臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：科技於法律程序上之應用--以線上糾紛解決途徑為例
書刊名：世新法學
作者：王明禮 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wang, Ming-li
出版日期：2005
卷期：2
頁次：頁1-28
主題關鍵詞：線上糾紛解決途徑；替代性糾紛解決途徑；網際網路；網路法；網路世界；Online dispute resolution；Alternative dispute resolution；Internet；Cyberlaw；Cyberspace
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:31
隨著網際網路(Internet)的基礎建設和各種應用之發展日漸成熟，以及線上交物糾紛的急速增加，利用網路利協助解決各種糾紛的需求也就越來越高，所謂「線上糾紛解決途徑」(online dispute resolution, ODR)似乎在一時之間成為法律圈的熱門話題。 本文從ODR及其前身──「替代性糾紛解決途徑」(alternative dispure resolution, ADR)──的目的出發，觀察ODR的發展歷程，發現既有的ODR實務及有關的討論，大都偏向如何將實體世界的糾紛處理程序轉移到網路世界中，而經常忽略了反方向的思考。這種思考模式，難以充分利用現代資訊科技的潛能，十分可惜。 本文進一步以網際網路上為了與垃圾電子郵件(email spam)搏鬥所發展出來的技術為例，配合其他網路相關技術或機制，來思考法律人可以從現代資通科技得到什麼樣的新想法。
The ubiquity of the Internet and the maturation of various online applications have made it increasingly feasible—desirable even—for dispute resolution processes to take advantage of the convenience provided by modern communications technologies. The growth of “online disputes”—disputes arisen out of online transactions and other online activities—make such proposals even more compelling. After examining the development of DOR, however, the author have found that field practices and related discussions predominantly focus on transplanting real-space system designs and experience into ODR. In contrast, little has been furthered regarding what we could learn from the system designs and experience of cyberspace. This approach, the author argues, will limit the potential of ODR. After introducing various technologies online communities have developed to combat email spa and some other network technologies and mechanisms, the author tries to demonstrate what cyberspace has to offer beyond those usually associated with modern communications technologies.
期刊論文
1.Andersen, William R.(2004)。Technology and the Washington State Administrative Process-Some Preliminary Notes。WASH. L. REV.，79，13。  new window
2.Dickinson, David(2004)。Note, An Architecture for Spam Regulation。FED. COMM. L.J.，57，129-158。  new window
3.Froomkin, A. Michael(1995)。The Metaphor Is the Key: Cryptography, the Clipper Chip, and the Constitution。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，143(3)，709-897。  new window
4.Hadfield, Gillian K.(2004)。Delivering Legality on the Internet: Developing Principles for the Private Provision of Commercial Law。Am. L. & ECON. Rev.，6，154。  new window
5.Hensler, Deborah R.(2003)。Our Courts, Ourselves: How the Alternative Dispute Resolution Movement Is Re-Shaping Our Legal System。PENN ST. L. Rev.，108，165。  new window
6.王明禮、李界昇、周威秀、林三元、林明儀、林郁菁、林夢平、張睿元、雷雅雯、蔡惠如、蕭敏(20040400)。網際網路法發展趨勢特別報導。科技法學評論，1(1)，1-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Katsh, Ethan(1996)。Software Worlds and the First Amendment: Virtual Doorkeepers in Cyberspace。U. Chi. Legal F.，1996，335。  new window
8.Katsh, M. Ethan(1996)。Dispute Resolution in Cyberspace。CONN. L. REV.，28，953。  new window
9.Keane, Jim、Miller-Moore, Debi(2004)。Linking Information Technology and Dispute Resolution--Framing the Future of Online Dispute Resolution Using OdrXML。Dispute Resolution Journal，59。  new window
10.Mnookin, Jennifer L.(1996)。Virtual(ly) Law: The Emergence of Law in LambdaMOO。J. OF Computer-Mediated Comm，2(1)。  new window
11.Post, David(2000)。Of Blackholes and Decentralized Lawmaking in Cyberspace。VAND. J. ENT. L. & PRAC.，2，70。  new window
12.Thompson, Clive(2004)。Double Blind Negotiating on the Internet Gets Lawyers' Egos out of the Way。LEGAL AFF，2004(Jun.)，12。  new window
13.Katsh, Ethan(2004)。Bringing Online Dispute Resolution to Virtual Worlds: Creating Processes through Code。New York Law School Law Review，49(1)，271-291。  new window
14.Wahab, Mohamed(2004)。Globalisation and ODR: Dynamics of Change in E-Commerce Dispute Settlement。International Journal of Law and Information Technology，12(1)，123-152。  new window
15.Ramasastry, Anita(2004)。Government-to-Citizen Online Dispute Resolution: A preliminary Inquiry。Washington Law Review，79，159。  new window
16.Moeves, Amy S.、Moeves, Scott C.(2004)。Two Roads Diverged: A Tale of Technology and Alternative Dispute Resolution。The William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal，12，843。  new window
圖書
1.Katsh, Ethan、Rifkin, Janet(2001)。Online Dispute Resolution--Resolving Conflicts In Cyberspace。Jossey-Bass。  new window
2.Sunstein, Cass R.(2001)。Republic.com。Princeton University Press。  new window
其他
1.Barnett, Jeremy(20050113)。Arbitration: Playing catch-up，http://www.legalit.net/ViewItem.asp?id=22571， 2005/01/15。  new window
2.Dibbell, Julian(19931223)。A Rape in Cyberspace: How an Evil Clown, a Haitian Trickster Spirit, Two Wizards, and a Cast of Dozens Turned a Database Into a Society。  new window
3.Graham, Paul(2002)。A Plan for Spam，http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html。  new window
4.(1996)。The Internet Standards Process--Revision 3，http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2026.txt。  new window
5.Roy, Marie-Christine，Dewit, Olivier，Aubert, Benoit A.(2001)。The Impact of Interface Quality on Trust in Web Retailers，http://www.cirano.qc.ca/pdf/publication/2001s-32.pdf， 2005/03/30。  new window
6.Zeller, Tom Jr.(20050201)。Law Barring Junk E-Mail Allows a Flood Instead，http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/01/technology/01spam.html。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：977（臺灣：953，外國：24） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2488187 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68305361
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上