:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺北市立國中教師執行零體罰教育政策之探討:正當性觀點
書刊名:公共行政學報. 政大
作者:陳恒鈞洪健哲
作者(外文):Chen, Hen-chinHung, Chien-che
出版日期:2009
卷期:33
頁次:頁45-81
主題關鍵詞:政策設計正當性零體罰教育政策政策執行能力臺北市立國中教師Policy designLegitimacy deficitZCPEImplementation capacityTeacher of Taipei city's junior high school
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:35
眾所皆知,一項政策即使是以有效的方式執行,最終也可能因為正當性的不足而宣告失敗,我國所推動的零體罰教育政策即是一例。為證明該項說法,本文遂運用正當性觀點,以台北市立國中教師為對象進行探討。正當性具備與否逐漸成為政策設計時的考量要素。進言之,政策設計的實質內容,以及決策時所採取的程序步驟,深深影響政策利害關係人,乃至一般大眾對該項政策所持的態度與支持。儘管這兩項要素無法充分說明正當性對政策設計的重要性,惟針對個案而言,本文認為這兩要素攸關該項政策之推動,主因是欠缺正當性,受政策影響者的政策接受度將逐日漸減,連帶影響政策目標的達成度。 據此,本文首先進行理論探討,說明政策設計正當性對政策執行之影響;其次,運用文獻分析法,將零體罰教育政策發展歷程,劃分為五個階段進行探討;繼而運用半結構式訪談法,冀能獲得基層國中教師對零體罰政策的看法,藉以確定六項影響因素。最後,依據六項因素設計問卷,同時運用多元迴歸法,進行實證分析,檢證政策設計正當性要素對政策執行能力之影響。 研究結果顯示:(一)政策設計要素六項自變數中,與零體罰政策執行能力具有正向顯著性影響者,分別是:「問題建構明確度」、「目標與工具適合度」、「政策目標可行性」、「環境系絡契合度」及「執行人員認知接受度」等五項;(二)另一方面,由於專家、學者與技術官僚未能充分接受第一線教師的意見,以致「政策參與管道暢通度」與零體罰政策執行能力為負向顯著關係。
It is known even a policy is implemented and achieves its objectives in an efficient and effective way; the policy can fail in terms of legitimacy. The Zero Corporal Punishment Educational (ZCPE) Policy, which was executed in Taiwan, as an example. To testify, this paper applies the perspective of policy design for legitimacy deficit to explore the policy’s implementation capacity. More detail, the substantive elements of policy and the procedural steps elements taken by decision makers affect the perception of policy legitimacy held by the stakeholders and the general public. Even these two elements do not exhaust the entire range of possible factors having a significant influence on legitimacy deficits, they are particularly important, since failure in policy legitimacy may subsequently hinder the long-term goals of decision makers by eroding society’s acceptance of their legitimate claims to govern. In doing so, this paper first of all explores the theory of policy design for legitimacy. Secondary, using documentary analysis and pre-interview with the main stakeholders, especially the teachers, the results point out six causes that make legitimacy deficits appear and its significant factors. Besides, it also applies the core concepts to design the outline of interview. Finally, the paper further uses the multi-regression method to test the related hypothesis. The findings in terms of legitimacy deficit can be summarized as follows: (1) the question construction accuracy, the policy goal and the tool relevance, the policy goal feasibility, the context of environment, and the cognition of implementers have an significant and positive influence on the implementation capacity of the Zero Corporal Punishment Educational Policy, (2) since experts and technocracy cannot be appreciated the importance of teachers’ participation; the participation channel has a significant but negative influence on the policy’s implementation capacity
期刊論文
1.Rochefort, David A.、Cobb, Roger W.(1993)。Problem Definition, Agenda Access and Policy Choice。Policy Studies Journal,21(1),56-71。  new window
2.Stone, Deborah(1989)。Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas。Political Science Quarterly,104(2),281-300。  new window
3.Elmore, R. F.、McDonnell, L. M.(1987)。Instruments and strategy in public policy。Policy studies review,7(1),174-186。  new window
4.Linder, S. H.、Peters, B. G.(1989)。Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts。Journal of Public Policy,9(1),35-58。  new window
5.Carmin, J.、Darnall, N.、Mil-Homens, J.(2003)。Stakeholder involvement in the design of U.S. voluntary environmental programs: Does sponsorship matter?。Policy Studies Journal,31(4),527-543。  new window
6.Lindblom, Charles Edward(1959)。The Science of "Muddling Through"。Public Administration Review,19(2),79-88。  new window
7.吳清山、林天佑(2005)。友善校園。教育資料與研究,62,177。  延伸查詢new window
8.Deleon, P.(1988)。The contextual burdens of policy design。Policy Studies Journal,17(2),297-309。  new window
9.Dryzek, J. S.(1983)。Don’t toss coins in garbage cans。A prologue to policy design,10(1),66-87。  new window
10.Ingram, H.,、A. Schneider(1990)。Improving implementation through framing smarter statues。Journal of Public Policy,11(2),187-206。  new window
11.May, P. J.(1991)。Reconsidering policy design: Policies and publics。Journal of Public Policy,11(2),187-206。  new window
12.Montpetit É.(2008)。Policy design for legitimacy: Expert knowledge, citizens, time and inclusion in the United Kingdom’s biotechnology sector。Public Administration,86(1),259-77。  new window
13.Parkinson, J.(2003)。Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy。Political Studies,51(1),180-196。  new window
14.Wallner, J.(2008)。Legitimacy and public policy: Setting beyond effectiveness, efficiency, and performance。The Policy Studies Journal,36(3),421-43。  new window
會議論文
1.齊力(2007)。年)檢視台灣晚近人本教育主張者的人本主義思想內涵。台北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林靜淑(1997)。台灣有關體罰教育政令的演變及其影響因素之探討(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳冠旭(2008)。近十年來輔導與管教學生辦法之變遷與教師因應歷程之研究,新竹。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Peters, B. Guy(1986)。American Public Policy: Promise and Performance。Chatham, NJ:Chatham House。  new window
2.Peters, B. Guy、Van Nispen, Frans K. M.(1998)。Public Policy Instruments: Evaluating the Tools of Public Administration。Cheltenham, U. K.:Edward Elgar。  new window
3.Beetham, D.(1991)。The Legitimation of Power。Basingstoke, UK:Macmillan。  new window
4.Ackoff, Russell L.(1974)。Redesigning the Future: A Systems Approach to Societal Problems。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
5.Eliadis, P.、Hill, M. M.、Howlett, M.(2005)。Designing Government From Instruments to Governance。Montreal:Kingston:McGill-Queen University Press。  new window
6.Salamon, Lester M.、Lund, Michael S.(1989)。Beyond Privatization: The Tools of Government Action。Washington, DC:Urban Institute Press。  new window
7.Weimer, David L.、Vining, Aidan R.(1992)。Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice。Prentice-Hall。  new window
8.Dahl, Robert Alan(1998)。On Democracy。Yale University Press。  new window
9.羅清俊(2007)。社會科學研究方法:如何做好量化研究。威仕曼文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.Baumgartne, F. R.、Jones, B. D.(1993)。Agendas and Instability in American Politics。Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
11.Thomas, John Clayton(1995)。Public Participation in Public Decisions: New Skills and Strategies for Public Managers。San Francisco, CA:Jossey Bass Publishers。  new window
12.Bobrow, Davis B.、Dryzek, John S.(1987)。Policy Analysis by Design。Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh Press。  new window
13.Scharpf, Fritz W.(1997)。Games Real Actors Play: Actor-centered Institutionalism in Policy Research。Westview Press。  new window
14.Salamon, L. M.、Elliott, O. V.(2002)。The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance。Oxford University Press。  new window
15.Schneider, Anne L.、Ingram, Helen M.(1997)。Policy Design for Democracy。Lawrence, Kansas:The University Press of Kansas。  new window
16.Babbie, Earl R.、陳文俊(2005)。社會科學研究方法。臺北:雙葉書廊有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
17.Weber, Max、Gerth, Hans H.、Mills, C. Wright(1958)。From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology。Galaxy Books。  new window
18.Schön, D. A.、Rein, M.(1994)。Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies。New York, NY:Basic Books。  new window
19.吳定(2000)。公共政策。臺北市:中華電視股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.林水波、施能傑、葉匡時(1993)。強化政策執行能力之理論建構。臺北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
21.林水波(1999)。公共政策新論。臺北市:智勝文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
22.March, James G.、Olsen, Johan P.(1989)。Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics。New York:The Free Press, A Division of Macmillan, Inc.。  new window
23.林水波(2007)。公共政策析論。五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
24.鄒川雄(20000000)。中國社會學實踐:陽奉陰違的中國人。臺北:洪葉文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Cooper, Terry L.(1991)。An ethic of citizenship for public administration。Prentice Hall。  new window
26.Huntington, Samuel P.(1968)。Political Order in Changing Societies。Yale University Press。  new window
27.Bovens M.、P. ‘t Hart(1996)。Understanding policy fiascos。New Brunswick。  new window
28.Gross-Stein, J.(2001)。The cult of efficiency。Toronto。  new window
29.Putnam, R. D.(1993)。Making democracy: Civic traditions in modern Italy。Princeton。  new window
30.Schneider, A.,、H. Ingram(2005)。Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy。Albany。  new window
圖書論文
1.Schneider, Anne、Ingram, Helen(1990)。Policy Design: Elements, Premises and Strategies。Policy Theory and Policy Evaluation。New York:Greenwood Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE