:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:研究發展、技術引進與專利--一般動差法於可數追蹤資料的應用
書刊名:經濟論文叢刊
作者:楊志海 引用關係陳忠榮 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Chih-haiChen, Jong-rong
出版日期:2001
卷期:29:1
頁次:頁69-87
主題關鍵詞:研發技術引進專利一般動差法R&DTechnology importPatentGMM
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:91
     本文利用臺灣1989-1996年股票上市的製造業廠商為研究對象,建立追蹤資料來分析廠商研究發展與技術引進的不同技術來源與專利申請的關連,並探討過去的創新成果對專利申請的動態影響效果。由於專利申請過程的決定因素中,若將研發支出視為外生,可能導致傳統可數追蹤資料模型估計的結果不具一致性。因此,本文應用一般動差法(Generalized Method of Moment, GMM)對可數追蹤資料(count panel data)模型進行估計。實證的結果發現,研發支出對專利申請的影響的動態結構中,僅有當期研發支出的影響為顯著,落後期研發支出的影響則不顯著,而研發支出的總彈性約在0.301-0.309之間。至於技術引進支出對廠商申請專利影響的動態結構,則與內部來源的研發支出有所不同,可能存在時間落遲的現象,且影響的總彈性低於研發支出的彈性,介於0.100-0.118之間。此外,在其他情況不變下,規模較大、廠商廣告密度較高,或是科學性的產業,亦對廠商申請專利的表現具正面的影響效果。
     This paper addresses the relationship between R&D, technology imports and patent applications for Taiwanese manufacturing firms listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. Applying the GMM on count panel data, the estimation bias of traditional panel data models owing to endogenous R&D can be eliminated. The empirical results show that the total elasticity of R&D is around 0.301-0.309, and the total elasticity of technology imports is about 0.00-0.118 which is lower than that of R&D. In addition, firm size, advertising intensity and the science industry dummy have a significant positive impact on firms' patenting behavior.
期刊論文
1.Hsiao, Cheng、Anderson, T. W.(1982)。Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data。Journal of Econometrics,18,47-82。  new window
2.Acs, Zolt J.、Audretsch, David B.(1991)。Innovation and size at the firm level。Southern Economic Journal,57(3),739-744。  new window
3.Griliches, Z.(1990)。Patent Statistics as Economic Indicator: A Survey。Journal of Economic Literature,28(4),1661-1707。  new window
4.林惠玲、李顯峰(199606)。臺灣專利權數與R&D支出關係之研究--非負整數計量模式之應用。經濟論文,24(2),273-302。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Hausman, Jerry A.、Hall, Bronwyn H.、Griliches, Zvi(1984)。Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents: R&D Relationship。Econometrica,52(4),909-938。  new window
6.Cameron, A. C.、Trivedi, P. K.(1990)。Regression Based Tests for Overdispersion in the Poisson Model。Journal of Econometrics,46(3),347-364。  new window
7.Hall, B. H.、Griliches, Z.、Hausman, J. A.(1986)。Patents and R&D: Is there a lag?。International Economic Review,27(2),265-283。  new window
8.Kumar, N.(1987)。Technology imports and local research and development in Indian manufacturing。The Developing Economies,25,220-233。  new window
9.Siddharthan, N. S.(1988)。In-house R&D, imported technology, and firm size: lessons from Indian experience。The Developing Economics,26,212-221。  new window
10.Ahn, S.、Schmidt, P.(1995)。Efficient estimation of models for dynamic panel data。Journal of Econometrics,51,5-27。  new window
11.Ahn, S.、Schmidt, P.(1997)。Efficient estimation of dynamic panel data models: alternative assumptions and simplified estimation。Journal of Econometrics,53,309-321。  new window
12.Van Reenen, John、Griffith, Rachel、Blundell, Richard(1995)。Dynamic count data models of technological innovation。The Economic Journal,105(429),333-344。  new window
13.Johansson, P.、Brannas, K.(1996)。Panel data regression for counts。Statistical Paper,37,191-213。  new window
14.Chamberlain, G.(1992)。Comment: sequential moment restrictions in panel data。Journal of Business & Economic Statistics,10。  new window
15.Cincera, M.(1997)。Patents, R&D, and technological spillovers at the firm level: some evidence form econometric count models for panel data。Journal of Applied Econometrics,12,265-280。  new window
16.Crepon, B.、Duguet, E.(1997)。Estimating the innovation function from patent numbers: GMM on count panel data。Journal of Applied Econometrics,12,243-263。  new window
17.Gourieroux, C.、Monfort, A.、Trognon, A.(1984)。Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Methods: Theory。Econometrica,52,681-700。  new window
18.Gourieroux, C.、Monfort, A.、Trognon, A.(1984)。Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: applications to poisson models。Econometrica,52(3),701-720。  new window
19.Katrak, H.(1990)。Imports of technology and the technological effort of Indian enterprises。World Development,18,371-381。  new window
20.Katrak, H.(1997)。Developing countries' imports of technology, in-house technological capabilities and efforts: an analysis of the Indian experience。Journal of Development Economics,53,67-83。  new window
21.Montalvo, J. G.(1993)。Patents and R&D at the firm level: a new look。Espanola de Economia,67,81-82。  new window
22.Montalvo, J. G.(1997)。GMM estimation of count-panel-data models with fixed effects and predetermined instruments。Journal of Business & Economic Statistics,15,82-89。  new window
23.Zimmerman, K. F.、Winkelmann, R.(1995)。Recent developments in count data modeling: theory and application。Journal of Economic Surveys,9,1-24。  new window
24.Zimmerman, K. F.、Winkelmann, R.(1991)。A new approach for modeling economic count data。Economics Letters,37,139-143。  new window
會議論文
1.Chamberlain, G.(1993)。Feedback in panel data model。Boston, MA。  new window
研究報告
1.陳忠榮(1996)。Technological source and technological capability。Japan。  new window
2.Wooldridge, J.(1990)。Distribution free estimators of some nonlinear panel data model。0。  new window
3.Wooldridge, J.(1991)。Multiplicative panel data without the strict exogeneity assumption。0。  new window
圖書
1.Schumpeter, J. A.(1976)。Capitalism, socialism, and democracy。New York:Harper and Brothers。  new window
2.Scherer, Frederic M.、Ross, David(1990)。Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance。Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
3.Rosenberg, N.(1982)。Inside the black box: Technology and economics。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Hsiao, Cheng(1986)。Analysis of Panel Data。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Pakes, A.、Griliches, Z.(1984)。Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look。R&D, Patents and Productivity。沒有紀錄。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE