:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論劉向《列女傳》的婚姻觀
書刊名:新史學
作者:朱曉海 引用關係
作者(外文):Chu, Sherman
出版日期:2007
卷期:18:1
頁次:頁1-42
主題關鍵詞:婚姻人倫關係德色衝突守貞勸諫MarriageEthical relationsConflict between de and seConflict between virtue and physical attractivenessChastityLicentiousnessAdmonition
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:96
《列女傳》的原始編撰目的在:教導、培養天子對后妃的正確品味,以便適當擇偶,造福家國,本文因此採取婚姻為貫穿全文的軸線,詳細敘述該書的看法,包括婚姻的本質特點、婚姻的目的、婚姻在人倫關係中的位階、婦女在婚姻關係中的責任等課題,以及由這些課題衍生出的特殊觀點,例如:認為婚禮乃聖禮,所有的儀節都不能苟且、內在美與外在美難以並存、婦女面臨人倫關係中衝突時,僅能以自殺解決、不看重婦女能否生育、對「淫」採取極廣泛且嚴格的認定、子不教乃母之過等等。最後並檢視該書的看法是否有禮教吃人的嫌疑。
The Book of Various Women was originally composed with the goal of cultivating the emperor's taste in women, so that the emperor could benefit the state by properly choosing his mates. In light of this understanding, this article focuses on Liu Xiang's understanding of marriage, scrutinizing various ideas presented in the work, such as the nature and the purpose of marriage, the priority of marriage in ethical relations, and women's duties in the marital relationship. This article further discusses notions derived from these specific issues: that marital rites were consecrated and that no ceremonial acts should be neglected; that virtue and physical attractiveness could not coexist; and that women could only commit suicide when facing conflicts in ethical relations. This paper also shows that in the sphere of work women's productivity was largely discounted, that the definition of licentiousness was very broad and standards very strict, and that mothers were responsible for the misdeeds of sons. This article finally examines whether the ideal of ritual propriety expounded in the work can be considered inhumane.
圖書
1.瞿中溶、劉承幹(2004)。漢武梁祠畫像考。北京:北京圖書館出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭玄、孔穎達(1977)。禮記注疏。臺北:大化書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.李昉(1997)。太平御覽。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
4.王先謙(1981)。荀子集解。世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.王充、黃暉(1995)。論衡校釋。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.歐陽詢(1977)。藝文類聚。臺北:文光出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.王聘珍、王文錦(199812)。大戴禮記解詁。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.班固、陳立、吳則虞(1994)。白虎通疏證。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.司馬遷、裴駰、司馬貞、張守節、瀧川龜太郎(1972)。史記會注考證。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)盧弼(1972)。三國志集解,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(清)王先謙(1972)。後漢書集解,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(南宋)朱熹(1985)。四書集註,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(梁)釋僧佑(1986)。弘明集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.(清)梁端(1981)。列女傳,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.(清)王先謙(1972)。漢書補注,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.(清)戴望(1966)。管子校正,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.(唐)孔穎達(1977)。左傳注疏,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.(唐)孔穎達(1977)。毛詩注疏,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.(東漢)荀悅(1967)。申鑒,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.(唐)賈公彥(1977)。儀禮注疏,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.(宋)洪興祖(1966)。楚辭補注,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.(唐)孔穎達(1977)。周易注疏,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.(東漢)蔡邕(1966)。琴操,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.(梁)蕭統(1998)。文選,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE