:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國公共服務擴大就業計畫之再就業效果評析:從積極勞動市場的角度
書刊名:社會政策與社會工作學刊
作者:傅從喜 引用關係
作者(外文):Fu, Tsung-hsi
出版日期:2006
卷期:10:1
頁次:頁115-149
主題關鍵詞:公共服務擴大就業計畫積極勞動市場政策結構性失業工作創造再就業Public service employmentActive labor market policyStructural unemploymentDirect job creationRe-employment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:95
「公共服務擴大就業計畫」不論就其投入經費或參與人員數而言,都算是我國近年來規模最大的社會工程之一,其實施成效值得關注。本研究是以積極勞動政策的角度,來評估此項方案的再就業效果。本研究之進行,是以分層系統抽樣方式選取樣本,再以電話訪問方式對方案進用人員進行結構式問卷調查。訪問結果總計得有效樣本2,014份。調查發現,公服計畫進用人員回到一般就業市場之比例約為三成;且成功再就業者中,大部分是在離開公服計畫後相當短之時間內,即重回一般就業市場。另一方面,成功再就業者中,也有相當比例是從事臨時性或不穩定就業。經邏輯回歸分析發現,進用人員的年齡、教育程度、參加公服計畫前之失業長度、參加公服計畫前是否工作過、公服工作內容是否與就業專長相符等,都對其是否成功再就業有顯著之影響。整體而言,人力資本較優、勞動市場參與之經歷較佳者,其再就業之機率較高。顯示公服計畫具有協助進用人員過渡失業階段之效果,但對改善勞動市場弱勢者之就業處境方面,成效較為有限。另一方面,透過比較進用人員在參與公服計畫前後的薪資水準,也發現公服計畫相當程度具有協助進用人員維持就業力與所得能力的效果。
The Public Service Employment (PSE) scheme in Taiwan was one of its largest social programs in terms of financial input and numbers of participants. Therefore, it is important to pay attention to its outcomes. The purposes of implementing this scheme are multiple, including social, economic, and labor market goals. This paper evaluates the PSE scheme from the perspective of active labor market policies. The main purpose is to review the impact of the PSE scheme on participants' re-employment. Analyses in this paper are based on results of a structural survey. The survey was conducted by telephone interview, and the samples were drawn from the participants based on stratified sampling. A total number of 2,014 samples were successfully interviewed. This research has found that, at the time of survey, the re-employment rate of PSE participants was 32.8%. Among those who had been back to unsubsidized job, many have found a regular job soon after they left the PSE scheme. However, some of them were doing temporary jobs. Using a logistic model, this research has found that several variables, such as participants' age, education level, length of unemployment before entering the PSE scheme, previously participated in the labor market before the PSE scheme or not, and whether PSE job matched their job skills, have significant impact on the probability of reemployment. Generally speaking, participants with better human capital and better labor market records have higher probability of finding a regular job. This implies that the PSE scheme is helpful for participants to get through the unemployment, although its effect on improving the employability of the disadvantaged is limited. On the other hand, comparing participants' wages before and right after the PSE scheme, the results showed that to some extent the PSE scheme has helped participants to maintain their employability and wage level.
期刊論文
1.郭登聰(19900900)。對以工代賑計畫問題的評析和對策。社區發展季刊,51,97-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Ackum, A. S.(1995)。Swedish Labor Market Programs: Efficiency and Timing。Swedish Economic Policy Review,2(1),65-98。  new window
3.Boeri, T.、Burda, M. C.(1996)。Active Labor Market Policies, Job Matching and the Czech Miracle。European Economic Review,40(4),805-817。  new window
4.Boeri, T.(1997)。Learning from Transitional Economics: Accessing Labor Market Policies Across Central and Eastern Europe。Journal of Comparative Economies,25(3),366-384。  new window
5.Breen, R.(1991)。Assessing the Effectiveness of Training and Temporary Employment Schemes: Some Results from the Youth Labor Market。The Economic and Social Review,22(1),177-198。  new window
6.Lubyova, M.、Van Ours, J. C.(1999)。Effects of Active Labor Market Programs on the Transition Rate from Unemployment into Regular Jobs in the Slovak Republic。Journal of Comparative Economics,27(1),90-112。  new window
7.Skedinger, P.(1995)。Employment Policies and Displacement in the Youth Labor Market。Swedish Economic Policy Review,2(1),135-171。  new window
8.Terrell, K.、Sorm, V.(1999)。Labor Market Policies and Unemployment in the Czech Republic。Journal of Comparative Economics,27(1),33-60。  new window
會議論文
1.李易駿(2004)。公共服務擴大就業計畫的反思與理論對話。第二屆民間社會福利研討會:臺灣的社會福利發展--全球化v.s.在地化,中華民國老人福利推動聯盟 (會議日期: 2004/09/24-09/25)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Harasty, M.(2004)。Successful Employment and Labor Market Policies in Europe and Asia anf the Pacific。Geneva:International Labor Office。  new window
2.Meager, N.、Evans, C.(1997)。The Evaluation of Active Labor Market Measures for the Long-Term Unemployment。Geneva:International Labor Office。  new window
3.Betchman, G.、Olivas, K.、Dar, A.(2004)。Impact of Active Labor Market Programs: New Evidence from Evaluation with Particular Attention to Developing and Transition Countries。Washington, DC:World Bank。  new window
4.Gustin, P.(2001)。Public Work Programs in Hungary。Paris:OECD。  new window
5.Sohlman, A.、Turnham, D.(1994)。What Can Developing Countries Learn from OECD Labor Market Programs and Policies?。Paris:Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
6.Wilson, S.、Fretwell, D. H.(1999)。Public Service Employment: A Review of Programs in Selected OECD Countries and Transition Economies。Washington, DC:World Bank。  new window
學位論文
1.王菁菁(2005)。以工作福利的理念檢視以工代賑方案執行之效果--以嘉義縣為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.行政院(2003)。立法院第五屆第三會期「九十二年度中央政府總預算追加預算案報告」。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院經建會(2004)。中華民國台灣地區就業市場情勢月報第11期。台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院勞委會(2002)。多元就業開發方案。台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院勞委會(2004)。九十三年度多元就業開發方案。台北。  延伸查詢new window
5.The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2004)。OECD Employment Outlook 2004。Paris:The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
6.孫健忠(1995)。臺灣地區社會救助政策發展之研究。時英出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.張坤維、林志美、楊茹憶、許雲翔、李桂香(2004)。韓國就業促進作法考察報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.Auer, P.、Efendioglu, U.、Leschke, J.(2004)。Active Labor Market Policies Around the World: Coping with the Consequences of Globalization。Geneva:International Labor Office。  new window
9.Dar, A.、Tzannatos, Z.(1994)。Active Labor Market Programs: A Review of the Evidence form Evaluation。Washington, DC:World Bank。  new window
10.European Commission(2002)。The New Actors of Employment: Synthesis of the Pilot Action 'Third System and Employment'。Belgium:European Commission。  new window
11.Nathan, R. P.、Cook, R. F.、Rawlins, V. L.(1981)。Public Service Employment: A Field Evaluation。Washington, DC:The Brookings Institute。  new window
12.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(1993)。OECD Employment Outlook 1993。Paris:OECD。  new window
其他
1.職訓局(2005)。永續就業希望工程專區,http://www.evtagov.tw/step/001/index,asp, 2005/06/10。  延伸查詢new window
2.International Labor Office(20050601)。Promoting Youth Employment: the Road to Decent and Productive Jobs。  new window
3.Ravallion, M.,Galasso, E.,Lazo, T.,Philipp, E.(2001)。Do Workfare Participants Recover Quickly form Retrenchment?,Development Research Group, World Bank。,http://www.econ.vale.edu/seminars/laborAap02/ ravellion2-020327.pdf, 2005/03/01。  new window
圖書論文
1.Harrington, M.(1973)。[Public Service Employment: An Analysis of Its History, Problems, and Prospects] Introduction。Public Service Employment: An Analysis of Its History, Problems, and Prospects。New York:Praeger。  new window
2.Edin, P. A.、Holmlumd, B.(1991)。Unemployment Vacancies and Labor Market Programs: Swedish Evidence。Mismatching and Labor Mobility。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Erikson, T.(1994)。Unemployment in Finland。Unemployment in Nordic Countries。North Holland。  new window
4.Garfinkel, I.、Palmer, J. L.(1978)。Issues, Evidence, and Implication。Creating Jobs: Public Employment Programs and Wage Subsidies。Washington, DC:The Brookings Institute。  new window
5.Gittell, M.(1973)。Public Employment and the Public Service。Public Service Employment: An Analysis of Its History, Problems and Prospects。New York:Praeger。  new window
6.Haveman, R. H.(1978)。The Dutch Social Employment Program。Creating Jobs: Public Employment Programs and Wage Subsidies。Washington, DC:The Brookings Institute。  new window
7.Kesselman, J. R.(1978)。Work Relief Programs in the Great Depression。Creating Jobs: Public Employment Programs and Wage Subsidies。Washington, DC:The Brookings Institute。  new window
8.Koning, J.、Mosley, H.、Schmid, G.(2001)。Introduction: Active Labor Market Policies, Social Exclusion, and Transitional Labor Markets。Labor Market Policy and Unemployment: Impact and Process Evaluation in Selected European Countries。Cheltenham:Edward Elgar。  new window
9.Lee, J.(2001)。Income Assistance and Employment Creation through Public Works in Korea。Labor Market Reforms in Korea: Policy Options for the Future。Seoul:World Bank and Korea Labor Institute。  new window
10.Nixon, R. A.(1973)。The Historical Development of the Conception and Implementation of Full Employment as Economic Policy。Public Service Employment: An Analysis of Its History, Problems, and Prospects。New York:Praeger。  new window
11.Renga, S.(2000)。The Role of the Italian Social Security System for the Unemployment in the Labor Market。Job Creation and Labor Law: From Protection Towards Pro-action。The Hague, Netherlands:Kluwer Law International。  new window
12.Schmid, G.(1982)。Public Finance Measures to Generate Employment for Hard-to-Place People: Employer Wage Subsidies or Public Employment Programs?。Public Finance and Public Employment。Detroit:Wayne State University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE