:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣地區生命科學作者之引用研究
書刊名:教育資料與圖書館學
作者:蔡明月 引用關係周淑珍
作者(外文):Tsay, Ming-yuehChou, Shu-chen
出版日期:2004
卷期:41:4
頁次:頁503-529
主題關鍵詞:臺灣生命科學自我引用自我被引用作者生產力作者被引用期刊影響因素合作者Taiwan life scienceAuthor productivityAuthor citation countsAuthor self-citationImpact factorCo-authorship
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:26
     本研究採用書目計量學的方法,進行臺灣地區生命科學高生產作者影響力之國際指標研究。影響力即文獻被引用情況。高生產作者來自91年度國科會研究計畫「臺灣地區生命科學生產力與影響力之國際指標研究(一)」之研究成果,作者被引用次數及自我引用之數據均檢索自國際知名之引用文獻系統Web of Science的科學引用文獻索引(Science Citation Index, SCl)資料庫。研究內容計有:作者被引用、作者自我引用、生產力與被引用、生產力與自我引用、被引用與自我引用、被引用與合作者、被引用文獻與期刊影響因素,以及自我引用與合作者之間的關係。本研究進一步利用皮爾森相關係數之統計檢驗,檢測上述各組變數之間的關係。本研究結果發現:臺灣地區生命科學高生產與高影響力的作者群均是由較少數科學家組成。相關性檢測結果亦顯示,作者出版文獻越多,獲得的被引用總次數也越多。此外,作者生產力與自我引用之間不甚相關;被引用次數越多的作者,其自我引用的情況也越明顯。被引用總次數與被引用篇數呈高度正相關。文獻在第5年的被引用次數未必比第2年的被引用次數多。期刊影響因素愈高,文獻被引用次數相對也愈多。再且,當文獻被引用次數越多時,合作者人數也越多。最後,文獻之合作者人數越多,其自我引用次數也會略為增多。
     This study employed bibliometric methodology to investigate the productivity and impact of the life science research in Taiwan based on the literature published and the citation received. The research productivity study was completed in July 2002. The present study explored the impact of life science research in Taiwan, in terms of author citation analysis and self-citation analysis. The author data was drawn from the results of the previous study of research productivity. One hundred most productive authors were studied. The data of cited author and self-citation were searched from Web of Knowledge, Science Citation Index (SCI) database. The correlation between productivity and citation, between productivity and self-citation and between citation and self-citation were tested by the Pearson correlation coefficient. The results of the present study reveal that: For the 100 most productive and most cited authors, there are significant correlations between author productivity and citation counts, between citation counts and journal impact factor and between coauthor and self-citation, all with p<0.01 or p<0.05. However, the correlation between author productivity and selfcitation is not significant with p>0.01 or 0.05.
期刊論文
1.Snyder, H. W.、Bonzi, S.(1998)。Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980-1989)。Journal of Information Science,24(6),431-435。  new window
2.傅雅秀(19961200)。從科學傳播的觀點探討中央研究院生命科學專家的資訊尋求行為。圖書館學刊. 臺大,11,133-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡明月(19990600)。洛卡定律(Lotka's Law)與作者生產力。中國圖書館學會會報,62,57-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Katz, J.S.、Hicks, D.(1997)。How much is a collaboration worth? A carlibrated bibliometric model。Scientometrics,40(3),541-554。  new window
5.Kostoff, R. N.(1998)。The Use and Misuse of Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation。Scientometrics,43(1),27-43。  new window
6.蔡明月、尤慧敏(20031000)。臺灣地區生命科學研究者發表期刊論文之生產力研究。國家圖書館館刊,92(2),1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Balaban, A. T.(1996)。How should citations to articles in high- and low-impact journals be evaluated, or what is a citation worth?。Scientometrics,37(3),495。  new window
8.White, H. D.(2001)。Authors as citers over time。Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,52(2),89。  new window
9.Mussurakis, S.(1993)。Do citation conventions influence coauthorship patterns?。American Journal of Roentgenology,161(16),1317。  new window
圖書
1.Price, D. J. de S.(1970)。Citation Measures of Hard Science, Soft Science, Technology, and Nonscience。Communication Among Scientists and Engineers。Lexington, Mass。  new window
圖書論文
1.尤慧敏、蔡明月(2004)。臺灣地區生命科學文獻與作者生產力研究。王振鵠教授八秩榮慶論文集。臺北:臺灣學生書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE