臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：中國東北亞安全政策的本質與目的：以六方會談為例
書刊名：東亞研究
作者：游智偉／洪銘德
作者(外文)：Yu, Chih-wei／Huang, Ming-te
出版日期：2010
卷期：41:1
頁次：頁77-117
主題關鍵詞：六方會談；北韓核武危機；古典現實主義；權力平衡；Six-Party Talks；North Korea Nuclear Crisis；Classical realism；Balance of power
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:26
  • 點閱點閱:62
隨著中國國力的相對崛起與日本的相對衰弱，中國在北韓核武危機與六方會談為其東北亞安全政策實踐的主要場域，藉由回顧其在北韓核武危機與六方會談中扮演的角色與功能應可回答兩個問題：其一，中國的東北亞政策是否如其所言般，乃以「和諧世界」為綱領？而或仍以現實主義為基本路線？其二，協調召開六方會談究竟是不是中國將開始「有所做為」？而或僅是偶然的結果？本文透過回顧中國在六方會談與北韓核武危機中扮演的角色與比對其對2006年北韓核武試爆與2009年北韓發射火箭的反應差異，認為中國的東北亞政策乃以古典現實主義為基本路線，以權力平衡為工具，分別藉由六方會談與美日安保條約限制北韓核武化的衝擊與可能隨之而來的日本正常化企圖，藉此穩固區域現狀；再者，核武化的北韓亦同時影響中國的安全利益，且其亦刻意維護北韓政權的存續，因此不能因此將之視為中國提供公共財或成為霸權的開端，而是因其安全利益亦同時受到威脅之故。
With the rapid rise of China and the relative decline of Japan, the North Korean Nuclear Crisis and the Six-Party Talks are the main fields for realization of China’s Northeast Asian policy. Reflections on China’s role and functions in the Nuclear Crisis and the Six-Party Talks may help answer two questions. First, is China’s Northeast Asia policy really the practice of the concept of harmonious world, or is still based on the principle of realism? Second, coordinating among parties to the talk, is Six-Party Talks the start of China’s active policy or merely an accidental result? By comparing and contrasting the role which China plays in the North Korean Nuclear Crisis and Six-Party Talks after 2003 and the different response making by China in the North Korean Nuclear Test in 2006 and rocket launch in 2009, what can be concluded in this paper is that China’s Northeast Asia policy is still based on the fundamental principle of classical realism; therefore, the concepts of balance of power and maintenance of status quo are the underlying guidelines hidden in their security policy toward Northeast Asia. In a nutshell, through their performance in the Six-Party Talks, China cannot be regarded as a regional hegemony, because China’s activities in the Six-Party Talks are still mainly interest-oriented rather than hegemony-oriented, so China has no intention to provide the public goods for the purposes of managing crises. Furthermore, in the Six-party talks, China has played a role with the function of coordination, and what they can offer is to harmonize the divergent standpoints held by U.S. and North Korea in crisis. Therefore, Chinese performance in the Six-Party Talks cannot be considered as the signal that China starts to shoulder the responsibility of hegemony in a long-term, but merely an overlap of national interest and responsibility towards the international society in a short-term.
Other
1.Sutter, R. G.(2005)。China’s rise in Asia: Promises and perils。  new window
期刊論文
1.吳正偉(20020900)。北韓與美國核子協議的演變。共黨問題研究，28(9)，108-117。  延伸查詢new window
2.Jervis, Robert(1998)。Realism, Game Theory, and Cooperation。World Politics，40(3)，317。  new window
3.門洪華(2007)。中國軟實力評估報告。國際觀察，2007(3)，40-41。  延伸查詢new window
4.Park, Kyung-Ae(2004)。North Korea in 2003: Pendulum Swing between Crisis and Diplomacy。Asian Survey，44(1)，139-146。  new window
5.Gurtov, Mel(200205)。Common Security in North Korea: Quest for a New Paradigm in Inter-Korean Relations。Asian Survey，42(3)，397-418。  new window
6.Park, John S.(2005)。Inside Multilateralism: The Six-Party Talks。The Washington Quarterly，28(4)，75-91。  new window
7.Christensen, Thomas J.(1996)。Chinese Realpolitik: Reading Beijing's World-View。Foreign Affairs，75(5)，37-52。  new window
8.朱松柏(20030900)。六邊會談與朝鮮半島核武危機。展望與探索，1(9)，4-7。  延伸查詢new window
9.趙建民、許志嘉(20090100)。中共第四代領導集體的「和諧世界觀」：理論與意涵。遠景基金會季刊，10(1)，1-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.黃鴻博(19960200)。中共與「北韓核武危機」。共黨問題研究，22(2)，36-49。  延伸查詢new window
11.Medeiros, Evan S.、Fravel, M. Taylor(2003)。China's New Diplomacy。Foreign Affairs，82(6)，22-35。  new window
研究報告
1.Glaser, Bonnie、Snyder, Scott、Park, John S.(2008)。Keeping an Eye on an Unruly Neighbor, Chinese Views of Economic Reform and Stability in North Korea。Washington, D.C.。  new window
圖書
1.李軍(2006)。韓國的東北亞地區安全政策。東北亞地區安全政策及安全合作構想。北京：時事出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Shirk, Susan、溫恰溢(2008)。脆弱的強權--在中國崛起的背後。台北：遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Buzan, Barry(1991)。People, and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold Era。Boulder, CO：Lynne Rienner Publisher。  new window
4.Cha, Victor D.、Kang, David C.(2003)。Nuclear North Korea: A Debate on Engagement Strategies。NY：Columbia University Press。  new window
其他
1.(20020802)。中國向東盟論壇提交新安全觀立場文件，北京。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭必堅(2003)。中國和平崛起新道路和亞洲的未來--在2003年博鼈亞洲論壇的講演，http://www.crf.org.cn/peacefulrise/zhengbijian.htm 2007/01/28。  延伸查詢new window
3.中央社(20090406)。北韓發射火箭外交部：嚴重關切。  延伸查詢new window
4.中央廣播電台(20090414)。北韓拒絕六方會談，南韓：遺憾。  延伸查詢new window
5.中華人民共和國外交部(20050714)。外交部發言人劉建超在例行記者會上答記者問。  延伸查詢new window
6.聯合國安全理事會(20090413)。安全理事會主席聲明（S/PRST/2009/7）。  延伸查詢new window
7.中央社(20090414)。安理會譴責北韓發射火箭，中國反對。  延伸查詢new window
8.法新社(20090410)。討論北韓發射長程火箭，六強無結論。  延伸查詢new window
9.中央社(20090331)。南韓情報機構相信北韓擁有核彈頭。  延伸查詢new window
10.中華人民共和國人民政府網站(20061117)。胡錦濤會見盧武鉉表示中韓致力於朝鮮半島無核化。  延伸查詢new window
11.中央社(20090401)。國際危機集團：北韓已成功研製小型核彈頭。  延伸查詢new window
12.中央社(20090415)。情勢升高，北韓要求原能總署人員離境。  延伸查詢new window
13.新華網(20060903)。朝鮮要求美國立即從韓國撤軍。  延伸查詢new window
14.薑遠珍(2003)。北韓核武爭議懸而未決，台北：中央出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.黃啟霖(20090414)。北韓積極考慮自行興建輕水核電站。  延伸查詢new window
16.蔡裕明(200303)。北韓核武變局與東北亞安全。  延伸查詢new window
17.閻學通(200404)。議題一：中國和平崛起的戰略背景，對『和平崛起』的理解。  延伸查詢new window
18.Alagappa, Muthiah(2009)。Reinforcing National Security and Regional Stability: The Implications of Nuclear Weapons and Strategies。  new window
19.Berger, Thomas(2004)。Japan’s International Relations: The Political and Security Dimensions。  new window
20.Broomfield, Emma V.(2003)。Perceptions of Dangers: the China Threat Theory。  new window
21.Bush, George W(2002)。The President’s State of Union Address。  new window
22.Cha, Victor D.(2002)。Korea’s Place in the Axis。  new window
23.Glaser, Bonnie(2007)。U.S.-China Relations: Dialogue Boosts Ties, Even without Results。  new window
24.Glosserman, Brad(2004)。U.S.-Japan Relations: Mr. Koizumi’s Payback。  new window
25.Grieco, Joseph M.(1993)。Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realism Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism。  new window
26.Gupta, Amit(2008)。Introduction。  new window
27.Huges, Christopher W. and Akiko Fukushima(2004)。U.S.-Japan Security Relations- Toward Bilateralism Plus?。  new window
28.Kapur, S. Paul(2009)。Dangerous Deterrent: Nuclear Weapons Proliferation and Conflict in South Asia。  new window
29.Kim, Hong Nack(2006)。The Koizumi Government and the Politics of Normalizing Japanese-North Korean Relations。  new window
30.Kim, Ilpyong J.(2006)。Kim Jong Il’s Military-First Politics。  new window
31.Kim, Yongho(2008)。North Korea: A Perpetual Rogue State?。  new window
32.Kliman, Daniel M.(2006)。Japan’s Security Strategy in the post-9/11 World: Embracing a New Realpolitik。  new window
33.Lamy, Steven L.(2001)。Contemporary Mainstream Approaches: Neo-Realism and Neo-Liberalism。  new window
34.Lin, Chong-pin(2006)。Beijing’s New Grand Strategy: An Offensive with Extra-Military Instruments。  new window
35.Lum, Thomas et al(2008)。China’s “Soft Power” in Southeast Asia。  new window
36.Lynn, Valerie(2006)。North Korea: U.S. Foreign Policy Options。  new window
37.Manning, Robert A.(2002)。United States-North Korean Relations: From Welfare to Workfare?。  new window
38.Manyin, Mark E.(2001)。North Korea-Japan Relations: The Normalization Talks and the Compensation/Reparations Issues。  new window
39.Mochizuki, Mike M.(2009)。Japan’s Shifting Strategy toward the Rise of China。  new window
40.Moon, Chung-in and Taehwan Kim(2004)。South Korea’s International Relation: Challenges to Developmental Realism?。  new window
41.Pollack, Jonathan D. and Mitchell B. Reiss(2004)。South Korea: The Tyranny of Geography and the Vexations of History。  new window
42.Pritchard, Charles L.(2005)。The Korean Peninsular and the Role of Multilateral Talks。  new window
43.Rice, Condoleezza(2008)。The U.S. Position in Asia: Stronger than Ever。  new window
44.Ross, Robert(1997)。Beijing as Conservative Power。  new window
45.Ross, Robert(1999)。The Geography of Peace: East Asia in the Twenty-First Century。  new window
46.Scobell, Andrew(2004)。China and North Korea: from Comrades-In-Arms to Allies at Arm’s Length。  new window
47.Snyder, Scott(2007)。China-Korea Relations: Political Fallout from North Korea’s Test。  new window
48.Solingen, Etel,(2007)。Nuclear Logics: Contrasting Paths in East Asia and the Middle East。  new window
49.Taylor, M. Fravel(2006)。Regime Insecurity and International Cooperation: Explaining China’s Compromises in the Territorial Dispute。  new window
50.Toloraya, Georgy(2008)。The Six Party Talks: A Russian Perspective。  new window
51.U.S. DoD(2008)。Nuclear Posture Review (Excerpts)。  new window
52.Wit, Joel S., Jon Wolfsthal and Choong-suk Oh.(2005)。The Six Party talks and Beyond: Cooperative Threat Reduction and North Korea。  new window
53.Wu, Xinbo(2001)。Four Contradictions Constraining China’s Foreign Policy Behavior。  new window
54.Yee, Herbert and Ian Storey(2002)。Introduction。  new window
55.Zhao, Suisheng(2004)。The Making of China’s Periphery Policy。  new window
圖書論文
1.Brzezinksi, Zbigniew、Mearsheimer, John J.(2005)。Clash of the Titans。Foreign Policy, no. 146。  new window
2.Snidal, Duncan(1993)。Relative Gain and the Pattern of International Cooperation。Neorealism and Neoliberalism:the Contemporary Debate。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：920（臺灣：919，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1855660 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67652112
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上