:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:董監事專業性與財務報表重編
書刊名:文大商管學報
作者:邱秀清李慕萱劉仲凱
作者(外文):Chiu, Hsiu-chingLee, MushangLiu, Chung-kai
出版日期:2009
卷期:14:1
頁次:頁1-17
主題關鍵詞:財務報表重編董監事專業性公司治理Directors' expertiseFinancial restatementCorporate governance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:34
公司治理的核心爲董監事機制,而董監事專業性的提升可加強公司治理監督機制,進而提高財務報表可信度。財務報表重編雖不同於財務報表舞弊,但仍會誤導資訊使用者,致使作出錯誤的決策。本研究選取2003年至2006年財務報表重編上市上櫃公司共34筆研究樣本,選取相同產業與其間之未重編公司作比較。研究結果發現具備財務專業背景之董監事與財務報表重編爲顯著負相關,董監事兼職數與財務報表重編爲顯著正相關,顯示董監事專業性可以減少財務報表重編之發生。
The function of boards of directors and supervisors is the core of the corporate governance. The directors' expertise can strengthen the administrative mechanism, and in-crease financial statement's credibility. The restatement does not equal to a financial statement fraud. However, it will mislead the financial statement users and make them do improper decisions. We examine a sample of 34 restatements on listed company in the period 2003-2006, together with matched pairs control groups of similar industry and time. Our research find out that the boards of directors and supervisors who have financial background have significant negative relationship with restatement, and the existence of other jobs held by directors and supervisors has significant positive relationship with restatement. The results support directors' expertise can reduce the incidence of restatement.
期刊論文
1.陳牡丹(19990600)。上市公司財務報表重編次數、重編影響方向與操縱盈餘動機之關聯性研究。臺中商專學報,31,193-214。  延伸查詢new window
2.Dezoort, F. T.、Salterio, S. E.(2001)。The effect of corporate governance experience and financial reporting and audit knowledge on audit committee members' judgments。Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,20(2),31-47。  new window
3.Gendron, Y.、Bedard, J.、Gosselin, M.(2004)。Getting inside the black box: A field study of practice in "effective" audit committees。Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,23(1),153-171。  new window
4.McDaniel, L.、Martin, R. D.、Maines, L. A.(2002)。Evaluating financial reporting quality: The effects of financial expertise versus financial literacy。The Accounting Review,77,139-167。  new window
5.Raghunandan, K. R.、Rama, D. V.、Scarbrough, D. P.(1998)。Accounting and auditing knowledge level of Canadian audit committees: Some empirical evidence。Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation,7(2),181-194。  new window
6.Beasley, M. S.、Carcello, J. V.、Hermanson, D. R.、Lapides, P. D.(2000)。Fraudulent financial reporting: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms。Accounting Horizons,14(4),441-454。  new window
7.Chen, Gongmeng、Firth, Michael、Gao, Daniel N.、Rui, Oliver M.(2006)。Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China。Journal of Corporate Finance,12(3),424-448。  new window
8.DeFond, Mark L.、Hann, Rebecca N.、Hu, Xuesong(2005)。Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors?。Journal of Accounting Research,43(2),153-193。  new window
9.Fich, Eliezer M.、Shivdasani, Anil(2006)。Are Busy Boards Effective Monitors?。The Journal of Finance,61(2),689-724。  new window
10.Morck, Randall、Shleifer, Andrei、Vishny, Robert W.(1988)。Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis。Journal of Financial Economics,20(1/2),293-315。  new window
11.Xie, Biao、Davidson, Wallace N. III、DaDalt, Peter J.(2003)。Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: The Role of the Board and the Audit Committee。Journal of Corporate Finance,9(3),295-316。  new window
12.Core, John E.、Holthausen, Robert W.、Larcker, David F.(1999)。Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance。Journal of Financial Economics,51(3),371-406。  new window
13.Fama, Eugene F.(1980)。Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm。Journal of Political Economy,88(2),288-307。  new window
14.Vafeas, Nikos(1999)。Board Meeting Frequency and Firm Performance。Journal of Financial Economics,53(1),113-142。  new window
15.Barnhart, Scott W.、Rosenstein, Stuart(1998)。Board Composition, Managerial Ownership, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis。The Financial Review,33(4),1-16。  new window
16.Abbott, Lawrence J.、Parker, Susan、Peters, Gary F.(2004)。Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements: A Study of the Efficacy of Certain Blue Ribbon Committee Recommendations。Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,23(1),69-87。  new window
17.Beasley, Mark S.(1996)。An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Finacial Statement Fraud。The Accounting Review,71(4),443-465。  new window
18.Palmrose, Zoe-Vonna、Richardson, Vernon J.、Scholz, Susan(2004)。Determinants of Market Reactions to Restatement Announcements。Journal of Accounting and Economics,37(1),59-89。  new window
學位論文
1.莊偲奕(2006)。董事會特徵對績效影響之研究--以服務類上市(櫃)公司為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.詹玉霞(2003)。盈餘管理與公司治理對財務報告重編影響之研究(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭鈞介(2006)。董監事會特性及審計品質對財務報表重編之影響(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.謝宇秦(2005)。獨立董監事特性與盈餘管理之關聯性研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳祥福(2003)。財務報表重編與董監獨立性/專業性之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉仲嘉(2006)。董監事機制及其獨立性與公司經營績效之關聯性研究(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE