:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:應用熵值法與灰關聯分析法實證貨櫃碼頭場站機具作業效率之比較分析
書刊名:航運季刊
作者:楊鈺池 引用關係沈克勇
作者(外文):Yang, Yi ChihSam, Ke Yung
出版日期:2009
卷期:18:3
頁次:頁37-54
主題關鍵詞:作業效率貨櫃碼頭灰色關聯分析熵值法Operating efficiencyContainer terminalEntropyGrey relational analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:127
2007年馬士基公司的11300Teu超大型貨櫃輪投入市場競爭行列,揭開邁入萬噸級船舶時代來臨,在當下碼頭資源與港埠設施有限情況下,如何選擇高效率和高效能場站機具配置來滿足貨櫃處理量需求,成爲港埠經營者和航商所關心課題。是故,本文研究目的在於探討場站機具作業效率之評量要因,不同場站機具作業效率之比較以及自動化作業是否符合高雄港第六貨櫃中心和未來洲際貨櫃碼頭使用需求。經文獻探討和問卷調查方式找出影響作業效率的關鍵因素,再利用此熵值代入灰關聯分析法來實證不同場站機具之作業效率衡量優劣排序。經實證結論爲:(1)影響場站機具作業效率之重要因素,依序爲CY櫃場機具配置數量、拖車在櫃場作業距離、櫃場機具的運行速度、CY櫃場機具處理效率、拖車配置數量。(2)場站機具灰關聯度分析所得優劣,依序分別爲SA、RT、ASC、SC以及TT。(3)櫃場半自動化作業爲業界公認效率最佳的機具,可提供第六貨櫃中心或新洲際貨櫃碼頭配置場站機具之決策建議。
Sea transport has made critical changes due to emergence of mega container ship tendency; ship type such as EMMA MERSK in terms of 11300TEUS in 2007. To allure a mega container ship calling on the terminal requires not only setting up adequate hardware and software facilities but also conquering many issues relevant to massive operational business, hence it is of crucial important to enhance container terminal capacity by upgrading operating efficiency of cargo handling facilities. The purpose of this paper is to explore key impact factors of operating efficiency in the container Yard, and make a comparison among various cargo handling facilities based on Entropy and Grey Relational Analysis approaches. Our finding was summarized as: (1) Key impact factors are number of cargo handling facilities, transport distance of trailers, moving speedy of gantry crane, efficiency of cargo handling facilities, and number of trailer, (2) Operating efficiency comparison of cargo handling facility modes based on Entropy and GRA approaches are SA>RT>ASC>SC>TT, (3) semi-automatic crane is optimal cargo handling facility in the aspect of operating efficiency being recognized by shipping industry sectors.
期刊論文
1.Roll, Y.、Hayuth, Y.(1993)。Port Performance Comparison Applying Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)。Maritime Policy and Management,20(2),153-161。  new window
2.Martínez-Budría, E.、Díaz-Armas, R.、Navarro-Ibáñez, M.、Ravelo-Mesa, T.(1999)。A study of the efficiency of Spanish port authorities using data envelopment analysis。International Journal of Transport Economics,26(2),237-253。  new window
3.Tongzon, Jose(2001)。Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis。Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,35(2),107-122。  new window
4.邱盛生、倪安順及楊啟宏(2006)。“應用DEA/AR模式評估港埠經營效率之研究-以基隆、台中及高雄三港為例”。運輸計畫季刊,第35卷,第四期,頁 355-378。  延伸查詢new window
5.倪安順(1996)。“亞洲地區國際商港港埠競爭力與效率調查之研究”。海運月刊,124期。  延伸查詢new window
6.Preston, P. and Kozan, E.(2000)。“An Approach to Determine Storage Locations of Containers at Seaport Terminals”。Computer & industrial engineering,pp. 983-995。  new window
7.Barros, C. P.(2003)。“The Measurement of Efficiency of Portuguese Seaport Authorities with DEA”。International Journal of Transport Economics,Vol.30,pp. 335-354。  new window
8.Park, R.(2004)。“An Alternative Approach to Efficiency Measurement of Seaport”。Maritime Economic & Logistics,Vol. 6,pp. 53-60。  new window
9.Barros, C. P. and Athanassiou M(2004)。“Efficiency in European Seaport with DEA: Evidence from Greece and Portugal”。Maritime Economic & Logistics,Vol. 6,pp. 122-140。  new window
10.Cullinane, K. P. B., Song, D. W., Ji, P. and Wang, T. F.(2004)。“An Application of DEA Windows Analysis to Container Port Production Efficiency”。Review of Network Economics,Vol . 3, No. 2,pp. 186-208。  new window
11.Kim, K. H., Kim, K. W., Hwang, H and Chang, S. K.(200)。“Operator-scheduling Using a Constraint Satisfaction Technique in Port Container Terminals”。Computer & industrial engineering,pp. 373-381。  new window
12.Cullinane, K. P. B., Song, D. W. and Wang, T. F.(2005)。“The Application of Mathematical Programming Approaches to Estimating Container Port Production Efficiency”。Journal of Productivity Analysis,Vol. 24,pp. 73-92。  new window
13.Murty, K. G., Liu, J, Wan, Y. W. and Linn, R.(2005)。“A Decision Support System for Operations in a Container Terminal”。Decision Support System,pp. 309-332。  new window
14.Barros, C. P.(2006)。“A Benchmark Analysis of Italian Seaport Using Data Envelopment Analysis”。Maritime Economic & Logistics,Vol. 8,pp. 347-365。  new window
15.Cullinane, K., Wang T. F., Song, D. W. and Ji P.(2006)。“The Technical Efficiency of Container Port: Comparing Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis”。Transportation Researcher Part A,Vol. 40,pp.354-374。  new window
16.Rio L. R. and Macaca, A. C. G.(2006)。“Analyzing the Relative Efficiency of Container of Terminals of Macros Using DEA”。Maritime Economic & Logistics,Vol. 8, No. 4,pp. 331-346。  new window
17.崔容石(2004)。“ 貨櫃碼頭機具結合生產性之模擬研究 ”。韓國海洋水產月刊,第236 號。  延伸查詢new window
18.崔容石、河泰營(2006)。“ 知識經濟來模擬設計貨櫃碼頭之方案 ”。韓國海洋政策研究,第 30 卷,第 1 期。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Song, D. W., Cullinane, K. P. B, and Wang, T.(2003)。An Application of DEA Window Analysis to Container Port Production Efficiency。  new window
2.戴輝煌、鍾彥妍(2007)。“以熵值法結合灰色關聯分析的理論探討 ─ 以華南地區貨櫃港口競爭力為分析個案”。成功大學。ISBN 978-986-01-0764-7,A1-43。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.黃文吉(1997)。“臺灣地區貨櫃沿海轉運之研究”。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.戴輝煌(2006)。越洋航商在兩岸三地擇港因素與港口競爭力之評估(博士論文)。國立交通大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.薛勝陽(2007)。運用資料包絡分析法評估全球前20大貨櫃港埠經營績效之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭景怡(2004)。貨櫃裝卸作業與岸肩載運機具指派之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.張徐錫(2001)。東亞地區主要貨櫃港SWOT分析量化模式構建之研究(碩士論文)。國立海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳榮聰(1992)。“航商對台灣三大國際商港港埠條件滿意度調查研究”。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林光、張志清(2006)。海運學。臺北市:航貿文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.溫坤禮、張簡士琨、葉鎮愷、王建文、林慧珊(2006)。MATLAB在灰色系統理論的應用。臺北:全華。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄧聚龍、郭洪(2000)。灰色系統理論與應用。台北:高立圖書有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.張偉哲、溫坤禮、張廷政(2000)。灰關聯模型方法與應用。高立圖書有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.夏力生(1998)。“港務管理及棧埠經營”,增訂版。台北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE