:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「一個中國」政策與臺灣加入國際組織的資格
書刊名:臺灣國際法季刊
作者:吳志中 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Zhi-zhong
出版日期:2006
卷期:3:3
頁次:頁99-132
主題關鍵詞:國際法國際法主體一個中國國際組織中國代表權International lawSubject of international lawOne China policyInternational organizationRepresentation of China
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:45
  • 點閱點閱:37
關於臺灣當前的外交困境,除了中國持續不斷的無理打壓之外,長期以來主要是受限於「一個中國」政策,而無法進入國際社會。事實上,此一外交困境源自於臺灣與中華民國的混淆,因為「中華民國」不能參加國際組織的問題與「臺灣」不能參加國際組織的問題不同。前者的問題必須從國際法的政府繼承論來探討,而後者的問題是關於新國家是否成立的問題。本文析究,臺灣加入國際組織的行動雖和中國政府的影響力有關,但臺灣自己以「重返」而非以一獨立國際法主體的名義加入,才是造成無法進入國際組織的重要關鍵。如果我們繼續在國際間以「中華民國(Republic of China)」稱呼自己,由於「中華民國」是「中國」的一個舊政府,此舉將繼續強化國際人士以為我國仍停留在中國代表權問題,而無論要說明「一國兩府」或主張「一國兩席」,都是非常困難的事。「一個中國」已是國際間的共識,中華人民共和國(People's Republic of China)已是國際社會唯一承認的中國政府,我國若繼續使用「中華民國」為名義,遲早會被視為中國的一省或一部份。
In terms of our current diplomacy constraints, part from the constant unreasonable pressure of China, since long ago we can't enter international society because of the limit of the 'One China' policy. As a matter of fact, this diplomatic constrain can be sourced from the confusion of Taiwan and The Republic of China, because the issue of 'The Republic of China' not being able to join the international community is different with the issue of 'Taiwan' not being able to join the international community. The issue of the former should be discussed with the government inheriting the theory of International Law, meanwhile the issue of the later is about whether a new state should establish. This essay proclaims that although the action taken by Taiwan in joining the international community has connection with the influence of China's government, it is mainly due to Taiwan's insist on 'returning' to international community instead of joining with the name of an 'independent International Law main body'. If Taiwan continue to call ourselves 'The Republic of China' in international society, this behavior will continue to increase the confusion of international society and the question of representation of China will stay since 'The Republic of China' is an old government of 'China'. It's very difficult whether to explain 'One Country, Two Governments' or to state 'One Country, Two Seats'. 'One China' has been the mutual recognition of international society, The People's Republic of China has been the only Chinese government that international society acknowledges. If the name of 'The Republic of China' is kept used by the Government of Taiwan, sooner or later Taiwan be considered a province or one part of China.
期刊論文
1.小谷鶴次(1973)。分裂国家と国際法の適用。国際法外交雑誌,61(2)。  延伸查詢new window
2.王志安(1992)。多数国条約における当事者としての台湾。法学論叢,130(4)。  延伸查詢new window
3.Green, L. C.(195007)。The Recognition of Communist China。The International Law Quarterly,3(3),418-422。  new window
4.姚壯(1989)。香港與國際組織。中國國際法年刊,322-325。  延伸查詢new window
5.廖宏祥(20030525)。加入WHO臺灣應先正名。新臺灣周刊,373。  延伸查詢new window
6.Agreement on Mutual Cooperation in Civil Aviation(19930728)。Taipei-Moscow Commission and Cultural Coordination Commission-Taipei Economic and Cultural Commission。Chinese Yearbook International Law and Affairs,12,463。  new window
7.(1990/1991)。Annex: List of Bi-Lateral Agreements。Chinese Yearbook International Law and Affairs,10。  new window
8.Carolan, Christopher J.(2000)。The 'Republic of Taiwan': A Legal Historical Justification for A Taiwanese Declaration of Independence。New York University Law Review,75(2),429-468。  new window
9.Fitzmaurice, G. G.(1958)。Third Report of the Law of Treaties。Yearbook of the International Law Commission,2。  new window
10.Chiu, Hungdah(1990)。Legal Problems in ROC's Participation in Inter Govemmental Organizations。A.R.C.I.L.I.A.,4。  new window
11.Magdelenat, Jean-Louis、Huang, Jiefang(1985)。Les accords de transport aerien dans Ies successions d’Etas: Ie cas particulier de Hong-Kong。Annals de droit aeroen et spatial。  new window
12.王志安(1989)。國際法上具有高度自治權的地域之香港(上)--以其條約關係的移轉為中心。外交時報,1989(3)。  延伸查詢new window
13.松田幹夫(1977)。自治領の締結條約能力--國際法主體性の探索として。國際法外交雑誌,76(3)。  延伸查詢new window
14.Attix, Cheri L.(1995)。Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea: Are Taiwan's Trading Partners Implying Recognition of Taiwanese Statehood?。California Western International Law Journal,25(2),357-357。  new window
15.Meron, Theodor(1979)。The Composition of the UN Regional Economic Commissions the PLO。International and Comparative Law Quarterly,28(1),52-64。  new window
16.姜皇池(20020700)。參與WHO之檢討--從國際法角度觀察。國策專刊,20,9-11。  延伸查詢new window
17.黃居正(20051200)。臺灣主張了什麼?[評The Creation of States in International Law by James Crawford, 2 ed]。臺灣國際法季刊,2(4),223-243。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.許慶雄(20051210)。臺灣現階段「建立國家」之問題點。淡江大學日本研究所研討會。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳荔彤(2003)。臺灣在國際法院的適格性探討。臺灣在國際法院的適格性研討會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.日本外務省(2003)。國際機關總覽。東京:日本外務省國際組織局。  延伸查詢new window
2.王志安(1999)。國際法における承認。東京:東信堂。  延伸查詢new window
3.中華民國外交部(199305)。中華民國參與聯合國。外交部。  延伸查詢new window
4.王正華(1970)。中華民國與聯合國史料編--中國代表權篇。國史館。  延伸查詢new window
5.姜皇池(2001)。臺灣與國際法。元照出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.許慶雄(1995)。臺灣的國家定位。知英文化。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃居正(2006)。國際航空法的理論與實踐。新學林出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.戴天昭、李明峻(2000)。臺灣國際政治史。前衛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Smith, Adam(1994)。An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations。Modem Library。  new window
10.Pulles, Foster Rhea(1992)。American Foreign Policy toward Communist China: 1949-1969。New York:Thomas Y. Crowell Company。  new window
11.Charmelot, Jacques(19940307)。Les Droits de I’Homme au Menu des entretiens du Minister Neerlandais des Affaires Etrangers。Agence France Presse。  new window
12.Copper, John F.(1990)。Taiwan: Nation-State or Province?。  new window
13.Crawford, James(2006)。The Creation of State。Cambridge University Press。  new window
14.Roberts, Adam、Kingsberry, Benedict(1995)。United Nations Divided World。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
15.Di Marzo, Luigi(1980)。Component Units of Federal States and International Agreement。  new window
16.Bedjaoui, Mohamud(1961)。Law and the Algerian Revolution。International Association of Democratic Lawyers。  new window
17.Union of International Associations(2002)。Yearbook of International Organizations 2002/03。  new window
18.Gould, W.(1957)。An Introduction to International Law。  new window
19.Marek, K.(1953)。Identity and Continuity of States in International Law。  new window
20.Henkin, Louis(1980)。International Law: Cases and Materials。St. Paul, Minn:West Publishing Co。  new window
21.許宗力、黃昭元(2000)。兩國論與臺灣國家定位。臺北:學林文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Krestof, Nicholas D.(19930118)。Taiwan Winning New Friends, Hopes for Another One in Clinton。  new window
2.UN(19800416)。Press Release,SEA/445。  new window
圖書論文
1.李明峻(2002)。臺灣加入國際組織的法理問題。戰鬥的法律人(林山田紀念論文集)。學林文化出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.李明峻(2002)。臺灣加入國際組織的法理問題。林山田紀念論文集。學林文化出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.許慶雄(2001)。臺灣國際法地位之探討。臺灣主權論述論文集。國史館。  延伸查詢new window
4.Gemma, S.(1924)。Les gouvernements de fait。Recueil des Cours。  new window
5.藤田久一(1980)。内戦と一九四九年ジュネーブ条約。国際人道法。世界思想社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE