:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣東北角磯釣釣者願付價值之分析
書刊名:農業經濟半年刊
作者:孫金華江福松 引用關係施淵源劉振鄉
作者(外文):Sun, Chin-hwaChiang, Fu-sungShr, Yuan-yuanLiu, Chen-hsiang
出版日期:2003
卷期:74
頁次:頁63-88
主題關鍵詞:磯釣釣魚資格費用願付價值Tobit模型東北角海岸Surf/rock fishingFishing feeWilling to payTobit modelNortheastern coast of taiwan
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:24
  • 點閱點閱:101
     本文探討磯釣釣者進入東北角海岸國家風景區管理處劃定之垂釣區,為維護嗜藻性磯鈞魚類生物相,依野生動物保育法管理制度法源依據,應登記及回報捕獲種類及數量並繳納費用,因此本文以問卷調查方式調查訪問東北角海岸磯釣釣者對魚類資源的保育觀念,建立磯釣釣者願付價值Tobit實證模型。估計結果顯示釣魚經驗愈久、每次磯釣成本愈高及所得收入愈高,願付價值愈高;而釣者年齡增加、到東北角磯釣次數愈多、每次磯釣時間愈長,則願付價值愈低。以2001年時東北角磯釣總人數,本文依不同收取釣魚費用標準預估可收取磯釣執照費約為七百多萬元到二千多萬元,研究結果擬供東北角管理處及農委會及縣政府魚類資源保育主管機關,未來規劃釣者進入垂釣區之收費參考標準,並建議相關主管單位應用於未來教育推廣及資源保育之工作。
     The objective of this paper is to investigate the anglers' willing-to-pay(WTP)for the surf/rocks fishing in the Northeastern coast of Taiwan, which is under the authority of Northeast Coast National Scenic Area Administration(NCNSAA). For conservation the herivorous fish, the Wildlife Conservation Law regulates the parties who wish to harvest fish within the area shall register, report, and provide the record about the number of species caught. They shall also pay for a certain fishing fee. The anglers' survey is conducted in this research in order to establish a Tobit model to estimate angler's WTP. Results show that angler's WTP for fishing fee per day is positively related to the individual's years of experience of fishing, cost spent during each fishing trip, and personal income, but negatively related to angler's age, fishing frequency in a year, the time duration of each fishing trip. The results will provide NCNSAA, local government, and the Council of Agriculture certan basis for regulating the fishing fee in the Northeastern Coast of Taiwan in the near future. According to the total number of anglers in 2001, the total fishing fee is estimated to be between 7 to 20 million NT dollars depending on the level of fishing fee. The revenue from the fishing fee will provide the fund for the authority to conserve the surf/rock fish resource.
期刊論文
1.Haab, T.、McConnell, K. E.(1997)。Referendum Models and Negative Willingness to Pay: Alternative Solutions。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,32(2),251-270。  new window
2.王昭正、陳益壯、林建信(20011200)。奧萬大森林遊樂區遊客付費意願分析--多指標多因子模式之應用。農業經濟半年刊,70,91-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Davis, R. K.(1963)。Recreation planning as an economic problem。Natural Resources Journal,3(3),239-249。  new window
4.Brown, Thomas C.、Champ, Patricia A.、Bishop, Richard C.、McCollum, Daniel W.(1996)。Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public Good。Land Economics,72(2),52-166。  new window
5.鄭蕙燕、林政德(19981200)。條件評估法之嵌入效果:臺灣野生動物保護區之驗證。農業經濟半年刊,64,125-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.蕭代基、錢玉蘭、蔡麗雪(19980100)。淡水河系水質與景觀改善效益之評估。經濟研究.臺北大學經濟學系,35(1),29-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林曜松(2000)。生物多樣性公約(五)-自然保護區。大自然,69,110-115。  延伸查詢new window
8.Langford, I. H.、Bateman, I. J.、Jones, A. P.、Langford, H. D.、Georgiou, S.(1998)。Improved Estimation of Willingness to Pay in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies。Land Economics,74(1),65-75。  new window
9.孫金華、施淵源、劉振鄉(1999)。從維護本土生物多樣性內涵-談嗜藻性魚類之保育管理。漁業推廣,156,34-38。  延伸查詢new window
10.Flores, N. E.、Champ, P. A.、Brown, T. C.(2002)。Contingent Valuation and Incentives。Land Economics,78(4),591-604。  new window
11.Moon, W.、Florkowski, W. J.、Bruckner, B.、Schonhof, I.(2002)。Willingness to pay for environmental practices: implications for eco-labeling。Land Economics,78(1),88-102。  new window
研究報告
1.Arrow, Kenneth J.、Solow, Robert M.、Leamer, Edward E.、Portney, Paul R.、Radner, Roy、Schuman, Howard(19930115)。Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation。  new window
2.Carson, R. T.、Hanemann, W. M.、Kopp, R. J.、Krosnick, J. A.、Mitchell, R. C.、Presser, S.、Ruud, P. A.、Smith, V. K.(1994)。Prospective Interim Lost Use Value Due to DDT and PCB Contamination in the Southern California Bight。沒有紀錄。  new window
3.顏家芝、林晏州(1994)。東北角海岸風景特定區遊客及觀光服務業調查研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.施淵源(1999)。台灣東北角淺水海域遊憩性磯釣魚類資源保育及管理之分析(碩士論文)。國立海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳信帆(2001)。臺灣野生動物保護區經濟活動管理方式之研究-以溪流生態系保護區為例,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Mitchell, Robert Cameron、Carson, Richard T.(1989)。Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method。Washington, DC:Resources for the Future Press。  new window
2.Maddala, G. S.(1983)。Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.交通部觀光局(1995)。風景區經營管理常用法規彙編。風景區經營管理常用法規彙編。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院農業委員會(1997)。農業法規暨解釋彙編(三)。農業法規暨解釋彙編(三)。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.緬因州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.麻薩諸塞州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
3.羅德島州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
4.康乃狄克州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
5.紐約州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
6.紐澤西州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
7.德拉瓦州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
8.馬里蘭州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
9.北卡羅來納州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
10.南卡羅來納州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
11.維吉尼亞州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
12.喬治亞州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
13.佛羅里達州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
14.阿拉巴馬州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
15.密西西比州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
16.路易斯安那州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
17.德克薩斯州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
18.加勒佛尼亞州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
19.俄勒岡州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
20.華盛頓州娛樂性釣魚休閒執照費,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE