習。教育研究月刊，309，4-23。
梁歆、黃顯華（2010）。大學與學校協作下學校發展主任的理念、策略與角色：香港優質學校改進計畫的個案研究。教育研究集刊，56（1），99-126。
符碧真（2018）素養導向國教新課綱的師資培育：國立臺灣大學「探究式─素養導向的師資培育」理想芻議。教育科學研究期刊，63（4），59-87
陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。臺北市：五南。
陳伯璋，盧美貴（2014）。另類學校課程美學實踐的反思：以道禾實驗學校為例。教育研究月刊，241，34-52。
陳美如、雷嗣汶（2019）。跨領域學習：創新課程發展關鍵元素。教育研究月刊，300，18-35。
陳佩英（2015）。結構縫隙、社群連結與教育學想像的實踐。中等教育，66（1），58-78。
陳佩英、簡菲莉（2018）。一所高中學校轉型之歷程研究：活動理論取徑。教育研究與發展期刊，14（3），65-100。
陳佩英、林佳慧（2020）。自決改變的行動者：初探聯合世界學院學生學習經驗。教育研究月刊，310，102-119。
陳佩英、曾正宜（2011）。探析專業學習社群的展化學習經驗與課程創新行動。教育研究集刊，57（2），39-84。
陳彥廷（2014）。課程轉化實作促進國小師培生對數學課程理解之研究。當代教育研究季刊，22（4），1-54。
陳斐卿、林盈秀、蕭述三（2013）。教師合作設計課程的困難--活動理論觀點。教育實踐與研究，26（1），63-94。
單文經（2000）。析論抗拒課程改革的原因及其對策：以國民中小學九年一貫課程為例。教育研究集刊，45，15-34。
馮朝霖（2004）。駱駝‧獅子與孩童─尼采精神三變說與批判教育學及另類教育學的起源。教育研究月刊，121，5-13。
馮朝霖（2016）。乘風尋度—教育美學論輯。新竹市：道禾書院。
馮朝霖、范信賢、白亦方（2011）。國民中小學課程綱要系統圖像之研究-研究報告，國家教育研究院委託計畫（NAER-99-12-A-1-02-01-1-02）。新北市：國家教育研究院
黃志賢、林福來（2008）。利用活動理論分析台灣泰雅族國中生的數學學習並設計教學活動。科學教育學刊，16（2），147-169。
黃政傑（2014）。課程設計。臺北市：臺灣東華。
黃政傑、張嘉育（2010）。讓學生成功學習：適性課程與教學之理念與策略。課程與教學季刊，13（3），1-22。
黃囇莉、洪才舒（2017）。學習的意義感：建立、失落及再創生。教育科學研究期刊，62（1），133-162。
楊俊鴻、歐用生（2009）。第三空間及其課程美學意蘊。教育資料與研究雙月刊，88，69-92。
楊龍立（2016）。活動理論簡介及評析。國教新知，63（2），3-10。
甄曉蘭（2000）。新世紀課程改革的挑戰與課程實踐理論的重建。教育研究集刊，44（1），61-90。
甄曉蘭（2001）。從課程組織的觀點檢討統整課程的設計與實施。課程與教學季刊，4（1），1-19。
甄曉蘭（2004）。課程理論與實務─解建與重建。臺北市：高等教育。
趙志成（2014）。香港推行自主學習的探索。教育學報，42（2），143-153。
趙志成、何碧愉、張佳偉、李文浩（2013）。學校改進的理論與實踐。香港：香港中文大學香港教育研究所。
劉佩雲（2002）。自我調整學習的課程與教學。課程與教學季刊，5（3），35-48。
劉欣宜、林佳慧（2017）。尋找新的可能--談國民中小學彈性學習課程的多元面貌。教育研究月刊，278，46-59。
劉美慧（2000）。建構文化回應教學模式：一個多族群班級的教學實驗。花蓮師院學報，11，115-142。
潘慧玲、陳文彥（2018）。校長促進教師專業學習的槓桿：校長學習領導對教師課堂教學研究影響之中介模式分析。教育研究集刊，64（3），79-121。
潘慧玲、陳佩英、張素貞、鄭淑惠、陳文彥（2014）。從學習領導論析學習共同體的概念與實踐。市北教育學刊，45，1-28。
蔡清田、陳延興（2010）。整合型計畫：中小學課程相關之課程、教學、認知發展等學理基礎與理論趨向。新北市：國家教育研究院籌備處。
蔡清田、陳延興（2013）。國民核心素養之課程轉化。課程與教學季刊，16 （3），59-78。
鄭文星（2002）。九年一貫課程之「彈性學習時間」的問題與研究。國民教育研究集刊，10，137-162。
盧乃桂、何碧愉（2010a）。能動者行動的意義──探析學校發展能量的提升歷程。教育學報，38（1），1-31。
盧乃桂、何碧愉（2010b）。能動者工作的延續力：學校改進的啟動與更新。教育學報，38（2），1-39。
謝易霖（2019）。與英雄同行：自主學習取向課程實踐之教師反思。課程與教學季刊，22（2），145-172。
鍾啓泉（譯）（2010）。佐藤學著。學校的挑戰：創建學習共同體。上海：華東師範大學。
簡良平、甄曉蘭（2001）。學校自主發展課程之相關因素分析。教育研究集刊，46（1），53-80。
藍佩嘉（2019）。拚教養：全球化、親職焦慮與不平等童年。臺北市：春山。
鍾宜興 （2018）素養導向課程設計理念與實務之分析：論課程綱要發展之變與不變。中等教育，69（2），8-20
龐維國、薛慶國（2001）。中國古代的自主學習思想探析。心理科學，24（1），59-62。

 
西文部分
Abrams, P. (1983). Historical Sociology. Ithaca, NY: Cornel University Press.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
Barab, S. A., Evans, M. A., & Baek, E.-O. (2004). Activity theory as a lens for characterizing the participatory unit. In Jonassen, D. (Ed.), Handbook for Educational Communications and Technology (pp.199–214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Belland, B. R., Kim, C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2013). A framework for designing scaffolds that improve motivation and cognition. Educational Psychologist, 48, 243-270.
Belski, R., & Belski, I. (2014). Cultivating student skills in self-regulated learning through evaluation of task complexity. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(5), 459-469.
Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher-curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts, New York, NY: Doubleday.
Bhabha, H., & Rutherford, J. (1990). The third space: Interview with Homi Bhabha. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: community, culture, difference (pp.207-221). London, UK: Lawrence & Wishart.
Blase, J., Blase, J., & Phillips, D. Y. (2010). Handbook of school improvement: How high-performing principals create high-performing schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445–457.
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Campbell, B., Campbell, L., & Dickinson, D. (2004). Teaching and learning through multiple intelligences. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Centre for the New Economy and Society (2018). The future of jobs report. Cologny/Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
Cetin, B. (2015). Academic motivation and self-regulated learning in predicting academic achievement in college. Journal of International Education Research, 11(2), 95-106.
Cochrane, T., & Rhodes, D. (2013). iArchi[tech]ture: Developing a mobile social media framework for pedagogical transformation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 372-386.
Cuban, L. (1988), A fundamental puzzle of school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 69(5), 341-344.
Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming Again, Again and Again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3-13.
Davydov, V. V. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Davydov, V. V. (2008). Problems of developmental instruction: a theoretical and experimental psychological study. New York, NY: Nova Science.
Deakin Crick, R., Broadfoot, P., & Claxton, G. (2004). Developing an effective lifelong learning inventory: The ELLI project. Assessment in Education, 11(3), 248-272. doi:10.1080/0969594042000304582
Dempster, N., Townsend, T., Johnson, G., Bayetto, A., Lovett, S., & Stevens, E. (2017). Leadership and literacy: Principals, partnerships, and pathways to improvement. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Dimmock, C. (2012). Leadership, capacity building and school improvement: Concepts, themes, and impact. London, UK: Routledge.
Doyle, W. (1992). Constructing curriculum in the classroom. In F. K. Oser, A. Dick., & J. Patry (Eds), Effective and responsible Teaching: The New Synthesis (pp.66-79). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Pub.
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4–58.
Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 168–182.
Eisner, E., & Vallance, E. (1974). Five conceptions of curriculum: Their roots and implications for curriculum planning. In E. Eisner, & E. Vallance (Eds.), Conflicting conceptions of curriculum (pp.1-18) Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Elmore, R. F., & Fuller, B. (1996). Empirical research on educational choice: What are the implications for police-makers? In B. Fuller, R. F. Elmore, & G. Orfield (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions and the unequal effects of school choice(pp.187-201). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working, and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
Engeström, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a test bench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context (pp.64-103). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics. 43(7), 960-974.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity-theoretical conceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings, and future challenges. Educational research review, 5(1), 1-24.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 368-387.
European Commission. (2019). Key competences for lifelong learning. Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/297a33c8-a1f3-11e9-9d01-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
Fadel, C., Bialik, M., & Trilling, B. (2015). Four-dimensional education: The competencies learners need to succeed. Boston, MA: Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce & Industry (2017). Leapfrogging to education 4.0: Students at the Core. New Delhi, India: Author.
Finnish National Board of Education. (2016). National core curriculum for basic education 2014. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish National Agency for Education.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). Learning as a generative activity: eight learning strategies that promote understanding. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107707085.
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep learning: Engage the world change the world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Gardiner, A., Hase, S., Gardner, G., Dunn, S., & Carryer, J. (2007). From competence to capability: a study of nurse practitioners in clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(20), 250-258
Goodlad, J. I. (1979). The scope of curriculum field. In J. I. Goodlad & others (Eds.), Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculum practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Goodlad, J. I. (1994). Educational renewal: better teachers, better schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass publishers.
H.K. Curriculum Development Council (2017). Secondary Education Curriculum Guide Draft Booklet 3 Effective Learning and Teaching: Developing Lifelong and Self-directed Learners. Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/renewal/Guides/SECG%20booklet%203_20170531.pdf
Hallinger, P. (2011) Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125-142.
Hargreaves, A. & O’Connor, M.T. (2018). Collaborative professionalism: When teaching together means learning for all. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(8), 811–826.
Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2007). Heutagogy: A child of complexity theory. International Journal of Complexity & Education, 49 (1), 111-118.
Haste, H. (2001). Ambiguity, autonomy, and agency: psychological challenges to new competence. In D. Rychen, & L. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and Selecting Key Competencies (pp. 93-120). Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
Haworth, L. (1986). Autonomy: An essay in philosophical psychology and ethics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hollins, E. R. (2008). Culture in school learning: Revealing the deep meaning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Housand, A., & Reis, S. (2008). Self-regulated learning in reading: gifted pedagogy and instructional settings. Journal of Advanced Academies, 20(1), 108-136.
Istance, D., & Dumont, H. (2010). Future directions for learning environments in the 21st century. In H. Dumont, D. Istance, & F. Benavides (Eds.), The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice (pp. 317–338). Paris, France: OECD, Centre for Research and Educational Innovation.
Kiemer, K., Groschner, A., Pehmer, A., & Seidal, T. (2015). Effects of a classroom discourse intervention on teachers’ practice and student motivation to learn mathematics and science. Learning and Instruction, 35, 94-103.
Knowles, M. (1970). The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy. New York, NY: Associated Press.
Leithwood, K., Seashore K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How leadership influences student learning. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/school-leadership/key-research/Documents/How-Leadership-Infl uences-Student-Learning.pdf
Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow, Russia: Progress.
Leontiev A.N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Hillsdale, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lingard, B., Hayes, D., Mills, M., & Christie, P. (2009). Leading learning: Making hope practical in schools. Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.
MacBeath, J., & Dempster, N. (Eds.). (2009). Connecting leadership and learning: Principles for practice. London, UK: Routledge.
McMillan, J. H. (2016). Classroom assessment: principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction (7th ed.). London, UK: Pearson Education.
McMillan, J. (2009). An overview on transformative learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning (pp. 90-105). New York, NY: Routledge.
Miettinen, R. (2013). Innovation, human capabilities, and democracy: Toward an enabling welfare state. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ministry of Education (2014). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education: General guidelines. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.
Murphy, J. (1993). Restructuring: In search of a movement. In J. Murphy & P.Hallinger (Eds.), Restructuring schooling: Learning from ongoing efforts(pp.1-31). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
Murphy, J., Elliott, S., Goldring, E., & Porter, A. (2007). Leadership for learning: A research-based model and taxonomy of behaviors. School Leadership and Management, 27(2), 179–201.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). How People Learn II: Learners, Contexts, and Cultures. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. New Zealand: Author.
Neuhouser, F. (2011). Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the origins of autonomy. Inquiry, 54, 478-493.
Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston, MA: Alley and Bacon.
O’Meara, J. (2010). Beyond differentiated instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
OECD. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies. Paris, France: Author.
Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom Applications of Research on Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101
Payne, R. K. (2013). A framework for understanding poverty: A cognitive approach (5th ed). Highlands, TX: aha﹗Process.
Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 317-344.
Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary discourses. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulation learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407.
Popkewitz, T. S. (1988). Education reform: Rhetoric, ritual, and social interest. Educational Theory, 38, 77-93
Robertson, W., & Riel, V. (2019). Right to Be Educated or Right to Choose? School Choice and Its Impact on Education in North Carolina. Virginia Law Review, 105(5), 1079–1114.
Robinson, V. M. J. (2011). Student-centered leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674.
Rogers, C. (1969). Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: A Bell & Howell.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Rosas, C. L. O. (1997). Using participatory action research for the reconceptualization of educational practice. In S. Hollingsworth (Ed.), International action research (pp. 219-224). Washington, DC: Falmer.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (eds.). (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Sannino A., & Engeström Y. (2018). Cultural-historical activity theory: founding insights and new challenges. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 14(3), 43–56.
Sarason, S. B. (1982). The culture of the school and the problem of change (2nd ed). Boston, MA: Alley and Bacon.
Sarason, S. B. (1996). Revisiting “The culture of the school and the problem of change”. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1987). Enhancing comprehension skill and self-efficacy with strategy value information. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, 285-302.
Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1989). Learning goals and children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 279-293.
Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1991). Learning goals and progress feedback during reading comprehension instruction. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23, 351-364.
Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E.L. (2013). Barry J. Zimmerman’s theory of self-regulated learning. In H. Bembenutty, T. J. Cleary, & A. Kitsantas (Eds.), Application of self-regulated learning across diverse disciplines: a tribute to Barry J. Zimmerman (pp. 1–28). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000), Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York, NY: Doubleday Currency.
Shapley, P. (2000). On-line education to develop complex reasoning skills in organic chemistry. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2), 43-52.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Sinnema, C., & Aitken, G. (2013). Trends in international curriculum development. In M. Priestley, M. & G.J.J. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: new trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 141-163). London, UK: Continuum.
Skilbeck, M. (1984). School-based curriculum development. London, UK: Harper ＆Row.
Slattery, C. P. (1995). Curriculum development in the postmodern era. New York, NY: Garland.
Smith, J. (2007). Toward the pedagogically engaged school: Listening to student voice as a positive to disengagement and ‘dropping out’? In D. Thiessen& A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International Handbook of Student Experience in Elementary and Secondary School. Netherlands: Springer, 635-658.
Stake, R. (2000). Case studies. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research(pp.435-453). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stolk, J. & Harari, J. (2014). Student motivations as predictors of high-level cognitions in project-based classrooms. Active Learning in High Education. 15(3), 231–247.
Turner, J. C., Christensen, A., Kackar-Cam, H. Z., Fulmer, S. M., & Trucano, M. (2018) The development of professional learning communities and their teacher leaders: An activity systems analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(1), 49-88.
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of curriculum studies, 44(3), 299-321.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walk, D. F. (1971). A naturalistic model of curriculum development. The School review, 80(1), 51-65.
Wanger, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of education research: A framework for reconsidering research-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 3-22.
Wanger, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of education research: A framework for reconsidering research-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 3-22.
Watson, N., & Fullan, M. (1992). “Beyond School District-university Partnerships.” In Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (Eds.), Teacher Development and Educational Change (pp. 213-242). London, UK: Falmer Press.
Wetherill, K. S., & Applefield, J. M. (2005). Using school change states to analyze comprehensive school reform projects. School Effectiveness and School Improvement,16 (2), 197-215.
Wormeli, R. (2005). Summarization in any subject: 50 techniques to improve student learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Yamagata-Lynch, L. C., & Haudenschild, M. T. (2009). Using activity systems analysis to identify inner contradictions in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 507-517.
Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2010). Activity systems analysis methods: understanding complex learning environments. Boston, MA: Springer.
Yates, L. & Young, M. (2010). Editorial: Globalization, knowledge, and the curriculum. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 4-10.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zeicher, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (1996) Reflective teaching: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166-183.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. New York, NY: Routledge.