臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：由反應變異探討黃金比美感的心理實質性
書刊名：中國廣告學刊
作者：唐大崙
出版日期：2004
卷期：9
頁次：頁134-142
主題關鍵詞：黃金比例；心理實質性；美感；心理物理實驗；Golden-ratio；Psychological reality；Aesthetic；Psychophysical experiment
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:31
  • 點閱點閱:21
許多平面媒體設計者慣以黃金比為例，來討論構成美感的原理原則。黃金分割作成的構圖甚至被喻為是「神聖的比例原則」深深影響文藝復興之後的視覺藝術創作者。但是，黃金比例的美感到底有無普同性?或者它只是反映吾人對某一種數字的迷思?這個問題是一個心理學問題，換句話說，黃金分割的美感是不是人類真正運作的心理歷程?它到底有無心理運作的實質性(psychologicaI reaIity) ，需要心理學的研究方法來釐清。 近幾年，國外許多研究有些支持，有些不支持黃金比例的美感具有心理實質性。但是這些研究多以調查的方法，描述平均美感趨勢的結果。本研究則藉由心理物理學常用的調整法，測量一般人對於各種比例調整判斷的誤差分布。結果發現，不論在「線段分割作業」或是在「矩形鄰邊調整作業」中，1比1的比例判斷誤差都是最小，反之， 1.6比1的黃金比例判斷誤差則明顯偏高。顯然，這個結果還是不支持「黃金比例的美感具有心理實質性」的想法。
The golden-ratio has been defined as an aesthetic ratio and is still observed today as a guiding principle in visuaI art， even though there is Iittlesound empiricaI evidence for its support. Itseems that goIden-ratio has the psychologicaI reality in aesthetic activity. But more recent investigations fail to support the psychologicaI reality of preference for the golden-ratio by providing average population preference data. This study provide the response variability distribution information to address this issue by psychophysicaI experiments. Results show that this variability distribution is larger for the goIden-ratio(l.6: 1) than for the unity-ratio(l: 1) in line segment task and rectaogular adjustment task. Obviously， results do oot support the idea that goldeo-ratio aesthetic activity has the psychologicaI reality.
期刊論文
1.Blumenthal, A. L.(1967)。Prompted Recall of Sentences。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior，6，203-206。  new window
2.Adams-Webber, Jack(1997)。Self-Reflexion in Evaluating Others。American Journal of Psychology，110(4)，527-541。  new window
3.Angier, R. P.(1903)。The aesthetics of unequal division。Psychological Review: Monograph Supplement，4，541-561。  new window
4.Benjafield, J.、Adams-Webber, J.(1976)。The golden section hypothesis。British Journal of Psychology，1，11-15。  new window
5.Benjafield, J.(1976)。The golden rectangle: some new data。American Journal of Psychology，89，737-743。  new window
6.Benjafield, J.、Pomeroy, E.、Saunders, M.(1976)。The golden section and the accuracy with which proportions are drawn。Canadian Journal of Psychology，34，253-256。  new window
7.Benjafield, J.(1985)。A review of recent research on the golden section。Empirical Studies of the Arts，3，117-134。  new window
8.Binnie-Dawson, J. L. M.、Choi, P. P.(1982)。A study of perceptual and cultural cues in Chinese and western paintings。Psychologia，25，18-31。  new window
9.Boselie, F.(1997)。The golden section and the shape of objects。Empirical Studies of the Arts，15(2)，131-141。  new window
10.Crowley, A. E.(1991)。The golden section。Psychology & Marketing，8(2)，101-116。  new window
11.Davis, F. C.(1933)。Aesthetic proportion。American Journal of Psychology，45，298-302。  new window
12.Feasey, L.(1921)。Some experiments of aesthetics。British Journal of Psychology，45，298-302。  new window
13.Godkewitsch, M.(1974)。The golden section: An artifact of stimulus range and measure of preference。American Journal of Psychology，87，269-277。  new window
14.Green, C. D.(1995)。All that glitters: A review of psychological research on the aesthetics of the golden section。Perception，24，937-968。  new window
15.Hekkert, P.、Peper, C. E.、van Wieringen, P. C. W.(1994)。The effect of verbal instruction and artistic background on the aesthetic judgement of rectangles。Empirical Studies of the Arts，12，185-203。  new window
16.Hoge, H.(1995)。Fechner's experimental aesthetics and the golden section hypothesis today。Empirical Studies of the Arts，13，131-148。  new window
17.Hoge, H.(1996)。The golden section hypothesis--a funeral, but not the last one。Visual Arts Research，22，79-89。  new window
18.Macrosson, W. D. K.、Strachan, G. C.(1997)。The preference amongst product designers for the golden section in line partitioning。Empirical Studies of the Arts，15(2)，153-163。  new window
19.Macrosson, W. D. K.、Stewart, P. E.(1997)。The inclination of artists to partition line sections in the golden ratio。Perceptual & Motor Skills，84(3, Pt 1)，707-713。  new window
20.May, Michael(1996)。Did Mozart use the golden section?。American Scientist，84，118-119。  new window
21.McManus, I. C.(1980)。The aesthetics of simple figures。British Journal of Psychology，71，505-524。  new window
22.McWhinnie, H. J.(1987)。A review of selected research on the golden section hypothesis。Visual Arts Research，13，73-84。  new window
23.Nakajima, Y.、Ohta, H.(1989)。Effect of golden ratio on the beauty of double concentric circles。Perceptual & Motor Skills，69(3)，767-770。  new window
24.Neperud, R. W.、Freedman, K.(1988)。Bases of children's visual preferences and discriminations。Visual Arts Research，14，83-88。  new window
25.Neperud, R. W.、Serlin, R. C.(1984)。The Fibonacci sequence: Proportional and semantic bases of children's aesthetic preferences。Studies in Art Education，25，92-103。  new window
26.Piehl, J.(1976)。The golden section: an artifact of stimulus range and demand characteristics。Perceptual & Motor Skills，43，47-50。  new window
27.Piehl, J.(1978)。The golden section: The "true" ratio?。Perceptual & Motor Skills，46，831-834。  new window
28.Pierce, E.(1894)。Aesthetics of simple forms。Psychological Review，1，483-495。  new window
29.Plug, C.(1980)。The golden section hypothesis。American Journal of Psychology，93，467-487。  new window
30.Russell, P. A.(2000)。The aesthetics of rectangle proportion: effects of judgement scale and context。American Journal of Psychology，113，27-42。  new window
31.Schiffman, H. R.(1966)。Golden section: Preferred figural orientation。Perception & Psychophysics，1，193-194。  new window
32.Schiffman, H. R.、Bobko, D. J.(1978)。Preference in linear partitioning: the golden section re-examined。Perception & Psychophysics，24，102-103。  new window
33.Svensson, L. T.(1977)。Note on the golden section。Scandinavian Journal of Psychology，18，79-80。  new window
34.Thorndike, E. L.(1917)。Individual differences in judgments of the beauty of simple forms。Psychological Review，24，147-153。  new window
35.Touhy, A. P.(1987)。Affective asymmetry in social perception。British Journal of Psychology，78，41-51。  new window
36.Weber, C. O.(1931)。The aesthetics of rectangles and theories of affection。Journal of Applied Psychology，15，310-318。  new window
37.Davis, S. T.、Jahnke, J. C.(1991)。Unity and the golden section: Rules for aesthetic choice?。American Journal of Psychology，104(2)，257-277。  new window
圖書
1.Koffka, K.(1935)。Principles of Gestalt Psychology。New York：Harcourt, Brace and Co.。  new window
2.Berlyne, D. E.(1971)。Aesthetics and psychobiology。New York：Appleton-Century-Crofts。  new window
3.袁金塔(1991)。中西繪畫構圖之比較。台北：藝風堂。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Ching, F. D. K.(1979)。Architecture: Form, space, and order。New York：Van Nostrand Reinhold。  new window
5.Huntley, E. H.(1970)。The divine proportion。New York：Dover。  new window
6.Lawlor, R.(1982)。Sacred geometry, philosophy and practice。London：Thames and Hudson Ltd.。  new window
7.Arnheim, Rudolf(1974)。Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye。University of California Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：595（臺灣：594，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2178223 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67974274
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上