With the studies on archaic Han languages, besides the rhymed phasing system according to the [Book of Odes], the scholars of the Ching Dynasty further applied the system of pronunciation dictation parts of characters used in the [Shou-Wen] etymological dictionary by Hsu Shen, circa the East-Han Dynasty, in systematically incorporating the non-rhymed text from the Pre-Chin Dynasty period into the archaic rhymes., which had expanded vista in the studies of Han Languages' archaic phonetics, and marked a significant milestone. Although the study results of the various schools and the actual contents often vary, the writer believes that primary reason lies with that despite the various schools are based on the etymological dictionary by Hsu Shen, certain scholars differ in the recognition of the form structures of certain individual characters, particularly with the characters of phonetic dictation. As a consequence, the categorization of archaic pronunciation is also diversified. The writer believes that the etymological dictionary by Hsu Shen was originally a dictionary, and should have incorporated the verification of the studies on archaic linguistics and facilitated with Pre-Chin Dynasty rhymed language materials. This would enable the differences among the various schools' actual character collection contents of archaic rhymed parts as accrued by the intellectual predecessors to be minimized. Moreover, on the issues of the differences amongst the various schools and controversial characters, retrospection from the perspective of linguistics will yield more objective approaches. Founded on such study view-point, this paper cites certain arguments via actual examples and study results from the archaic rhymed part categorization employed in the system of pronunciation dictation parts of characters used in the etymological dictionary by Hsu Shen, which is generally functional in adjusting the various predecessors' archaic rhyme categorizations. Therefore, the writer believes that the study approach and method that incorporated archaic linguistics may open another window to the studies of archaic pronunciations. Moreover, given the considerable the study results on archaic-Chinese linguists by the predecessors and contemporary scholars, researchers of the field should take great advantage of the rich available information.