資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.141.12.202)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
整合AHP與選擇轉換本質法(ELECTRE法)於最有利標評選之研究
書刊名:
商業現代化學刊
作者:
陳曉紅
/
潘朝烈
/
黃營芳
作者(外文):
Chen, Xiao-hong
/
Pan, Chao-lieh
/
Huang, Ying-fang
出版日期:
2008
卷期:
4:3
頁次:
頁99-119
主題關鍵詞:
最有利標
;
廠商評選
;
因素分析
;
層級分析法
;
選擇轉換本質法
;
ELECTRE方法
;
Most advantageous bid
;
Vendor selection
;
Factor analysis
;
Analytic hierarchy process
;
AHP
;
Elimination et choice translating reality
;
ELECTRE
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:109
政府於1999年5月27日公佈施行「政府採購法」之「最有利標」決標模式以來已幫招標機關解決不少低價搶標及採購品質之問題,根據「最有利標」決標精神,招標單位可依據採購標的需要對其技術、品質、功能、管理、商業條款、過去履約績效、價格、財務計劃、與其他與採購之功能或效益之相關事項進行多屬性評選。然而在辦理「最有利標」實務作業中,主要關鍵的因素在於評選因素、權重及評選準則的訂定,其中因評選因素複雜且包含量化及非量化的特性,又因現行「最有利標」的評選常僅對可量化因素數字予以評選,而未將非量化因素納入評選考量因素之做法,實難以滿足「最有利標」的評選作業的需要,此亦爲現行「最有利標」評選作業中最爲人垢病之處。爲解決如是現有「最有利標」評選作業之困境,本研究中提出一整合式的評選方法,首先以廠商評選理論選出重要評選因子,然後再以層級結構的的觀念,來簡化複雜的評選層級,以求取評選因素之權重,最後本文即嘗試應用熵ELECTRE之方法來建立「最有利標」標評選的模式,以供招標機關辦理評選「最有利標」評選廠商之參考,經驗證結果確實能提供招標機關建置「最有利標」評選依據。
以文找文
Since May 27th, 1999, the Taiwanese government has utilized contract awarding on the basis of "the most advantageous tender" of the "Government Procurement Act". The action has helped the tendered entity solve many problems, such as the lowest price-hid and procurement quality. Based upon the spirit of "the most advantageous tender", the tendered entity conducts multiple attributes selection based upon technology, quality, function, management, commercial terms, past performance, price, financial plans and other related matters according to the requirements of the procurement. However, operation of "the most advantageous tender" mainly relies upon a stipulation of selective factors, and a weighting of the selective criteria. The selective factors are complicated, and they contain quantitative and qualitative features. Nevertheless, the selection of the "most advantageous tender" includes quantitative factors and does not include qualitative factors that certainly can not satisfy the demand of selective operation. This operation excludes the qualitative factors that are regarded as defective. To solve the selective operation dilemma of the existing "most advantageous tender", this research proposes an integrated selective method. In the first step, the research uses a vendor selection theory to select the important selective factors, then simplify the complicated selective hierarchies through a hierarchical structure to obtain a weighting of selective factors. Finally, this article applies entropy ELECTRE to establish a selection model of "the most advantageous tender". In serving as a reference far tendering, the inviting entity handles the supplier selection with this model. Research results can truly provide the inviting entity with a scientific basis for selection.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Damart, S.、Dias, L. C.、Mousseau, Vincent(2007)。Supporting groups in sorting decisions: Methodology and use of a multi-criteria aggregation/disaggregation DSS。Decision Support Systems,43(4),1464-1475。
2.
de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira(2007)。Muiticriteria decision model for outsourcing contracts selection based on utility function and ELECTRE method。Computers & Operations Research,34(12),3569-3574。
3.
Aiello, G.、Enea, M.、Galante, G. A.(2006)。Multi-objective approach to facility layout problem by genetic search algorithm and Electre method。Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing,22(5/6),447-455。
4.
Cheng, S.、Chan, C. W.、Huang, G. H.(2003)。An integrated multi-criteria decision analysis and inexact mixed integer linear programming approach for solid waste management。Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,16(5/6),543-554。
5.
Emmanuel, R.、Christian, I.、Andrd, B.、Francis, A.(2005)。A global approach of indoor environment in an air-conditioned office room。Building and Environment,40(1),29-37。
6.
Georgopoulou, E.、Sarafidis, Y.、Mirasgedis, S.、Zaimi, S.、Lalas, D. P.(2003)。A multiple criteria decision-aid approach in defining national priorities for greenhouse gases emissions reduction in the energy sector。European Journal of Operational Research,146(1),199-215。
7.
Gilliams, S.、Raymaekers, D.、Muys, B.、Van Orshoven, J.(2005)。Comparing multiple criteria decision methods to extend a geographical information system on afforestation。Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,27(4),142-158。
8.
Herbsman, Z. J.、Chen, W. T.、Epstein, W. C.(199509)。Time is Money Innovative Contracting Method in Highway Construction。ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,121(3),273-281。
9.
Juan, C. L. L.、Eduardo, F. G.(2003)。Anew method for group decision support based on ELECTREIH methodology。European Journal of Operational Research,148(1),14-27。
10.
Maria, F. N.(2006)。ELECTRE m as a support for participatory decision-making on the localisation of waste-treatment plants。Land Use Policy,23(1),76-85。
11.
Morrissey, A. J.、Browne, J.(2004)。Waste management models and their application to sustainable waste management。Waste Management,24(3),297-308。
12.
Shanian, A.、Savadogo, O.(2006)。A non-compensatory compromised solution for material selection of bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) using ELECTRE IV。Electrochimica Acta,51(25),5307-5315。
13.
Siskos, Yannis、Grigoroudis, Evangelos、Krassadaki, Evangelia、Matsatsinis, Nikolaos(1995)。A multicriteria accreditation system for information technology skills and qualifications。European Journal of Operational Research,182(2),867-885。
14.
Herbsman, Zohar J.、Ellis, Ralph(1992)。Multiparameter Bidding System -Innovation in Contract Administration。Journal Cons-truction Engineering and Management,118(1),142-149。
15.
Dickson, G. W.(1966)。An analysis of vendor selection system and decisions。Journal of Purchasing,2(1),5-17。
學位論文
1.
陳冠傑(2004)。應用近似最佳解績效排序法於多目標設計決策之研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。
延伸查詢
2.
鄭淳樺(2005)。應用多評準決策分析與衛星影像在水庫污染削減位置優選之研究(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。
延伸查詢
3.
廖意芳(2005)。應用灰關聯與ELECTRE於空氣品質監測點優選之研究(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。
延伸查詢
4.
楊景任(2006)。虛擬企業資訊傳輸模式之評選--以封裝測試業為例(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。
延伸查詢
5.
陳立煥(2006)。電子代工產業設置區域營運中心區位評選之研究(碩士論文)。華梵大學。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
(1990)。Contracting for Works Services (Volume II) Tendering and Contract Procedures。U. K.:Department of the Environment。
2.
(1989)。United States Public Contracting。American Society of Civil Engineers。
3.
Saaty, T. L.(1998)。The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation。New York:McGraw-Hill International Book Co.。
4.
Hwang, Ching-Lai、Yoon, Kwangsun(1981)。Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey。Springer-Verlag。
5.
Yoon, K. Paul、Hwang, Ching-Lai(1995)。Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction。Sage。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
半導體業評選附屬設備供應商之關鍵因素研究
2.
結合模糊積分與VIKOR模式評估航空公司服務品質
3.
應用層級分析法(AHP)於最有利標評選權重之研究
4.
優度評價法用於評選最有利標之廠商
5.
石化業建廠統包商評選機制之研究
6.
公共工程採最有利標評選營造廠商作業之探討
7.
網路廣告媒體選擇之研究
1.
我國人壽保險業顧客購買保單類型之研究
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
由反恐的觀點檢視我國現行入出境管理之做法及問題
2.
創業管理教育在Babson College之我見
3.
經營特性、產業環境特性及顧客關係管理系統與企業經營績效關係之研究
4.
五大音樂教育教學法
5.
幸運名稱與華人金融行銷之企業品牌化策略
6.
經營策略對品牌價值之影響:以臺灣無線網路通訊公司為例
7.
實務應用:TOGAF架構框架
8.
從ISO/TC289成立談永續品牌評價應有的觀念與方法
9.
無形資產資本化與財務分析師盈餘預測誤差之關聯性:論IFRS3與IAS38公報之影響
10.
企業財務危機前之媒體管理
11.
Real Earnings Management and Subsequent Accounting Performance: The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance
12.
基於會計盈餘資訊性的融資限制
13.
我國企業盈餘管理程度變化之探討
14.
Do Family Firms Make More Optimistic Forecasts?
QR Code