:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:TIMSS-R架構與DEA分析法的運用--以臺灣地區國民中學學校經營效率南北地區比較為例
書刊名:臺東大學教育學報
作者:劉春初
作者(外文):Liu, Chun-chu
出版日期:2004
卷期:15:1
頁次:頁167-184
主題關鍵詞:國民中學教育評鑑Secondary schoolEducational evaluation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:50
教育評鑑是一重要且困難的任務,但是藉由有效具定期評估,不但可了解本身在教育資源投入與果產出間的合理性,進而促使資源有效分配,及改善整體經營績效。本研究應用國際認可之TIMSS-R之架構與社會科學普遍使用之DEA分析法評估臺灣地區南、北區之國民中學經營效率,研究結果顯示,臺灣地區南、北區域之國民中學績效,並不因為所屬地區而有差異,也就是說,任一位學生不管在南部受國民中學教育或是在北部受國民中學教育是一樣的,如果不一樣的話,其原因可能來自內部因素,此一研究結果可提教育當局改善學校經營績效的參考。
Assessing the performance of an educational system is an important but difficult task. Despite the difficulties involved, school performance assessment can be used to set performance targets, to make resource allocation decisions, and to improve overall school performance. An evaluation of school performance allows education administrator to know whether schools are actually utilizing their resources in the most efficient way. The results of evaluation can also provide practical guidelines on how schools can improve further. This study combined both the non-parametric methodology of data envelopment analysis (DEA) and TIMSS-R to evaluate the secondary schools in Taiwan. The results show that no efficiency difference exists between schools operating in northern Taiwan compared to those operating in the south. In other words, no matter where the schools are, students received school education of similar quality at secondary level.
期刊論文
1.Anderson, L.、Walberg, H. J.、Weinstein, T.(1998)。Efficiency and effectiveness analysis of Chicago public elementary school: 1989, 1991, 1993。Journal of Educational Administration Quarterly,34(4),484-504。  new window
2.王國明、顧志遠(19910100)。DEA模式在教育評鑑上應用之研究。現代教育,6(1)=21,118-127。  延伸查詢new window
3.Engert, F. M.(1995)。A Study of School District Efficiency in New York State using Data Envelopment Analysis。Dissertation Abstracts International,56(7),2502。  new window
4.顧志遠(19990700)。高等教育單位之生產力評估與資源分配整合模式研究。管理與系統,6(3),347-364。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Zhu, A.、Cooper, W. W.(1981)。Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of DEA to Program Follow Through。Manageerial Science,27(6),668-697。  new window
6.陳榮方(19981200)。以資料包絡法評量我國大學校院之教育品質。高雄科學技術學院學報,28,227-238。  延伸查詢new window
7.Bessent, Authella M.、Bessent, E. W.(1980)。Determining the Comparative Efficiency of Schools through Data Envelopment Analysis。Educational Administration Quarterly,16(2),57-75。  new window
8.Soteriou, A. C.、Karahanna, E.、Papanastasiou, C.、Diakourakis, M. S.(1998)。Using DEA to evaluate the efficiency of secondary school: the case of Cyprus。International Journal of Educational Management,12(2),65-73。  new window
9.Ray, S. C.(1991)。Resource-use efficiency in public school: A study of Connecticut data。Management Science,37(12),1620-1628。  new window
10.Golany, Boaz、Roll, Yaakov(1989)。An application procedure for DEA。OMEGA: International Journal of Management Science,17(3),237-250。  new window
11.劉春初(19981100)。公共部門效率衡量--DEA與AHP之應用。中華管理評論,1(2),(2)1-(2)9。  延伸查詢new window
12.Boussofiane, A.、Dyson, R. G.、Thanassoulis, E.(1991)。Applied data envelopment analysis。European Journal of Operational Research,52(1),1-15。  new window
13.Farrell, Michael James(1957)。The Measurement of Productive Efficiency。Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General),120(3),253-290。  new window
14.Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William W.、Rhodes, Edwardo(1978)。Measuring the efficiency of decision making units。European Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444。  new window
學位論文
1.王建正(2002)。國民小學學校經營效率評鑑指標之研究--DEA評鑑模式(碩士論文)。屏東師範學院,屏東縣。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃清信(2001)。台灣省國立高級中等學校效率之評估--資料包絡分析法應用(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉明超(2000)。台灣地區高級職業學校教育管理效率評估之研究--DEA模式之應用分析(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Zomorrodian, M. R.(1990)。Guidelines for improving efficiency in elementary schools in Western Massachusetts: A data envelopment analysis approach(90-35426)。  new window
2.Anderson, L., Weinstein, T., Strykowski, B. F., & Walberg, H.J.(1994)。A primer for analyzing educational effectiveness and efficiency。  new window
3.Bardhan, I. R(1995)。Data envelopment analysis and frontier regression approaches for evaluating the efficiency of public sector activities: Applications to public school education in Texas。  new window
4.Bessant, A., Bessant, W., Kennington, J., & Reagan, B.(1981)。A fractional programming model for determining the efficiency of decision-making units。  new window
5.Bessant, A., Bessent, W., Kennington, J., & Reagan, B.(1982)。An application of mathematical programming to assess productivity in the Houston independent school district.。  new window
6.Bessent, A. & Bessent, W.(1983)。Evaluation of educational program proposals by means of data envelopment analysis。  new window
7.Fare, R., Geosskopf, S., & Weber, W.L.(1989)。Measuring school district performance。  new window
8.Pierre Foy & Macro Joncas(1999)。TIMSS-R technical report: sample design。  new window
9.Golany, B. & Tamir, E(1995)。Evaluating efficiency-effectiveness-equality trade-offs: a data envelopment analysis approach。  new window
10.Gray, J.(1981)。School effectiveness research: key issues。  new window
11.Jesson, D., Mayston, D., & Smith, P.(1987)。Performance assessment in education sector: educational and economic perspectives。  new window
12.Johnes, G. and Johnes, J.(1993)。Measuring the research performance of UK economics departments: an application of data envelopment analysis。  new window
13.Mayston, D., & Jesson, D.(1988)。Developing model of educational accountability。  new window
14.Sexton, T.R. & Sleeper, S.(1994)。Improving pupil transportation in North Carolina。  new window
15.Thanassoulis, E.(1996)。Altering the bias in differential school effectiveness using data envelopment analysis。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top