In the history, do "Jings Study" and "the Study of Jing Fang’s Book of Changes" have the same name concept? What is the condition of the Jing Fang himself in the study of "Book of Changes"? The host said what Yao Xun-Shuang of eight palaces worlds transmit the disciplines from. What is the content of the Jing Fang school’s thought in “Book of Changes"? Whether do the histories of biographies record Lu Chichu in "Jings Book of Changes Biography"? Whether does the terminology category in "Jings Book of Changes Biography" conform to the situation of the Western Han Dynasty? We should reconsider to take the history as the root, to take the text as the evidence, and to sort out the real situations of the transmission of the various schools’ thought from, to analyze the characteristics of the various schools’ thought, to take the words as the textual research basis, to distinguish who is the real author of the note, and to line the divided place which the descendants can quote in order to examine the real truth of the record of the Confucian classics, history, philosophy and belles-letters. Once those have been distinguished clearly, the Jings school of thought and its theory of the historical vein can be sorted clearly, and the study policy of the “Book of Changes” at the present age can be provided sufficiently.