:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:特殊教育研究中質量融合應用之探究
書刊名:特殊教育與復健學報
作者:秦麗花
作者(外文):Chyn, Li-hua
出版日期:2002
卷期:10
頁次:頁15-33
主題關鍵詞:質量融合特殊教育Combination of qualitative and quantitative methodsSpecial education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:34
期刊論文
1.Simth, J. K.(1981)。Quantitative versus qualitative research: An attempt to clarify the issue。Educational Researcher,12(3),6-13。  new window
2.Smith, J. K.(1986)。Closing down the conversation: The end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational researchers。Educational Researcher,15(1),4-12。  new window
3.甄曉蘭(19961100)。從典範轉移的再思論質的研究崛起的意義。嘉義師院學報,10,119-146。  延伸查詢new window
4.Greene, Jennifer C.、Caracelli, Valerie J.、Graham, Wendy F.(1989)。Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs。Educational evaluation and policy analysis,11(3),255-274。  new window
圖書
1.Creswell, John W.(1994)。Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches。Sage。  new window
2.Yin, R. K.(1989)。Case Study Research--Design and Method。Newburry Park, Calif:Sage Publications。  new window
3.Merriam, S. B.(1988)。Case study research in education: A qualitative approach。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
4.高敬文(1996)。質化研究方法論。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
5.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1985)。Naturalistic Inquiry。Sage。  new window
6.Patton, Michael Quinn、吳芝儀、李奉儒(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Patton, Michael Quinn(1990)。Qualitative evaluation and research method。Sage。  new window
其他
1.邱兆偉(1995)。【質化硏究】的訴求與設計。  延伸查詢new window
2.林惠芬(2000)。國內三份主要教育學術硏究期刊所使用之統計方法的分析與探討。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林彩鈾(1993)。教育硏究的兩個典範:質與量的討論。  延伸查詢new window
4.胡永崇(2001)。讓硏究與教學結合,讓理論與實務結合:檢討幾個國內特殊教育硏究的現況。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃富廷(1998)。硏究與實務的間隙---從社會學權力宰割關係的角度談起。  延伸查詢new window
6.郭明德(1998)。質化硏究的探討與省思。  延伸查詢new window
7.鈕文英(1999)。自然探究法之理論與方法分析。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K.(1999)。Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods。  new window
9.Bedmarz, D.(1986)。Quantitaty and quality in evaluation research: A divergent view。  new window
10.Brody, H.(1992)。Philosophic Approaches。  new window
11.Collins, R.(1984)。Statistics versus words。  new window
12.Howe, K. R.(1988)。Against the quantitative-qualitative incompalibility thesis or dogmas die hard。  new window
13.Hagner, D. C., & Helm, D. T.(1994)。Qualitative methods in rehabilitation research。  new window
14.McWilliam, R. A.(1991)。Mixed method research in special Education。  new window
15.Rossman, G. B. & Wilson, B. L.(1985)。Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study。  new window
16.Reichardt, C. S. & Cook, T. D.(1979)。Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods。  new window
17.Simpson,. R. G.(1992)。Quantitative research as the method of choice within a continuum model in section nine research practices。  new window
18.Steckler, A., McLeroy, K. R., Goodman, R. M., Bird, S. T., & McCormick, L.(1992)。Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: An introduction。  new window
圖書論文
1.Guba, Egon G.、Lincoln, Yvonna S.(1994)。Competing paradigms in qualitative research。Handbook of qualitative research。Sage Publications。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top