:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學校院體育推動績效評估指標之探討--層級分析法之應用
書刊名:大專體育學刊
作者:孫美蓮林進財張家銘黃家隆
作者(外文):Sun, Mei-lienLin, Chin-tsaiChang, Chia-mingHuang, Chia-lung
出版日期:2000
卷期:2:2
頁次:頁1-12
主題關鍵詞:層級分析法評估指標Analytic hierarchy processEvaluation criterion
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:30
  • 點閱點閱:56
國家體育風氣能夠全面蓬勃地發展,基層的推動是相當重要的。學校教育往往是影響人們未來生涯發展的關鍵期,它不僅建立個人的基礎,也銜接社會生活的任務。欲落實及鼓勵推行、推展學校體育教育,擁有客觀評鑑指標對體育推動之績效是相當重要的。本文利用Saaty(1971)的層級分析法(analytic hierarchy process, AHP),將問題加以層級化、結構化與數量化,建構評估因子與評估指標之二層級模式架構,並發展出客觀且實用性的學校體育推動績效評估指標。本研究發現可以提供給有關單位擬定政策之參考。
For the vigorous wild spreading atmosphere of exercise over the whole country, the local organizations play an important role to set it into action. School education, however, is a critical period affect the development of human beings afterwards. It is, not only to help people to shape personalities, but also responsible to bridge them to the society. Thus, having objective measurement criteria is vital for the effect of advancing exercise and satisfy the attempt of encouraging driving physical education on campus and put it into practice. This survey, based on the analytic hierarchy process developed by Saaty in 1971, examined these questions hierarchically, structurally and numerically. It involved two hierarchical models of measuring factors and criteria and developed objective and practical norms for the impetus of effective measuring criteria on campus. The intention of this survey was, therefore, to supply data to the relevant administrations for the establishment in the near future.
期刊論文
1.教育部體育長(1999)。各級學校體育實施辦法。國民體育季刊,28(4),101-104。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝天助(1995)。從建全行政業務來談學校體育行政組織的定位。大專體育,23,3-6。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1999)。教育部八十八年學年度中小學體育訪視實施要點。國民體育季刊,28(4),117-119。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭文英(1998)。具區間成對比較値的分析層級程序法決策屬性權重估計。管理與系統,5(1),131-143。  延伸查詢new window
5.Goh, C. H.(1997)。Analytic hierarchy process for robot selection。Journal of Manufacturing Systems,16,381-386。  new window
6.Satty, T. L.(1971)。How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process。European Journal of Operational Research,40,9-10。  new window
7.李仁德(19950200)。體育室在大學院校行政組織系統之探討。大專體育,16,3-6。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Khaksari, Shahriar、Kamath, Ravindra、Grieves, Robin(1989)。A new approach to determining optimum portfolio mix。Journal of the Portfolio Management,15,43-49。  new window
9.周文祥(19980200)。大學體育教學之省思。大專體育,35,90-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Barbarosoglu, Gulay、Yazgac, Tulin(1997)。An Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to the Supplier Selection Problem。Production and Inventory Management Journal (First Quarter),38(1),14-21。  new window
會議論文
1.陳鎰明(2000)。台灣地區學校體育發展指標之實證研究。迎接千禧年--運動與生活品質學術研討會。台北:台北國際會議廳。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.(1999)。中華民國體育白皮書。臺北:行政院體育委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部體育司編輯委員會(1990)。體育法規選輯。臺北市:教育部體育司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top