|
參考文獻
標示*者為納入本後設分析之文獻
壹、中文文獻
*丁慕玉. (2008). 數位學習對微積分的影響-以虎尾科技大學爲例. 國立虎尾科技大學學報, 27(1), 109-128.https://doi.org/10.6425/JNHUST.200803.0109
*王怡萱. (2016). 探究 Kahoot 雲端即時反饋系統輔助高中國文學習之效益. 教育傳播與科技研究, (115), 37-57.https://doi.org/10.6137/RECT.2016.115.03
李茂能(2020)。整合分析軟體CMA簡介與操作實務。台北市：五南。
*李淑慧, & 鐘樹椽. (2008). 從教學策略與學習成就探討國小六年級學生經濟素養與問題解決能力之學習成效. 花蓮教育大學學報, (27), 221-249.
https://doi.org/10.7073/JNHUE.200812.0221
*李佳琪, & 洪智倫. (2019). Cool English 平臺教材融入教學對國小四年級學生英語聽讀學習成效與學習動機影響之研究. 師資培育與教師專業發展期刊, 12(1), 163-205.
*李忠屏, & 羅希哲. (2009). 互動式電子白板教學成效與學生學習態度之研究-以網路資訊素養課程爲例. 人文社會科學研究, 3(4), 153-173.
https://doi.org/10.6284/NPUSTHSSR.2009.3(4)8
*余惠娥, & 鄭永熏. (2018). 國小四年級生 YouTube 自主學習融入翻轉教室對自然科學習成效之影響. 教育傳播與科技研究, (118), 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.6137/RECT.201806_118.0001
*林妙香, & 林淑莉. (2013). 互動式多媒體性教育教學介入方案對特殊教育學校高職階段智能障礙學生性知識的學習成效. 特殊教育季刊, (126), 17-33.
https://doi.org/10.6217/SEQ.2013.126.17-33
*林凱胤, & 楊宜真. (2012). 無線教室回饋系統融入護專藥理學課程之初探. 醫護科技期刊, 14(1), 69-82.
https://doi.org/10.6563/TJHS.2012.14(1).6
*林立群, & 顏晴榮. (2013). 多媒體組合方式對學習成效之影響--以國小三年級數學例行性問題解決為例. 科學教育月刊, (365), 2-18.
https://doi.org/10.6216/SEM.201312_(365).0001
*林彥廷. (2019). 結合學習診斷系統之翻轉教室教學策略對學生學習軟體工程之影響. 科技與工程教育學刊, 49(1/2), 65-90.
https://doi.org/10.6232/JTEE.201912_49(1/2).0004
*洪士程, & 洪翊平. (2014). 互動式虛擬電子白板融入國小二年級數學之教學成效研究. 資訊科技國際期刊, 8(1), c1-9.
*洪士程,& 魏兆均. (2015). 使用互動式電子白板對提升國小五年級數學學習成效之研究.資訊科技國際期刊9(2).
*姜大立.(2015)電腦輔助音樂教學對幼稚園及一年級學生音樂性向發展之影響. 崑山科技大學學報,108-121, 2015.
聂风华, 钟晓流, & 宋述强. (2013). 智慧教室: 概念特征, 系统模型与建设案例 (Doctoral dissertation).
*高震峰, & 吳維慈. (2012). 互動式電子白板融入國小高年級視覺藝術教學之實驗研究. 藝術教育研究, (24), 1-42.
*陳詩瑾, & 曾善美. (2012). 運用電子白板教學於國小六年級音樂節奏學習成效之研究. 臺中教育大學學報: 人文藝術類, 26(1), 79-98.
https://doi.org/10.7037/JNTUHA.201206.0079
*連欣欣. (2014). 電子繪本融入分享閱讀與推論理解教學對國小學童閱讀理解能力之成效.
https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2014.00582
*黃郁婷. (2010). 運用互動電子白板與小組合作學習策略輔助國小四年級摘寫國語課文大意之成效研究. 師資培育與教師專業發展期刊, 3(2), 17-48.
https://doi.org/10.6764/JTEPD.201012.0017
*黃仕奇, & 楊德清. (2014). 數位動畫對小六學童數常識發展之研究. 科學教育學刊, 22(1), 33-55.
https://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.2014.2201.02
黄荣怀, 胡永斌, 杨俊锋, & 肖广德. (2012)。智慧教室的概念及特征. 开放教育研究, 2(22.27)。
*張承憲, 許為翔, & 陳宗禧. (2011). 情境式 WebQuest 應用於國小環境教育之研究. 數位學習科技期刊, 3(3), 77-94.
張菀珍, & 葉榮木 (2014)應用多媒體行動學習系統輔助大學生情緒管理學習成效與評量之探究. 教育科學研究期刊第 59 卷第 4 期, 99.
https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(4).04
*翁兆言, 詹雅晴, & 張晶貽. (2017). 探究互動科技結合提問式閱讀策略對學習成效與興趣之影響—以中學生國語文學習為例. 國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報, 13(2), 117-137.
*區國良, 曾郁庭, & 沈大鈞. (2017). 應用擴增實境於 Google Maps 對地圖資訊學習影響之研究. 高雄師大學報: 自然科學與科技類, (42), 31-58.
*楊凱悌, 王子華, & 邱美虹. (2011). 探討互動式電子白板對於不同認知風格國中學生學習效益之影響─ 以細胞分裂單元為例. 課程與教學, 14(4), 187-208.
https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201110.0188
*趙貞怡, & 董松喬. (2011). 以互動式電子白板融入國小社會領域問題導向學習之研究. 國民教育, 51(5), 82-90.
https://doi.org/10.6476/JNE.201106.0082
*蔡文榮, & 蔡佩君. (2012). 互動式電子白板在英語教學過程中對學習成就與學習態度之影響. 教育科學期刊, 11(2), 69-91.
https://doi.org/10.6388/JES.201212.0069
*蔡淑慧, & 沈俊毅. (2013). [Wii 太鼓達人] 遊戲融入國民中學音樂節奏教學之研究. 數位學習科技期刊, 5(2), 1-26.
https://doi.org/10.3966/2071260X2013040502001
*戴文雄, 王裕德, 王瑞, & 陳嘉苓. (2016). 翻轉教學式合作學習對生活科技實作課程學習成效影響之研究. 科學教育學刊, 24(1), 57-88.
https://doi.org/10.6173/cjse.2016.2401.03
*薛曉琳, & 周保男. (2017). 動態幾何團體 GeoGebra 導入國中數學教學之實驗研究: 以二元一次方程式圖形為例. 教育傳播與科技研究, (117), 31-46.
https://doi.org/10.6137/RECT.201712_117.0003
貳、英文文獻
Akar, H. (2020). The effect of smart board use on academic achievement: A meta-analytical and thematic study. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 8(3), 261-273. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.v8i3.908.
Armstrong, K. (2014). Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.923482
Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students' learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 12.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119558378
Butrime, E. (2021, March). Virtual Learning Environments and Learning Change in Modern Higher Education During the Covid-19 Coronavirus Pandemic: Attitudes of University Teachers. In World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 222-231). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72660-7_22
Cao, Y., & Kim, Y. S. G. (2021). Is retell a valid measure of reading comprehension? Educational Research Review, 32,100375.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100375
Cami l leri , M. A. , & Cami l leri , A. C. (2020) . The use of mobi le learning technologies in primary educat ion. Cogni tive and affective perspectives on immers ive technology in education, 250-266. IGI Global .
Cebrian, G., Palau, R., & Mogas, J. (2020). The smart classroom as a means to the development of ESD methodologies. Sustainability,12(7),3010. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073010.
Chang, C. Y., Chen, C. L. D., & Chang, Y. H. (2016). Smart classroom 2.0 for the next generation of science learning in Taiwan. In State-of-the-Art and Future Directions of Smart Learning (pp. 61-67). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-868-7_7
Chang, C. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2019). Trends in digital game-based learning in the mobile era: a systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2016. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 13(1),68-90. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2019.10016603
Chang, Shu-Hsuan, Po-Jen Kuo, Jiz Xin Kao & Lee-Jen Yang(2022)Using an integrative Meta-analysis to examine the effects of smart classroom-based instruction on academic achievement: A technological change perspective. Manuscript submitted for publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2146138
* Chen, H. R., Chiang, C. H., & Lin, W. S. (2013). Learning effects of interactive whiteboard pedagogy for students in Taiwan from the perspective of multiple intelligences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(2),173187.
https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.49.2.c
*Chen, L. H. (2011). Enhancement of student learning performance using personalized diagnosis and remedial learning system. Computers & Education, 56(1), 289-299
* Chiou, C. C., Tien, L. C., & Tang, Y. C. (2020). Applying structured computer-assisted collaborative concept mapping to flipped classroom for hospitality accounting. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 26, 100243.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100243
Chou, P. N., Chang, C. C., & Lin, C. H. (2017). BYOD or not: A comparison of two assessment strategies for student learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 63-71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.024
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 2nd ed Hillsdale NJ Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290095
Cooper, H. (2015). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (Vol. 2). Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878644.n3
Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2019). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation. https://doi.org/10.7758/9781610448864.4
Demir, E. K. (2021). The role of social capital for teacher professional learning and student achievement: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 33, 100391.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100391
Dhindsa, H. S. (2011). Using interactive whiteboard technology-rich constructivist learning environment to minimize gender differences in chemistry achievement. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(4), 393-414.
Fidan, M., & Tuncel, M. (2019). Integrating augmented reality into problem based learning: The effects on learning achievement and attitude in physics education. Computers & Education, 142, 103635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103635
Fu, Q. K., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Trends in mobile technology-supported collaborative learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2016. Computers & Education, 119, 129-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.004
Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2002). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge.
Garzón, J., Baldiris, S., Gutiérrez, J., & Pavón, J. (2020). How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of augmented reality on education? A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Educational Research Review, 31, 100334.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100334
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis, 1st edn Orlando. FL: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/228501
Hew, K. F., Bai, S., Dawson, P., & Lo, C. K. (2021). Meta-analyses of flipped classroom studies: A review of methodology. Educational Research Review, 33, 100393.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100393
Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj, 327(7414),557-560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
Holmes, K.A. and Prieto-Rodriguez, E. Student and Staff Perceptions of a Learning Management System for Blended Learning in Teacher Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), pp.21-34 (2018).
* Hong, H. Y., Ma, L., Lin, P. Y., & Lee, K. Y. H. (2020). Advancing third graders’ reading comprehension through collaborative Knowledge Building: A comparative study in Taiwan. Computers & Education, 157,103962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103962
Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M. J. (1991). The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction and leaning efficiency during computer-bases cooperative instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development,39(3),27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296436
Hsu, Y. C., Ho, H. N. J., Tsai, C. C., Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., Wang, C. Y., & Chen, N. S. (2012). Research trends in technology-based learning from 2000 to 2009: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 354-370.
Hu, D. H. (2009). Smart classroom 2.0: Context-aware educational system. ICCE 2009, 10.
* Huang, C. S., Su, A. Y., Yang, S. J., & Liou, H. H. (2017). A collaborative digital pen learning approach to improving students' learning achievement and motivation in mathematics courses. Computers & Education, 107,31-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.014
Huang, R., Yang, J., & Hu, Y. (2012). From digital to smart: The evolution and trends of learning environment. Open Education Research, 18(1), 12–24.
*Huang, T. H., Liu, Y. C., Yan, W. T., & Chen, Y. C. (2009). Using the innovative cooperative learning model with the interactive whiteboard to primary school students’ mathematical class: Statistic vs. pie chart and solid diagram. In Proceedings of the 4th International LAMS Conference (pp. 84-94).
Jena, P. C. (2013). Effect of smart classroom learning environment on academic achievement of rural high achievers and low achievers in science. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, (03), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.3.1
Kirbas, A. (2018). The Effect of Interactive Whiteboard Applications Supported by Visual Materials on Middle School Students' Listening Comprehension and Persistence of Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(11), 2552-2561.
https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.061120
* Kuo, F. R., Hsu, C. C., Fang, W. C., & Chen, N. S. (2014). The effects of Embodiment-based TPR approach on student English vocabulary learning achievement, retention and acceptance. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 63-70.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.10.003
* Kuo, F. O., Yu, P. T., & Hsiao, W. H. (2013). Develop and Evaluate the Effects of Multimodal Presentation System on Elementary ESL Students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 12(4), 29-40.
Lai, C. L. (2020). Trends of mobile learning: A review of the top 100 highly cited papers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 721-742.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12884
*Lee, C. C., Hao, Y., Lee, K. S., Sim, S. C., & Huang, C. C. (2019). Investigation of the effects of an online instant response system on students in a middle school of a rural area. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 217-223.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.034
*Lin, C. C., Hsiao, H. S., Tseng, S. P., & Chan, H. J. (2014). Learning English Vocabulary Collaboratively in a Technology-Supported Classroom. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13(1), 162-173.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.034
Lin, H. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Research trends of flipped classroom studies for medical courses: A review of journal publications from 2008 to 2017 based on the technology-enhanced learning model. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1011-1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1467462
* Lin, H. C. K., Wu, C. H., & Hsueh, Y. P. (2014). The influence of using affective tutoring system in accounting remedial instruction on learning performance and usability. Computers in Human Behavior, 41,514-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.052
*Lin, Y. T. (2019). Impacts of a flipped classroom with a smart learning diagnosis system on students' learning performance, perception, and problem solving ability in a software engineering course. Computers in Human Behavior, 95,187-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.036
Liu, X., Huang, R., & Chang, T. W. (2016). Design of theoretical model for smart learning. In State-of-the-Art and Future Directions of Smart Learning (pp. 77-86). Springer, Singapore.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-868-7_9
Lo, F. Y. R., & Chen, C. H. (2021). Technology-enhanced synchronous and asynchronous college distance English teaching amid COVID-19. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 69-114.
https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202103_29(1).0003
MacLeod, J., Yang, H. H., Zhu, S., & Li, Y. (2018). Understanding students’ preferences toward the smart classroom learning environment: Development and validation of an instrument. Computers & Education, 122, 80-91.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.015
Mok, M. M., & Chen, Y. C. (2004). A theory of self-learning in human and technology environment: Implications for education reforms. International Journal of Education Management, 4(15), 172–186.
Nguyen, T. D., Pham, L. D., Crouch, M., & Springer, M. G. (2020). The correlates of teacher turnover: An updated and expanded meta-analysis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 31, 100355.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100355
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Palau, R., & Mogas, J. (2019). Systematic literature review for a characterization of the smart learning environments. Propuestas multidisciplinares de innovación e intervención educativa, 55-71.
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological bulletin, 86(3), 638.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (Eds.) (2005). Publication bias in metaanalysis. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
Radosavljevic, V., Radosavljevic, S., & Jelic, G. (2022). Ambient intelligence-based smart classroom model. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(2), 307-321.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1652836
Saini, M. K., & Goel, N. (2019). How smart are smart classrooms? A review of smart classroom technologies. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 52(6), 1-28.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3365757
Schmidt, F. L., Oh, I. S., & Hayes, T. L. (2009).Fixed‐versus random‐effects models in meta‐analysis:Model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62(1),97-128.
https://doi.org/10.1348/000711007X255327
Sevindik, T. (2010). Future’s learning environments in health education: The effects of smart classrooms on the academic achievements of the students at health college. Telematics and Informatics, 27(3), 314-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2009.08.001
Shanwal, V. K. (2017). A comparative study of Traditional and Smart Classrooms in relation to their Creativity and Academic achievement. Integrated Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 15-19.
Sharpe, D. (1997). Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: Why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away. Clinical psychology review, 17(8), 881-901.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00056-1
Shi, Y., Peng, C., Wang, S., & Yang, H. H. (2018, July). The effects of smart classroom-based instruction on college students’ learning engagement and internet self-efficacy. In International Conference on Blended Learning (pp. 263-274). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94505-7_21
Shi, Y., Yang, H., Zhang, J., Pu, Q., & Yang, H. H. (2020, August). A Meta-Analysis of Students' Cognitive Learning Outcomes in Smart Classroom-Based Instruction. In 2020 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp. 8-12). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET49818.2020.00012
Shi, Y., Yang, H., Zhang, J., Wang, S., & Yang, H. H. (2019, July). The effects of interactive whiteboard-based classroom instruction on students' cognitive learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. In 2019 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp. 276-280).IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET.2019.00065
*Shieh, R. S. (2012). The impact of Technology-Enabled Active Learning (TEAL) implementation on student learning and teachers’ teaching in a high school context. Computers & Education, 59(2), 206-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.024
Shyr, W. J., & Chen, C. H. (2018). Designing a technology‐enhanced flipped learning system to facilitate students' self‐regulation and performance. Journal of Computer assisted learning, 34(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12213
Siripongdee, K., Pimdee, P., & Tuntiwongwanich, S. (2020). A blended learning model with IoT-based technology: effectively used when the COVID-19 pandemic?. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2),905-917. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.698869
Sterne, J. A., & Harbord, R. M. (2004). Funnel plots in meta-analysis. The stata journal, 4(2), 127-141.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0400400204
Stošić, L. (2015). The importance of educational technology in teaching. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE),3(1),111-114. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2015-3-1-111-114
Song, F., Sheldon, T. A., Sutton, A. J., Abrams, K. R., & Jones, D. R. (2001). Methods for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Evaluation & the health professions, 24(2), 126-151.
Suo, Y., Miyata, N., Morikawa, H., Ishida, T., & Shi, Y. (2008). Open smart classroom: Extensible and scalable learning system in smart space using web service technology. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 21(6),814-828. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2008.117
* Shyr, W. J., & Chen, C. H. (2018). Designing a technology‐enhanced flipped learning system to facilitate students' self‐regulation and performance. Journal of Computer assisted learning, 34(1), 53-62.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12213
Tissenbaum, M., Lui, M., & Slotta, J. D. (2012). Co-Designing Collaborative Smart Classroom Curriculum for Secondary School Science. J. Univers. Comput. Sci., 18(3), 327-352.
Tissenbaum, M., & Slotta, J. D. (2019). Developing a smart classroom infrastructure to support real-time student collaboration and inquiry: a 4-year design study. Instructional Science, 47(4), 423-462.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09486-1
Tu, Y. F., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Trends of library-associated mobile learning based on a review of academic studies published from 2007 to 2016. The Electronic Library.
https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-06-2017-0138
Volk, M., Cotič, M., Zajc, M., & Starcic, A. I. (2017). Tablet-based cross-curricular maths vs. traditional maths classroom practice for higher-order learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 114, 1-23.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.004
* Wang, Y. H. (2017). Exploring the effectiveness of integrating augmented reality-based materials to support writing activities. Computers & Education, 113, 162-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.013
Witta,E.L. (2005). Achievement in online vs. traditional classes . Encyclopedia of distance learning, 34-37. IGI Global.
Xie, H., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Wang, C. C. (2019). Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017. Computers & Education, 140,103599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103599
Yan, Z., Gaspar, R., & Zhu, T. (2021). How humans behave with emerging technologies during the COVID‐19 pandemic?. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(1),5.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.249
Yang, J., Pan, H., Zhou, W., & Huang, R. (2018). Evaluation of smart classroom from the perspective of infusing technology into pedagogy. Smart Learning Environments, 5(1),1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0070-1
*Yang, J. C., Chen, C. H., & Jeng, M. C. (2010). Integrating video-capture virtual reality technology into a physically interactive learning environment for English learning. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1346-1356
* Yang, K. T., Wang, T. H., & Chiu, C. M. H. (2015). Study the effectiveness of technology-enhanced interactive teaching environment on student learning of junior high school biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 263-275
Zhu, Z. T., Yu, M. H., & Riezebos, P. (2016). A research framework of smart education. Smart learning environments, 3(1), 1-17.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0026-2
|