:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學生對全校運動會的目標認同傾向、涉入程度、外在影響程度及參與率之研究
書刊名:大專體育學刊
作者:劉照金 引用關係莊哲仁沈裕盛
作者(外文):Liu, Chao-chinChuang, Che-jenShen, Yu-cheng
出版日期:2002
卷期:4:2
頁次:頁31-44
主題關鍵詞:全校運動會目標認同傾向涉入程度外在影響程度參與率School annual gamesObjectives perception tendenciesInvolvement levelsExternal influencesCollegiate students
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:27
本研究目的在探討不同特質及組織環境之大學生,對全校運動會目標認同傾向、涉入程度、外在影響程度及參與率之差異程度。研究者以自行發展之「全校運動會目標認同傾向量表」、「全校運動會涉入程度量表」及「全校運動會外在影響程度量表」為工具,共調查台灣地區七所大專校院936位學生(男460位,女476位,平均年齡為20.53±2.97歲),經由描述統計、 t考驗及單因子變異數分析,結果如下: (1)不同性別、年級之大學生在目標認同傾向、涉入程度及參與率之差異達顯著水準,而且女生、高年級生之目標認同傾向及涉入程度高於男生及一年級生,然參與率則反之;(2)不同運動頻率及體能水準之大學生在目標認同傾向、涉入程度、外在影響程度及參與率之差異達顯著水準,而低運動頻率及低體能者之目標認同傾向、涉入程度及外在影響程度顯著高於規律運動及高體能者,然參與率則反之;(3)就讀不同性質學校之大學生在目標認同傾向、涉入程度、外在影響程度及參與率之差異達顯著水準,技術學院學生之目標認同傾向及涉入程度高於科技大學生,而外在影響程度則高於普通大學生,且普通大學生之參與率則高於技術學院及科技大學生;(4)日間部與進修部學生在涉入程度及參與率之差異達顯著水準,進修部學生之涉入程度顯著高於日間部學生,然參與率則反之;(5)不同學院及公私立大學學生在目標認同傾向、涉入程度及外在影響程度之差異均未達顯著水準,但理工學院之參與率則顯著高於文法商學院;(6)總計本研究之大學生參與全校運動會平均次數為2.35人次,參與率則為1.4次/年。
The purposes of this study were to investigate the differences of objectives perception tendencies (OPT), involvement levels (IL), external influences (EI) and participation rate (PR) in School’s Annual Games (SAG) among collegiate students in Taiwan. The research instrument “OPT Scale,” “IL Scale,” and “EI Scale” were executed which developed by researcher. The subjects of the study included 936 students (male=460, female476, average age=20.53±2.97 years old) from seven universities in Taiwan. The results were as follows. (1) OPT and PR showed significant differences among different genders and graders, as well as female and senior students were higher in OPT and IL than male students and freshmen, however, there was no significant difference in PR. (2) There had significant different in OPT, IL, EI, and PR who with different exercise frequency (EF) and physical fitness level (PFL), the low EF and PFL students had higher OPT, IL, and EI than those with regular exerciser and better PFL, but scored a lower PR. (3) there had significant different on OPT, IL, EI, and PR of students from various educational system, the technology college students’ OPT and IL was higher than those in universities of science and technology, as well as scored higher in EI than those in universities, on the other hand, the university students had more PR than the other two groups of subjects. (4) Full-time students were significantly different from part-times students on IL and PR, the part-times students were involved in SAG far more than Full-time students, however, their PR was lower than Full-time student. (5) There was no significant difference in OPT, IL, and EI of various academy and private and public collegiate students, but the science and engineering college students’ PR much more than those in the art and law and business academy. (6) The average number of collegiate students in Taiwan participating in School’s Annual Games was 2.53 times, and the PR was 1.48 per year.
期刊論文
1.王武昌、邱榮貞(19951200)。大專院校舉辦全校運動會現況調查。中華體育季刊,9(3)=35,40-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李坤培(19961100)。第四十六屆全校運動會參與現況分析。臺大體育,29,37-46。  延伸查詢new window
3.林怜利、蘭震輝、李玉麟、許成源(2000)。基隆地區三所大專全校運動會之現況比較。德育學報,16,93-96。  延伸查詢new window
4.許義忠、Sessoms, H. D.(1998)。價值傾向與休閒態度研究--以美國北卡羅萊納教堂山大學的台灣留學生為例。戶外遊憩研究,11(2),41-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳鎰明、林恩賜(19981200)。臺灣地區各級學校學生體育目標認同傾向之研究。體育學報,26,41-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.張孝銘(2000)。休閒體驗中之自由感研究--以夜二間學生為例。建國學報,19(1),213-220。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉照金、周宏室(2002)。體育潛在課程的社會文化特徵分析--體育教學情境中幾種典型的潛在課程模式反思。國立體育學院論叢。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.葉憲清(1990)。全校運動會的經營管理。國民體育季刊,11(1),22-35。  延伸查詢new window
9.葉憲清(1996)。學校體育專題研究第三號:四所城鄉國中體育經營現況之研究。國立體育學院論叢,6(1),1-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.樊政治(1988)。運動會及其史的意義。國民體育季刊,11(2),39-50。  延伸查詢new window
11.Buchan, B.(1974)。Building organization commitment: The socialization of managers in work organization。Administrative Science Quarterly,19(4),533-546。  new window
12.Gunter, B. G.、Gunter, N. E.(1980)。Leisure styles: A conceptual framework for modem leisure。Sociological Quarterly,21,361-374。  new window
13.Liu, C. C.(2001)。A study of the cause-effect relationship among exercise behavior, physical fitness and sport-specific self-concept of college students。Annual Journal of Physical Education and Sports Science,25-36。  new window
14.McAuley, E.、Coumeya, K. S.(1994)。The subjective exercise experiences scale(SESS): Development and preliminary validation。Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,16,163-177。  new window
15.Schempp, R. G.、Cheffers, J. T.、Zaichkowsky, L. D.(1983)。Influence of decision-making on attitudes, creativity, motor skills and self-concept in elementary children。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sports,54,183-189。  new window
16.Bloch, P. H.、Bruce, G. D.(1984)。Product Involvement as Leisure Behavior。Advances in Consumer Research,11,197-202。  new window
17.陳江福(19950200)。國立臺中商專創校七十五週年校慶運動會學生參加人次及態度調查之比較分析。大專體育,16,107-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.李蕙貞(20010500)。雲科大學生對全校運動會意見之調查研究。科技學刊,10(3),241-254。  延伸查詢new window
19.Chelladurai, P.、Saleh, S. D.(1980)。Dimensions of leader behavior in sports: Development of a leadership scale。Journal of Sport Psychology,2,34-45。  new window
20.陳朝陽(19851200)。國民中學運動會的目標與方向。國民體育季刊,14(4)=67,9-11。  延伸查詢new window
21.唐先梅、陳芳茹(20000800)。從性別角色理論看雙薪家庭夫妻休閒生活之差異。生活科學學報,6,75-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Selin, S. W.、Howard, D. R.(1988)。Ego involvement and leisure behavior: A conceptual specification。Journal of Leisure Research,20(3),237-244。  new window
23.黃國義(19851200)。論運動會之目標與方向。國民體育季刊,14(4)=67,1-2。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.劉照金、莊哲仁(2002)。大學生對全校運動會目標認同傾向、參與因素及涉入程度之量表之編製研究。中華民國大專院校九十一年度體育學術研討會。桃園縣:國立中央大學。289-299。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉照金(2002)。大學生性別角色、社經地位、重要他人與其休閒運動態度、休閒運動參與及休閒運動經驗之關係研究。第二屆中華民國運動與休閒管理國際學術研討會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳信安(1999)。休閒活動的知覺自由之研究--台北縣淡水國小六年級為例(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.Klint, K. A.(1985)。Participation motives and self-perceptions of current and former athletes in youth gymnastics(碩士論文)。University of Oregon,Oregon, Eugene。  new window
3.Watkins, M. N.(1986)。The influence of involvement and information search on consumers choices of recreation activities(博士論文)。University of Oregon。  new window
圖書
1.行政院體育委員會(2001)。體育法規彙編。臺北:行政院體育委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉照金(1998)。體育興趣選項教學對大學生體適能、運動自我概念之影響研究--以國立屏東技科大學為例。屏東:睿煜出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Butcher, J.、Hall, M. A.(1983)。Adolescent girls' participation in physical activity。  new window
4.Eitzen, D. S.、Sage, G. H.(1989)。Sociology of North American sport。Dubuque, IA:WM. C. Brown Publishers。  new window
5.Leonard, W. M. II.(1988)。A sociological perspective of sport。New York:Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
6.Sage, G. H.(1990)。Power and ideology in Amgrigan sport: A critical perspective。Champaign, II:Human Kinetics。  new window
7.Sherif, C. W.、Sherif, M.、Nebergall, R. E.(1965)。Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment involvement approach。New Haven, CT:Yale University Press。  new window
8.張春興、楊國樞(1989)。心理學。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.李金泉(1993)。SPSS/PC+實務與應用統計分析。臺北市:松崗電腦圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.Mundy, J.(1998)。Leisure education: Theory and practice。Champaign, IL:Sagamore Publishing。  new window
11.Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly(1975)。Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: The Experience of Play in Work and Games。Jossey-Bass。  new window
圖書論文
1.Driver, B. L.、Tocher, S. R.(1970)。Towards a behavioral interpretation of recreational engagements with implications for planning。Elements of outdoor recreation planning。Ann Arbor, Ml:University of Michigan Press。  new window
2.Kidd, B.(1987)。Sports and masculinity。Beyond patriarchy: Essays hymen on pleasure, power, and change。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.McPherson, B.(1981)。Socialization into and through sport involvement。Handbook of social science of sport。IL:Stipes Publishing Co。  new window
4.黃光國(1993)。因素分析。社會及行為科學研究法。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE