臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：董事法制的移植與衝突--兼論「外部董事免責」作為法制移植的策略
書刊名：臺北大學法學論叢
作者：邵慶平 引用關係
作者(外文)：Shao, Ching-ping
出版日期：2005
卷期：57
頁次：頁169-225
主題關鍵詞：公司治理；外部董事；獨立董事；受託義務；注意義務；忠實義務；誠信義務；團體迷思；Corporate governance；Outside director；Independent director；Fiduciary duty；Duty of care；Duty of loyalty；Duty of good faith；Groupthink
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(14) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:209
  • 點閱點閱:78
近年來，美國公司治理模式的移植已經在世界各地蔚為風潮。在法制移植的過程中，「外部董事」的設置與「受託義務」的概念常被認為是不可或缺的環節。然而，過度強調受託義務的重要性，可能使得潛在的外部董事候選人怯於接受職務，也可能使得擔任外部董事者產生強烈的風險趨避的態度，而不利於公司股東利益之極大化，此一情形使得外部董事的法制移植變得更為困難。 著眼於美國公司治理法制的精神，以及外部董事與監察人並存的公司監控模式，本文提出「外部董事免責」制度作為法制移植的策略。本文認為若能減免外部董事的法定義務與責任，將促使外部董事資格嚴謹化，而受託義務在實務上的適用也能更加明確。此外，外部董事與監察人兩個公司內部監控的機制也能有效地予以區隔，不僅消除疊床架屋之弊，更能收互補其短之效。經由這樣的改變，本文相信移植的外部董事制度不僅能在我國生根、茁壯，更能確實強化我國現有的公司治理機制。
In recent years, borrowing American legal model of corporate governance has emerged as a global trend. The institution of outside director and the concept of fiduciary duty are always deemed the indispensable pieces in the process of legal transplant. However, what is often ignored is the divergence between the standard of conduct and the standard of review in terms of directors’ fiduciary duty. Overemphasize the importance of fiduciary duty in the borrowing countries might deter the potential candidates for outside director from taking these positions. And those who already hold the positions would therefore become strong risk-averse and tend to make conservative decisions without keeping close eye on the maximization of shareholder welfare. The side-effect of strong fiduciary duty would make it even more difficult to effectively import the institution of outside director. In view of the spirit of American corporate governance system and the potential conflict between outside director and supervisor, a proposal of “no liability for outside director” is made in this article as a strategy aimed to successfully transplant the legal institutions. With the introduction of eliminating or limiting the liability of outside director, the qualifications for obtaining the positions could be greatly enhanced and the practical application of fiduciary duty principle simplified. Furthermore, this proposal offers various justifications for the simultaneous existence of outside director and supervisor. It is believed that, with the “no liability” rule and other complementary measures in place, a new set of legal institutions would function much better than Taiwan’s current corporate governance system.
期刊論文
1.Gordon, Jeffrey N.(1991)。Shareholder Initiative: A Social Choice and Game Theoretic Approach to Corporate Law。University of Cincinnati Law Review，60，347-347。  new window
2.林國全(20020500)。法人得否被選任為股份有限公司董事。月旦法學雜誌，84，20-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Skeel, David A. Jr.(2001)。Shaming in corporate law。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，149(6)，1811-1869。  new window
4.Eisenberg, Melvin A.(1999)。Corporate Law and Social Norms。Columbia Law Review，99(5)，1253-1253。  new window
5.洪秀芬(2005)。董事會與股東會權限之爭議。月旦法學教室，31，32-33。  延伸查詢new window
6.Cox, James D.、Munsinger, Harry L.(1985)。Bias in the Boardroom: Psychological Foundations and Legal Implications of Corporate Cohesion。Law and Contemporary Problems，48，83-135。  new window
7.Dallas, Lynne L.(2003)。The Multiple Roles of Corporate Boards of Directors。San Diego L. Rev.，40，781-820。  new window
8.Pinto, Arthur R.(1998)。Corporate Governance: Monitoring the Board of Directors in American Corporations。American Journal of Comparative Law，46(2)。  new window
9.Eisenberg, Melvin Aron(1993)。The Divergence of Standards of Conduct and Standards of Review in Corporate Law。Fordham Law Review，62(3)，437-468。  new window
10.Sale, Hillary A.(2004)。Delaware's Good Faith。Cornell Law Review，89(2)，456-495。  new window
11.Coffee, John C. Jr.(1999)。The future as history: The prospects for global convergence in corporate governance and its implications。Northwestern University Law Review，93(3)，641-708。  new window
12.Black, Bernard、Kraakman, Reinier(1996)。A Self-Enforcing Model of Corporate Law。Harvard Law Review，109(8)，1911-1982。  new window
13.Bainbridge, Stephen M.(2002)。Why a Board? Group Decisionmaking in Corporate Governance。Vanderbilt Law Review，55(1)，1-55。  new window
14.Hansmann, Henry、Kraakman, Reinier(2001)。The End of History for Corporate Law。Georgetown Law Journal，89(2)，439-468。  new window
15.O'Connor, Marleen A.(2003)。The Enron Board: The Perils of Groupthink。University of Cincinnati Law Review，71(4)，1233-1320。  new window
16.Gilson, Ronald J.、Roe, Mark J.(1993)。Understanding the Japanese Keiretsu: Overlaps between Corporate Governance and Industrial Organization。Yale Law Journal，102(4)，871-906。  new window
17.Roe, Mark J.(1993)。Some Differences in Corporate Structure in Germany, Japan, and the United States。Yale Law Journal，102(8)，1927-2003。  new window
18.林國全(20010600)。監察人修正方向之檢討--以日本修法經驗為借鏡。月旦法學，73，47-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Bhagat, Sanjai、Bernard, Black(1999)。The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance。Business Lawyer，54(3)，921-963。  new window
20.馮震宇(20041000)。從博達案看我國公司治理的未來與問題。月旦法學，113，215-235。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.黃銘傑(20000700)。公司監控與監察人制度改革論--超越「獨立董事」之迷思。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，29(4)，159-208。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.柯芳枝(19951000)。日本法上外部監察人制度之探討。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，25(1)，235-256。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.林仁光(20040300)。論經營者誠信、內部控制、內部稽核制度與公司治理。月旦法學，106，39-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Coffee, John C. Jr.(2002)。Racing towards the top? The impact of cross-listings and stock market competition on international corporate governance。Columbia Law Review，102(7)，1757-1831。  new window
25.Gilson, Ronald J.、Kraakman, Reinier(1991)。Reinventing the Outside Director: An Agenda for Institutional Investors。Stanford Law Review，43(4)，863-906。  new window
26.林國全(1999)。法人代表人董監事。月旦法學雜誌，49，16-17。  延伸查詢new window
27.Pease, Donald E.(1987)。Outside Directors: Their Importance to the Corporation and Protection from Liability。The Delaware Journal of Corporate Law，12(1)，25-107。  new window
28.Blair, Margaret M.、Stout, Lynn A.(2001)。Trust, Trustworthiness, and the Behavioral Foundations of Corporate Law。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，149(6)，1735-1810。  new window
29.Franzen, Corinne A.(1993)。Increasing the Cornpetitivenes- Of U.S. Corporations: Is Bank Monitoring the Answer?。Minnesota Journal of Global Trade，2(2)，271-271。  new window
30.Kim, Hwa-Jin(1999)。Living with the IMF: A New Approach to Corporate Governance and Regulation of Financial Institutions in Korea。Berkeley Journal of International Law，17(1)，61-61。  new window
31.Gordon, Jeffrey N.(2002)。What Enron Means for the Management and Control of the Modem Business Corporation: Some Initial Reflections。University of Chicago Law Review，69(2)，1233-1235。  new window
32.Dallas, Lynne L.(1992)。The Control and Conflict of Interest Voting Systems。North Carolina Law Review，71(1)，1-1。  new window
33.Coates, John C., IV(1999)。Measuring the Domain of the Mediating Hierarchy: How Contestible Are U.S. Public Corporations?。Journal of Corporation Law，24(4)，835-835。  new window
34.Horsey, Henry Ridgely(1994)。The Duty of Care Component of the Delaware Business Judgment Rule。Delaware Journal of Corporate Law，19(3)，971-971。  new window
35.Romano, Roberta(1989)。What Went Wrong with Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance?。Delaware Journal of Corporate Law，14(1)，1。  new window
36.Veasey, E. Norman(1990)。Counseling Directors on the Duty of Loyalty and the Use of Special Committee。Delaware Lawyer，8(1)，30-30。  new window
37.Brown, J. Robert, Jr.(2003)。Speaking with Complete Candor: Shareholder Ratification and the Elimination of the Duty of Loyalty。Hastings Law Journal，54(4)，641-641。  new window
38.Kahan, Dan M.(1996)。What Do Alternative Sanctions Mean?。University of Chicago Law Review，63(2)，591-591。  new window
39.Rock, Edward B.(1997)。Saints and Sinners: How Does Delaware Corporate Law Works?。UCLA Law Review，44(4)，1009-1010。  new window
40.Rosenberg, Davis(2002)。Venture Capital Limited Partnership: A Study in Freedom of Contract。Columbia Business Law Review，2002(1)，363-363。  new window
圖書
1.林國全、劉連煜(1999)。股東會書面投票制度與證券集中保管。元照。  延伸查詢new window
2.Easterbrook, Frank H.、Fischel, Daniel R.(1992)。The Economic Structure of Corporate Law。The Economic Structure of Corporate Law。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
3.王震武(2003)。心理學。臺北市：學富文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃銘傑(2001)。公開發行公司法制與公司監控--法律與經濟之交錯。台北。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.賴源河、王泰銓(2002)。新修正公司法解析。元照。  延伸查詢new window
6.廖大穎(2004)。股份轉換制度之研究：兼評控股公司的管理機制。臺北：正典。  延伸查詢new window
7.Janis, Irving L.(1982)。Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes。Boston, MA：Houghton Mifflin。  new window
8.王文宇(200301)。新公司與企業法。臺北：元照。  延伸查詢new window
9.劉連煜(2002)。公司法理論與判決研究。台北：元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.余雪明(200209)。證券交易法。證券暨期貨市場發展基金會。  延伸查詢new window
11.柯芳枝(2003)。公司法論。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.劉連煜(1995)。公司監控與公司社會責任。臺北：五南圖書出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.王文宇(2003)。公司法論。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.王新超、Makin, Perter、Cooper, C.、Cox, C.(2002)。組織和心理契約。臺北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
15.吳秉恩(1993)。組織行為學。臺北：華泰書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.曾宛如(20020000)。公司管理與資本市場法制專論。臺北：學林文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.余雪明(1996)。獨立董事與投資人保護。法律與當代社會：馬漢寶教授七秩榮慶論文集。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
18.Bacon, Jeremy(1990)。Membership and Organization of Corporate Boards。Membership and Organization of Corporate Boards。New York, NY。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：599（臺灣：594，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2017497 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67810498
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上