目的：在於探討羽球現場間歇有氧動力測驗對大學男子甲組羽球單、雙打選手的運動表現與生理反應之影響。方法：讓16名大學男子甲組羽球選手（單、雙打各8名）先進行一次跑步機最大攝氧量衰竭測驗後，以平衡次序法分別讓受試者各進行2次不同的羽球「Y字型」6、9拍現場有氧間歇動力測驗（受試者每完成一趟6或9拍測驗時，就立即給予13秒的休息，並以此方式反覆運動至衰竭為止），兩項測驗以及次與次測驗之間隔時間至少為24小時。每次測驗過程中，均全程記錄其總完成時間、趟數和距離；所有受試者也在進行每次測驗時記錄心跳率(HR)反應，並在每次運動測驗之後立即測量運動自覺量表(RPE)；攝氧量(VO2)和血乳酸(LA)則分別安排在每次運動衰竭後的第30秒和第3分鐘進行。單、雙打組分別在6、9拍測驗之間以及每組受試者在6、9拍測驗之間的數據，均以獨立樣本t-test進行統計分析。結果：一、運動表現方面：單打組在6拍測驗的總完成時間、趟數和距離皆明顯(p<.05)優於雙打組，不同二組在每個6拍和Y字型的完成時間方面則無差異(p>.05)；單、雙打組之間在進行9拍測驗的所有運動表現指標皆無差異(p>.05)。二、生理指標方面：單、雙打組之間分別在進行6、9拍測驗時的VO2、HR、LA、RPE上升程度均無明顯差異(p>.05)；單打組在6拍測驗時的VO2、LA、RPE增加的程度均明顯(p<.05)比其9拍測驗來得小，而雙打組在6拍測驗時僅VO2上升的幅度明顯比其9拍測驗來得小而已，其他指標在單、雙打組各自進行6、9拍測驗時則無差異(p>.05)。結論：雖然單、雙打選手之間在進行羽球現場有氧動力測驗時，具有相同的移動速度以及引起相同程度的生理反應，但由於羽球比賽分組的不同，可能會使單打組的有氧耐力和運動效率比雙打組好，進而在6、9拍測驗時表現出較佳的運動表現。

Purpose: To investigate the effects of a badminton-specific aerobic intermittent power test on the performance and physiological responses of collegiate male badminton singles and doubles players in Taiwan. Methods: Sixteen of Taiwan's top-level collegiate male badminton singles (n=8) and doubles (n=8) players were recruited for the study. All subjects performed the maximal oxygen consumption test on a treadmill, and one day later, began performing the two tests. All subjects performed the 6-ST and 9-ST twice, respectively, using a counter-balanced method. Subjects were given 13 s of rest after completing one lap, and were then instructed to repeat the process over and over until exhaustion. A minimum of 24 hours elapsed between the 6-ST and 9-ST, and between the first and second performance of each test. The total amount of time spent running laps, the number of laps run, and the distance covered during each test were measured for the singles and doubles groups. Heart rate (HR) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured during and immediately after each test, respectively. Oxygen consumption (VO2) and blood lactate concentration (LA) were analyzed at 30 s and 3 min after each test, respectively. Data collected during the two performances of the same test were analyzed by Pearson's coefficient correlation, while each group's data during the 6 -ST and 9-ST, respectively, and were analyzed using an independent-sample t-test. Results: 1) Performance: Results showed that the total amount of time spent running, the number of laps and the distance run during the 6-ST for the singles group were all greater (p<.05) than those of the doubles group. No significant difference in these performance parameters was found between the singles and doubles groups when the 9-ST was performed. 2) Physiological parameters: The extent of physiological responses (VO2, HR, LA, RPE) to the 6-ST and 9-ST, respectively, between the singles and doubles groups showed no significant differences (p>.05). For the singles group, the extent of VO2, LA, and RPE responses to the 6-ST was significantly lower than the extent of responses to the 9-ST. For the doubles group, the elevation of VO2 after the 6-ST was lower than (p>.05) that observed after the 9-ST. Concluded: These results suggest that although the singles and doubles groups moved at the same rate of speed and had the same physiological responses to both the 6-ST and the 9-ST, the singles group exhibited superior aerobic power performance and greater exercise efficiency than the doubles group during the field tests. This may be related to the different characteristics of badminton singles versus doubles competition.