|
參考文獻
一、中文部分
1.大野義男、江瑞坤 (2014)，精實現場管理：豐田生產方式資深顧問親授40年現場管理實務，台北市：中衛發展中心。
2.大野義男、侯東旭、江瑞坤 (2007)，豐田的三位一體生產系統。台北市：中衛發展中心。
3.王鳳彬、鄭騰豪、劉剛 (2018)，企業組織變革的動態演化過程，中國工業經濟，
4.李慶芳 (2006)。情境知識的管理模式：探索知識內嵌的本質、情境學習與實踐中知曉。國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所未出版博士論文，高雄市。
5.杜慧文、劉信宏、楊恩琳、翁政義 (2011)。機械產業發展的回顧與展望。科學發展，457期，頁39-42。
6.林瓊瀛 (2001)。為何而變？何時該變？該如何變？解開組織變革的五個問號，會計研究月刊，118期，頁16-19。
7.張玉琦、高士閔、邵蓓宣、江守智、賀大新 (2020)。「精實是一種態度，永遠要求今天比昨天更好」，經理人月刊，第191期，頁62-82。
8.陳志遠、葉怡良、許禮哲、魏式琦 (2021)。推動豐田生產系統的新架構：組織學習觀點。產業與管理論壇，第23卷第3期，頁74-104。
9.彭玉樹、朱珮珊 (2014)。台灣資訊電子業組織變革前因之研究：組織寬裕、公司治理結構觀點，創新與管理，第10卷第14期，頁1-23。
10.黃延聰 (2020)。組織能力之更新：組織認定觀點。中山管理評論，第28卷第1期，頁9-66。
11.黃銘章 (2017)。二元俱存可以提升供應商的績效嗎？結合觀點下中衛體系供應網絡二元俱存的跨層次影響。組織與管理，第10卷第2期，頁103-154。
12.劉仁傑、吳銀澤、巫茂熾、邱創鈞、桑原喜代和 (2018)。面對未來的智造者：工業4.0的困惑與下一波製造業再興，台北：大寫出版。
13.蕭瑞麟 (2006)，不用數字的研究，台北：紅螞蟻圖書有限公司。
二、英文部分
1.Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 61-83.
2.Billington, P. J. (2004). A classroom exercise to illustrate lean manufacturing pull concepts. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 2(1), 71-76.
3.Boumgarden, P., Nickerson, J., and Zenger, T. R. (2012). Sailing into the wing: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 587-610.
4.Brix, J. (2019). Innovation capacity building: An approach to maintaining balance between exploration and exploitation in organizational. The Learning Organization, 26(1), 12-26.
5.Buer, S. V., Strandhagen, J. O., and Chan, F. T. (2018). The link between industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing: Mapping current research and establishing a research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2924-2940.
6.Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics and Supply Chain Management. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
7.Dawson, P. M. (1994). Organizational Change: A Processual Approach. Paul Chapman Publishing.
8.Dyer‚ W. G‚ and Wilkins‚ A. L. (1991). Better stories‚ not better constructs‚ to generate better theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review‚16(3), 613-619.
9.Eisenhardt‚ K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review‚14(4), 532-550.
10.Gavetti, G., Henderson, R., and Giorgi, S. (2005). Kodak and the Digital Revolution (A). Harvard Business School Publishing.
11.Gonzalez, R. V. D., and de Melo, T. M. (2018). The effects of organization context on knowledge exploration and exploitation. Journal of Business Research, 90, 215-225.
12.Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., and Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693-706.
13.Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., and Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation exploitative innovation and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11)‚1661-1674.
14.Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880.
15.Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., and Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299-312.
16.Kang, H. S., Lee, J. Y., Choi, S., Kim, H., Park, J. H., Son, J. Y., and Do Noh, S. (2016). Smart manufacturing: Past research, present findings, and future directions. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 3(1), 111-128.
17.Khanagha, S., Volberda, H., and Oshri, I. (2014). Business model renewal and ambidexterity: Structural alteration and strategy formation process during transition to a cloud business model. R&D Management, 44(3), 322-340.
18.Kim, C., Song, J., and Nerkar, A. (2012). Learning and innovation: Exploitation and exploration trade-offs. Journal of Business Research, 65(8), 1189-1194.
19.Klein‚ H. K.‚ and Myers‚ M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretative field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly‚ 23(1), 67-94.
20.Knol, W. H., Lauche, K., Schouteten, R., and Slomp, J. (2019). The duality of lean: Organizational learning for sustained development. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2019, No. 1, p. 10594). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
21.Kolberg, D., and Zühlke, D. (2015). Lean automation enabled by industry 4.0 technologies. IFAC-Papers On Line, 48(3), 1870-1875.
22.Kotter, J. P. (1999). What effective general managers really do. Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 145-159.
23.Lavie, D., Kang, J., and Rosenkodf, L. (2011). Balance within and across domains: The performance implications of exploration and exploitation in alliance. Organization Science, 22(6), 1517-1538.
24.Lewin, K. (1951). In Dorwin Cartwright (Eds.), Field Theory of Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. New York: Harper and Brothers.
25.Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., and Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646-672.
26.March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
27.Müller, J., Maier, L., Veile, J., and Voigt, K. I. (2017). Cooperation strategies among SMEs for implementing industry 4.0. In Digitalization in Supply Chain Management and Logistics: Smart and Digital Solutions for an Industry 4.0 Environment. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), 23, 301-318. Berlin: epubli GmbH.
28.Nadler, D.A., and Shaw, R. B. (1995). Change Leadership: Core Competency for the Twenty-First Century, Discontinuous Change: Leading Organizational Transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1-14.
29.Osiyevskyy, O., Shirokova, G., and Ritala, P. (2020). Exploration and exploitation in crisis environment: Implications for level and variability of firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 114, 227-239.
30.Oviatt, B.M. (1988). Agency and transaction cost perspectives on the manager-shareholder relationship: Incentive for congruent interests. Academy of Management Review, 13(2), 214-225.
31.Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., and Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685-695.
32.Simsek, Z. (2009). Organization ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 598-624.
33.Styhre, A. (2002). Non‐linear change in organizations: organization change management informed by complexity theory. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 23(6),343-351.
34.Sykes, C. (2018). Patrick Dawson: Organizational change as a nonlinear, ongoing, dynamic process. The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers, Springer International Publishing AG, Switzerland, 401-420.
35.Taylor, A., and Greve, H. R. (2006). Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 723-740.
36.Úbeda-García, M., Claver-Cortés, E., Marco-Lajara, B., and Zaragoza-Sáez, P. (2020). Toward a dynamic construction of organizational ambidexterity: Exploring the synergies between structural differentiation, organizational context, and interorganizational relations. Journal of Business Research, 112, 363-372.
37.Wheelwright, S. C., and Clark, K. B. (1994). Accelerating the design‐build‐test cycle for effective product development. International Marketing Review,11(1), 32-46.
38.Yin‚ R. K. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Newbury Park‚California: Sage.
39.Zhou, K., Liu, T., and Zhou, L. (2015). Industry 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges. In 2015 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), IEEE, 2147-2152.
三、日文部分
1.門田安弘，(1983)，トヨタ生產方式の新展開，日本能率協會。
2.千野俊猛，(2004)，トヨタ生産方式の本，日刊工業新聞社。
3.原田武彥，(2013)，モノの流れをつくる人，日刊工業新聞社。
4.若松義仁，(2014)，トヨタの習慣，株式会社三才ブックス。
5.藤本隆宏，(2004)，日本のもの造り哲学 ，日本経済新聞社。
6.日経ビジネス，(2016)，IoTが変わる世界：データ資本主義，5月23日号，頁38-41。
|