一、中文文獻
王秀惠（民92）。國小自然與生活科技領域教師教學信念、教學效能與教學行為之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。
王雲東（民96）。社會研究方法。臺北市：威士曼文化。
王靜如、周金燕、蔡瑞芬（民95）。國小教師科學教學基準系列報導（二）：科學本質與科學探究。屏東教大科學教育，23，3-17。
石曉玫（民97）。運用學習社群提升偏遠地區幼稚園教師專業成長之研究— 以南投縣國民教育幼兒班教師為例（未出版之碩士論文）。朝陽科技大學，臺中市。
朱仲謀（譯）（民95）。行動研究—原理與實作（原作者：Jean McNiff, Jack Whitehead）。臺北市：五南。（原著出版年：2004）。
朱柔若（譯）（民89）。社會研究方法：質化與量化取向（原作者：W. Lawrence Neuman）。臺北市：揚智文化。（原著出版年：1991）。
朱陳翰思（民91）。國民小學教師自我效能感與專業知能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中師範學院，臺中市。
何文純（民96）。國民小學社會資本與學習社群關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市 。
何縕琪、張景媛（民92）。合作省思專業成長模式對國小教師的教學知識與信念以及社群關係之影響。教育心理學報，34，157-178。
余曉清(民87)。科學教育與性別差異的省思。兩性平等教育季刊，2，51-57。
吳旭平（民98）。從實踐社群探看中等教師於在職進修之創化。「教育專業發展學術」發表之論文，臺中東海大學。
吳萬益、林清河（民91）。企業研究方法。臺北市：華泰書局。
吳璧如（民94）。教師效能感的縱貫性研究：以幼教職前教師為例。教育與心理研究，28，383-408。李俊湖（民96）。教師專業成長。研習資訊，6，97-102。.
李國偉（譯）（民91）。電腦也搞不定：從數學看計算機科學的罩門（原作者：David Harel）。臺北市：遠見。（原著出版年：2000）。
沃文豪（民96）。國小教師之科學教學自我效能與科學教學行為相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
林世華、陳柏熹、黃寶園、傅瓊儀、趙如錦（譯）（民94）。社會科學研究法：量化與質化取向。（原作者：Keith F.Punch）。臺北市：心理。
林佩璇（民89）。個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用。「質的研究研討會」發表之論文，國立中正大學。
林炎全（民94）。數學史料融入數學教學引例。取自：http://sciedu2.ncue.edu.tw/front/bin/ptdetail.phtml?Part=PRO-01&;Category=9
林勇吉（民99）。透過敘說取向個案研究探討四位國中數學教師發展數學探究教學之故事：聚焦於信念、知識與實務（未出版之博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。林勇吉、秦爾聰（民96）。透過「合作探究導向」的專業成長計劃促進中學教師進行數學探究教學：探討數學探究教學能力與信念之改變。「第二十三屆中華民國科學教育學術研討會」發表之論文，國立高雄師範大學。
林勇吉、秦爾聰、段曉林（民99）。以敘說探究探討一位國中教師發展數學探究教學之信念與實務。教育科學研究期刊，3，1-32。林淑梤、張惠博、段曉林（民98）。促進實習教師教學學習的夥伴實習輔導。教育科學研究期刊，54，23-55。林國瑞、江澤群、李一聖、劉海鵬（民90）。臺北市國民小學體育教師效能信念及教學教學效能之相關研究。「2001國際高等教育體育學術研討會」發表之論文，國立臺灣師範大學。林育賢（民97）。國小特教班教師自我效能與教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺東大學，臺東縣。
邱怡文（民97）。臺北縣健康與體育領域教師專業能力與進修需求研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。
柯澍馨、林亭如（民96）。台灣地區高職餐飲科教師效能信念與有效教學行為之研究。學校行政，51，72-92。
洪宏蔚（民98）。澎湖縣國小教師數學學習領域有效教學行為、自我效能及教學效能相關之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。
洪萬生（2004）。數學史如何呈現。科學月刊，35，1002-1004。
紀雅芳、溫媺純（2008）。5E 學習環融入數學探究教學對國中生學習動機之影響。台灣數學教師電子期刊，13，1-10。胡幼慧（民95）。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北市：巨流。
胡倩瑜、臧瑩卓（民97）。協助一位幼兒園在職進修教師課程轉型之行動研究。幼兒保育學刊，6，25-45。
秦爾聰 、林勇吉、林晶珮、段曉林（民98）。實施數學探究教學所遭遇的問題與解決之道：一位七年級數學教師之行動研究。台灣數學教師電子期刊，19，35-58。取自：http://www.tame.tw/attachments/month_1009/720109895831.pdf
高毓惠（民92）。成為一個教師──「真實性探究教學」的實踐（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北市師範學院，臺北市。
張世忠（民91）。建構教學─理論與應用。臺北市：五南。張溫瑜（民95）。一位資深教師對於探究教學的理解與實踐（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。
張筵儀（民100）。地方政府毒品防制政策之組織建構及推動策略－我國縣市政府毒品危害防制中心之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義。張德銳、王淑珍（民99）。教師專業學習社群在教學輔導教師制度中的發展與實踐。臺北市立教育大學學報，1，61-90。教育部(民92)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北市：教育部。教育部（2009）。國民中小學九年一貫數學學習領域課程綱要。取自：http://www.edu.tw/eje/content.aspx?site_content_sn=4420郭麟瑤（民96）。國中數學科教師在九年一貫課程數學學習領域中教學信念與教學行為表現之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東市。
陳月娥（民89）。社會研究法（含概要）。臺北市：千華。
陳火城（民93）。高雄市國小教師數學教學信念與教學效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文），國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
陳世佳（民93）。以教師專業成長為目標之教師評鑑。教育資料與研究，127，33-44。陳向明（民91）。社會科學質的研究。臺北市：五南。陳均伊（民95）。以合作專業成長模式協助二位科學教師實施探究教學之個案研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。陳均伊（民100）。教師專業成長之個案研究—一位國中自然教師探究教學觀點的轉變。教育科學研究期刊，55，233-264。陳欣民、柳賢（民95）。教師專業成長的另類模式──數學科初任教師運用指標自我評鑑之個案研究。「中華民國第22屆科學教育學術研討會」發表之論文，國立台灣師範大學。
陳玫良（民97）。國中自然與生活科技教師課程領導、組織承諾和教學效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。陳俊瑋（民98）。台灣地區教師自我效能感研究之統合分析。彰化師大教育學報，15，41-64。陳冠州、秦爾聰、段曉林（民95）。探究取向數學教學效能與改革信念量表之發展。「中華民國第22 屆科學教育學術研討會」發表之論文，國立臺灣師範大學。
陳美如（民90）。合作探究式教學觀察：多元文化觀點。教育研究資訊，9，43-65。陳啟榮（民95）。建構式教學的涵義及其在教育上之啟示。課程與教學，5，57-61。
陳義彥等（譯）（民96）。政治學方法論與途徑（原作者：David March &; Gerry Stoker）。臺北市：韋伯。
陳嘉彌（民92）。師徒式教育實習之理論與實務。臺北市：心理。陳嘉彌（民94）。國小跨年級同儕師徒制教學策略之研究。臺北市：揚智。陳慧敏（民92）。國民小學教師之校長教學領導知覺與自我效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東縣。
陳靜婉（民90）。國民小學教師在職進修與專業成長知覺之研究--以彰化縣為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北師範學院，臺北市。
單小琳（民89）。教師成長檔與專業發展。學校行政，9，46-57。
曾千純、段曉林、溫媺純、秦爾聰、王國華（民96）。探討「探究師資培育計畫」對於數學/科學教師探究教學效能轉變的影響。「第二十三屆中華民國科學教育學術研討會」發表之論文，國立高雄師範大學。
黃坤錦（民92）。教師在職進修與教師專業發展。教育資料集刊，28，241-258。
黃宗顯（民93）。應用教師自我評鑑促進教師專業發展。教育資料與研究，127，45-54。黃秋鑾（民98）。臺灣地區國民中學校長知識領導、學習社群與學校創新經營效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。黃秋鑾（民99）。教師進修的另一管道─以「學習社群」提升教師專業成長。北縣教育， 71，29-36。
黃國彥（民97）。高中生活科技科教師教學信念與教學效能之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。高雄師範大學，高雄市。
黃惠玲（民93）。彰化縣國民小學教師在職進修動機取向與自我效能之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學，嘉義縣。
黃萬居、熊瑞棻（民93）。新世紀國小科學教師專業素養之研究。臺北市立師範學院學報，35，201-230。黃興豐（民98）。介紹Ball研究小組「數學教學需要的學科知識」之研究。台灣數學教師（電子）期刊，18，32-49。取自：http://163.21.236.74/attachments/month_1006/y20106815525.pdf楊明坤、李建璋、林淑惠、林依柔（民99）。探究式教學融入國小高年級數學領域學習之行動研究－以體積單元為例。屏東教大科學教育，32，39-50。
葉至誠（民89）。社會科學概論。臺北市：揚智文化。
葉重新（民90）。教育研究法。臺北市：心理出版社。
葉木水（民94）。語意網整體服務系統之建置。管理與系統，2，93-121。
溫明麗、黃乃熒、林建福、黃純敏、黃桂君、陳怡如、梁瑞芸（譯）(民91)。行動研究教育學（原作者：R. D. Parsons, S. Lewis, Hinson, &; D. S. Brown）。臺北市：雙葉。
甄曉蘭（民90）。中小學課程改革與教學革新。臺北市：元照。趙金婷（民89）。學習社群理念在教學上的應用。教育資料與研究，35，60-66。潘明宏、陳志瑋（譯）（民92）。最新社會科學研究方法。（原作者：C. Frandfort Nachmias &; David Nachmias ）。臺北市：韋伯文化。
潘淑滿（民92）。質性研究理論與應用。臺北市：心理。
蔡執仲、段曉林、靳知勤（民96）。巢狀探究教學模式對國二學生理化學習動機影響之探討。科學教育學刊，15，119-144。鄭文實、陳志賢、連廷嘉（民99）。國小組織氣氛、教師自我效能感與專業評鑑意願之相關研究。大仁學報，36，62-82。
謝志偉（民96）。教育研究典範的未來趨勢混合方法論（Mixed Methodology）介紹。屏東教育大學學報，26，175-194。
謝京含（民94）。再談幼托整合。幼教資訊，161，9-11。
謝臥龍（主編）（民93）。質性研究。臺北市：心理出版社。
鍾筱蘭（民93）。從一年級數學課室討論文化看學生的學習--以三個個案探討。（未出版之碩士論文）國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
鍾靜（民89）。學生學習為中心的數學教學特質分析研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC 89-2511-S-152-003），未出版。
簡玉琴（民91）。桃園縣國民小學教師自我效能與教學效能關係之研究。（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北市師範學院，臺北市。
簡錫昌（民92）。論教師在職進修研習活動之發展模式。南投文教，19，16-21。
顏弘志（民93）。從建構主義看探究教學。科學教育研究與發展季刊，36，1-14。
顏弘志、段曉林（民95）。建構主義取向教學的實踐—一位國小自然科教師信念、教學實務的改變。科學教育學刊，14，571-596。顏瓊芬、黃世傑（民92）。學生在開放式科學探究過程中互動模式之研究。科學教育學刊，11，141-169。魏方亭（民90）。嘉南地區國中教師工作價值觀、自我效能感及工作壓力與任教承諾關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。
魏育琳（民94）。探討以開放式探究教學為焦點的自然教師成長團體之個案研究。（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。
饒見維（民88）。九年一貫課程與教育革新。載於中華民國教材研究發展會（主編），九年一貫課程研討會論文集(下)--邁向課程新紀元-九年一貫課程與教育革新（307-312頁）。臺北市：台灣師範大學。
二、英文文獻
American Association for the Advancement of Science.(1993). Benchmarks for science literacy, Project 2061. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 1-12.
Ashton , P. T., &; Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teacher’ssense of efficacy and student achievement. New York, NY: Longman.
Bandura, A. &; Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87-99.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
Barab, S. A., &; Plucker, J. A. (2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 165-182.
Beatty, T. H. (2002). The relationship between teacher sense of efficacy and pupil control ideology in urban middle schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The College of William and Mary, Virginia, USA.
Bishop, A. (1988). Mathematical enculuration: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
Bleicher, R. E. (2007). Nurturing confidence in preservice elementary science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(6), 841-860.
Bong, M., &; Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1-40.
Brand, B. R., &; Moore, S. J. (2010). Enhancing teachers' application of inquiry-based strategies using a constructivist sociocultural professional development model. International Journal of Science Education, 7(33), 1-25.
Brown, S.W. (2000). Practicing best-in-class service recovery. Marketing Management, Summer, 2(9), 8-9.
Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods. New York, NY: Oxford University.
Cantrell, A., McGarvey, D.J., Truscott, T.G., Rancan, F., &; Bohm, F. (2003). Singlet oxygen quenching by dietary carotenoids in amodel membrane environment. Arch Biochem Biophys, 412, 47-54.
Cantrell, P., Young, S., &; Moore, A. (2003). Factors affecting science teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14, 177-192.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., &; Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students' academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 473-490.
Cheung, H. Y. (2008). Teacher Efficacy: A comparative study of Hong Kong and Shanghai primary in-service teachers. Australian Educational Researcher, 35(1), 103-124.
Choi, N. (2005). Self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of college students’ academic performance. Psychology in the Schools, 42(2), 197-205.
Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 23(6), 42-44.
Colburn, L. K. (2000). An analysis of teacher change and required supports as technology is integrated into classroom instruction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Collette, A.T., &; Chiappetta, E. C. (1994). Science instruction in the middle and science school. New York, NY: Merrill.
Cooper, B., &; Harries, A. V. (2002). Children’s responses to contrasting “realistic”mathematics problems: Just how realistic are children ready to be? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 1-23.
Corey, G. (2001). Theory and practice of counselling and psychotherapy (6 th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks Cole.
Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 613-642.
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 631-645.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative approaches, and mixed method approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., &; Plano-Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks Calif: Sage.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and The Internal Structure of Test. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Curtis, A., &; Cheng, L. (2001). Teachers’ self-evaluation of knowledge, skills and personality characteristics needed to manage change. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 29(2), 139-152.
Danielson, C. (2001). New trends in teacher evaluation. Educational Leadership, 58(5), 12-15.
Denzine, G. M., Cooney, J. B., &; Mckenzie, R. (2005). Confirmatory factor analysis of the teacher efficacy scale for prospective teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 689-708.
Diezman,C. M. (2004). Assessing learning from mathermatic inquire: Challenges for student, teachers and researchers. In Proceedings Mathematical Association of Victoria Conference(pp.80-85). Melbourne:Mathematical Association of Victoria.
Driver, R., Newton, P., &; Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
Duran, E., Ballone-Duran, L., Haney, J., &; Beltyukova, S. (2009). The impact of a professional development program integrating informal science education on early childhood teachers’ self-efficacy and beliefs about inquiry-based science teaching. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(4), 53-70.
Elbers, E., &; Streefland, L. (2000). Collaborative learning and the construction of common knowledge. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 479-490.
Enochs, L. G., Scharmann, L. C., &; Riggs, I. M. (1995). The relationship of pupil control to preservice elementary science teacher self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Science Education, 79, 63-75.
Erdem, E., &; Demirel, z. (2007). Teacher self-efficacy belief. Social Behavior &; Personality: An International Journal, 35(5), 573-586.
Fong, C., Norman, L. B., &; Kenneth, R. T. (2004). Counseling theories and techniques for rehabilitation health professionals. New York, NY: Springer.
Franzblau, S. H., &; Moore, M. (2001). Socializing efficacy: A reconstruction of self-efficacy theory with the context of inequality. Journal of Community &; Applied Social Psychology, 11(2), 83-96.
Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 517-534.
Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application, (4th ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
George, A. L., &; Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Gerber, B. L., Price, C., Barnes, M., Hinkle, V., Barnes, L., &; Gordon, P. (2003). Excellence in rural Science Teaching: Examining Elements of Professional Development Models. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA .
Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. New York, NY : Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, S., &; Demno, M. H. (1984).Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582.
Glanz, J. (2003). Action research: An educational leader's guide to school improvement. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
Glazer, E. M., &; Hannafin, J. H. (2006). The collaborative apprenticeship model: Situated professional development within school settings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 179-193.
Guieford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGram-Hill.
Hawley, W. D., &; Linda Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond &; G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127-150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hawley, W. D., &; Valli, L. (2000, August). Learner-centered professional development. (Research Bulletin No. 27). Boomington, IN: Phil Delta Kappa Center for Evaluation, Development, and Research.
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Bassler, O. C., &; Brissie, J. S. (1987). Parent involvement : Contributions of teacher efficacy, school socioeconomic status, and other school characteristics. American Educational Research Journal, 24(3), 417-435.
Howard, B. B., &; McColskey, W. H. (2001). Evaluating experienced teachers. Education Leadership, 58(5), 48-51.
Howard, E. (2003). How supervision influences teacher efficacy and commitment: An investigation of a path model. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(2), 110-141.
Israel, B. A., Eng, E., Schulz, A. J., &; Parker, E. A. (2005). Methods in community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a model of learning in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(1), 5-32.
Jeanpierre, B., Oberhauser, K., &; Freeman, C. (2005). Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers’ classroom practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 668-690.
Johnson, R. B., &; Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004).Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor nalysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187-200.
Kazempour, M. (2009). Impact of inquiry-based professional development on core conceptions and teaching practices: A case study. Science Educator, 18(2), 56-68.
Keys, C. W., &; Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 631-645.
Keys, C. W., &; Bryan, L.A. (2000). Co-constructing inquiry-base science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 6-20.
Khmelkov, V. T. (2000). Developing professionalism: Effects of school workplace organization on novice teachers’ sense of responsibility and efficacy. Retrieved from UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertation.（AAT9967316）.
Kim, H., &; Song, J. (2005). The features of peer argumentation in middle school students' scientific inquiry. Research in Science Education, 36(3), 211-233.
King, M. B. (2002). Professional development to promote schoolwide inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 243-257.
Kurz, T. B. (2001). An exploration of the relationship among teacher efficacy, collective teacher efficacy, and goal consensus. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A &; M University, USA.
Labone, E. (2004). Teacher efficacy: Maturing the construct through research in alternative paradigms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 341-359.
Lavonen, J., Jauhiainen, J., Koponen, I. T., &; Kurki-Suonio, K. (2004). Effect of a long-term in-service training program on teachers’ beliefs about the role of experiments in physics education. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 309-328.
Lederman, N. G. &; Niss, M. L. (2000). Problem solving and solving problem: Inquiry about inquiry. School Science and Mathematics, 100(3), 113-116.
Lederman, N. G., &; Niess, M. L. (1998). 5 Apples + 4 Oranges = ? School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 281-284.
Lederman, N. G. (1996).The nature of science: Instructional implications for a process more tentative than products. Paper presented at National Association for Research in Science Teaching: St.Lous, MO
Instructional implications for a process more tentative than products. National Association for Research in Science Teaching: St. Louis, MO.
Lee, Y. S. (2001). An inquiry-based mathematics classroom. Voyages in Mathematics and Science, 26, 3-5.
Lee, J. C. K., Lo, L. N. K., &; Walker, A. (2004). Partnership and change for school improvement. In J. C. K. Lee, L. N. K. Lo, &; A. Walker (Eds.), Partnership and change: Toward school development (pp. 1-30). Hong Kong: The Chinese University.
Linnerbrink, E. A., &; Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student Engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 119-137.
Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., &; Bonner, J. J. (2007). The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers’ use of inquiry teaching practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1318-1347.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., &; Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Loughran, J., Gunstone, R., Berry, A., Milroy, P., &; Mulhall, P. (2000). Science cases in Action: Developing an understanding of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
Lu Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., &; Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Luft, J. A. (2001).Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development program on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 517-534.
Luft, J., Bang, E. J., &; Roehrig, G. (2007). Supporting beginning science teachers: Strategies experienced science teachers can use to assist beginning science teachers. The Science Teacher, 74, 24-29.
Luft, J. A., Firestone, J., Wong, S., Adams, K., Ortega, I., &; Bang, E. J. (2011). Beginning secondary science teacher induction: A two-year mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1199-1224.
Marshall, J. C., Horton, R. M., Igo, B. L., &; Switzer, D. M. (2009). K-12 science and mathematics teachers’ beliefs about and use of inquiry in the classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 575-596.
Marshall, J. C., Horton, R., Igo, B. L., &; Switzer, D. M. (2009). K-12 science and mathematics teachers’ beliefs about and use of inquiry in the classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 575-596.
McClain, K., &; Cobb, P. (2001). An analysis of development of sociomathematical norms in one first-grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(3), 236-266.
Mckernan, J. (1991). Curriculum action research. London, UK.
McNeal, B. &; Simon, M. (2000). Mathematics culture clash: Negotiating new classroom norms with prospective teachers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior,18(4), 475-509.
McNeal, B., &; Simon, M. (2000). Mathematics culture clash: Negotiating new classroom norms with prospective teachers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(4), 475-509.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study Research in Education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Michael, R. (2005). Using the multiple intelligences to enhance instruction for young children and young children with disabilities. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(4), 255-259.
Millis, G. E. (2003). .Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Minstrell, J., &; van Zee, E. H. (Eds.) (2000). Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Mulholland, J., &; Wallace, J. (2001). Teacher induction and elementary science teaching: Enhancing self-efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 243-261.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and national science education standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2005). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., &; Duschl, R. (2003). What ideas-about-science should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692-720.
Pajares, F., &; Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding &; S. Rayner (Eds.), Perception (pp. 239-266). London, UK: Ablex Publishing.
Pajares, F., &; Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs: Jointly contributing to the equality of human life. In H. Marsh, R. Craven, &; D.
Mclnerney (Eds.). International avoidances in self research (Vol. 2, pp.95-121). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory into Practice, 41(1), 16-225.
Palincsar, A. S., Magnusson, S. J., &; Vincent, M. (2002). Supporting guided-inquiry instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(3), 88-91.
Palmer, D. (2006). Durability of changes in self-efficacy of pre-service primary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 655-671.
Pappas, M. J. (2000). Managing the inquiry learning environment. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 16(7), 27-30.
Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Punch, K. F. (1998). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Putnam, R. T., &; Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
Ramey-Gassert, L., Shroyer, L., &; Staver, J. (1996). A qualitative study of factors inluencing science teaching self-eicacy of elementary level teachers. Science Teacher Education, 80(3), 283-315.
Richardson, V. (2003). The dilemmas of professional development. Pli Delta Kappan, 84(5), 401-406.
Riggs, I. M., Enochs, L. G., &; Posnanski, T. J. (1998). The teaching behaviors of high versus low efficacy elementary science teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, San Diego.
Roehrig, G. H., &; Luft, J. A. (2004). Constraints Experienced by Beginning Secondary Science Teachers in Implementing Scientific Inquiry Lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 3-24.
Romberg, T. A., &; Kaput, J. J. (1999). Mathematics worth teaching, mathematics worth understanding. In E. Fennema &; T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 3-19). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sandoval, W. A., &; Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23-55.
Sandoval, W. A., &; Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963-980.
Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., &; Blumenfeld, P. (2005). Enacting reform-based science materials: The range of teacher enactments in reform classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 283-312.
Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., &; Blumenfeld, P. (2005). Enacting Reform-based Science Materials: The Range of Enactments in Reform Classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 283-312.
Schowalter, V. (1974). Program objectives and scientific literacy, Part 5 and 6, Prism. Newsletter of the Center for United Science Education, 2, 3-4.
Schuck, S. (2003). The use of electronic question and answer forums in mathematics teacher education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 5, 19-31.
Schwartz, R. S., &; Lederman, N. G. (2002). “It’s the nature of the beast”: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 205-236.
Schwartz, R. S., Gfeller, M., &; Lederman, N. G. (2001). Nature of science and nature of mathematics: Natural connections or strange bedfellows? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educators of Teachers of Science, Costa Mesa, CA.
Schwarz, C. V., &; White, B. Y. (2005). Metamodeling knowledge: Developing students'understanding of scientific modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 165-205.
Settlage, J. J. (2000). Understanding the Learning Cycle: Influences on abilities to embrace the approach by preservice elementary school teachers. Science Education, 84, 43-50.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 31-34.
Shymansky, J. A. (2008). Teachers helping teachers teach science inquiry: The “just ask”project. Paper presented at the international conference of Professional Development and Student Learning for Innovative Science Curricula, Taipei, Taiwan.
Smith, M. U., &; Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describ ing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis of classroom teachers and science education. Science Education, 83, 493-509.
Stronge, J. M. (2002). Qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Suchman (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Supovitz, J. A., &; Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963-980.
Supovitz, J. A., Mayer, D. P., &; Kahle, J. B. (2000). Promoting inquiry-based instructional practice: The longitudinal impact of professional development in the context of systemic reform. Educational Policy, 14(3), 331-356.
Tschannen-Moran, M., &; Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
Tuan, H. L., &; Wen, M. C. (2005). The development of an inquiry teaching efficacy questionnaire. Paper presented at the International Conference of Authentic Science and Mathematics (Teacher) Education, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Van Driel, J. H., Beijard, D., &; Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of eachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137-158.
Wheatley, K. F. (2002). The potential benefits of teacher efficacy doubts for educational reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 5-22.
Whitin, P. (2006). Meeting the challenges of negotiated mathematical inquiry. Teaching &; Learning: The Journal of Natural Inquiry and Reflective Practice, 21 (1), 59-83.
Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom pratice? Science Education, 87(1), 112-143.
Wolters, C., &; Daugherty, S. G. (2007). Goal structures and teachers’ sense of efficacy: Their relation and association to teaching experience and academic level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 181-193.
Wood, T., &; Turner-Vorbeck, J. (2001). Extending the conception of mathematics teaching. In T. Wood, B. S. Nelson, &; J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy (pp. 185-208). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wood, T., Williams, G., &; McNeal, B. (2006). Children’s mathematical thinking in different classroom cultures. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(3), 222-255.
Woolfolk, A. E., &; Hoy, W. K. (2000). Changes in efficacy during the early years of teaching. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Yager, R. E. (2005). Accomplishing the visions for professional development of teachers advocated in the National Science Education Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 95-102.
Yang, H. Li., &; Tang, J. H. (2003). A three-stage model of requirements elicitation for Web-based information systems. Industrial Management and Data Systems,103(5), 398-409.
Yilmaz, H., &; Cavas, P. H. (2008). The effect of the teaching practice on pre-service elementary teachers’ science teaching efficacy and classroom management beliefs. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science &; Technology Education, 4(10), 45-54.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.
Yore, L. D., &; Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689-725.