資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.129.59.198)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
從賽局理論觀點看個案分組討論對學習表現之影響:以二技在職專班大學生為例
書刊名:
課程與教學
作者:
呂宗翰
/
辛沛翰
/
蔡憲唐
/
姜昱伊
作者(外文):
Lu, Chung-han
/
Hsin, Pei-han
/
Tsai, Hsien-tang
/
Chiang, Yu-yi
出版日期:
2008
卷期:
11:4
頁次:
頁163-186
主題關鍵詞:
賽局理論
;
個案分組討論
;
信任
;
知識分享
;
學習表現
;
Game theory
;
Case study
;
Trust
;
Knowledge sharing
;
Learning performance
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(
1
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:29
在管理教育中,個案分組討論不但已被廣泛使用於培養學生的系統思考、自我管理、與人際關係處理能力,也可透過成員間彼此溝通與發展認同感來培養群體信任與分享知識,進而對教學個案有進一步的體認。本研究以賽局理論為基礎,以自陳式量表來探討個案分組討論過程中所產生的信任維繫與知識分享行為,及其對學習表現的影響。研究過程發現若引入明文契約與競合理論的方式,可培養小組成員間的信任感覺,也可使知識分享處於競爭且合作的狀態,並產生學習綜效。實證結果顯示學生認為個案分組討論的學習方式,會比個人獨立學習獲得更多的知識及想法;並可透過知識分享與建立信任感來改善個人的學業成績。這賽局觀點的研究成果將可提供從事個案教學的教師們在進行個案分組討論時,能順利塑造具有成員背景多元化及良好競合氣氛的課堂文化,以期各小組成員都能增進其學習表現。
以文找文
Case study in management education is used with increasing frequency not only to integrate the development of students' systematic thinking, self-management, and interpersonal abilities but also to facilitate communication, trust, and the knowledge sharing among teammates. Based on game theory and co-opetition perspectives, the present study intends to investigate 2-year part-time college students’ dynamic behaviors of mutual trust and knowledge sharing toward learning performance via self-developed questionnaire scales. The results show that, via trust-building and knowledge sharing processes, the case study group with co-opetition oriented game leads to better learning performance than individual-learning-alone group. Moreover, diversified backgrounds of teammates will also enhance learning performance. These practical game-based implications are valuable to management educators.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Prusak, L.、Cohen, D. J.(2001)。How to Invest in Social Capital?。Harvard Business Review,79(6),86-93。
2.
James, H. S., Jr.(2002)。The Trust Paradox: A Survey of Economic Inquiries into the Nature of Trust and Trustworthiness。Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,47(3),291-307。
3.
Rogers, Edward W.(2001)。A Theoretical Look at Firm Performance in High-tech Organizations: What Does Existing Theory Tell Us?。Journal of High Technology Management Research,12(1),39-61。
4.
Shih, M. H.、Tsai, H. T.、Wu, C. C.、Lu, C. H.(2006)。A Holistic Knowledge Sharing Framework in High-tech Firms: Game and Co-opetition Perspectives。International Journal of Technology Management,36(4),354-367。
5.
Carter, John R.、Irons, Michael D.(1991)。Are economists different, and if so, why?。Journal of Economic Perspectives,5(2),171-177。
6.
Slavin, R. E.(1991)。Synthesis of research on cooperative learning。Educational Leadership,48(5),71-82。
7.
Spence, M.(2002)。Signaling in Retrospect and the Informational Structure of Markets。American Economic Review,92(3),434-459。
8.
Annen, K.(2003)。Social Capital, Inclusive Networks, and Economic Performance。Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,50(4),449-463。
9.
Boyatzis, R. E.、Stubbs, E. C.、Taylor S. N.(2002)。Learning cognitive and emotional intelligence competencies through graduate management education。Academy of Management Learning and Education,1(2),150-162。
10.
Pintrich, Paul R.、De Groot, Elisabeth V.(1990)。Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance。Journal of Educational Psychology,82(1),33-40。
11.
Hendriks, P.(1999)。Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing。Knowledge and process management,6(2),91-100。
12.
Webb, N. M.、Nemer, K. M.、Chizhik, A. W.、Sugrue, B.(1998)。Equity issues in collaborative group assessment: Group composition and performance。American Educational Research Journal,35(4),607-651。
13.
Webb, N. M.(1993)。Collaborative Group versus Individual Assessment in Mathematics: Processes and Outcomes。Educational Assessment,1,131-152。
14.
Damon, W.、Phelps, E.(1989)。Critical Distinctions among Three Method of Peer Education。International Journal of Educational Research,13,9-19。
15.
Webb, N. M.(1997)。Assessing Students in Collaborative Groups。Theory into Practice,36,205-213。
16.
Tullock, G.(1999)。Non-prisoner's Dilemma。Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,39,455-458。
17.
Richards, D.(2001)。Reciprocity and Shared Knowledge Structure in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game。Journal of Conflict Resolution,45,621-635。
18.
James, H. S., Jr.、Cohen, J. P.(2004)。Does Ethics Training Neutralize the Incentives of the Prisoner's Dilemma? Evidence from a Classroom Experiment。Journal of Business Ethics,50,53-61。
19.
Cagle, J.、Baucus, M. S.(2006)。Case Studies of Ethics Scandals: Effects on Ethical Perceptions of Finance Students。Journal of Business Ethics,64,213-229。
20.
Huang, P. H.、Wu, H. M.(1994)。More Order without More Law: A Theory of Social Norms and Organizational Cultures。Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,10(2),390-406。
21.
Colvin, J. W.(2007)。Peer Tutoring and Social Dynamics in Higher Education。Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning,15(2),165-181。
22.
Graham, J. G.(1987)。English Language Proficiency and the Prediction of Academic Success。TESOL Quarterly,21(3),505-512。
23.
Llewellyn, S.(2007)。Case Studies and Differentiated Realities。Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management,4(1),53-68。
24.
Frank, B.、Schulze, G. G.(2000)。Does Economics Make Citizens Corrupt?。Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,43(1),101-113。
25.
Daido, K.(2006)。Peer Pressure and Incentives。Bulletin of Economic Research,58(1),51-60。
26.
Zsolnai, L.(2003)。Honesty versus Cooperation: A Reinterpretation of the Moral Behavior of Economics Students。American Journal of Economics and Sociology,62(4),707-712。
27.
Fraser, S. C.、Beaman, A. L.、Diener, E.、Kelem, R. T.(1977)。Two, Three, or Four Heads Are Better Than One: Modification of College Performance by Peer Monitoring。Journal of Educational Psychology,69(2),101-108。
28.
Zimbardo, P. G.、Butler, L. D.、Wofle, V. A.(2003)。Cooperative College Examinations: More Gain, Less Pain When Students Share Information and Grades。The Journal of Experimental Education,71(2),101-125。
29.
Krumboltz, J. D.、葉家榮(1996)。Competitive Grading Sabotage Good Teaching。Phi Delta Kappan,December,324-326。
圖書
1.
McCain, R.(2003)。Game Theory: A Non-technical Introduction to the Analysis of Strategy。Cincinnati, OH:South-Western College Publishing。
2.
Cooper, D. R.、Schindler, P. S.(2003)。Business Research Methods。McGraw-Hill Irwin Publisher。
3.
Hargreaves-Heap, S. P.、Varoufakis, Y.(2004)。Game Theory: A Critical Text。Game Theory: A Critical Text。New York, NY。
4.
Von Neumann, J.、Morgenstern, O.(2007)。Theory of Games and Economic Behavior。Theory of Games and Economic Behavior。Princeton, NJ。
5.
Knowles, M. S.、Holton, E. F., III、Swanson, R. A.(2005)。The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development。The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development。Burlington, MA。
6.
Brandenburger, A. M.、Nalebuff, B. J.(1996)。Co-opetition: A Revolutionary Mindset that Combines Competition and Cooperation: The Game Theory Strategy That's Changing the Game of Business。Co-opetition: A Revolutionary Mindset that Combines Competition and Cooperation: The Game Theory Strategy That's Changing the Game of Business。New York, NY。
7.
Gambetta, D.(1990)。Can We Trust in Trust?。Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations。New York, NY。
8.
Schrader, S.(1990)。Zwischenbetrieblicher informationstransfer: Eine empirische analyse kooperativen verhaltens。Zwischenbetrieblicher informationstransfer: Eine empirische analyse kooperativen verhaltens。Berlin:Duncker & Humblot。
9.
Aronson, E.(2001)。Nobody Left to Hate: Teaching Compassion after Columbine。Nobody Left to Hate: Teaching Compassion after Columbine。New York, NY。
10.
Mohrman, A. M., Jr.、Mohrman, S. A.、Lawler, E. E.(1992)。The Performance Management of Teams。Performance Measurement Evaluation and Incentives。Cambridge, MA。
11.
Kim, P. H.、Aldrich, H. E.(2005)。Social Capital and Entrepreneurship。Social Capital and Entrepreneurship。Hanover, MA。
12.
Axelrod, R.(2006)。The Evolution of Cooperation。The Evolution of Cooperation。New York, NY。
13.
Campoy, R. W.(2005)。Case Study Analysis in the Classroom: Becoming a Reflective Teacher。Sage。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
Factors Influencing Knowledge-Sharing Behaviors in Faculty Learning Communities
2.
轉換型領導對群體成員知識分享影響之跨層次研究:社會兩難觀點之分析
3.
團隊成員交換關係、信任與知識分享關係之研究
4.
倫理理念、信任關係、與知識分享成效之研究
5.
海運供應鏈整合成功因素關聯性之研究
6.
高承諾人力資源管理、知覺組織支持、信任與知識分享之關係探討:跨層次的分析
7.
海運業組織內信任、知識分享、行銷能力關係之研究
8.
在領導信任下之組織公民行為與知識分享對於籃球隊績效影響之探討
9.
企業內部知識分享之研究
10.
社會支持、信任、關係品質與組織知識分享行為之關係研究
11.
從社會交換理論與交易成本理論分析組織內之知識分享行為
12.
組織公平、信任與知識分享行為之關係性研究
1.
組織信任、知識分享與知識心理所有權的關聯-調節式中介效果檢驗
2.
大學生全人教育之參與經驗與素養發展關係研究:以國立臺灣師範大學為例
3.
團隊成員關係資本與知識分享的關係-社會互動觀點
4.
轉型領導和組織公民行為之研究
5.
組織內部社會資本對知識分享與組織創新影響之研究
6.
以整合性架構探討專業虛擬社群成員知識分享之促進因素
7.
知識虛擬社群信任建立機制:一個促進知識分享架構
8.
從知識網絡與競合理論探討知識的移轉與分享
9.
經理人之組織政治與知識分享之相關研究
1.
信任與知識分享:社會交換理論在競合關係下的真相--(2008第八屆中小企業研討會,嘉義:國立中正大學)
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code