資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.21.12.100)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
建構主義取向教學的實踐--一位國小自然科教師信念、教學實務的改變
書刊名:
科學教育學刊
作者:
顏弘志
/
段曉林
作者(外文):
Yen, Hung-chih
/
Tuan, Hsiao-lin
出版日期:
2006
卷期:
14:5
頁次:
頁571-595
主題關鍵詞:
教師信念
;
建構取向教學
;
教師專業成長
;
Teacher belief
;
Constructivist approach teaching
;
Teacher professional development
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
7
) 博士論文(
4
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
7
共同引用:0
點閱:159
本研究的主要目的有二,第一是探究一位擁有四年教學經驗的國小自然科教師,其原有的教師信念與教學實務。第二是經歷本研究所設計的教師專業成長活動後,其教師信念與教學實務的改變歷程。從文獻整理中發現,對於影響教師實施建構主義取向教學的信念,可分成下列三個信念組:一、過去經驗的信念組。二、環境文化的信念組。三、知識論的信念組。研究結果發現:一、由建構主義的觀點來看,學期初個案教師這三個信念組均呈現不同於建構教學的信念,而個案教師的教學實務則普遍採取教師為中心的教學方式。二、透過知識論為基礎的專業成長活動,將可能有助於個案教師建構建構主義的相關知識背景,使研究者與個案教師更容易溝通,並可協助個案教師進行自我反思。三、學生良好的回饋有助於建立新成功的教學經驗,改變過去經驗的信念組的,使教師對於實施建構主義取向教學有安全感與滿足感,進而挑戰舊有環境文化與知識論的信念組。文末亦根據研究結果對當前師資培育、課程推廣與後續研究提出建議。
以文找文
This paper explores the transformations in the beliefs and practices of a primary school teacher of science in the context of participation in constructivist-based professional development. This case study research employed formal and informal teacher interviews and the qualitative instrument “Secondary Teaching Analysis Matrix ⎯ Science Version” (STAM). The research aimed to authentically describe the transformations of the teacher’s beliefs and practices. Constructivist li-terature suggests that a teacher core belief system can be separated into three belief sets, past experience belief sets, environment and culture belief sets, and epistemology belief sets. The results from this study are threefold. First, the teacher’s three belief sets did not initially include beliefs about the importance of a constructivist approach. This was manifest in a teacher-centered approach in the initial semester. Second, employing a constructivist approach assisted the teacher to change the original belief sets. Third, the positive response of students assisted the teacher to shift his practice from teacher-centered to student-centered. This study suggests that discussions about epistemology during teacher professional development may assist teachers to realize a constructivist approach in their teaching. Further studies of teacher belief sets may be warranted.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Crawford, B. A.(2000)。Embracing the essence of inquiry: new roles for science teachers。Journal of research in science teaching,37(9),631-645。
2.
Bybee, R. W.、Landes, N. M.(1990)。Science for Life & Living: An Elementary School Science Program from Biological Sciences Curriculum Study。The American Biology Teacher,52(2),92-98。
3.
Cronin-Jones, L. L.(1991)。Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: Two case studies。Journal of research in science teaching,28,235-250。
4.
Feldman, A.(2000)。Decision making in the practical domain: A model of practice conceptual change。Science Education,84,606-623。
5.
Niaz, M.、Abd-El-Khalick, F.、Benarroch, A.、Cardelhni, L.、Labuni, C. E.、Marin, N.、Montes, L. A.、Nola, R.、Orlik, Y.、Scharmann, L. C.、Tsai, C. C.、Tsaparlis, G.(2003)。Constructivism: Defense or a continual critical appraisal。Science & Education,12(8),787-797。
6.
Richardson, V.(1992)。The Agenda-setting dilemma in a constructivist staff development process。Teaching & Teacher Education,5(3),287-300。
7.
Ritchie, S. M.、Rigano, D. L.(1996)。Laboratory apprenticeship through a student research project。Journal of research in science teaching,33(7),799-815。
8.
Tippins, D.(1993)。Reconstructing science teacher education within communities of learners。Journal of Science Teacher Education,4(3),65-72。
9.
Stofflett, R. T.(1994)。The Accommodation of science pedagogical knowledge: The application of conceptual change constructs to teacher education。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,31(8),787-810。
10.
Veal, W.(2004)。Beliefs and knowledge in chemistry teacher development。International Journal of Science Education,26(3),329-351。
11.
Hodson, D.、Hodson, J.(1998)。From Constructivism to Social Constructivism: A Vygotskian Perspective on Teaching and Learning Science。School Science Review,79(289),33-41。
12.
Hashweh, M. Z.(1996)。Effects of science teachers' epistemological beliefs in teaching。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,33,47-63。
13.
郭重吉(19950900)。建構主義與數理教學。建構與教學,1,1-4。
延伸查詢
14.
顏弘志(20000600)。從科學本質看科學教育。科學教育研究與發展季刊,19,20-25。
延伸查詢
15.
顏弘志(20040900)。從建構主義看探究教學。科學教育研究與發展季刊,36,1-14。
延伸查詢
16.
范毓娟、郭重吉(19950200)。在國中理化課程中試行建構主義教學之個案研究。科學教育,6,69-87。
延伸查詢
17.
Tobin, K.、Fraser, B. J.(1989)。Barriers to higher-level cognitive learning in high school science。Science Education,73(6),659-682。
18.
Etchberger, M. L.、Shaw, K. L.(1992)。Teacher change as a progression of transitional images: A chronology of a developing constructivist teacher。School Science and Mathematics,92(8),411-417。
19.
Driver, R.、Oldham, V.(1986)。A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science。Studies in Science Education,13(1),105-122。
20.
Clark, C. M.(1988)。Asking the right questions about teacher preparation: Contributions of research on teacher thinking。Educational Researcher,17(2),5-12。
21.
Nespor, J.(1987)。The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching。Journal of Curriculum Studies,19(4),317-328。
22.
Tsai, Chin-Chung(2002)。Nested epistemologies: Science teachers' beliefs of teaching, learning and science。International Journal of Science Education,24(8),771-783。
23.
Wallace, C. S.、Kang, N. H.(2004)。An investigation of experience science teachers' beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41(9),936-960。
24.
Posner, G. J.、Strike, K. A.、Hewson, P. W.、Gertzog, W. A.(1982)。Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change。Science Education,66(2),211-227。
25.
Driver, R.、Asoko, H.、Leach, J.、Mortimer, E.、Scott, P.(1994)。Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom。Educational Researcher,23(7),5-12。
會議論文
1.
Sidam-Tabbaa, A.、Davis, N. T.(1991)。Teacher empowerment through change: a case study of a biology teacher。annual meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators。New Orleans, LA。
學位論文
1.
陳石峰(1998)。一位高中生物教師施行建構主義取向教學之個案研究--成長與省思(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。
延伸查詢
2.
楊安琪(2002)。國小自然科教師對建構取向教學之信念與實施情形之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院。
延伸查詢
3.
蘇鳳珠(2001)。國民小學教師建構式教學信念與教學行為之研究(碩士論文)。臺南師範學院。
延伸查詢
4.
葉倩亨(1998)。建構取向教學在國中一年級數學課之實驗研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。
延伸查詢
5.
李暉(1993)。國中理化教師試行建構主義教學之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
舒煒光、邱仁宗(1990)。當代西方科學哲學述評。臺北:水牛出版社。
延伸查詢
2.
Gallagher, J.、Parker, J.(1995)。Secondary Teaching analysis Matrix (STAM)。East Lasing, MI:Michigan State University。
3.
Kelly, G. A.(1965)。The psychology of personal constructs。New York:Notom。
4.
Tufte, E. R.(1990)。Envisioning Information。Cheshire, CT:Graphics Press。
5.
Von Glasersfeld, E.(1981)。An introduction of knowledge: Contributions to conceptual semantics。Seaside California:Intersystem Publications。
6.
Rogoff, Barbara(1990)。Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context。Cambridge University Press。
7.
魏明通(1997)。科學教育。臺北:五南。
延伸查詢
8.
Vygotsky, Lev S.(1962)。Thought and language。Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press。
圖書論文
1.
Duit, R.、Treagust, D. F.(1998)。Learning in Science - From Behaviorism Towards Constructivism and Beyond。International handbook on science education。New York:Kluwer Academic Publisher Press。
2.
Fenstermacher, G. D.(1979)。A philosophical consideration of recent research on teacher effectiveness。Review of research in education。Itaska, IL:F. E. Peacock。
3.
Gallagher, J.(1993)。Secondary Science Teachers and Constructivist Practice。The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education。Washington, D.C.:AAAS Press。
4.
Glynn, S.、Duit, R.(1995)。Learning science meaningfully: constructing conceptual models。Learning Science in the Schools。Mahwah, N.J.:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
5.
Hand, B.(1996)。Diagnosis of teachers’ knowledge bases and teaching roles when implementing constructivist teaching/learning approaches。Improving Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathematics。New York:Teachers College Press。
6.
Thompson, A.(1992)。Teachers’ beliefs and conception: A synthesis of the research。Handbook of research on mathmatics teaching and learning。Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。
7.
Wallace, J.、Louden, W.(1998)。Curriculum Change in Science: Riding the Waves of Reform。International handbook on science education。New York:Kluwer Academic Publisher。
8.
Cobern, William W.(1993)。Contextual Constructivism: The Impact of Culture on the Learning and Teaching of Science。The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education。Washington, D.C.:AAAS Press。
9.
Tobin, K.、Tippins, D. J.(1993)。Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning。The practice of constructivism in science education。Washington, DC:American Association for the Advancement of Science Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
不同學習領域教師對探究與探究教學的看法與教學實務
2.
以專題式學習融入服務學習之行動研究--以玄奘資管系系統分析與設計課程為例
3.
實習教師成就目標、教師信念及任教意願與創意教學信念關係之研究
4.
教室是平的?一位國小自然科教師的敘說探究
5.
探究教學的專業成長歷程--以十位國中科學教師的觀點為例
6.
探討教師角色在促進國小學童論證表現的改變--以啟發式科學寫作(SWH)教學為情境的四年個案研究
7.
「生命科學概論--以生物產業觀點為出發」:一項通識教育課程之改進
1.
參與學習社群之科學教師其探究教學專業成長轉變之研究
2.
U化問題導向合作探究學習模式的發展與應用-國小學生科學提問能力進展特徵之探討
3.
「探究師資培育計畫」對國中科學與數學教師探究教學自我效能的影響
4.
社會建構主義在國小語文教學之實踐─社會互動教學與語文能力建構歷程之研究
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code