:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:都市人、車流量與街道空間型態之關連性分析--以新竹市為例
書刊名:建築學報
作者:張淑貞 引用關係陳美智何曉萍 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Shu-chenChen, Mei-chihHo, Hsiao-ping
出版日期:2016
卷期:98
頁次:頁81-96
主題關鍵詞:空間型構法則路網結構土地使用強度步行設施Space syntaxRoad configurationLand use intensityWalking facilities
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:25
  • 點閱點閱:5
台灣的道路設計常被批評「重車本、輕人本」,常為滿足車輛通行效率,讓步行空間受到極大的壓迫;故本文主要目的即要探討都市人、車流量與街道空間型態的關係,並瞭解實證地區之道路設計是否有重車、輕人之傾向。本研究將街道空間型態分為「人行環境」和「道路環境」兩類,其中「人行環境」的變項有:人行道平均寬、總步行空間平均寬度、人行道長度建置率、總步行空間長度建置率,「道路環境」的變項有:全區道路便捷度(Rn)、地區道路便捷度(R3)、路寬、土地使用強度。本研究結果顯示:(1)人行環境建置越充足的路段人流量越高;總步行空間長度建置率對人流量的正向影響力最大,其次是土地使用強度。(2)路寬是影響車流量最重要的因子,其次是全區性道路便捷度,再則是土地使用強度。(3)空間型構之道路便捷度可以有效預測車流量,但對於人流量之解釋能力有限。(4)道路空間設計有偏重車行需求,而輕忽步行環境之傾向。
The road design in Taiwan is often criticized for "valuing traffic more than pedestrian". In order to meet the efficiency of vehicle traffic, walking space is often greatly oppressed. Therefore, this study will explore the relationship between urban pedestrian flow, traffic flow and street spatial pattern, and understand whether road design tends to emphasize vehicles more than pedestrian. We classify the street spatial pattern into "pedestrian environment" and "road environment" categories. The former has variables, such as the average sidewalk width and ratio of the length, average total pedestrian width and ratio of the length, and the latter's variables are global integration (Rn), local integration (R3), road width, and land use intensity. The results show that: (1) the roads with more sufficient pedestrian facilities have the pedestrian flow more, and the length of the pedestrian space built is the most factor affecting the pedestrian flow, followed by land use intensity. (2) The road width is the most important factor affecting the traffic flow, followed by the global integration (Rn) and land use intensity. (3) The space syntax can effectively predictor the traffic flow, but have restrictedly capability for the interpretation of the pedestrian flow. (4) The road space design has the tendency to focus on traffic flow demands, and to underestimate the pedestrian environment.
期刊論文
1.江彥政、翁珮怡(20121200)。多走路多健康:步行環境與居民健康之關係。戶外遊憩研究,25(4),25-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林楨家、張孝德(20080900)。建成環境影響兒童通學方式與運具選擇之研究 : 臺北市文山區國小兒童之實證分析。運輸計劃,37(3),331-361。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.許添本(20030900)。人本交通與綠色交通的發展理念。都市交通,18(3),41-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.李素馨、張淑貞(20060300)。都市街道特性與被搶恐懼感之研究。造園學報,12(1),41-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Hillier, B.(2004)。Can streets be made safe?。Urban Design,9,31-45。  new window
6.張新立、沈依潔(20050900)。民眾步行行為意向之研究--以臺北市民為例。運輸學刊,17(3),233-260。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.藍武王、林文雄(19911000)。臺北市人行道服務品質之評估與改善。中華道路,30(4),3-12。  延伸查詢new window
8.Foltête, J.-C.、Piombini, A.(2007)。Urban layout, landscape features and pedestrian usage。Landscape and Urban Planning,81(3),225-234。  new window
9.Choi, A.-S.、Kim, Y.-O.、Oh, E.-S.、Kim, Y.-S.(2006)。Application of the space syntax theory to quantitative street lighting design。Building and Environment,41(3),355-366。  new window
10.Kim, H.-K.、Sohn, D. W.(2002)。An analysis of the relationship between land use density of office buildings and urban street configuration: Case studies of two areas in Seoul by space syntax analysis。Cities,19(6),409-418。  new window
11.Choi, A.-S.、Jang, S. J.、Park, B.-C.、Kim, Y.-O.、Kim, Y.-S.(2007)。Rational-design process and evaluation of street-lighting design for apartment complexes。Building and Environment,42,3001-3013。  new window
12.Baran, P. K.、Rodriguez, D. A.、Khattak, A. J.(2008)。Space syntax and walking in a new urbanist and suburban neighborhoods。Journal of Urban Design,13(1),5-28。  new window
13.Frank, L.、Engele, P.(2001)。The built environment and human activity patterns: Exploring the impacts of urban form on public health。Journal of Planning Literature,16(2),204-216。  new window
14.Frank, L.、Pivo, G.(1994)。Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: Single-occupant vehicle, transit, and walking。Transportation Research Record,1466,44-52。  new window
15.Orellana, D.、Wachowicz, M.(2011)。Exploring patterns of movement suspension in pedestrian mobility。Geographical Analysis,43(3),241-206。  new window
16.Moudon, A. V.、Hess, P.、Snyder, M. C.、Stanilov, K.(1997)。Effects of site design on pedestrian travel in mixed-use, medium-density environments。Transportation Research Record,1578,48-55。  new window
17.Lerman, Y.、Rofè, Y.、Omer, I.(2014)。Using space syntax to model pedestrian movement in urban transportation planning。Geographical Analysis,46(4),392-410。  new window
18.Penn, A.、Hiller, B.(1998)。Configurationally modeling of urban movement networks。Environment and Planning B,25(1),59-84。  new window
19.Shriver, K.(1997)。Influence of environmental design on pedestrian travel behavior in four Austin neighborhoods。Transportation Research Record,1578,64-75。  new window
20.Zook, J. B.、Lu, Y.、Glanz, K.、Zimring, C.(2012)。Design and pedestrianism in a smart growth development。Environment and Behavior,44,216-234。  new window
21.Hillier, B.、Penn, Alan、Hanson, J.、Grajewski, T.、Xu, J.(1993)。Natural Movement: Or, Configuration and Attraction in Urban Pedestrian Movement。Environment and Planning B: Planning and design,20(1),29-66。  new window
22.Peponis, J.、Ross, C.、Rashid, M.(1997)。The structure of urban space, movement and co-presence: The case of Atlanta。Geoforum,28(3/4),341-358。  new window
會議論文
1.夏皓清、傅裕豪、葉光毅(2009)。台灣都市間行人步行意識之比較分析--以台中、嘉義、台南、高雄為例。第十三屆國土規劃論壇。台南市:國立成功大學都市計劃系。1-31。  延伸查詢new window
2.Dawson, P. C.(2003)。Analysing the effects of spatial configuration on human movement and social interaction in Canadian Arctic communities。4th International Syntax Symposium。Canada:University of Calgary。37.1-37.14。  new window
3.Ruben, T. G.(2012)。Improving pedestrian accessibility to public space through space syntax analysis。8th International Space Syntax Symposium。Santiago:PUC。  new window
4.Read, S.(2001)。Thick urban space: Shape, scale and the articulation of the urban in and inner-city neighborhood of Amsterdam。3th International Space Syntax Symposium。Atlanta:Georgia Institute of Technology。18.1-18.12。  new window
5.Raford, N.(2003)。Looking Both ways: Space syntax for pedestrian exposure forecasting and collision risk analysis。4th International Space Syntax Symposium。University of California Berkeley。51.1-51.16。  new window
6.蘇智鋒(2001)。空間型構基因導論--SPACE SYNTAX(空間型構法則分析)之運用。第五屆建築生產及管理技術研討會,台中市逢甲大學建築學系 。中華民國建築學會。323-331。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.盧俊宏(2003)。國內健走(快走)行為與環境之研究。台北市:行政院衛生署國民健康局。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林上閔(1996)。都市商業區行人對步道類型選擇偏好之研究(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.沈致承(2013)。民眾步行行為意願之研究 —以臺中市西屯區民眾為例(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.紀佐霖(2007)。人行道環境因子對使用者旅運行為之影響(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.徐耿宏(2007)。都市社區步行空間之研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳周翊(2008)。都市街道組構型態與人潮、車流預測傾向探討--以空間型構數位分析為工具(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.游弘裕(2008)。大眾運輸系統轉乘站周邊步行環境對搭乘意願之影響--以高雄捷運為例(碩士論文)。國立屏東科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.廖心如(2007)。以空間型構理論探討烏日鄉高鐵特定區開發前後都市空間型態之變遷(碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.劉嘉瑩(2002)。台北市步行空間改善效益之研究--應用特徵價格法(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.鄭念維(2009)。由使用者觀點檢討都市人行空間之研究--台南市個案分析(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.龍宗彥(2004)。以型構與行為分析觀點探討都市公共開放空間系統之設計議題—以台北市信義計畫區為例(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.藍嘉俊(2001)。失落的人性空間--台北市人行空間問題的政治經濟學分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.羅怡珊(2004)。落實人行空間水平連續性規劃之研究--以台北市大直地區為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林季芸(2011)。空間的價值向度。台北:田園城市出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Hillier, B.(1996)。Space is the Machine。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Hillier, B.(1989)。The Spatial Pattern of Crime on the Studley Eatate。London:Unit for Architectural Studies, University College London。  new window
4.Llewelyn, D.(2000)。Urban Design Compendium。London:The Housing Corporation。  new window
5.Hillier, Bill、Hanson, Julienne(1984)。The Social Logic of Space。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.李玲玲(20120405)。近5成民眾愛騎車出門!油價漲很大,公共運輸使用率增加,http://www.nownews.com/2012/04/05/327-2801735.htm。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE