:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:組織成員薪資缺口之研究:兼敘薪資給付基礎量表建構
書刊名:危機管理學刊
作者:陳恒毅 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, H. Y.
出版日期:2010
卷期:7:2
頁次:頁47-58
主題關鍵詞:策略性薪酬組織控制薪資缺口Strategic compensationOrganizational controlSalary gap
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:36
良善薪資設計被視爲組織績效良窳重要影響因素之一,其影響範圍甚廣,如:組織營運成本、文化塑造等。其中在策略性薪酬之觀點下,薪資給付基礎必需兼顧組織長期營運目標;也必需照顧好組織內部員工,但此兩種導向亦常有矛頓之處,往往無法兩邊兼顧。例如,在景氣不好時,員工無薪休假、裁員等現象屢見不顯,因此業主如何處理,已被視爲重要議題之一。 爲此,本研究結合組織控制觀點,佐以質性研究方式,深度訪談路竹、崗山等地螺帽業具有實務經驗員工,發掘出四大薪資缺口類型及薪資給付基礎內涵;最後請三十位業主給予這些缺口之具體看法,研究者並根據這些修訂薪資量表題項。 最後以量化研究方式予以驗證,並建構出16題三大層面的理論模型。
The well-designed system of payment is regarded as the significantly influential factor in the field of organization performance. It leads to a variety of impacts, such as the organization operation cost, the mold of culture and so on. In terms of strategic compensation, the basis for pay should be taken the long-term operation goal of the organization into consideration. The compensation basis should involve taking care of the employees belonging to the organization. However, the two aspects often contradict each other, for example, the unpaid leave and dismissals during the recession. So, how the employers deal with the problem is one of the important issues. This study adopts organizational control viewpoint and the methods of qualitative research. Besides, we conduct the in-depth surveys with interviewing the experienced employees in the screw nut factory in Luchu and Kangshan. In this way, we find out the 4 types of salary gap and the content of the basis for pay. Eventually, 30 employers are asked to express their concrete opinions about the issue of the wage gap. All of these inspire the research to revise the items of the scale regarding the basis for pay, and verify the items by means of quantitative methods. And finally, the model: 3 perspectives and 16 items are built.
期刊論文
1.余德成、連淑君、張玲慈(19991000)。高雄地區航運業薪資制度之研究。海運研究學刊,8,47-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳心田、蘇國賢(20000800)。影響員工流動的因素:我國科技公司之分析。科技管理學刊,5(2),57-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳光華、黃榮鵬(20051200)。建構最佳的旅行業業務員薪資結構制度。戶外遊憩研究,18(4),69-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.莊婉潔(2009)。世界螺絲王國南北聚落拼出世界競爭力。國際商情雙月刊,293,15-16。  延伸查詢new window
5.Darmon, R. Y.、Rigaux-Bricmont、Balloffet, P.。Designing sales force satisfying selling position: A conjoint measurement approach。Industrial Marketing Management,32,501-515。  new window
6.Huang, I. C.、Huang, P. W.、Chen, Y. J.(2004)。A study of Taiwan's travel agent salary system: An agency theory perspective。Tourism Management,25(4),483-490。  new window
7.Rice, R. W.、Phillips, S. M.、McFarlin, D. B.(1990)。Multiple discrepancies and pay satisfaction。Journal of Applied Psychology,75,386-393。  new window
8.Solomon, C. M.(1994)。Work/Family’s failing grade,。Personnel Journal,72(5),72-87。  new window
9.Wright, P. M.、Snell, S. A.(1991)。Toward an integrated view of strategic human resource management。Human Resource Management Review,1,203-225。  new window
10.Gomez-Mejia, L. R.、Welbourne, T. H.(1988)。Compensation Strategy: An Overview and Future Steps。Human Resource Planning,11(3),173-189。  new window
11.Flamholtz, E. G.、Das, T. K.、徐淑英(1985)。Toward an Integrative Framework of Organizational Control。Accounting, Organizations and Society,10(1),35-50。  new window
12.Morton, P. J.(1998)。Annual bonuses, employment and productivity change in Taiwan's manufacturing sector。Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,37,481-507。  new window
13.Balkin, D. B.、Gomez-Mejia, L. R.(1990)。Matching compensation and organization strategies。Strategic Management Journal,11(2),153-169。  new window
14.黃家齊(20000600)。績效資訊特性與控制、薪資設計--組織控制觀點與代理理論觀點之整合。臺大管理論叢,10(2),227-255。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.曹國雄(19981100)。個人特徵、工作特徵和個人知覺及其相關因素對薪資滿足的影響。中原學報,26(4),9-20。  延伸查詢new window
16.Hachen, D. S.(1990)。Three Models of Job Mobility in Labor Markets。Work and Occupation,17,320-354。  new window
17.Holmström, Bengt(1979)。Moral Hazard and Observability。The Bell Journal of Economics,10(1),74-91。  new window
18.Adams, J. S.(1965)。Injustice in Social Exchange。Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,2,87-92。  new window
圖書
1.陳順宇(2007)。結構方程模式。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳明隆、涂金堂(2005)。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北市:五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
3.丘周剛、吳世庸、胡廷楨、高文彬、劉敏熙(2007)。人力資源管理。台北縣:新文京。  延伸查詢new window
4.李建華、茅靜蘭(1990)。薪資制度與管理實務。台北:超越企業管理顧問。  延伸查詢new window
5.林財丁、陳子良(2005)。人力資源管理。台中市:滄海。  延伸查詢new window
6.胡政源(2002)。人力資源管理:理論與實務。台北縣:大揚。  延伸查詢new window
7.Henderson, R. I.(1989)。Compensation management: Rewarding performance。New York:Prentice Hall。  new window
8.Mathis, R. L.、Jackson, J. H.(1991)。Human Resource Management Minnesota West。  new window
9.Muchinsky, P. M.(1993)。Psychology applied to work: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology。C. A.:Brooks/Cole, A Division of International Thomson。  new window
10.Peach, E. B.、Buckley, M. R.(1993)。Pay for performance。New York:McGrew-Hill。  new window
11.Milkovich, G. T.、Newman, J. M.(2004)。Compensation。N. Y.:McGraw-Hill。  new window
12.Decenzo, D. A.、Holovia, S. J.(1990)。Employee benefit。N. Y.:Prentice Hall。  new window
13.Martocchio, Joseph J.(2000)。Strategic compensation: A Human Resource Management Approach。New Jersey:Prentice Hall, Inc.。  new window
14.Ehrenberg, R. G.、Smith, R. S.(1991)。Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy。New York:Harper ColIins Publishers Inc。  new window
15.吳萬益、林清河(2001)。企業研究方法。臺北:華泰圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
16.戴國良(2004)。人力資源管理:企業實務導向與本土個案實例。臺北市:鼎茂圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
17.李長貴、諸承明、余坤東、許毓芬、胡秀華(2007)。人力資源管理:增強組織的生産力與競爭優勢。臺北:華泰文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.Kleiman, L. S.(1997)。Human resource management: a tool for competitive advantage。New York:Cincinnati, OH:South-Western:Southwestern Publishing。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE