目的：編制測量已婚男女性生活品質問卷，檢驗其信度和效度，得出我國已婚男女性生活品質常模。方法：採用文獻回顧、個人訪談、專家評定等方法形成初始問卷，然後進行項目分析、探索性因數分析、驗證性因數分析、信度檢驗以及效標效度檢驗。常模取樣對於女性，對1,529名城市已婚女性進行的調查結果進行分析。對於男性，測量已婚男性1,425人。該問卷已編製成軟體。結果：對於女性，探索性因數分析得到32個題項，形成六個因數，可解釋總方差的63.59%，六個因數依次爲：性滿意度、性交流、性焦慮、性反應、性態度、性體像，因數載荷範圍在0.488-0.818之間。驗證性因數分析驗證了六因數模型，其結果爲：χ^2/df=5.247; GFI=0.905; NFI=0.906; TLI=0.914; CFI=0.922; RMSEA=0.053。總的Cronbach'sα係數爲0.937，重測信度爲0.925，與ENRICH的分量表性生活有較高的相關性(r=0.716, P<0.01)。以均數和百分位的形式建立了全量表及各因數的總體常模、年齡常模。對於男性，新編量表條目與總分相關在0.450到0.723之間，各條目決斷值(CR)均有顯著性；重測信度爲0.981, Cronbach'sα係數爲0.940，分半信度爲0.905。通過探索性因數分析提取5個公因數，形成五個分量表（性生理、性心理、性愛撫、性欲望、性交流），解釋方差總變異的55.90%，因數載荷在0.420-0.732之間。新編量表總分以及五個分量表與效標Olson婚姻品質問卷(ENRICH)三個分量表（夫妻交流、性生活、婚姻滿意度）和國際勃起功能指數－5(IIEF-5)有一定的正相關，相關係數在0.249-0.710之間。量表常模顯示，不同年齡得分之間有顯著性差異。該軟體在新浪網上應用，已有較好的回饋。結論：已婚女性與男性性生活品質問卷具有較好的信度和效度，形成我國已婚男性與女性的常模，可以用於我國已婚男性與女性性生活品質的評估。

Objective: From the aspect of humanism, to develop the questionnaire for The Quality of Sexual Life for married males and females (QSL) and assess its reliability and validity, and develop its norm of Chinese married males and females. Methods: Literature review, personal interview and qualitative study were used to develop initial questionnaire. For female, the initial questionnaire was administered to 366 married women for exploratory factor analysis, and then to 1,529 married women for confirmatory factor analysis. To evaluate the reliability and validity, correlation analysis was also used. For male, questionnaire was administered to 520 married males aged 22-70 from nine provinces of China, among whom 477 males finished effectively. 192 were tested with the criterion scales, and 32 were retested after two weeks with QSL. The reliabilities and validities of QSL were examined by factor analysis and other methods. Norm sampling surveyed 1,425 married males aged 22-75 from nine provinces of China. QSL had been created as software. Results: For female, Development of sexual quality of life questionnaire and establishment of norm. After exploratory factor analysis, a questionnaire consisted of 32 items was established, which had six factors: satisfaction, communication, anxiety, sexual response, attitude and self-image. These six factors could explain 63.59% of the total variance and were confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis (χ^2/df=5.247; GFI=0.905; NFI=0.906; TLI=0.914; CFI=0.922; RMSEA=0.053). Cronbach coefficient was 0.937, testretest reliability was 0.925. The correlation coefficient between the total score of the questionnaire and subscale score of ENRICH (sexual relationship) was high (r=0.716, P<0.01). For male, QSL correlation between each item and the total score is between 0.450-0.723, each item having a significant CR value. The retest reliability is 0.981; Cronbach's α is 0.940; split reliability is 0.905. The correlations between SHSM's subscales (sexual physiology, sexual psychology, sexual caress, sexual desire, sexual communication) and 3 subscales (husband-wife communication, sexual life, marriage satisfaction) from Olson's Marital Quality Inventory (ENRICH) and the 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF-5) are positive, r ranging from 0.249 to 0.710. Exploratory factor analysis results in a 5-factor model, accounting for 55.90% of the total variance, with factor loadings between 0.420-0.732. The norm of the scale shows that there are significant difference between age groups. This QSL software is used in the website of Chinese Sina and has got good feedback. Conclusion: QSL has good psychometric properties and formed its norm of Chinese married males and female, thus it can be used in assessing quality of sexual life of Chinese married males and females.