This paper compares the results of spatial analyses based on the same data set but through two different types of data aggregation. Area data are data aggregated according to a type of spatial units. In general, configurations of spatial units fall into two types, regular-lat-tice and irregular area. Accrodingly, spatial analyses on area data can be conducted based on these two tpes of spatial units. Would the spatial analysis based on one type of spatial units differ from that based on the other? If so, how significant is it? These are the research questions being answered in this paper. The results show that the type of spatial unit configuration does not seem to play a significant role in affecting the outcome of a spatial data analysis. However, if data are available, the outcome based on regular lattice seems to be more reliable due to its uniform size and spacing.