臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：越洋航商在兩岸三地擇港因素與港口競爭力之評估
作者：戴輝煌 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tai, Hui-huang
校院名稱：國立交通大學
系所名稱：交通運輸研究所
指導教授：黃承傳
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2006
主題關鍵詞：港口選擇；營運誘因；競爭優勢；港口競爭力；灰色理論；Port Selection；Operational Incentives；Competitive advantage；Port competitiveness；Grey Theory
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:3
近年以來，東亞迄北美地區的貨櫃流量為全球最高，貨櫃航商在此間的船隊運能投入亦持續增長。台灣海峽兩岸三地之上海、高雄、鹽田與香港四大港口，同為目前貨櫃航商配置越洋主航線之重要樞紐港口，其在貨源分佈與航線配置上具有重疊性，競爭情勢甚為顯著。
本文主要內容共分為三大部分，第一部分首先由貨櫃航商之觀點，對於影響航商在兩岸三地間，選擇樞紐港口的重要因素，進行探究，並分析這些影響因素與樞紐港口可提供誘因之間的因果關係。經綜合相關文獻並參酌航商在兩岸三地四大港口營運上的特殊性，進行問卷設計調查，並以因素分析方法，篩選出影響航商之港口選擇以及吸引航商誘因的各項因素。繼而應用結構方程模式(SEM)，探討這些重要影響因素(港口內部條件與外部環境、航商之營運策略配合因素)與樞紐港口營運誘因(如增加營收、節省成本等)之關係。結果顯示：貨櫃航商在樞紐港口之營運策略配合因素，對於航商整體營運成本之節省，具有正向之影響。且該因素與樞紐港口外部環境間，具有顯著之相關性。此外，樞紐港口外部環境愈佳，愈有助於貨櫃航商擴大其市場範圍與增加營收。
為了分析與評估四大樞紐港口的競爭優勢與整體競爭力，本文第二部分則綜合上述三大類影響因素，進行第二次問卷設計與調查，再以灰關聯分析法(GRA)評估四大港口的各項競爭優勢，並分別採用階層分析法(AHP)、熵值法(Entropy)及折衷權重法(Compromised Weighting Method)求取各類因素的權重值，進行港口整體競爭力的評比。結果發現：樞紐港口內部條件以鹽田港具有最佳優勢，外部環境與航商營運策略的配合因素，則以上海港最佳。整體競爭力的評比結果，亦均以上海港最佳。
此外，為了解營運實務上，各類不同的營運考量因素對於港口競爭力的影響，於第三部分首先應用灰色理論之GM(1,1)方法對各大樞紐港口進行三種情境之總櫃量預測，再應用灰關聯分析得出不同因素的權重值。以保守之預測結果為例：未來五年內之總櫃量成長以上海港最高，鹽田港將會超越香港，而高雄港之總櫃量將會達到1千萬TEU以上，與我國交通部之預測值極為接近。由於櫃量多寡係港口之貨源因素所呈現的現象，亦為航商擇港之重要考量因素。因此，本文以過去迄未來之櫃量增長率平均值，代表港口外部環境之貨源因素時，亦得出該一指標對於影響樞紐港口競爭力的權重值最高的結果，而港口內部條件之基礎設施指標，權重值較弱。顯示樞紐港口原本就需擁有設施完善的內部條件，才能符合貨櫃航商配置越洋航線之最基本要求。
綜論之，影響樞紐港口競爭力最重要的因素，或航商選擇樞紐港口最重視的因素，以港口外部環境居首，其次依序為營運策略配合因素及港口內部條件。本文並綜合研究結果，研提有助於提升我國高雄港整體競爭力的建議，以供參考。
In recent years, the global ocean container transportation markets between East Asia and North America have maintained the highest market shares, and almost all major container carriers have continuously increased their fleet capacities in this district. Currently, many container carriers select Shanghai, Kaohsiung, Yantian and Hongkong as hub ports to deploy trunk routes. Due to the overlap in cargo-sources and route-deployment, competitions do obviously exist among those ports.
This dissertation includes three parts. Firstly, from the viewpoints of container carriers, to investigate major factors affecting hub ports selection, as well as to explore the causal relationships among these factors and the operational incentives to the carriers across Taiwan-strait. A questionnaire survey was conducted on the basis of extensive literature review, and the characteristics of shipping operation in those hub ports. Factors analysis was then used to identify major influential factors of port selection and operational incentives to the liners. Moreover, a Structural Equations Modeling (SEM) approach was used to examine the relationships among influential factors of port selection; including internal and external factors of port, and operational strategy of container carriers, and the operational incentives, such as expanding the market, increasing revenue, cost-saving of liners, etc.. Results indicate that operational strategy of container carriers has direct impacts on cost-saving of liners and is positively correlated with the external factors of hub-port. In addition, external factors have positive impacts on expanding market and increasing revenue of container carriers.
In the second part, a second questionnaire survey was designed and conducted based on the three categories of major influential factors identified above to analyze and evaluate relative competitive advantages and port competitiveness among those hub ports. Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) was used to evaluate the relative port competitive advantages based on those factors. Moreover, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Entropy and Compromised Weighting Method were utilized to obtain the weights of the three major factors for evaluating and comparing the competitiveness among those hub ports. Results show that in terms of internal factors, Yantian possess the best competitive advantage, whereas Shanghai possess best competitive advantages on both external factors and operational strategy of container carriers, which is also ranked as the port with the highest competitiveness.
Furthermore, in order to explore the impact of influence factors on hub port competitiveness from the operational viewpoints of carriers, the third part of this dissertation adopts the GM(1,1) of Grey Theory to predict future throughput of the four hub ports under three different scenarios, and the GRA method to estimate weights of influential factors on port competitiveness. The results of conservative scenarios reveal that the growth of container cargos in 2010 would be the highest in Shanghai, and Yantain would handle more container cargos than Hongkong. In the meantime, there would be about 10 million TEU in Kaohsiung which approximated to the figure the Ministry of Communications in Taiwan anticipated. The container volume of ports is an indicator of cargo-source in the hinterland, and an attracting factor for container carriers on port-selection and route-deployment. So, the average growth rate of past and future volume is taken as an indicator of cargo-source. Results indicate that cargo-source is the most influential factor with the highest weight while the infrastructure of port internal factors is less significant on hub-port competitiveness with the lowest weight for container carriers. It shows that good internal factors are the basic required conditions for the selection of hub-ports.
In conclusion, the external factors of hub ports are the most significant influential elements on port competitiveness and carriers’ selection, followed by operational strategies and internal factors. Finally, suggestions are proposed and discussed for the enhancement of the competitiveness in Kaohsiung.
中文部分
1. 王昱傑(民95)，「利用灰關聯分析進行台灣地區貨櫃船公司財務績效代表性指標之擷取」，航運季刊，第十五卷，第一期，頁1-17。new window
2. 古欽中(民90)，「影響港埠物流發展相關因素之探討」，國立高雄第一科技大學運輸倉儲營運所碩士論文。
3. 石珉宇(民91)，台灣地區海洋運輸商品運量預測方法之研究，國立交通大學運輸科技與管理研究所碩士論文。
4. 交通部高雄港務局(民94)，高雄港洲際貨櫃中心計劃：徴求民間參與興建及營運第一期工程貨櫃中心可行性評估報告，交通部委託中華顧問工程司專案研究計劃。
5. 交通部運輸研究所(民91)，台灣地區整體國際港埠發展之規劃(91年至95年)，交通部運輸研究所委託中華顧問工程司專案研究計劃。
6. 交通部運輸研究所(民89)，亞太地區國際港埠競爭力分析與趨勢研判，交通部運輸研究所委託中華顧問工程司專案研究計劃，MOTC-IOT-P-B-88-005 (89.2.)。
7. 交通部運輸研究所(民88)，港埠運量預測之研究，交通部運輸研究所港灣技術研究中心專案計劃。
8. 交通部運輸研究所(民81)，台灣地區國際港埠作業效率之比較分析，交通部運輸研究所專案研究計劃。
9. 江金山、吳佩玲、蔣祥第、張廷政、詹福賜、張軒庭、溫坤禮(民87)，灰色理論入門，台北：高立圖書公司。
10. 吳偉銘(民91)，「港埠競爭模型之理論建置」，運輸計劃季刊，第三十一卷第四期，頁709-738。new window
11. 呂志哲(民93)，中國大陸經濟發展對亞洲主要港埠貨櫃量影響之分析與預測，國立交通大學運輸科技與管理研究所碩士論文。
12. 呂錦山(民90)，「國際港埠物流中心選擇因素之探討：結構方程模式之應用」，航運季刊，第十卷，第二期，頁1- 30。new window
13. 李選士、周明道、郭森桂(民92)，「應用資料包絡分析評估亞太地區貨櫃港效率」，航運季刊，第十二卷，第四期，頁81-105。new window
14. 林光、張志清(民95)，航業經營與管理，台北：航貿文化事業有限公司。
15. 林智偉(民93)，灰色理論應用於基隆港棧埠作業民營化績效評估之研究，國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文。
16. 林錦桂(民89)，台灣地區港埠貨櫃運量預測之研究，國立台灣海洋大學航運管理研究所碩士論文。
17. 周文生(民91)，「灰色關聯分析應用於計程車服務品質績效指標擷取之研究─以台北市品牌無線電計程車為例」，運輸學刊，第十四卷第一期，頁87-106。new window
18. 周建張(民92)，「台灣地區海運貨櫃運量迴歸預測模式之改善研究」，航運季刊，第十二卷，第一期，頁27-42。new window
19. 邱皓政(民93)，社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析，第二版，五南圖書公司，台北市。
20. 施大元(民92)，「高雄港顧客忠誠度之研究：以貨櫃航商為例」，國立成功大學交通管理研究所碩士論文。
21. 倪安順(民92)，以資源基礎理論探討航商貨櫃港口選擇行為之研究，國立台灣海洋大學航運管理研究所博士論文。new window
22. 徐慧芬(民88)，應用鑽石模型建立國際港埠競爭力評估準則之研究，國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文。
23. 高強、黃旭男、Toshiyuki, S.(民92)，管理績效評估:資料包絡分析法，台北：華泰圖書公司。new window
24. 張偉哲、溫坤禮、張廷政(民89)，灰關聯模型方法與應用，台北：高立圖書公司。
25. 許巧鶯、溫裕弘(民86)，「台灣地區國際航空客運量之預測─灰色預測模式之應用」，運輸計劃季刊，第二十六卷，第三期，頁525-556。new window
26. 郭建男(民91)，應用包絡分析法評估亞太地區港埠貨櫃作業績效之研究，國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文。
27. 陳武正、林科(民83)，「海峽兩岸客貨運量預測與分析」，第二屆海峽兩岸航運研討會論文集，1994年1月。
28. 陳垂彦(民86)，兩岸海運直航貨運量預測與分佈之研究，國立成功大學交通管理研究所碩士論文。
29. 陳昭宏(民90)，「亞太港埠競爭力與核力能力指標之研究」，運輸學刊，第十三卷，第一期，頁1-25。new window
30. 陳順宇(民93)，多變量分析，第三版，華泰圖書公司，台北市。
31. 曾國雄、胡宜珍(民85)，「公車系統營運與服務績效指標擷之研究─灰色關聯分析之應用」，模糊系統學刊，第二卷，第一期，頁73-82。
32. 馮正民、邱裕鈞(民93)，研究分析方法，新竹：建都文化事業股份有限公司。
33. 馮正民、陳勁甫(民81)，「評估準則權重之求算─折衷權重法」，交通運輸，第十四期，頁51-67。
34. 黃芳銘(民93)，結構方程模式理論與應用，修訂版，五南圖書公司，台北市。
35. 楊清喬(民91)，「廠商在自由貿易港區內投資之影響因素研究」，國立成功大學交通管理研究所碩士論文。
36. 農用新(民92)，港埠競爭力之研究─以高雄港與上海港為例，國立東華大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
37. 溫坤禮、張簡士堒、葉鎮愷、王建文、林慧珊(民95)，MATLAB在灰系統理論的應用，台北：全華科技出版社。
38. 溫坤禮、黃宜豊、陳繁雄、李元秉、連志峰、賴家瑞(民91)，灰預測原理與應用，台北：全華科技出版社。
39. 溫裕弘(民86)，航空運量預測與航空網路設計之研究─應用灰色理論，國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文。
40. 葛蕙銀(民93)，「最適貨櫃船船型之研究：以越太平洋航線為例」，國立高雄第一科技大學運籌管理研究所碩士論文。
41. 蔣昭弘(民92)，「銀行業績效評估之研究-以信託投資公司改制商業銀行為例」，萬能科技大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
42. 蔡嘉恩(民93)，「貨櫃碼頭策略聯盟之研究：以高雄港為例」，國立成功大學交通管理研究所碩士論文。
43. 鄭光遠(民94)，「由服務行銷觀點探討國內航空公司服務品質改善策略」，國立交通大學交通運輸研究所博士論文。new window
44. 鄧聚龍(民89)，灰色系統理論與應用，台北：高立圖書公司。
45. 戴輝煌(民91)，「西太平洋地區樞紐港埠選擇成本比較分析：ACS模式之應用」，運輸學刊，第三十一卷第四期，頁1-28。new window
46. 戴輝煌、黃承傳(民95)，「兩岸三地樞紐港口選擇因素之探討」，運輸計劃季刊，(95.08.21.已接受刊登，稿件序碼1056號)。new window
英文部分
1. Alphaliner (2005), The Container Market Database, http: //www.alphaliner.com/ brs-alpha/ search.new window
2. Bollen, K. A. & Long, J. S. (1993), Testing Structural Equations Models, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Byrne, B. M (2001), Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concept, Applications and Programming, University of Ottawa. Lawrence Erlbaum associates Published, London.
4. Containerization International Year Book (1997~2005), The Part of Editorial Reviews, and The Sections of “Port and Terminals”, “Services”.
5. Cullinane, K., Song, D. W. & Gray, R. (2002), “A Stochastic Frontier Model of the Efficiency of Major Container Terminal in Asia: Assessing the Influence of Administrative and Ownership Structures,” Transportation Research, Part A, 36, pp. 743-762.
6. Chang, S. E. (2000), “Disasters and Transport Systems: Loss, Recovery and Competition at the Port of Kobe after the 1995 Earthquake," Journal of Transport Geography, 8, pp. 53-65.
7. D’Este, G. M. & Meyric, S. (1992), “Carrier Selcetion in a RO/RO Ferry Trade: Part1, Decision factors and attitudes,” Maritime Policy and Management, 19, pp. 115-138.
8. Fung, K. F. (2001), “Competition between the Ports of Hong Kong and Singapore: a Structural Vector Error Correction Model to Forecast the Demand for Container Handling Services,” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.28, No.1, pp.3-22.new window
9. Feng, C. M. & Wang, R. T. (2000), “Performance Evaluation for Airlines Including the Consideration of Financial Ratios,” Journal of Air Transport Management, 6, pp. 133~142.
10. Fleming, D. K. & Baird, A. J. (1999), “Comment: Some Reflections on Port Competition in the United States and Western Europe,” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.26, No.4, pp.383-394.
11. Fleming, D. K. (1996), Concepts of Strategic Commercial Location for Container, Professor Emeritus, Geography and Marine Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
12. Foggin, J. H. & Dicer, G. N. (1985), “Disappearing Hinterlands: the Impact of the Logistics Concept on Port Competition,” Journal of the Transportation Research, Forum, Vol.26, pp.385-391.
13. Golob, T. F. (2003), “Review: Structural Equation Modeling for Travel Behavior Research,” Transportation Research, Part B, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp.1-25.new window
14. Golob, T. F. & Regan, A. C. (2001), “Impacts of Highway Congestion on Freight Operations: Perceptions of Trucking Industry Managers,” Transportation Research, Part A, Vol. 35, No. 7, pp.577-599.
15. Ha, M. S. (2003), “A Comparison of Service Quality at Major Container Ports: Implications for Korean Ports,” Journal of Transport Geography, 11, pp.131-137.
16. Heaver, T. D., Meersman, H., & Van De Voorde, E. (2001), “Co-operation and Competition in International Container Transport: Strategies for Ports,” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.28, No.3, pp.293-305.
17. Heaver, T. D., Meersman, H., & Van De Voorde, E. (2000), “Do Mergers and Alliance Influence European Shipping and Port Competition? ,” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.27, No.4, pp.363-373.
18. Heaver, T. (1995), “The Implications of Increased Competition among Ports for Port Policy and Management,” Maritime Policy and Management, 22, pp.125-133.
19. Helmick, J. S. (1994), Concentration and Connectivity in the North Atlantic Liner Port Network: 1970-1990, Dissertation (PhD), Department of Management and Logistics, University of Miami.
20. Hayuth, Y. & Fleming, D. K. (1994), “Concepts of Strategic Commercial Location: the Case of Container Ports,” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.21, No.3, pp.187-193.
21. Hayuth, Y. (1981), “Containerization and the Load Center Concept,” Economic Geography, 57, pp.160-176.
22. Kerlinger, F. N. (1986), Foundations of Behavioral Research, New York: CBS College Published.

23. Lee, H. S., Chou, M. T. & Kuo, S. G. (2005), “Evaluating Port Efficiency in Asia Pacific Region with Recursive Data Envelopment Analysis,” Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies (EAST’s 05), Vol. 6, pp.544-599.
24. Lin, L. C. & Tseng, L. A. (2005), “Application of DEA and SFA on the Measurement of Operating Efficiencies for 27 International Container Ports,” Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies (EAST’s 05), Vol. 5, pp.592-607.
25. Lirn, T. C., Thanopoulou, H. A., Beynon, M. J. & Beresford, A. K. C. (2004), “An Application of AHP on Transhipment Port Selection: A global Perspective,” Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6, pp.70-91.
26. Murphy, P. R. & Daley, J. M. (1994), “A comparative Analysis of Port Selection Factors,” Transportation Journal, No.3, pp.15-21.
27. Nir, A. S., Lin, K. & Liang, G. S. (2003), “Port Choice Behavior- from the Perspective of the Shipping,” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp.165-173.
28. Notteboom, T. E. & Winkelmans, W. (2001), “Structural Changes in Logistics: How Will Port Authorities Face the Challenge?” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.28, No.1, pp.71-89.new window
29. Park, R. K. & De, P. (2004), “An Alternative Approach to Efficiency Measurement of Seaports,” Maritime Economics and Logistics, 6, pp. 53-69.
30. Robinson, R. (1998), “Asia Hub/feeder nets: the Dynamics of Restructuring,” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 21-40.new window
31. Shang, K. C. & Marlow, P. B. (2005), “Logistics Capability and Performance in Taiwan's Major Manufacturing Firms,” Transportation Research, Part E, Vol.41, No.3, pp. 217-234.
32. Shang, K. C. (2004), “The Effects of Logistics Measurement Capability on Performance,” Asia Pacific Management Review, Vol.9, No.4, pp.671-687.
33. Shipping Statistics & Market Review (SSMR) (2002~2005), Issued by Institute of Shipping Economics and logistics (ISL), Vol. 47~49.
34. Sanchez, R. J., Hoffmann, J., Micco, A., Pizzolitto, G. V., Sgut, M. & Wilmsmeier, G. (2003), “Port Efficiency and International Trade: Port Efficiency as a Determinant of Maritime Transport Costs,” Maritime Economics & Logistics, Vol.5, pp.199-218.
35. Song, D. W. & Yeo, K. T. (2004), “A Competitive Analysis of Chinese Container Ports Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6, pp.34-52.
36. Song, D. W. (2003), “Port Co-opetition: in Concept and Practice,” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.30, No.1, pp.29-44.new window
37. Song, D. W. (2002), “Regional Container Port Competition and Co-operation: the Case of Hong Kong and South China,” Journal of Transport Geography, 10, pp.99-110.

38. Stopford, M. (2002), “Is the Drive for Ever Bigger Containerships Irresistible?” The Proceedings of CI (Containerization International), Shipping Forecasting Conference, 25th April, Clarkson Research.
39. Slack, B. (1985), “Containerization, Inteer-port Competition and Port Selection,” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.12, pp. 293-303.
40. Tai, H. H. & Hwang, C. C. (2005), “Analysis of Hub Port Choice for Container Trunk Liners in East Asia,” Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies (EAST’s 05), Vol.6, pp.907-919.
41. Tiwari, P., Itoh, H. & Doi, M. (2003), “Shippers’ Port and Carrier Selection Behavior in China: a Discrete Choice Analysis,” Maritime Economics & Logistics, 5, pp.23-39.
42. Thomas, B. J.(1998), “Structural Change in the Maritime Industry: Impact on Inter-port Competition in Container Trades,” The Proceedings of International Conference on Shipping Development and Port Management (KaoPort 21), pp.1-24.
43. Tongzon, J. & Wu, H. (2005), “Port Privatization, Efficiency and Competitiveness: Some Empirical Evidence from Container Ports (Terminals),” Transportation Research, Part A, Vol.39, pp. 405-424.
44. Tongzon, J. (2001), “Efficiency Measurement of Selected Australian and other International Ports Using Data Envelopment Analysis,” Transport Research, Part A, 35, pp.113-128.
45. Tongzon, J. (1995), “Determinants of Port Performance and Efficiency,” Transport Research, Part A, Vol.29, No.3, pp.245-252.
46. UNCTAD, Review of Maritime Transport, United Nations, New York & Geneva, 1997~2005.
47. UNCTAD (1993), Strategic Planning for Port Authorities, UNCTAD/SHIP/646, pp.10-12.
48. UNCTAD (1990), The Establishment of Trans-shipment Facilities in Development Countries, TD/B/C. 4/AC.7/10.
49. Veldman, S. J. & Buckmann, E. H. (2003), “A Model on Container Port Competition: An Application for the West European Container Hub-Ports,” Maritime Economics & Logistics, 5, pp.3-22.
50. Wong, W. G., Han, B. M., Ferreira, L. & Zhu, X. N. (2001), “Factors Influencing Container Transport: a Fuzzy Number-based Distribution Model Approach,” Transportation Planning and Technology., Vol. 24, pp. 171-183.
51. Wang, J.J & Slack, B. (2000), “The Evolution of a Regional Container Port System: the Pearl River Delta(PRD),” Journal of Transport Geography, 8, pp.263-275.
52. Wang, J. J. (1998), “A Container Load Center with a Developing Hinterland: A Case Study of Hong Kong,” Journal of Transport Geography, Vol.6, No.3, pp.187-201.
53. Wu, Y. (1988), “The Economics of Containership Route Deployment,” Geo Journal, Vol.16, No.3, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.301-314.
54. Yap, W. Y. & Lam, S. L. (2006), “Competition Dynamics between Container Ports in East Asia,” Transportation Research, Part A, 40, pp.35-51.
55. Yeo, G. T. & Song, D. W. (2005), “The Hierarchical Analysis of Perceived Competitiveness: An Application to Korean Container Ports,” Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies (EAST’s 05), Vol. 6, pp.866-880.
56. Zeng, Z. & Yang, Z. (2002), “Dynamic Programming of Port Position and Scale in the Hierarchized Container Ports Network,” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.29, No.2, pp.163-177.
57. Zohil, J. & Prijon, M. (1999), “The MED Rule: the Interdependence of Container Throughput and Transhipment Volumes in the Mediterranean Ports,” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.26, No.2, pp.175-193.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1045（臺灣：1037，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67513701
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上