:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:遠程耦合架構探討社區韌性:以布農族卡里布安部落農業調適為例
作者:藍姆路‧卡造 引用關係
作者(外文):Lameru Kacaw
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:地理環境資源學系
指導教授:蔡博文
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2022
主題關鍵詞:遠程耦合架構社區韌性土地利用調適關係性telecoupling frameworkcommunity resilienceland useadaptationralationality
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
本文試圖結合遠程耦合(Telecoupling)架構和韌性理論,以多元尺度社會與自然耦合系統之視角釐清土地利用背後的調適歷程,藉由理論結合從政治經濟結構、社會網絡及在地組織動能探討社區韌性,並以布農族卡里布安部落1937至2015年的農業調適為案例,進而提出理論的反思與討論。
本研究以歷時性的縱向時序為經,並時性多尺度耦合關係作為為緯,在經緯交錯的結構與關係中,以遠程耦合架構元素系統(system)、能動者(agent)、流動(flow)連結社會韌性之條件,並以成因(cause)和影響(effect)元素作為解釋人類與自然耦合關係之因素和結果。筆者解析卡里布安部落於國際貿易、國家政策及社會關係網絡背景下的農業發展,以及部落行動者能量和集體行動面對衝擊的重構過程,以說明土地利用的環境史和長時間積累的社區韌性。
筆者結合遠程耦合架構和韌性理論,引入PPGIS、民族誌研究及歷時網絡比較作為資料收集和分析方法,不僅有效拓展遠程耦合架構在社會科學研究的利用潛力,也探討韌性研究應該關注於調適能力或條件的累積過程,並將韌性視為關係性狀態,各種調適能力條件並非固定存在,而是彰顯在特定的關係網絡脈絡之下。
This study attempts to integrate the telecoupling framework and resilience theory to find a new analytical framework, and understand the adaptation process and condition from the perspective of land use within multi-scale social and natural coupling systems. The paper illustrated the applicability of the analytical framework contribute to the case of indigenous tribe community resilience from the cross-spatial influence of political economy, social networks, and community capacity.
Land use reflect the multiple interactions between human and environmental systems and community adaptation process. But local land use change is increasingly influenced by a complexity of globalized drivers that transcends multiple spatial and temporal scales. We need new strategies to mitigate the effects of cross-spatial human and environmental systems. This study considers temporal and spatial context, and emphasize the role of behavior and institutional change in telecoupled interactions. The social, institutional, and ecological processes and conditions through which telecoupling emerges are described. I link telecoupling framework elements (systems, agents, and flows) to social resilience conditions (political-economic structures, social networks, and local dynamics), and use telecoupling framework elements (causes and effects) as factors and consequences to explain the coupled relationship between humans and nature. This case study fund that Kalibuan tribal organizations constantly reconstruct cultural discourses and collective actions, and carry out social natural shocks in the context of international trade, national policies, and social relations at various stages to build their own community resilience.
I combined telecoupling framework and resilience theory, as well as introduced PPGIS and ethnographic methods. Which not only effectively expands the utilization potential of telecoupling concept in social science research, but also discusses that resilience concept should focus on historical processes of capacity accumulation and relationality meaning. The various adaptive capacity conditions are not fixed, but manifested under the context of special elements within network.
Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), 347-364.
Adger, W. N., Eakin, H. & Winkels, A. (2009). Nested and teleconnected vulnerabilities to environmental change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(3), 150-157.
AI-Kodmany, K. (2002). E-community participation: Communicating spatial planning and design using web-based maps, In Kidner, David et al. (Eds), Socio-Economic Applications of Geographic Information Science (pp. 69-92) , London: Taylor and Francis.
Akin. D. (1999). Compensation and the Melanesian State: Why the Kwaio Keep Claiming. The Contemporary Pacific, 11(1), 35–67.new window
Alberti, M. et al. (2011). Research on coupled human and natural systems (CHANS): approach, challenges, and strategies. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 92, 218-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9623-92.2.218
Aldrich, Daniel P. (2012). Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post‐Disaster Recovery. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Azzam, T. and S. Evergreen (2013). Data Visualization, Part I. New Directions for Evaluation 139. Hoboken, Nj: Wiley.
Baddeley, A. D. (1999). Essentials of Human Memory. New York: Psychology Press.
Bailey, D., & De Propris, L. (2014). Editorial: Recession, recovery and resilience? Regional Studies, 48(11), 1757–1760.
Barrios, R. (2014). Here, I'm not at ease': Anthropological perspectives on community resilience. Disasters, 38(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12044.
Barrios, R. (2016). Resilience: A commentary from the vantage point of anthropology. Annals of anthropological practice, 40(1):28-38new window
Bergson, H.(1976)。物質與記憶。張君譯。臺北市:先知。
Berkes F and C. Folke (2002). Back to the future: ecosystem dynamics and local knowledge. In: Gunderson LH and Holling CS (eds). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems (pp. 121–146). Washington DC: Island Press.
Berkes, F. (2001). Managing small-scale fisheries: alternative directions and methods. IDRC.
Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of environmental management, 90(5), 1692-1702.
Berkes, F., and C. Folke (1998). Linking social andecological systems: Management practices and social mech-anisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Berkes, F., J. Colding and C. Folke (2000). Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1251-1262.
Berkes, Fikret, and Helen Ross. Community resilience: toward an integrated approach. Society & natural resources, 26.1 (2013): 5-20.new window
Berkes. F., J. Colding, and C. Folke (2003). Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Bodin, Ö. and B. I. Crona (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference. Global Environmental Change, 19, 366-374.
Boonstra, W. J. (2016). Conceptualizing power to study social-ecological interactions. Ecology and Society, 21(1), 21. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07966-210121new window
Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., & Truffer, B. (2017). Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies, 51, 31–45.

Brand, F. and K. Jax (2007). Focusing the Meaning(s) of Resilience: Resilience as a Descriptive Concept and a Boundary Object. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 23. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art23/new window
Britton, D. (1997). Public history and public memory. The Public Historian, 19 (3), 11–23.
Brown, D., and J. C. Kulig (1996). The concepts of resiliency: Theoretical lessons from community research. Health and Canadian Society, 4(1), 29-52. http://hdl.handle.net/10133/1275new window
Carlson, A. K., W. W. Taylor, J. Liu, and I. Orlic. (2018). Peruvian anchoveta as a telecoupled fisheries system. Ecology and Society, 23(1), 35.new window
Carrasco, L. R., J. Chan, F. L. McGrath, and L. T. P. Nghiem (2017). Biodiversity conservation in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society, 22(3), 24.
Cauvin, T. (2016). Public history: A textbook of practice. New York: Routledge.
Challies, E., J. Newig, and A. Lenschow (2014). What role for social-ecological systems research in governing global teleconnections? Global Environmental Change, 27, 32-40. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.015
Chapin III, F. S., Kofinas, G. P., & C. Folke (2009). Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Springer Science & Business Media.
Chase, T. N., Pielke, R. A. & R. Avissar (2006). Teleconnections in the Earth System. Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Chaskin, R. J. (2008). Resilience, community, and resilient communities: Conditioning contexts and collective action. Child Care in Practice, 14(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575270701733724.new window
Clarke, C. (2004). Museums, the environment, and public history. In Martin Melosi and Philip Scarpino ed., Public history and the environment, 127–38. Florida: Krieger.
Copeland, Samantha et al. (2020). Measuring social resilience: Trade-offs, challenges and opportunities for indicator models in transforming societies. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51, 101799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101799.
Cornell et al. (2013). Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change. Environmental Science & Policy, 28, 60-70.
Cote, Muriel and Andrea J. Nightingale (2012). Resilience thinking meets social theory: Situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research. Progress in Human Geography, 36(4), 475–489.
Craig, W. J., Harris, T. M., and Weiner, D. (2002). Village participation and geographic information systems. London: Taylor and Francis.
Cutter, S.L. (2016). The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA, Nat. Hazards, 80, 741–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2.
Cutter, S.L. K.D. Ash, C.T. Emrich (2014). The geographies of community disaster resilience. Global Environ. Change, 29, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2014.08.005.
Daily G. (1997). Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press.
Dale A. and J. Sparkes (2007). Protecting ecosystems: network structure and social capital mobilization. Community Development Journal, 43 (2), 143-156.
David Bryson (1999). Queen Jeanne and the Promised Land: Dynasty, Homeland, Religion and Violence in Sixteenth-Century France. Leiden: Brill.
David, P. (1997). Path Dependence and the Quest for Historical Economics: One More Chorus of the Ballad of QWERTY. Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History, No. 20. Oxford: University of Oxford.
Davidson, Mark (2010). Social Sustainability and the City. Geography Compass, 4(7), 872–880, 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x.
Doussard, M., & Schrock, G. (2015). Uneven decline: Linking historical patterns and processes of industrial restructuring to future growth trajectories. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(2), 149–165. https://doi. org/10.1093/cjres /rsv003
Dunn, Christine E. (2007). Participatory GIS : a people's GIS ?. Progress in Human Geography, 31(5). DOI:10.1177/0309132507081493.

Eakin, H., et al. (2014). Significance of telecoupling for exploration of land-use change. In: K. C. Seto & A. Reenberg (Eds), Rethinking Global Land Use in an Urban Era. MA: MIT Press., Massachusetts: USA.
Eakin, H., Winkels, A. and J. Sendzimir (2009). Nested vulnerability: exploring cross-scale linkages and vulnerability teleconnections in Mexican and Vietnamese coffee systems. Environmental Science & Policy 12(4), 398-412.
Eakin, H., X. Rueda, and A. Mahanti (2017). Transforming governance in telecoupled food systems. Ecology and Society, 22 (4), 32. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09831-220432
Eakin, Hallie, Ruth DeFries, Suzi Kerr, Eric F. Lambin, Jianguo Liu, Peter J. Marcotullio, Peter Messerli, Anette Reenberg, Ximena Rueda, Simon R. Swaffled, Birka Wicke, and Karl Zimmerer (2014). Significance of Telecoupling for Exploration of Land-Use Change. In Karen C. Seto and Anette Reenberg edt., Rethinking Global Land Use in an Urban Era, (pp. 141–161). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
Elliot, A. J. et al. (2010). Red, rank, and romance in women viewing men. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(3), 399-417. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0029592
Elliott, J. R. et al. (2000). Limits to social capital: comparing network assistance in two New Orleans neighborhoods devastated by Hurricane Katrina. Sociol Q, 51(4), 624-48.
Fabinyi, M.et al. (2014). Social-ecological systems, social diversity, and power: Insights from anthropology and political ecology. Ecology and Society, 19(4), 28. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07029-190428.
Folke C. (2006). Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 16(3), 253–67.
Fox, Jonathan (1996). How does civil society thicken? the political construction of social capital in rural Mexico. World Development, 24(6), 1089-1103.
Friis, C., and J. Ø. Nielsen (2017a). Land-use change in a telecoupled world: the relevance and applicability of the telecoupling framework in the case of banana plantation expansion in Laos. Ecology and Society, 22(4), 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-09480-220430
Friis, C., and J. Ø. Nielsen (2017b). On the System. Boundary Choices, Implications, and Solutions in Telecoupling Land Use Change Research. Sustainability, 9 (6), 974.
Friis, Cecilie (2019). Global Land-Use Change Through a Telecouplin Lens: An Introduction. In Friis, Cecilie, and Jonas O. Nielsen edt. Telecouplin: Exploring Land-Use Change in a Globalised world, (pp.49-67). Palgrave MacMillan.
Friis, Cecilie, Jonas O. Nielsen, Iago Otero, Helmut Haberl, Jorg Niewohner, and Patrick Hostert (2016). From Teleconnection to Telecoupling: Taking Stock of an Emerging Framework in Land System Science. Journal of Land Use Science, 11, 131–153.
Garmezy, N. (1991). Resilience in children’s adaptation to negative life events and stressed environments. Pediatric Annals, 20, 459–466.
Glaser, M. et al. (2008). Human/Nature Interaction in the Anthropocene: Potential of Social-Ecological Systems Analysis. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives on Science and Society, 17(1), 77-80.new window
Goodchild, M.F.and J. A. Glennon (2010). Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: A research frontier. Int. J. Digit. Earth, 3, 231–241.
Görg, C. et al. (2017). Challenges for Social-Ecological Transformations: Contributions from Social and Political Ecology. Sustainability, 9(7), 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071045.
Haberl, H., Erb, K.-H., Krausmann, F., Berecz, S., Ludwiczek, N., Martínez-Alier, J., Musel, A. & A. Schaffartzik (2009). Using embodied HANPP to analyze teleconnections in the global land system: Conceptual considerations. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography 109(2), 119-130.
Hacker, K. (2013). Village-based participatory research. London: Sage.
Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Holling C. S. (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems”. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1-23.
Hopkins, Rob (2008). The Transition Handbook: From Oil Dependency to Local Resilience. England: Uit Cambridge Ltd.
Hu, X. (2017). From coal mining to coal chemicals? Unpacking new path creation in an old industrial region of transitional China. Growth and Change, 48(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12190.
Hughes, J. Donald (2009). An Environmental History of the World: Humankind's Changing Role in the Community of Life. London: Routledge.
Hull, Vanessa and J. Liu (2018). Telecoupling: A new frontier for global sustainability. Ecology and Society, 23(4), 41. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10494-230441
Hurlbert, J. et al. (2000). Core Networks and Tie Activation: What Kinds of Routine Networks Allocate Resources in Nonroutine Situations? American Sociological Review, 65(4), 598.
Ibarrola-Rivas, Maria-Jose et al. (2020). Telecoupling through tomato trade: what consumers do not know about the tomato on their plate, Global Sustainability, 3, e7, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.4
IFRC (2011). Characteristics of a Safe and Resilient Community: Community Based Disaster Risk Reduction Study. IFRC publication
Janssen, M. A.et al. (2006). Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems, Ecology and Society, 11(1), [online] URL:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art15/.new window
Kapsar, K. E. et al. (2019). Telecoupling Research: The First Five Years. Sustainability, 11(4), 1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041033.
Kobori, H. et al. (2016). Citizen science: A new approach to advance ecology, education, and conservation. Ecol. Res, 31:1–19.
Kontokosta, C.E., A. Malik, (2018) The Resilience to Emergencies and Disasters Index: applying big data to benchmark and validate neighborhood resilience capacity. Sustain. Cities Soc, 36, 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scs.2017.10.025.
Kyne, D. and D. P. Aldrich (2019). Capturing Bonding, Bridging, and Linking Social Capital through Publicly Available Data. Risks, Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy, 0, 1-26.

Lambin, E. F. & Meyfroidt, P. (2011). Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 108(9), 3465-72.
Lazard, A. and L. Atkinson (2015). Putting Environmental Inforgraphics Center State: The Role of Visuals at the Elaboration Likelihood Model’s Critical Point of Persuasion. Science Communication, 37(1), 6-33.new window
Lejano, R. (2017). Assemblage and relationality in social-ecological systems. Dialogues in Human Geography , 7(2),192-196
Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, et al. (2007). Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems. Science, 317, 1513-1516.
Liu, J. (2014). Forest Sustainability in China and Implications for a Telecoupled World. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, l(1), 230–250.new window
Liu, J. (2017). Integration across a metacoupled world. Ecology and Society, 22(4),29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09830-220429.
Liu, J., et al. (2007). Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems. Science, 317(5844), 1513-1516.
Liu, J., et al. (2013). Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society, 18(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05873-180226.
Liu, J., et al. (2014). Applications of the Telecoupling Framework to Land-Change Science. In: K. C. Seto & A. Reenberg (Eds), Rethinking global land use in and urban age. MA: MIT Press, Massachusetts.
Magis, Kristen (2010). Community Resilience: An Indicator of Social Sustainability. An International Journal, 23(5), 401-416.
Manson, Steven M. (2008). Does Scale Exist? An Epistemological Scale Continuum for Complex Human-Environment Systems. Geoforum 39 (2), 776–788.
Manyena S.B. et al. (2011) Disaster resilience: A bounce back or bounce forward ability? Local Environment, 16(5): 417–424.
Martin, R. and Simmie, J. (2008). Path dependence and local innovation systems in city-regions. Innovation: Management, Policy& Practice, 10, 183–196.
Martín-López, Berta, et al. (2019). A novel telecoupling framework to assess social relations across spatial scales for ecosystem services research. Journal of environmental management, 241, 251-263.
Massey D. (2005). For Space. Sage: London
McCord, P. et al. (2018). The Telecoupling GeoApp: AWeb-GIS application to systematically analyze telecouplings and sustainable development. Appl. Geogr., 96, 16–28.
Merz, M. M. Hiete, T. Comes, F. Schultmann (2013). A composite indicator model to assess natural disaster risks in industry on a spatial level. J. Risk Res, 16, 1077–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2012.737820.
Meyfroidt, P., Lambin, E. F., Erb, K.-H. & T. W. Hertel (2013). Globalization of land use: distant drivers of land change and geographic displacement of land use. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(5), 438-444.
Minor, E. S. and T. R. Lookingbill (2010). A Multiscale Network Analysis of Protected-Area Connectivity for Mammals in the United States. Conservation Biology, 24(6), 1549-1558.
Munroe, D. K., McSweeney, K., Olson, J. L. & Mansfield, B. (2014). Using economic geography to reinvigorate land-change science. Geoforum, 52, 12-21.
Murdoch, J. (2006) Post-structuralist Geography. Sage: London.
Newman, L. and A. Dale (2005). Network Structure, Diversity, and Proactive Resilience Building: a Response to Tompkins and Adger. Ecology and Society, 10(1), r2. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/resp2/.new window
Nicolini, Davide (2009). Zooming in and out: studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391-1418.
Nielsen et al. (2019). Toolbox: Capturing and Understanding Telecoupling through Qualtative Research. In Friis, Cecilie, and Jonas O. Nielsen edt. Telecouplin: Exploring Land-Use Change in a Globalised world, (pp.303-312). Palgrave MacMillan.

Niewohner, Jorg, Antje Bruns, Patrick Hostert, Tobias Krueger, Jonas O. Nielsen, Helmut Haberl, Christian Lauk, Juliana Lutz, and Daniel Muller (2016). Land Use Competition. Ecological, Economic and Social Perspectives, Human-Environment Interactions 6. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Nkhata, A. B., C. M. Breen, and W. A. Freimund (2008). Resilient social relationships and collaboration in the management of social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 13(1), 2. http://www.eco logyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art2/new window
Norberg, J. Wilson, J., Walker, B., and Ostrom, E. (2008). Diversity and resilience of social-ecological systems. In: Norberg, J. and Cumming, G. S. (eds.) Complexity theory for a sustainable future (pp. 46-79), New York: Columbia University Press.
Norris, Fran H. et al. (2008). CommunityResilience as aMetaphor, Theory, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1–2), 127–150.
Oberlack, C., S. Boillat, S. Brönnimann, J.-D. Gerber, A. Heinimann, C. Ifejika Speranza, P. Messerli, S. Rist, and U. Wiesmann (2018). Polycentric governance in telecoupled resource systems. Ecology and Society, 23(1),16.new window
https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09902-230116
Perkins, D. D. and D. A. Long (2002). Neighborhood Sense of Community and Social Capital: A multi-level analysis. In Fisher, A. T edt. Psychological Sense of Community: Research, applications, and implications (pp.291-318). Springer-Plenum.
Pfefferbaum, Betty et al. (2017). A Conceptual Framework to Enhance Community Resilience Using Social Capital. Clinical Social Work Journal, 45, 102-110.
Pike, A., Dawley, S., & Tomaney, J. (2010). Resilience, adaptation and adaptability. Cambridge Journal of Regions. Economy and Society, 3(1), 59–70.new window
Pilgrim S. E. et al. (2008). Ecological Knowledge is Lost in Wealthier Communities and Countries. Environmental Science and Technology, 42(4), 1004-1009.
Pimm, S. L. (1984). The complexity and stability of ecosystems, Nature, 307, 321-326.
Pretty, J. (2003). Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science, 302, 1912–1915.
Pretty, J. (2011). Interdisciplinary progress in approaches to address social-ecological and ecocultural systems. Environmental Conservation, 38(2), 127-139.
Pretty, J. and H. Ward (2001) Social Capital and the Environment. World Development, 29(2): 209-227.
Rapaport, C., T. Hornik-Lurie, O. Cohen, M. Lahad, D. Leykin, L. Aharonson-Daniel (2018). The relationship between community type and community resilience, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct, 31, 470–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijdrr.2018.05.020.
Raya Rey, A. N., J. C. Pizarro, C. B. Anderson, and F. Huettmann (2017). Even at the uttermost ends of the Earth: how seabirds telecouple the Beagle Channel with regional and global processes that affect environmental conservation and social-ecological sustainability. Ecology and Society 22(4), 31. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-09771-220431
Reenberg, A., Langanke, T., Kristensen, S. B. P. & T. S. Colding, (2010). Globalisation of agricultural landscapes a land systems approach. In: J. Primdahl & S. Swaffield (Eds), Globalisation and Agricultural Landscapes. Change patterns and policy trends in Developed countries (pp. 31-56). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rival L. (2009) The resilience of indigenous intelligence. In Hastrup, Kirsten ed. The Question of Resilience: Social Responses to Climate Change (pp. 293–313). Viborg (DK), Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab.
Rutter, M. (1993). Resilience: Some conceptual considerations. Journal of Adolescent Health, 14, 353-367
Saja, A.M.A. A. Goonetilleke, M. Teo, A.M. Ziyath (2019). A critical review of social resilience assessment frameworks in disaster management. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101096.
Sandström, A. and Rova, C. (2010). Adaptive co-management networks: a comparative analysis of two fishery conservation areas in Sweden, Ecology and Society, 15(3). http://www.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/ijc/article/view/156/102.
Schaffer-Smith, D. et al. (2018). Network analysis as a tool for quantifying the dynamics of metacoupled systems: an example using global soybean trade. Ecology and Society, 23(4), 3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10460-230403.
Scott, John (2000). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage
Seto, K. C., Reenberg, A., Boone, C. G., Fragkias, M., Haase, D., Langanke, T., Marcotullio, P., Munroe, D. K., Olah, B. & Simon, D. (2012). Urban land teleconnections and sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109(20), 7687-92.
Sieber, R. E. (2006) Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework, Annals of the Association of the American Geographers, 96 (3):491-507.
Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sun et al. (2018). Telecoupled land-use changes in distant countries. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16(2), 368-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61528-9.
Tate, E. (2012). Social vulnerability indices: a comparative assessment using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Natural Hazards, 63, 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0152-2.
Theobald, E.J. et al. (2015). Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biol. Conserv, 181, 236–244.
Thomas, W.L. Jr. (ed.) (1956). Man’s Role in Changing the Face of the Earth. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Timmerman, P. (1981). Vulnerability, Resilience and the Collapse of Society: A Seview of Models and Possible Climate Applications, Toronto: Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Toronto.
Tonini, F.and J. Liu (2017). Telecoupling Toolbox: Spatially explicit tools for studying telecoupled human and natural systems. Ecology and Society, 22, 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-09696-220411

Tsai, B. W.; Chang, C. Y.; Lin, C. C.; Lo, Y. C. (2006). PPGIS and Indigenous Society--New Partnership of Indigenous Peoples in Taiwan, Geography Research Forum, 26, 152-163.
Turner BL and Robbins P. (2008). Land-Change Science and Political Ecology: Similarities, Differences, and Implications for Sustainability Science. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33: 295-316.
Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, et al. (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100: 8074-8079.
Turner, B. (2010). Vulnerability and resilience: Coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science? Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 570-576.
Turner, B. L., Lambin, E. F. & A. Reenberg (2007). The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(52), 20666-20671.
Turner, Billie L., and Paul Robbins (2008). Land-Change Science and Political Ecology: Similarities, Differences, and Implications for Sustainability Science. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 295–316.
Turner, N. J. and F. Berkes (2006). Coming to understanding: developing conservation through incremental learning in the Pacific Northwest. Human ecology, 34(4), 459-513.
VanLandingham, M. (2018), Resilience among vulnerable populations: the neglected role of culture*, in: Creat. Katrina, Rebuilding Resil. Lessons from New Orleans Vulnerability Resiliency, Elsevier Inc, pp. 257–266. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/B978-0-12-809557-7.00011-9.
Verburg, P. H., Erb, K.-H., Mertz, O. & Espindola, G. (2013). Land System Science: between global challenges and local realities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(5), 433-437.
Verburg, Peter H., Karl-Heinz Erb, Ole Mertz, and Giovana Espindola (2013). Land System Science: Between Global Challenges and Local Realities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5 (5), 433–437.

Walker, Brian, C.S. Holling, Stephen R. Carpenter, and Ann Kinzig. 2004. Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society, 9 (2), 5.
Weichselgartner, Juergen and Ilan Kelman (2015). Geographies of resilience: Challenges and opportunities of a descriptive concept. Progress in Human Geography 39(3): 249-267.
Werner, E. E. (1971). The Children of Kauai: A Longitudinal Study from the Prenatal Period to Age Ten. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press,
Wilkinson C, Porter L and J Colding (2010). Metropolitan planning and social-ecological resilience: a practitioner’s perspective. Critical Planning, 17, 2-20.
Wilkinson, Cathy (2011). Social-ecological resilience: Insights and issues for planning theory. Planning Theory, 11(2), 148 –169.
Wilson Geoff (2012). Community Resilience and Environmental Transitions. London: Routledge.
Wolfe, D. A. (2010). The strategic management of core cities: Path dependence and economic adjustment in resilient regions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres /rsp032new window
Xiong, Hang et al. (2018). Trade in the telecoupling framework: evidence from the metals industry. Ecology and Society, 23(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09864-230111new window
Yang et al, (2019). The Role of Citizen Science in Conservation under the Telecoupling Framework, Sustainability, 11(4), 1108. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041108
Young, O. et al. (2006). The globalization of socio-ecological systems: An agenda for scientific research. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 304-316.
Yu, Y., et al. (2013). Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1178-1186.
Zimmerer, K. S., E. F. B. Lambin, and S. J. Vanek (2018). Smallholder telecoupling and potential sustainability. Ecology and Society, 23(1), 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-09935-230130new window
古關喜之(2008)。臺灣香蕉產業發展與日本市場的關係。臺灣文獻,59(4),235-262。
史濟增(1976)。台灣農業發展問題之演變,台灣經濟發展方向及策略研討會論文集, 台北:中央研究院經濟研究所。
李力庸(2009)。米穀流通與臺灣社會(1895-1945)。臺北:稻鄉出版社。new window
李雲棠(2009)。臺灣地區早期社會福利工作回顧,收於李萍編,臺灣基督教福利會五十五週年紀念特刊,頁63-64。臺北:道聲出版社。
李新民(2016)。社工人員情緒感染與心理復原力、工作壓力的相關研究初探,樹德科技大學學報,18(1) , 71 – 97。new window
林天枝、洪澨堂(1994)。FMTT新品系番茄品種改良及區域試驗。臺灣省臺中區農業改良場研究彙報,48,11-16。
林秋綿 (2001)。臺灣各時期原住民土地政策演變及其影響之探討。臺灣土地研究,2,23-40.new window
林靖修(2013)。供水系統與在地知識:以布農族卡里布安社區水資源管理研究為例。刊於風和日麗的背後-水、科技 、災難,范玫芳等編,頁230-269。新竹:交通大學出版社。
林靖修(2014)。財產制度與資源管理:一個原住民土地與水資源管理的民族誌比較研究。發表於「2014年臺灣人類學與民族學學會」,臺灣人類學與民族學學會主辦,台北,10月3-4日。
林靖修(2017)。基礎設施、水利社會與行動者的交織:陳有蘭溪流域Kalibuan社區共同灌溉系統建造與營運。臺灣人類學刊 , 15(2),97 – 146。new window
林靖修、范毅軍(2014)。環境適應、發展與永續:以陳有蘭溪流域布農人卡里布安社區的水資源管理研究為例,刊於臺灣及太平洋友邦南島民族氣候變遷調適及因應政策研討會論文集,中央研究院環境變遷研究中心主編,頁66-91。臺北:中央研究院。
武冠雄(1988)。中華民國的對外貿易。台北:正中書局。
洪伯邑、蕭彗岑(2017)。蘋果的政治技術:台灣高山農業的領域政治與經濟。台灣土地研究,20(2) ,1-29。new window
洪膺詮(2009)。從天神到上帝:1950年代布農族卡里布安部落集體改宗之研究。東海大學宗教研究所碩士論文。
紀駿傑 ( 2005 )。原住民研究與原和關係-後殖民觀點之回顧。刊於國家政策季刊,4(3) , 5-28。
海樹兒‧犮剌拉菲(2006)。布農族:部落起源及部落遷移史 。臺北:行政院原住民委員會。
高希均、李誠(1995)。台灣經驗再定位。台北:天下文化。
張瑞津 (1997)。陳有蘭溪流域的地形環境與自然災害之關係。中國地理學會會刊,25,43-64。
移川子之藏、宮本延人、馬淵東一(2010[1936])。臺灣原住民族系統所屬之研究。楊南郡譯。臺北:原住民族委員會。new window
郭秀岩(1975)。山地行政與山地政策,中央研究院民族學研究所集刊40期。南港:中央研究院民族學研究所。
陳惠薇(2013)。我國經濟自由化歷程之探討。經濟研究年刊,13,183-206。new window
曾令毅(2009)。植「油」報國:蓖麻栽培與戰時臺灣社會,臺灣史學雜誌,7,85-114。new window
曾寶慧(2016)。看得見與看不見的地景:台灣高山農業的政治生態學。臺灣大學地理環境資源學研究所碩士論文。
黃應貴(1982)。東埔社土地制度之演變:一個臺灣中部布農族聚落的研究。 中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,52,115-149。   new window
黃應貴(1984)。東埔社布農人的家庭。 中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,54,85-114。new window
黃應貴(1992)。東埔社布農人的社會生活。臺北:中央研究院。new window
黃應貴(1998)。政治與文化:東埔社布農人的例子。 台灣政治學刊,3,115-193。new window
黃應貴(2012)。文明之路,臺北市 : 中央硏究院民族學硏究所。
楊淑媛(1992)。兩性、親屬與人的觀念:以霧鹿布農人為例的研究。國立臺灣大學人類學研究所碩士論文。new window
楊淑媛(2005)。臺灣高地的政治體系初探:以布農人為例的研究。臺灣人類學刊,3(1),185-219。new window
董建宏(2012)。站在台灣農業發展的十字口:1970年代台灣農業政策轉變對農地與農業、農村發展之衝擊。跨界:大學與社會參與 , 2 ,56 – 76。
廖坤榮(2004)。台灣農會的社會資本形成與政策績效。政治科學論叢 ,22,181 – 219。new window
趙既昌(1985)。美援的運用。臺北:聯經。
劉淑靓(2000)。臺日蕉貿網絡與臺灣的經濟精英(1945-1971)。臺灣師範大學歷史學系碩士學位論文。
劉進慶(1992)。台灣戰後經濟分析。臺北:人間出版社。new window
衛惠林 (1956)。 臺灣土著社會的二部組織。民族學研究所集刊, 2,1-30。
藍姆路‧卡造、蔡博文(2017a)。原住民社區的農業發展調適:以布農族望鄉部落農業為例。民族、地理與發展:人地關係研究的跨學科交會(頁261-288)。台北市:南天書局。new window
藍姆路‧卡造、蔡博文(2017b)。陳有蘭溪流域布農族部落的社會資本與強健性:望鄉部落的個案觀察。跨‧文化:人類學與心理學的視野(頁199-231)。台北市:中研院民族所。new window
顏愛靜、傅小支、何欣芳(2011)。原住民社區永續農業發展之實踐—以新竹縣尖石鄉石磊部落自然農法為例。台灣土地研究,14(2),67-97。new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top