:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:建成環境影響兒童通學方式與運具選擇之研究:臺北市文山區國小兒童之實證分析
書刊名:運輸計劃
作者:林楨家 引用關係張孝德
作者(外文):Lin, Jen-jiaChang, Hsiao-te
出版日期:2008
卷期:37:3
頁次:頁331-361
主題關鍵詞:建成環境兒童通學方式運具選擇巢式羅吉特模式Built environmentChildrenSchool travel patternMode choiceNested logit model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:55
本研究目的在實證分析建成環境特性對兒童通學方式與運具選擇的影響,根據實證結果,地方政府可以鼓勵兒童獨自或步行通學為目標,研提可行的都市規劃策略。研究選擇臺北市文山區指南、景美、興華等三所國小學生進行問卷調查,利用巢式羅吉特模式進行分析。研究結果發現,在兒童的上學旅次中,土地使用混合程度、運具多樣性指標以及人行道比例,對於兒童獨自或步行上學均為正向影響,而街廓規模、車道寬度與交叉路口數則是呈現負向影響關係;另外,在兒童的放學旅次中,正向影響兒童獨自或步行放學的建成環境特性為建物密度與道路車輛密度,而負向影響的特性則有街廓規模和車道寬度。
The purpose of this study is to empirically analyze the influences of built environments on children’s school travel. Based on the empirical findings, local governments can develop urban planning strategies to encourage children to go to school independently or by walking. The study chose the students of three elementary schools, Chinan, Jingmei, and Xinhwa, in Taipei, Wenshan District, as samples and used questionnaire surveys. The sample data was analyzed using the nested logit model. The results of this study indicate that mixed land use, mode diversity and length percentage of sidewalks encourage children to go to school independently or by walking, while block size, road width and number of intersections discourage children from going to school independently or by walking. Furthermore, building density and vehicle density encourage children to leave school independently or by walking, but block size and road width discourage children from leaving school independently or by walking.
期刊論文
1.Bradshaw, R.(1995)。Why do parents drive their children to school。Traffic Engineering and Control,36(1),1121-1141。  new window
2.Cervero, R.(1996)。Mixed land-uses and commuting: Evidence from the American housing survey。Transportation Research Part A,30(5),361-377。  new window
3.Handy, S.(1996)。Urban Form and Pedestrian Choice: Study of Austin Neighborhoods。Transportation Research Record,1552,135-144。  new window
4.Cervero, R.、Kockelman, K. M.(1997)。Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design。Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,2(3),199-219。  new window
5.林楨家、楊恩捷(20061200)。都市型態對旅運需求影響之結構化分析。運輸學刊,18(4),391-416。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Crane, R.(2000)。The Influence of Urban Form on Travel: An Interpretive Review。Journal of Planning Literature,15(1),3-23。  new window
7.Zhang, M.(2004)。The Role of Land Use in Travel Mode Choice。Journal of the American Planning Association,70(3),344-360。  new window
8.Hu, G.、Pekkarinen, H.、Hanninen, O.、Tian, H.、Guo, Z.(2001)。Relation between Commuting, Leisure Time Physical Activity and Serum Lipids in a Chinese Urban Population。Annals of Human Biology,28(4),412-421。  new window
9.Hayashi, T.、Tsumura, K.、Suematsu, C.、Okada, K.、Fujii, S.、Endo, G.(1999)。Walking to Work and the Risk of Hypertension in Men: The Osaka Health Survey。Annals of Internal Medicine,130,21-26。  new window
10.Frank, L.、Pivo, G.(1994)。Impacts of Mixed Land Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-occupant Vehicle, Transit, and Walking。Transportation Research Record,1466,44-52。  new window
11.Rajamani, J.、Bhat, C.、Handy, S.、Knaap, G.、Song, Y.(2003)。Assessing Impact of Urban Form Measures on Nonwork Trip Mode Choice after Controlling for Demographic and Level-of-service Effects。Transportation Research Record,1831,158-165。  new window
12.Rhoulac, T.(2005)。Bus or Car: The Classic Choice in the Context of School Transportation。Transportation Research Record,1922,98-104。  new window
13.Lin, J. J.、Hsiao, P. C(2006)。Strategy Development of Mixed Land-use for Restraining Trip Generation in Taipei City。Transportation Research Record,1983,167-174。  new window
14.Schwanen, T.、Mokhtarian, P.(2005)。What Affects Commute Mode Choice - Neighborhood Physical Structure or Preferences toward Neighborhood。Journal of Transport Geography,13(1),83-99。  new window
15.McMillan, T.(2005)。Urban Form and a Child's Trip to School: The Current Literature and a Framework for Future Research。Journal of Planning Literature,19(4),440-456。  new window
16.McMillan, T.(2007)。The Relative Influence of Urban Form on a Child's Travel Mode to School。Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,41(1),69-79。  new window
17.Cervero, R.(2002)。Built Environment and Mode Choice: Toward a Normative Framework。Transportation Research D,7(4),265-284。  new window
會議論文
1.McDonald, N. C.(2006)。Children's travel patterns: Evidence from the 2001 national household travel survey。Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting。Washington, DC., USA。  new window
2.Morris, J.、Wang, F.、Lilja, L.(2001)。School Children's Travel Patterns: A Look Back and a Way Forward。0。  new window
3.Chatman, D.(2003)。The Influence of Workplace Land Use and Commute Mode Choice on Mileage Traveled for Personal Commercial Purposes。0。  new window
4.Stefan, K.、Hunt, J.(2006)。Age-based Analysis of Travel by Children in Calgary, Canada。0。  new window
5.Isebrands, H.、Hallmark, S.、Liu, X.(2006)。School Transportation Modes for Urban and Suburban Elementary School in Iowa。0。  new window
6.Zwerts, E.、Wets, G.(2006)。Children's Travel Behavior: A World of Difference。0。  new window
7.Mackett, R.(2002)。Increasing Car Dependency of Children: Should We be Worried?。0。29-38。  new window
8.蘇昭銘、陳雅慧(1999)。國小學童上下學交通安全管理措施之研究。0。129-139。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Reilly, M.、Landis, J.(2002)。The Influence of Built-form and Land Use on Mode Choice: Evidence from the 1996 Bay Area Travel Survey。0。  new window
2.Cervero, R.、Duncan, M.(2003)。Walking, Bicycling, and Urban Landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area。0。  new window
學位論文
1.陳文慧(2002)。鄰里通學道路設施與學童步行活動環境之調查研究--以台北市為例(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭子齊(2000)。都市土地使用型態對消費性旅次運具選擇行為之影響(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃文俊(1999)。國小五年級男童通學方式與身體活動在健康體適能之影響分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.張孝德(2007)。建成環境對兒童通學方式與運具選擇之影響--臺北市文山區國小學童之實證分析(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.蕭博正(2003)。臺北市土地混合使用特性對旅運需求之影響,0。  延伸查詢new window
6.洪玉蕙(2004)。臺北市國小通學步道規劃制度之研究-以北投國民小學為例,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Transportation Research Board(2005)。Does the Built Environment Influence Physical Activity? Examining the Evidence。Washington, D.C.:Transportation Research Board。  new window
2.Jones, P.、Bradshaw, R.(2000)。The Family and the School Run: What Would Make a Real Difference。Basingstoke:AA Foundation for Road Safety Research, University of Westminster。  new window
3.Boarnet, M. G.、Crane, Randall(2001)。Travel by Design: The Influence of Urban Form on Travel。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Ben-Akiva, Moshe E.、Lerman, Steven R.(1985)。Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand。Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press。  new window
5.亞聯工程顧問股份有限公司、臺北市政府交通局(2001)。臺北都會區整體運輸規劃基本資料之調查與驗校(二)。臺北都會區整體運輸規劃基本資料之調查與驗校(二)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Joo, J.(2002)。Local Transit Access: The Relevance of the Local Environment in Predicting Travel Mode Choice,0。  new window
2.Greenwald, M.,Boarnet, M.(2001)。The Built Environment as a Determinant of Walking Behavior: Analysis Non-work Pedestrian Travel in Portland, Oregon,0。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top